Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Topic: What have the Greeks done these past 2,000 years? Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 03:53 |
Everyone knows about the ancient Greeks and their contribution to the world (which has been appropriated by the West as essentially western) but what about the modern Christian Greeks (or Romaioi/Romioi)? What if any was their contribution since say about 500 AD,(when one can conventionally place the end of ancient Greek civilisation)? What, if anything, have they done for the world?
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 06:09 |
they spent old money savings and much more of that!
|
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 07:38 |
Well yes, apart from the obvious answer of getting themselves into enormous debt which they will eventually default on.
|
|
Nick1986
Emperor
Mighty Slayer of Trolls
Joined: 22-Mar-2011
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7940
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 09:25 |
They kept ancient Rome alive as the Byzantine Empire
|
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 09:36 |
A very good point. Since modern Greeks (mistakenly in my opinion) choose to emphasize their putative descent from the ancient Greeks they have changed their ethnonym from Romioi (i.e. Romans in the sense of the people of Nova Roma/Constantinopl, not the Latins) to Hellenes that gets overlooked. Another factor adding to that is that both Western historians (to appropriate Roman history as entirely Western) and modern Greek historians (to appropriate medieval Roman history as essentially Hellenic) subscribe to the Byzantium fallacy.
|
|
balochii
Colonel
Joined: 23-May-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 699
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 12:19 |
when empires fall, they fall for good, what have the romans done? what have the egyptians done? what have the arabs/muslim done? after they fell
I think only china has been a continious civilization and now in the next 50 years they would lead the world
|
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 12:30 |
Well the ancient Greeks of the Classical age weren't an empire (remember this was before Alexander's time) and they did alot. It is to my mind certain that the modern Christian Greeks (Romaioi) will never match them but nonetheless have they actually accomplished anything remotely similar?
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Apr-2011 at 14:30 |
Originally posted by Nick1986
They kept ancient Rome alive as the Byzantine Empire |
Those were morphing changes of same idea .Persia=Greece=Rome=Byzantine
|
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Apr-2011 at 05:14 |
I have also read previously of the power of the idea of Empire at the time. The first Persian Empire held almost 50% of the world's population, surealy something to fire the imagination. And it was a novel concept too then. However I disagree with the arbitrary definition of Byzantium, there was never such a state, it was known to its people as the Kingdom of the Romans or Romania. And to its contemporaries in the West untill the crowning of Charlamagne as Rome or simply the Empire. Regarrdless this does not detract from the achievement of the modern Christian Greeks in the sense that Nick presented it.
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Apr-2011 at 05:42 |
"Will continue" in your description you have missed only!Agree with the rest!"Uber" human idea has ruled and would be as it looks!?!Depends of Earth resources and cosmic casino's results!
|
|
ralfy
Knight
Joined: 03-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 53
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Apr-2011 at 08:56 |
The total debt of Greece is probably low if one includes corporate and household debt. U.S. total debt, though, is significant, with household debts three-fourths of GDP and corporate debt up to three times as high.
As for contributions from modern Greece, there's a lot. Search online or view references for more details.
|
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Apr-2011 at 10:40 |
From what I remember Greek debt (total:includes public, household & corporate) amounts to roughly 200% of GDP. By contrast Irish is of the order of 1,000%. But the problem is that what taxpayers have to pay is the public one where Greece is very high. Nonetheless I shall stop the debt talk here as I don't want to derail the thread. Other modern Greek achievements I can think of, that while not being of the same order as those of hte ancients still rank pretty good even by global standards: 1. Christianization of Slavic people and creation of the first Slavic alphabet (Glagolitic) 2. Preservation of Classical Greek literature and dissemination to the West and Arabs. 3. Helped spark the Italian Renaissance via the flight of many Greek scholars from the crumbling Roman Empire in the 14th and early 15th centuries.
|
|
Baal Melqart
General
Joined: 28-Mar-2011
Location: UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2011 at 09:54 |
I remember that they also had the thickest/highest/strongest wall in Constantinople. It kept the huns at bay for during the barbarian invasion and also kept the muslims out of the city for ages until 1453. They did improve the Roman aqueduct system by sourcing water from very distant areas all the way to the mighty city. Talking of defending Constantinople against the Muslims, they were the first to use Greek fire which was successful against maritime attacks from the eastern side of the city. I'm sure there is something else we are missing, such a great and wealthy empire must have excelled at something.
|
Timidi mater non flet
|
|
Athena
Baron
Joined: 28-Sep-2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2011 at 19:27 |
Could it be that when religion consumed everyone, it put an end to the intellectual gains of ancient Athens? Like we can not pick up from they left off, neither can we pick up from where the ancient Aztecs left off. We advanced the sciences, but the loss of the ability to think in terms is animism hampers us.
Our language is very materialistic, and prevents us from having animismistic discussions. I suspect to a degree, Rome killed the necessary spark of genius with its materialism. The religion that came out of Rome has struggled with this separation of spirit and material reality. The trinity of Egyptian theology, a part of the soul that dies with the body, a part of the soul is judged, and either enters the good life after death or not, and a part the soul that returns to the source, was externalized as the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. When the spirit is internalized authority is within. When the spirit is externalize, authority is externalized.
I am reading a book that suggest another part of the problem is the written word. When the written word is the voice of authority, it can kill the living word. Who had the money for written documents and how were they used to educate the people? If someone is not technologically correct, or politically correct, or does not meet the standards of which CV writes, than this person has no credibility, and this so restricts the pool of intelligence, we could say it is deadly thought.
Edited by Athena - 18-Apr-2011 at 19:30
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2011 at 22:04 |
If someone is not technologically correct, or politically correct, or does not meet the standards of which CV writes, than this person has no credibility, and this so restricts the pool of intelligence, we could say it is deadly thought.
Another totally incorrect interpretation and biased misrepresentation, and without context, of anything I have ever written....typical Athena.
Religion for example has not ''consumed everyone'' even tho the religion haters would promote it....they themselves are examples....unless of course in their obsession in and of itself it then consumes them.
My numerous aethists and agnostic friends would reject this line of thought utterly as inconclusive..without merit and typically only of an individual that hasn't got something better to do.
When for example, I speak of the method.... It's fairly obvious the value of why it increases ones apptitude for the research and study of history..
why?... because it promotes objectivity no matter the educational and experience background..tis why it's taught to layman thinkers in the first place....
but that unfortunately is not always obvious for some. Or is rejected by them in attempt to promote their own salving of inadequancies that only they are seeing and feeling. Tis sort of a self crucification or flagellation they feel necessary...when in truth the majority of those around them could give a damn less about it.
And as such the method doesn't promote wild speculation and dis-jointed, incoherent, subjective evaluation of a minium of fact or distortions and or revisions of fact.
But I like it when Athena trys to slamm me...she fails miserably.... but it's amusing ntl.
Edited by Centrix Vigilis - 18-Apr-2011 at 22:20
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
Centrix Vigilis
Emperor
Joined: 18-Aug-2006
Location: The Llano
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7392
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2011 at 22:25 |
As to the original topic and context...there were numerous things , as noted above, the Greeks continued to contribute to society as a whole...And another is the introduction of Greek and Roman words still in use in medicine and law today.
|
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
S. T. Friedman
Pilger's law: 'If it's been officially denied, then it's probably true'
|
|
Anothroskon
Janissary
Joined: 15-Apr-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Apr-2011 at 12:27 |
As for the last part this was actually the work of Western scientists as a whole, i.e. they would name species, stars, mathematical operators etc with Greek names out of reverence for the ancient Greeks in most cases even though they had nothing to do with it. Nothing to do with the moderns either of course.
|
|
Athena
Baron
Joined: 28-Sep-2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Apr-2011 at 14:59 |
Originally posted by Centrix Vigilis
If someone is not technologically correct, or politically correct, or does not meet the standards of which CV writes, than this person has no credibility, and this so restricts the pool of intelligence, we could say it is deadly thought.
Another totally incorrect interpretation and biased misrepresentation, and without context, of anything I have ever written....typical Athena.
Religion for example has not ''consumed everyone'' even tho the religion haters would promote it....they themselves are examples....unless of course in their obsession in and of itself it then consumes them.
My numerous aethists and agnostic friends would reject this line of thought utterly as inconclusive..without merit and typically only of an individual that hasn't got something better to do.
When for example, I speak of the method.... It's fairly obvious the value of why it increases ones apptitude for the research and study of history..
why?... because it promotes objectivity no matter the educational and experience background..tis why it's taught to layman thinkers in the first place....
but that unfortunately is not always obvious for some. Or is rejected by them in attempt to promote their own salving of inadequancies that only they are seeing and feeling. Tis sort of a self crucification or flagellation they feel necessary...when in truth the majority of those around them could give a damn less about it.
And as such the method doesn't promote wild speculation and dis-jointed, incoherent, subjective evaluation of a minium of fact or distortions and or revisions of fact.
But I like it when Athena trys to slamm me...she fails miserably.... but it's amusing ntl. |
We really do not like each other do we?
What you write and opine is immaterial to me personally as a
member; as a moderator what you write and opine will be judged against
the COC...just like anyone else. Present your theories and
datum...defend your positions and continue to do it in accordance with
forum guidelines-rules...all will be well...
don't.... and it will not be well. It's that simple. Because at
this point your focus is beginning to appear as a diatribe against any
non form of zoroastrianism as a spiritual belief mechanism and there are
some here who might find it offensive. As I noted earlier discuss this
historically and contextually in a professional manner....and that
potential is then reduced if not eliminated.
So remember.... my personal advice? respect...acknowledge and disagree as you will.....respect and acknowledge ntl. |
What is the difference between a threat and a warning, and who is attempting the most control over what others say here? The distinct difference between what the Greeks started and what religion did, is the Greeks began the effort of explaining the cause and effect of things scientifically, as opposed to explaining what happens as the work of God, Satan and demons. Athens was the mother of western civilization, father of our sciences and parents of democracy. While the bible relies on superstition and is a book of kings and slaves. It most certainly did consume human consciousness, making the reawakening of science and democracy very difficult, rejecting the medicine developed by Arabs as the Black arts, burning people as witches, preventing men like Galileo from speaking and advancing the sciences. Thanks to the ancient Greek and Roman documents, and the develops continued by Arabs, we have dug our way out of a not so pleasant past full of wasted years and wasted lives, because of superstitious notions. PS, I don't have great expectations of the people of the US will achieve from this point in their history. It seems civilizations are born and die, just like other life forms. However, they leave us a legacy from which we can benefit.
Edited by Athena - 20-Apr-2011 at 10:01
|
|
unclefred
Consul
Suspended, Historum joker
Joined: 09-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 337
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Apr-2011 at 14:51 |
Do you know the topic? It's not really about religion or CV, who you harass relentlessly AND WITH irrelevance.
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Apr-2011 at 15:40 |
Do not allow Greeks,to push you in conflict with comprehensive dimensions,CV and Athena!?!Let us talk about Greeks and all that they have stolen from other nations history or have contributed themselves for history. Byzantine Empire had many phases different one from other!Yes, people of masters call themselves Romei.(y)This structure was heterogeneous with lot of ethnic groups.Masters were 5% of Empire and the rest were Vulgaris.V=Beta letter from Greek language.Documents we have about it are talking about masters and very little about ordinary people.
|
|