Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Mighty Asian Navies!
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>
Author
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
King Chulalongkorn View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 23-Apr-2005
Location: Thailand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121 		  Quote King Chulalongkorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Mighty Asian Navies!
    Posted: 15-May-2005 at 18:24
I must admit the Burke is sexxy beast...beautiful! I wish the RTN could get 2 of these babies to join the surface fleet.
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk
Back to Top
JiNanRen View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 06-Apr-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547 		  Quote JiNanRen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jun-2005 at 19:14
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949 		  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jun-2005 at 20:30
Russian Typhoon class missile submarine





Taiwanese Sub




Complete ownage. pure and simple.

USS Abraham Lincoln.







Uss Ronald Reagan (brand new), the most advanced and most lethal Naval ship in the world.



Edited by Illuminati
Back to Top
JiNanRen View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 06-Apr-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547 		  Quote JiNanRen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jun-2005 at 20:48
^instruments of U.S. power projection.
Back to Top
I/eye View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 498 		  Quote I/eye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jun-2005 at 03:25

Japanese 8.8 Fleet

8 Destroyers and 8 anti-sub helicopters, thus the name 8.8 fleet

during the WWII, 8.8 referred to 8 battleships and 8 cruisers

of those 8 destroyers, 1 is 9k ton, 7 are at least 5k ton
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
Back to Top
babyblue View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174 		  Quote babyblue Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jun-2005 at 10:38

   the biggest one(and the widest) you see there is the Kongo...

if China is to defeat Japan, it must defeat this fleet first.
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Jun-2005 at 20:17

nope. if china to defeat japan, must defeat usa at the first. if usa go away, china could knock over japs even without using navy.

oh, i almost forget. there is nothing in current asia qualify to be navy, all are coast guards. 
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Jun-2005 at 20:33

there is not navy in asia, all are coastguards that can't perform without surpport from land air power. 



Edited by sinosword
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Jun-2005 at 21:04



Edited by sinosword
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jun-2005 at 06:48

those yankees are too fuuny. they psed our warship like this.
Back to Top
Anujkhamar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1027 		  Quote Anujkhamar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jun-2005 at 08:28

Read this article recently, thought it might be relevent:

thats supposed to say 8 D where the smiley is (it wont let me fix it)

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GF1f04.html



Edited by Anujkhamar
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Jul-2005 at 21:36

Back to Top
JiNanRen View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 06-Apr-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547 		  Quote JiNanRen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 18:49
The Lanzhou Class, # 170&171 are a hell of a class of destroyers, they are able to effectively provide air defense for the People's Liberation Army Navy(PLAN) with its VLS SAM system and can hold its own against any modern western DDGs.  THey are a real breakthrough for Chinese ship building.
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 23:08
hq-9 is a terminal-active guide missile unlike u.s. sm-2 and russian s-300's terminal semi-active guide model. there is not terminal fire-control radar on this ship because unnecessary. hq-9's own sending set could launch radar wave itself, there are three mk-99 fire-coutrol radars on u.s. aegis ship to do this job. aegis can't deal with targets under horizon without supports from awacs and data link because of mk-99's detecting dead angle. u.s. has already plan to develop the composite guide sm-2 which including active guide groupware, that will with excellent anti-jamming capability and solv the radar dead angle issue.     
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 23:11

skorea's lpx has been launched these days.
Back to Top
sinosword View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302 		  Quote sinosword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Jul-2005 at 23:26

two of japan's kongoII class have being constructed. will add a copter hangar than original.
Back to Top
Anujkhamar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1027 		  Quote Anujkhamar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Jul-2005 at 01:47
i finally got the link to work!

04.html">http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GF1f04.html

edith forget about it, its never going to work! i'll find another site





Edited by Anujkhamar
Back to Top
I/eye View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 498 		  Quote I/eye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Jul-2005 at 18:40

India getting the largest naval base in Asia..

Korea with the largest landing ship in Asia (named the Dokdo )..

Japan building 2 of largest combat ships in Asia..



Edited by I/eye
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
Back to Top
doorman View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 16-Jun-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28 		  Quote doorman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Jul-2005 at 12:56
I think China is overly hyped.  The new vessels that  PLAN navy are getting are unproven in combat (that is the  electronics, and the weapon systems on them).  Also China is nowhere near making a cutting edge propulsion system  unlike the US and Russia.  Korea is at a juncture where they are just  retiring  old WWII vessels that have been upgraded to death  with new designs. 
Japan is too heavily dependant on US technologies unlike europe.
Back to Top
I/eye View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 498 		  Quote I/eye Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2005 at 00:49

Korea: not retiring, replacing.. with 4000t/5000t/9000+t destroyers

depending on U.S. tech: buying the best money can buy
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.