Lost Galilean sites of the Gospels

Message Share Topic Printable Version Google Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks reddit Facebook MySpace Newsvine Furl Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic

I was quite surprised to find out that there are quite a few sites from the story/times of Jesus/Christ that scholars are not certain of their right location, or some are disputed/disputable. It had been my assumed impression that most of them are known where they where.
Such sites include Nazareth, Cana, Bethsaida, Tarichaea, Dalmanutha, Transfiguration mount? Aenon/Salim (one source says in Galilee though others don't seem to have it that far up)?
We have already posted on Cana in another thread/topic 4 weeks ago. (Nazareth i already posted on a few years ago in historum forum blog but it seems they may have since deleted the blog since unfairly banning me, so i may have to repost it somewhere.) However i think it is better to have one thread on all the Galilee sites rather than many threads.

First site is Bethsaida. Sources say this site is quite a mystery. I have 5 candidates below with the second one possibly the best though it has one or two or a few possible difficulties.

Bethsaida means "house of hunting/food/fish", it was also known as Julias, and was on the coast of the sea/lake of Galilee/Tiberias/Chinnereth/Gennesaret (fishing), and it was the home of Simon/Cephas/Peter, Andrew, John, James, Philip. See bible or bible reference works or the wiki article on it for basic introduction info if not familiar with it. I've come up with these following 5 candidates at various places around the sea/lake:

Aish (top/north-easterly):

Possible pros:
Aish is similar to saida with 3 letters ais/sai the same. 
Josephus said Bethsaida was near where the river entered the top of the sea of Galilee; Aish is also not far from where the river enters the sea.
Aish has an anchorage and harbour which might match "house of fishing"?
Bethsaida was in lower Gaulonitis which could fit Aish? Bethsaida was "of/in Galilee" which could fit Aish being in north eastern-most Galilee?
Aish is close to Capernaum and Chorasin. Bethsaida is implied to have been not too far Nathanael's Cana in John 1-2, and Cana seems to be Gamla.

Possible cons:
Bethsaida was a village raised to a city on account of number of people there. Aish doesn't seem to have a city immediately nearby?

Tiberias/Tiveriada (south-mid-west):

Possible pros:
Tiberias is a Roman name, so it may have had a Hebrew/Jewish name.
Tiberias has fishing, ships (in a gospel verse), a small harbour, and mysterious stone structure underwater nearby, which could match "house of fishing".
"The fishing industry goes back to the Stone Age in Tiberias".
"The lake is very full of fish" says Khusrou of his visit to Tiberias.
Tiberias had a stadium, and Bethsaida/Saidan/Saydan could be house of stadia/stadium?
Tiberias is associated with name Beithava'ad which is maybe similar to Bethsaida & Beteiha? (Maybe also an analogy with Sidon?) Kefar Zetim is also maybe not that far from Tiberias? 
Tiveriada is also similar to Beth-tsaida.
Its feminine grammatical gender could relate to fish?
Josephus said Bethsaida was acknowledged as a city/polis due to number of people there. (A theatre at Tiberias seated 7000 people.)
"Bethsaida of/in Galilee"; "Tiberias of Galilee".
Bethsaida/Julias was in "lower Gaulonitis"; Tiberias was "in lower Galilee"; Josephus has Judas and Gamla as either/both Gaulonitis &/or Galilee. (Why does bible say "of Galilee" for Bethsaida as it also did for Cana which seems to match Gamla?)
Bethsaida was also called Julias after Julias/Livias (wife/daughter of Augustus, and) mother of Tiberius; Tiberias was named after Tiberius.
One gospel says that Bethsaida was on opposite side from the desert place. (The plain of Gennesaret is also by Arbela which is near Kefar Zetim which is not necessarily that far from Tiberias?)
Tiberias & Tarichaea (2 main sites of the sea), could match Bethsaida & Tarichaea (fishing), or Bethsaida & Chorazin (gospels)?
"Bethsaida = Julias at the confluence of the Jordan in the lake, (a place) not proven in Jewish tradition".
Fishing has ceased there in modern times which could be spiritually significant?
Bethsaida founded 30/31/32/33 ce, Tiberias founded ca 20. They are mentioned in the same chapter of Josephus (Antiquities XVIII 2).

Possible cons:
The bible only calls Bethsaida a town/kome.
Josephus said Bethsaida/Julias was near where river entered top of the sea of Galilee.
Bible and Josephus both mention both Bethsaida/Julias and Tiberias.
Bethsaida/Julias was in "lower Gaulonitis"; Tiberias was "in lower Galilee".
The earlier Hebrew name of Tiberias was Rakkat not Bethsaida. (Bethsaida & Julias don't match Rakkat & Tiberias.)
One gospel says the deserted place was nearby Bethsaida.

El-Mesydiah/Mes'adiyeh:

Possible pros:
Is located on the present shoreline.
Name Mesydiah similar to saida (with m- prefix in Semtic).
Is near mouth of Jordan, like Josephus says Bethsaida was.

Possible cons:
Only a small number of pre-Byzantine ruins.
It is claimed that "the name is in origin radically different from Bethsaida. The substitution of sin for sad is easy, but the insertion of the guttural 'ain is impossible."

El-Bateiha(h)/Putaha plains (northeast):

Possible pros:
The name Bateiha &/or name Zaki is similar to Beth-tsaida.
One gospel says the deserted place was nearby Bethsaida. "House of hunting" could match the plain?
Lagoons there could have had "different kinds of fish"?

Possible cons:
One gospel says that Bethsaida was on opposite side from the desert place.

Sennabris (sw):

Possible pros:
"The substitution of sin for sad is easy". Sennabris is not far from Ziddim.

Possible cons: 
....

Edited by Arthur-Robin - 27-Apr-2019 at 16:42