Chinghizkhaan-Pros and Con

ok how then is what Genighis was doing genocide? He was onlly killing enemies. Vlad impaled the villlagers of one of his villages on polls so he scare the Turks away. What was that, loving them?
And I never said that Vlad was mass-murderer.

Here some evidence:
"..."He [the Sultan] marched on for about five kilometers when he saw his men impaled; the Sultan's army came across a field with stakes, about three kilometers long and one kilometer wide. And there were large stakes on which they could see the impaled bodies of men, women, and children, about twenty thousand of them, as they said; quite a spectacle for the Turks and the Sultan himself! The Sultan, in wonder, kept saying that he could not conquer the country of a man who could do such terrible and unnatural things, and put his power and his subjects to such use. He also used to say that this man who did such things would be worthy of more. And the other Turks, seeing so many people impaled, were scared out of their wits. There were babies clinging to their mothers on the stakes, and birds had made nests in their breasts."..."http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~emiller/vlad.html

So what? Ghengis s reffered as a hero among the Mongols. My point is that killing people has been such a wide practice in human history, so to say that Genghis, or Vlad, were genociders, is to take them out of their historical time and culture. My point here is not that Vlad is genocider, but that Genghis is not; that none of them we can jufge in own own standards, because they lived in different times with different mores.

I don't know, mate, this is what I dug up from the net. I agree that it may be over-done, but such a story cannot be conjured just from thin air - the numbers may be plumbed up, but not the case as a whole.
Again, my point is not that Vlad is genocider, I gave him as an example as the times and in defence of Genghis.