Originally posted by opuslola
Indeed, like a lot of sites, this one demands a good examination, from some really good experts.
It is the existance of places like this that sometimes causes problems within a certain part of us, to wonder about the so called facts that history and chronology now present to us.
Regards, |
Wondering is good. Twisting and warping facts blended with 1/2 truths and claimed proved with fuzzy math, isn't.
I myself have a truckload of questions about History as currently presented by the "Mainstream". But you don't go looking for answers in the manner which some have chosen.
90% of the questions I have are self generated through a lifetime of Observational Science, meaning most if not all are observable. I don't need to rely on or draw from someone else's conclusions. Especially when I can't figure out how in hell they came to these conclusions. After reading some of their explanations it's become clear they aren't really sure either
.
I'm not going to go into a huge list of reasons, no one really reads them anyway. I just want to give some different ideas other than conspiracies or aliens. I've read a couple of papers written in the last 5 years, peer reviewed, that agreed, at least in part, with most of my own ideas. They gave me a phrase to use to describe our world from about 15,000 t0 approx 5,000 ybp, post apocalyptic. We are not the first civilisation to have risen on this planet.
And if anyone mentions the "A word" I'll turn loose the flesh eating nano bots.
There is more than enough observable evidence to support this. There is some evidence to support the idea of several previous civs. The constant stream of anomalous artifacts from the Urals, dated to roughly 100,000 ybp can't be ignored forever. Humans, not aliens.
We have met the Enemy, and they is us. Pogo/Walt Kelly
Edited by red clay - 12-Jun-2011 at 00:04