Connecting European Peoples to Biblical Tribes!!

I really hate this type of pseudo-historical stuff, especially when Iranian peoples are used to connect these two, some ignorant religionists mix different religious and historical sources to prove European peoples were origianlly from somewhere in the Middle East, the reason is that the name of this tribe in the Bible is similar to the name of this European people, and if they are not really similar then they can change some letters to make them similar!

As for the Jews, those who didn't convert to Christianity (and later Islam) ended up in Eastern Europe. By this time, the tribes had intermixed with local Slavs, making it difficult to identify a family's origins

Cyrus&Nick&Baal,you can not connect them cause purpose of the Bible was they could be divided!Only if you put middle East population as population of two big Empires:Egypt&Persia events worked good,other way,no way!Egyptian population existence had been erased into the bible also made evil(Devil received AMoon's horns!).Analyzing words i found:"Slavs","Jews" and "Arabs" should have shared same syllables inside their languages than here are residuals of this population languages with stolen history&identity!Cause the rest of people there use their language,they are still more than 25-35% of population!(A lot of mixed blood exists also,normally!)
P.S.
I really have problems with Arabic&Persian words pronunciations!I will open new topic about it where you will post archaic forms of words from your languages!Hebrew's sites give me data but Latin alphabet hides the sounds!Phonetic of the words is most essential here!I believe Turkish language have preserved lot of archaic words also.As I saw here in forum some Persian words consist syllables from ancient Egyptian also. Main problem is lost phonetics inside!Old "Africa's" sounds:Dz,Dj,Kj,Gj,Nj,Lj,Zhe are lost&hidden by transcriptions with Latin alphabet.



Edited by medenaywe - 05-Jan-2012 at 16:51

Yes,but those could have been some mixture of those 2 above."Nations" in the Bible had been created upon rival Rulers names(or family names) in those ancient structures that fought for power among themselves.Nick your statement above is more precise than mine cause of structure of languages:Egyptian(Hebrew,Slavic,Arabic(?),Turkish(?) and (?)),Persian(Farsi+?) and Phoenician cause of scripts have known today as "Greek".Their influences to one another are more than evident now.

Originally posted by medenaywe It would be honest to say here something about minority language groups had lost in history!They existed of course but still are nameless. P.S. Where do Chinese and Hindi languages belong?!?

These are Asian languages. The Chinese culture was copied by their neighbors (most notably by the Japanese). Hindi originated in the Indus civilisation. When the Aryans from Persia conquered India, they gradually adopted the local customs and religion. But i'm puzzled as to what these have to do with the Biblical Middle East