Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

All the Gods. What man has created let no man cred

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Gnostic Bishop View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 02-Jul-2014
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15
  Quote Gnostic Bishop Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: All the Gods. What man has created let no man cred
    Posted: 07-Aug-2014 at 12:43
All the Gods. What man has created let no man credit to unworthy Gods.

Strange that your God hates everyone you do. This shows how your God was man made. No real self-respecting God would have man’s prejudices.

Most of the Abrahamic religions of today are immoral and unjustified in their stances of vicarious redemption and their discrimination and denigration of women and gays.

This is irrefutable.

Christians justify discriminate and denigrate women and gays by saying that it is God’s will. He will rule over you.

I think we should stop blaming imaginary Gods and step up to our own collective human guilt and shame, instead of passing on the blame to imaginary manmade Gods. It seems that we men want to discriminate and denigrate gays for our own male egos.

Do you agree that it is men and not Gods who are discriminating against our own women and gays even as we lay the blame on God?

Regards
DL
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2014 at 12:58
Well, perfect creations as we are, got to have someone or something to blame things on, couldn't possibly be us. Big smile
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2014 at 15:51
As a non gnostic, I remain offended by the above remarks in the op. And believe that they are in violation of the following sub sections of the CoC:

Specifically:

5. ..... defamatory remarks,......intended as an insult towards another member, personal attacks, words of hate. Any remarks that stirs up anger....


6...... and the belittlement of religious groups;....    



8...... tone of confrontation, annoyance, or contempt; disrespectful toward other members.

     
10. Religious preaching.


The administration is thus duly notified of these violations.

CV
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
Mountain Man View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 873
  Quote Mountain Man Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2014 at 19:03
Section 5 also applies to you, CV.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2014 at 21:01
Undoubtedly past comments might be construed as such. If so they have been dealt with or should have been reported and dealt with.

But your straw doesn't work here. As I'm not the current violator in question.

This apparent gnostic apostle-proselytiser is.

Your position as an agnostic thus does not detract from nor diminish my concern. As certainly evidenced by the op's comments:


''Most of the Abrahamic religions of today are immoral and unjustified in their stances of vicarious redemption and their discrimination and denigration of women and gays.''

''Christians justify discriminate and denigrate women and gays by saying that it is God’s will. He will rule over you.''

Generalizations and patently false. As not every adherent of the above theologies can be painted with so broad a brush. More importantly deliberately, specifically and directly, insulting and offensive towards the faiths in question.

A direct violation of the Coc.

Subsequently, at this point your professed and well known anti-religious bias interferes with your credibility in posting the retort.

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
TheAlaniDragonRising View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Spam Fighter

Joined: 09-May-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6084
  Quote TheAlaniDragonRising Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2014 at 22:38
CV, the admin's own comment directly after the OP should have been a sufficient indicator that such concerns as you have should go PM from that point on.
What a handsome figure of a dragon. No wonder I fall madly in love with the Alani Dragon now, the avatar, it's a gorgeous dragon picture.
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Aug-2014 at 01:24
Done.
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.