A Red Clay prank?

Conceding, for an extremely small moment in time, that Fomenko is correct, I wonder if Opuslola really exists.

Could it be that Opuslola is the fiendish invention of Red Clay and/or others in order to inflict excruciating mental pain on the rest of us?

Could Red Clay be so astonishingly cruel?

If one was to assume that Opuslola does exist, how do we know when he posts his thoughts as he admits to no points in time.

Personally, I like the first proposition, oh Red Clay, you cruel bugger!!!

Edited by toyomotor - 01-Feb-2014 at 03:01

Do we exist Sidney?All this is a big hollistic circus.

It appears you have found me out.

Hey guys, I do believe that some dates are close to correct and some may even be exactly correct. The reason I question so many of them before the wide spread usage of the printing press can be expressed in one word; Veracity!

"Definition of veracity (n)

Bing Dictionary
ve·rac·i·ty
[ və rássətee ]


1.truth: the truth, accuracy, or precision of something
2.truthfulness: the truthfulness or honesty of somebody
3.true statement: a truth or true statement

Synonyms: truth · accuracy · reliability · genuineness · authenticity · legitimacy"

For most periods preceding the "reliable ones" there does not seem to exist any "genuune, or reliable, authentic, and legitimate" evidence.

Most all reports or accounts of those times are based basically upon "Hearsay" and "Allegations" and nothing more.

The fact is that via years of repetitive writings about these times has led to them being accepted as true, and with the original sources not even mentioned. And when they are mentioned they have since burned, turned to dust, disappeared, been lost, only copies of the originals have survived, etc.

Regards, Ron

Edited by opuslola - 03-Feb-2014 at 15:36

And it seems it was a "bit of fun!

Za vas! or even Prosit!
Ron