Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Gobekli Tepe Posted: 03-Mar-2012 at 19:26 |
Why did they replace the original structure with smaller buildings? To me, this sounds like the result of a catastrophic, irreversable population decline
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Mar-2012 at 11:12 |
Originally posted by Drusin
That centrix I believe is true and a big part of the problem. Status quo wants to stay that way, I think a lot of experts would be reduced to waiting tables. What really gets me is the insistence that every activity of antiquity is for some ceremonial event. It's as though ancient man did little else except prey and offer sacrifices. I think they were worshiping the gods of commerce as much as we do today. |
Schmidt, the arch. that has been working on Gobekli since 1994, has postulated that religion, in this case anyway, came before everything else. It is thought that religion came after social organisation and cities. Schmidt's theory holds that at Gobekli religion came first, that it was the reason for the constructions and social org. came later.
Be careful when your looking around the net. I've seen datings that are all over the spectrum. And the tut-tutting and bluster from folks who proclaim to have knowledge of everything is thick. The "creationists" are doing a better job than usual of making fools of themselves trying to explain the antiquity of the site.
What's being missed in most of the articles is that the temples were not "filled in all at once" as most articles say. The first Temples were filled in, and then a smaller version was built on top. This continued to several levels. But the larger temples, 1st layer, weren't filled at the same times. This apparently happened over a considerable period of time.
Also, there are many "hills" not just one.
The level that this figure is on was dated at 11,500 ybp. And while the temple on this level is huge, there is another complete one that is larger, that was buried to provide a platform for this level. No reasons for this have yet been found. To date, the earliest construction has been dated to 15,000 ybp. However, with only about 5% of the site investigated, dating that is considerably older isn't out of the question.
This site has already turned history as we know it upside down. There's no doubt in my mind that when this site has been more fully investigated there will be a load of history books that will have to be revised. Not to mention the amount of crow that will have to be consumed by many.
Edited by red clay - 03-Mar-2012 at 12:07
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
Drusin
Knight
Joined: 06-Feb-2012
Location: usa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 64
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Mar-2012 at 20:40 |
That centrix I believe is true and a big part of the problem. Status quo wants to stay that way, I think a lot of experts would be reduced to waiting tables. What really gets me is the insistence that every activity of antiquity is for some ceremonial event. It's as though ancient man did little else except prey and offer sacrifices. I think they were worshiping the gods of commerce as much as we do today.
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Mar-2012 at 19:12 |
Originally posted by red clay
Mt Toba erupted approx. 75,000 ybp. reducing humans to pockets of survivors totaling less than 10,000. However, considering our civilization evolved in less than 15,000 years, there's 60,000 years left, plenty of time for an entire civilization to have evolved and vanish. Toba's destruction was pretty total, there's no clear evidence left behind of any advanced civ. prior to the eruption. However, they have found some evidence in the Urals, where they are finding fragments of Nano tech. as well as other unidentifiable manufactured items at a stratigraphic level of 100,000 ybp.
|
Yepper....Gibbons, Ambrose... Rampolino et.al...I recall it well. Fits in nicely with plausibility and probability of multi cause, especially natural, that the PHD egg heads disdain. Course most of them remain feigned intellectualists, tied to the grant endowment system and fear of denying the theorems they were taught.
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Mar-2012 at 11:39 |
The Nat Geographic channel had a special on last nite about Gobekli. All that you've seen in the pics on the net doesn't begin to show the enormous scale of it.
The sections that we have seen were built approx 11,500 ybp. There are other sections not yet fully excavated that date to 15,000 ybp.
What is interesting is that the first temples were very large. As time went on they were filled in and covered over, then a smaller version was built on top. This kept going until it just became a "Hill".
Even more interesting was a statement made by one of those working on it. "The oldest sections date to 15,000 ybp. Where did the engineering and stone working skills come from? If they learned from trial and error you could figure it took at least another thousand years."
BTW- The T shaped stone with the lizard was carved from one monolith, as were all of the others.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
Drusin
Knight
Joined: 06-Feb-2012
Location: usa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 64
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2012 at 18:06 |
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2012 at 10:49 |
Please explain Nano tech here Red?I do not work with archeology terminology well.Maybe picture or link will present us more what did they find there.
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2012 at 10:35 |
Mt Toba erupted approx. 75,000 ybp. reducing humans to pockets of survivors totaling less than 10,000. However, considering our civilization evolved in less than 15,000 years, there's 60,000 years left, plenty of time for an entire civilization to have evolved and vanish. Toba's destruction was pretty total, there's no clear evidence left behind of any advanced civ. prior to the eruption. However, they have found some evidence in the Urals, where they are finding fragments of Nano tech. as well as other unidentifiable manufactured items at a stratigraphic level of 100,000 ybp.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 19:04 |
This changes everything we know about the Stone Age. If early man smelted bronze that early then reverted to stone tools, it's possible Gobekli Tepi was the main trading center for this valuable commodity. Or perhaps they were the first empire, ruling over their more primitive neighbors until they were overthrown and the secrets of bronze forgotten?
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Drusin
Knight
Joined: 06-Feb-2012
Location: usa
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 64
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 11:35 |
I'm in agreement here about the site being a part of a larger network and community.
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 10:13 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
That's an interesting idea Red. So Gobekli Tepe was just a small outpost of a larger, more advanced civilisation? |
Or what was left of one.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
Don Quixote
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 02:47 |
Yes, what you call "her appearances" I call "Mother-Goddess aspects", it's the same thing. Mother-Goddess is Nature-seen-as-one, hence monotheistic religious cult/faith, /no matter what word we are going to use/.
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 02:23 |
My syllables says that in their concept of universe,Bull or cattle1.caries mother's head or 2.bull has mother head.We talked about it before."Other" gods&goddess were Her appearances on Earth,better said reincarnation forms.We are all part of Her reincarnation("Ri").Monotheistic religious cult dominate from the beginning of our civilization.
Edited by medenaywe - 27-Feb-2012 at 15:19
|
|
Don Quixote
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 01:55 |
Yes, the only clearly identifyable deity on Gobelki Tepe is Mother Goddess. There is a bull too, and this is the combination which is found in Catal Huyuk also - Mother-Goddess and the bull.
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 01:38 |
It was connected with their "sense of order":content the Mother and order will stay preserved on Earth! In Egypt pharaoh communicated with Mother and even dead would have preserved Her anger against their people.Cult could be started with Human presence on Earth.Gobekli shows us institutionalized religion with well developed symbolic&religious objects for it.
|
|
Don Quixote
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2012 at 01:20 |
Bulding a hill of dirt over sacred objects was done in Ancient Thrace with some of the royal tombs - the tombs were build and after this an artificial mound was piled on them, this is connected with seeing the mountians as sacred, hence putting a human-build structure and making it a hill was putting it is the "sacred space". The mountain was considered one of the symbols of the mother Goddess-Earth/Nature. In teh Thracian Orphism the sacred initiantions were done in a cave under a mountain - almos literally in the "womb of Earth/Goddess".
Hence, the deliberate burying can be seen as putting the whole temple or whatever we may call it in the "sacred space" and in this way making it "really sacred". Mountains of dirt had been made in other places, China. North America. The Egyptian pyramids are nothing but artificial mountains that contain the Pharaoh's tomb to put it in the "sacred space".
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Feb-2012 at 21:52 |
Plausibility and probability say yes..without answering for Red. If Shanidar cave can be occupied on and off for 100,000 years, and by neanderthal from 60-80,000BC/BP if ya buy the research of Ralph Solecki and others..why not. And off topic slightly; depending on your viewpoint it might also be the first example of religious ceremonies associated in burials. Case in point Shanidar 4 man and ....according to Melinda Zeder's research and theory based on her finding of Shanidar 10 man..Altho there is a counter that the pollen based evidence might have been introduced by rodents. And it's another fine example of what I stated above.....''with major natural disasters as a contributor to the collapse of the age in this region then most historians and archaeologists..In other words multiplicity of cause saw the collapse...not precisely singularity as can be readily identified.''
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Feb-2012 at 20:00 |
That's an interesting idea Red. So Gobekli Tepe was just a small outpost of a larger, more advanced civilisation?
|
Me Grimlock not nice Dino! Me bash brains!
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Feb-2012 at 17:09 |
I also am more likely to go along with major natural disasters as a contributor to the collapse of the age in this region then most historians and archaeologists...especially which you consider the geophysical nature and history of past activity. Couple this with the plausibility and probability of similar in the region and social upheaval due to wars... invasions etc...and you have a more realistic theory then it was just the unnamed Sea Peoples alone, for example, who did it.
In other words multiplicity of cause saw the collapse...not precisely singularity as can be readily identified.
Edited by Centrix Vigilis - 25-Feb-2012 at 17:11
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Feb-2012 at 15:43 |
Originally posted by TheAlaniDragonRising
Originally posted by red clay
To understand exactly what Gobekli was will require considerably more excavation than what's been done to date. That includes a vast area surrounding it. "Bronze Bowls"? Bronze is an alloy, a mix of copper and tin. It isn't found in nature. So now your looking at a "Hunter-Gatherer society that had the knowledge of and the ability to smelt copper and tin, and the ability to work it.
Somethings not right here.
Can you say "Post apocalyptic"?
| Could we be looking at a revaluation of the term bronze age with this site being much earlier? |
I don't think so. Apparently the technology behind bronze was lost. The copper age preceded the bronze.
Post apocalyptic goes with the belief in a previous civilization as advanced or more so than our own. After whatever global disaster knocked it out, there would still have been pockets of that civilization, some possibly untouched. This would explain isolated advanced cultures of extreme antiquity.
Edited by red clay - 25-Feb-2012 at 15:45
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|