Terror attacks in France

If you choose to bully little girls for wearing headscarves, deliberately insult other people's religion and bomb other people's countries, do not expect roses.

Originally posted by Iolo If you choose to bully little girls for wearing headscarves, deliberately insult other people's religion and bomb other people's countries, do not expect roses.

If your trying to justify this insanity, you can't. And don't try to do it here.
The attacks in Paris were a cowards act. It's easy to attack civilians who aren't aware or armed.

A totally senseless and meaningless act that has achieved nothing for their supposed "cause".

Iolo, your statement is more applicable to ISIL. Killing innocent civilians etc. will only get them a load of everything but roses.

NATO is right now considering "Article 5" an attack on one member is an attack on all.
However, I don't think the French are going to wait for that.

We dont have such attacks in Poland because we dont have muslim population except for small Tatar community which setlled here 400 years ago. I think this what happend in Paris is just an another argument against muslim migration to Europe.

There are also other consequences. Last week in my city a Syrian guy was badly beaten by some hooligans. This is said thing but on the other hand a clear signal for muslims to not come here.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/09/13/poland-today-refugees-tomorrow-terrorists-chant-angry-poles-against-a-muslim-invasion-in-their-country/

Edited by Mosquito - 16-Nov-2015 at 12:06

suppose. otoh they leave that anti-jew-Christian-homophobia-in general repressive bullshit at home...they probably be ok.

cuz no one wants an Islamist wacko fanatic..of any stripe..running around killing the innocent.

Yup.

Well the French not buying it but the current admin is still perping that these guys are nothing but the 'JV'.

Yup.

Please somebody tell the difference between;

Edited by Aeoli - 17-Nov-2015 at 04:26

Originally posted by medenaywe It is a same evil aeoli.

I prefer to live in a world of relative peace and where associations are not a precursor to acceptance. Where physical or ideaological-theological characteristics are positive in nature and not the basis of tyranny or repression or advancement of genocides.

But....in addition to being a soldier with vast experience in having to plan and deal with the opposites...I first and foremost am a Historian...and not an amateur one.

Which means I no better than to expect the world of "platonic love and universal brotherhood'. Iow. I know the record.

That was bullshit from it's inception and remains bullshit now.

Patience and appeasement of evil merely stimulates it...this is the record. And if it's necessary to eliminate it in order for the world, in general, to enjoy what little they can; given the record...then eliminate the evil.

Both are obvious....unless of course it's your intent to straw for those who perpetrate it.

Originally posted by Centrix Vigilis PS. Id advise you not laugh...because that's an inference, afaic, that you, the individual, are sympathetic to the aforementioned evil.