Soldier

I thought of a soldier in about the 1200 - 1400 (not really existed).

Soldier has a pike in hand (about 2 metres long) and it would be thrown also, a round shield not in the hand but reserved on the hand, an axe, a long-sword and a dagger or a sable, then a bow on it's shoulder and about 100 arrows.

Could someone like that really existed?

The pole weapon seems more like a light long spear than a pike, and it's going to be quite awkward to throw--obviously the soldier would not be suited to skirmish roles because he would not have enough mobility to close in and launch the spear from very short range (a bit like the Roman pilum) except if he had a horse. Even then, it's still more logical to surmise that this soldier would have retained his spear and used it for shock action, reserving the other weapons for emergencies. Of course he could have fought with his bow instead and reserved all the melee weapons for the final charge against a disorganized enemy formation.

I think the man, described as such, is a bit too heavily armed. In real battles such men would be split into spear and bow units, whether on foot or on horseback. And a hundred arrows can be a bit too much--for practicality, most archers carried no more than forty or fifty arrows in their quivers and took replacement quivers from the rear as they emptied their first ones. The only major exception is horse archers who carried their spare quivers on their saddle so that they could carry up to two hundred arrows along as they made their initial approach to the engagement. Such a great immediate stock of ammunition was not generally regarded as necessary, though, since the large-scale, long-winded battles that demanded such a great expenditure of ammunition were relatively rare. Most fights were short, sharp skirmished where only five to fifteen arrows were discharged by each participant.

Only nobility or especialy rich professionals had any likelihood of carrying so many weapons as the man described in the beginning of this article. If they had some measure of discipline they would probably have fought in a layered formation with the first ranks fighting with long spears and the rear ranks wielding bows.

He would have been a good fighter indeed. But then, because he's a good fighter, he would know that carrying a spear and a bow at the same time is not really that practical so he would probably leave one of the two with an attendant while he went to fight with the other, going back to the attendant to swap weapons (or get replacements) as often as necessary. It can still be made into a logical model that way.

A shame......although Hyarmendacil has a point, most people don't see that weapons don't work like they do in the movies and some weapons you see would be just too unwieldy to work.

Light infantrymen of Koguryo used axes as the main main hand-to-hand weapon.

Natives also used a lot of axes... tomahawks. Although they were usually European imported.