Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Bears in Britain

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
carolgreen270 View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 17-Jul-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11
  Quote carolgreen270 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Bears in Britain
    Posted: 24-Aug-2012 at 21:38
When did the bear become extinct in Britain? I have read (but without any sources given) that the Romans preferred to use Scottish bears as entertainment in the Colosseum at Rome, because they were fiercer. Also that bears were still in Ireland until the 10th century.

Are there any myths of the Irish/British/Scottish that refer to bears? Or records of bear encounters the older histories and chronicles?

These questions were prompted by seeing a number of Pictish stones with bears carved onto them. These could be from cultural memories, or imported stories (from the Vikings?), but I wonder.
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2012 at 03:29
Try the following: www.bearbiology.com/fileadmin/.../Kai_Curry-Lindahl_74-83.pdf
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
Sidney View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 31-Jan-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
  Quote Sidney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2012 at 09:29
Well, deja vu!! - Exactly my words but with someone else's name.:-)

See:http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=31377&KW=bears

Maybe it'lll generate some new interest, but seems a waste as there's an existing thread. Cheers for the link CV.

Edited by Sidney - 25-Aug-2012 at 09:32
Back to Top
Toltec View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Shape Shifter

Joined: 12-May-2011
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1748
  Quote Toltec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Aug-2012 at 11:36
apparently sometime between 500 and 1000 AD
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?

History Planet Website
<br /
Back to Top
Nick1986 View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Mighty Slayer of Trolls

Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
  Quote Nick1986 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2012 at 07:36
One theory suggests King Arthur was named after a bear
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2012 at 16:57
That's only because there were no Smilodon fatalis in ancient Britain.
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
Toltec View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Shape Shifter

Joined: 12-May-2011
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1748
  Quote Toltec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2012 at 18:06
Originally posted by Centrix Vigilis

That's only because there were no Smilodon fatalis in ancient Britain.
 
They were too scared of the Cave Lions to come to Europe..
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?

History Planet Website
<br /
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2012 at 18:25
Originally posted by Toltec

Originally posted by Centrix Vigilis

That's only because there were no Smilodon fatalis in ancient Britain.
 
They were too scared of the Cave Lions to come to Europe..
 
 
Yupper...the ole Panthera leo spelaea. Always wondered who won when they went into the den of Ursus spelaeus. To bad we were not around swilling 'cave beer'...well out of reach of course..to view that one.
 
probably like a modern rugby match.Wink
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
Toltec View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Shape Shifter

Joined: 12-May-2011
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1748
  Quote Toltec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2012 at 19:38
No idea with these two, in but in the old Lion vs Tiger fight thing, everyone backs tigers, but in recorded history almost every encounter was won by the lion. This is because lions fight each other regularly and have evolved to fight a face to face in a brawl, but tigers avoid each other and are ambush predators used to attacking prey from behind, so have no brawling ability.
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?

History Planet Website
<br /
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Oct-2012 at 22:20
Well in that case probably the bear...for they do today the same thing...as lions. Tis why there's only one dominant male in a selected area. Hence my 'cave beer best speculation' is their ancestors on the gigantica size did the same.
 
I threw that last in... not because I know but to avoid a trolling citation.....LOLLOLLOL
 
 
 
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
Nick1986 View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Mighty Slayer of Trolls

Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
  Quote Nick1986 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Oct-2012 at 08:08
The only wild cat in Britain at that time was the lynx in Scotland and Yorkshire. We did have other fierce wild beasts though: in addition to bears there were wolves and wild boar
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Oct-2012 at 14:33
Lura, from Daybreak 2250AD, was a golden Lynx........
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
Iolo View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 16-Mar-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11
  Quote Iolo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Nov-2012 at 10:46
Originally posted by Nick1986

One theory suggests King Arthur was named after a bear
 
It is not a theory - 'arth' means 'bear' in modern cymraeg ('Welsh').   For my money, general Ambrosius Aurelianus used a bearskin for a 'signum' so that his men could recognise him in battle, and his British -speaking soldiers called him 'the Bear'.   Incidentally, one of the very first poetic references to Arthur call him not by the barbarian title 'king' but 'amaradeur' - 'emperor', such as late-Roman troops regularly proclaimed their leaders  on a victorious battlefield.   The numbers might have been small by then, but the rituals were understood.    
Gobeithiaw y ddaw ydd wyf.
Back to Top
Toltec View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Shape Shifter

Joined: 12-May-2011
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1748
  Quote Toltec Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Nov-2012 at 12:18
The troops proclaimed their generals imperator not emperor. Imperator is a military rank similar to field marshal given to general who commanded whole regions of the empire.
Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?

History Planet Website
<br /
Back to Top
Iolo View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 16-Mar-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 11
  Quote Iolo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Nov-2012 at 14:38
Originally posted by Toltec

The troops proclaimed their generals imperator not emperor. Imperator is a military rank similar to field marshal given to general who commanded whole regions of the empire.
 
By that date I'd guess that the soldiers - who would mostly have come from up beyond the wall - would probably have been as ignorant of the distinction as I am.   As I understand it, though, 'amaradeur' is taken to mean emperor.
Gobeithiaw y ddaw ydd wyf.
Back to Top
Nick1986 View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Mighty Slayer of Trolls

Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
  Quote Nick1986 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2012 at 19:29
Originally posted by Iolo

Originally posted by Nick1986

One theory suggests King Arthur was named after a bear
 
It is not a theory - 'arth' means 'bear' in modern cymraeg ('Welsh').   For my money, general Ambrosius Aurelianus used a bearskin for a 'signum' so that his men could recognise him in battle, and his British -speaking soldiers called him 'the Bear'.   Incidentally, one of the very first poetic references to Arthur call him not by the barbarian title 'king' but 'amaradeur' - 'emperor', such as late-Roman troops regularly proclaimed their leaders  on a victorious battlefield.   The numbers might have been small by then, but the rituals were understood.    

Did Ambrosius ever fight on behalf of the reigning emperor against rebel Roman generals in Gaul?
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
Back to Top
Sidney View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 31-Jan-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
  Quote Sidney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Nov-2012 at 13:16
Originally posted by Iolo


Originally posted by Nick1986

One theory suggests King Arthur was named after a bear
It is not a theory - 'arth' means 'bear' in modern cymraeg ('Welsh').   For my money, general Ambrosius Aurelianus used a bearskin for a 'signum' so that his men could recognise him in battle, and his British -speaking soldiers called him 'the Bear'.      



Presumably a British bearskin? Meaning bears were still around in Britain in the 5th-6th Century AD.

Edited by Sidney - 23-Nov-2012 at 13:18
Back to Top
Sidney View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 31-Jan-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
  Quote Sidney Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2013 at 12:35
What happened to the original thread of this? It no longer seems to exist, and I was looking for a source I quoted within it.
Back to Top
Centrix Vigilis View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
  Quote Centrix Vigilis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2013 at 12:54
Dunno Sid...ya might query red viz PM for a file check.
 
CV
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"

S. T. Friedman


Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'

Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Jan-2013 at 09:37
This is all there is, unless there is an older thread that would be in the old archive.  Made prior to july 09.
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.