Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
JiNanRen
Colonel
Joined: 06-Apr-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Mighty Asian Navies! Posted: 07-May-2005 at 17:35 |
More PLAN Ships
Lanzhou Class DDG
Ma'anshan Class FFG
Edited by JiNanRen
|
|
King Chulalongkorn
Samurai
Joined: 23-Apr-2005
Location: Thailand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-May-2005 at 21:41 |
Hmmm..impressive, I must say.
|
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk
|
|
JiNanRen
Colonel
Joined: 06-Apr-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 547
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-May-2005 at 20:27 |
another pic of Lanzhou
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-May-2005 at 02:50 |
Of course Japanese and Chinese navies are the strongest in Asia.Indian and Korean navies are very decent too.
JMSDF
PLAN
Edited by sinosword
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-May-2005 at 04:16 |
Chinese 039 is launching C-802
Chinese 053H3 is practising to head off an ASM
Edited by sinosword
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-May-2005 at 17:46 |
JMSDF will get two new aegis ships soon.These kongo2 class will have copter hangar.
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-May-2005 at 18:31 |
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-May-2005 at 18:43 |
|
|
|
taylor21
Janissary
Joined: 11-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-May-2005 at 13:33 |
If you dont mind my asking, who is this coolstorm of who everyone speaks?im new an' i dont know!so plz be kind and explain.on topic, yes an impressive display of naval firepower.
|
Taylor.K
|
|
taylor21
Janissary
Joined: 11-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-May-2005 at 13:35 |
And what are those little stars beside profiles?
|
Taylor.K
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-May-2005 at 13:36 |
He is an extreme HongKong Chinese war hawk just like the Mr.Thai in this thread.
|
|
|
demon
Chieftain
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-May-2005 at 20:17 |
Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn
So..you said Japan doesnt have cruizers? lol. Guess you dont know anything about the navy! LOL!! |
It's not me jimmy; it's your grammar. I stated that Japanese navy was limited to cruisers, meaning that they have cruisers, but nothing above a cruiser's sophistication. Alias, I was talking about how Japan didn't have any Aircraft Carriers. And destroyers are at a lower technological sophistication compared to cruisers, so I'm right.
|
Grrr..
|
|
I/eye
Baron
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 498
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-May-2005 at 20:38 |
but they really don't have any cruizers....
|
[URL=http://imageshack.us]
|
|
babyblue
Chieftain
Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-May-2005 at 02:04 |
Originally posted by I/eye
but they really don't have any cruizers....
|
yes...both demon and long corn initially said japan has cruisers...which is WRONG..
|
|
|
Kazec
Janissary
Joined: 07-Apr-2005
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-May-2005 at 12:14 |
technically, Japan don't even have destroyers and frigates.
officially, Japan don't have any 'warship' now, all vesels in the JMSDF are 'defense ship'
sounds rhetoical, but it is a fact bounded by law
Edited by Kazec
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-May-2005 at 12:17 |
The difference between CG and DDG is disappearing. USN's Tico class and JMSDF's Kongo class almost have the same tonnage. Unnecessary to spend too much time on ploting out sorts.
|
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-May-2005 at 12:23 |
It's really a big guy heft more than 9kt
Ours is only 7kt
|
|
|
babyblue
Chieftain
Joined: 06-Aug-2004
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1174
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-May-2005 at 12:31 |
dunno why...but Arleigh Burkes (Kongo and whatever other bastards there are out there) have always looked small to my eyes ever i first saw them...but then they're one of the biggest destroyers. our 170 looks bigger and yet has a smaller tonnage?
|
|
|
King Chulalongkorn
Samurai
Joined: 23-Apr-2005
Location: Thailand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-May-2005 at 01:51 |
Sawadikaaa!
LOL. Excuse me for my grammar, but you have to understand that my first language is Thai as well as being fluent in French and Vietnamese, the English was added in as required of a Royal Thai Marine when we conduct exercises with our American counterparts. LOL. So I was wrong on the Japanese part on cruisers, a small misunderstanding and thank you for correcting us all.
Cheers MATE!
|
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk
|
|
sinosword
Consul
Joined: 29-Jan-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 302
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-May-2005 at 11:40 |
Originally posted by babyblue
dunno why...but Arleigh Burkes (Kongo and whatever other bastards there are out there) have always looked small to my eyes ever i first saw them...but then they're one of the biggest destroyers. our 170 looks bigger and yet has a smaller tonnage? |
Maybe that's because optic problem. Burkes often sit by the side of Carrier so look smaller.
|
|
|