A question on Greeks

Originally posted by Molossos Gazi, why can't Greeks have such features? We belong to the Indo-European family after all and it is not strange for a Mediterranean to be like that. The question is if original Turks can be like that since they should have mongoloid anthropological characteristics. However, there are blonde people in Turkey...

 

There were even blonde huns... WHY DO YOU GREEKS TRY TO GET GLORY WITH WRONG RACISM??

Originally posted by Gorgi Makedonski first, hi all second, there are several DNS studies who disagree with your statement

The several DNS studies from FYROM which you obviously mean, are considered jokes just like the people who still use them, since they have been refuted to death.

more of them say you have sub-saharian-asian origin

NEWSFLASH!!!!! The usual guiberish that you guys are  copy/pasting from your usual propagandistic site, in all the forums that you participate,  has been leveled from serious scientists. Too bad for you!!

& you forgot to mention  that Macedonians & Greeks have very litle common, exept few times they made aliance vs common enemies

Actually ancient Macedonians were part of Hellenic civilization unlike the FYROMIANs who were part of Slavic civilization.  

but i dont want to flood with unendless "paste-ings" on my first post

How's that? All that you FYROMIAN guys are doing in forums is nothing else than copying/pasting stuff from your propagandistic sites!!!  

Ah, You are so kind that you skipped the flood of propaganda 'paste-ings'  from your first post!!! Its sth unusual for you (plural) guys over there.  How can we reward you??

Just out of curiocity...after Homer and Gorgi which is it gonna be the next name of the famous Makedonski family and that we will have the honour to meet here?

 

I went through the article you provided and a couple more about Alexeev's theory. Isn't this all about IE origins??? (correct me if I'm wrong)

And if so, what makes this correct since I've found that a large number of scolars find it totally incorrect.

Just so you understand what I mean, the Institute of history and archaeology.Ural brunch of Russian Academy of Sciences.Chelyabinsk.Russia
in an article I found states that :

"Cultures of Scithian and Sarmatian world were not forming on the basis of the Late Bronze Age cultures placed from Dnieper river to the Altai. So called �Andronovo culture� is an archaeological myth. There are no features of �Steppe cultures� in cultures of India and Iran. And there are no Finno-Ugric borrowings in languages of Avesta and Rig Veda."

and

"The Early Afanasyevo culture was formed as a result of Indo-Iranian migration from Eastern Europe at the Early Bronze Age."

What do you think?

If Greeks were such a pure race why did Hitler dislike them??

He thought the Albanians were aryan race but not the Greeks.

Originally posted by Yiannis Originally posted by vulkan02 He thought the Albanians were aryan race but not the Greeks. Your idiocy, bringing Adolf Hitler as "proof" of your ridiculus claims, is inconceivable! Please take action, see some specialist, before the damage to your brain is irreversable. I'm not even going to bother with the other BS on "pureness" etc...

I dont think he deserved these words by  just claiming that you arent pure Aryans. He didnt defend or support Hitler (if he did, I would be the first person to reply his post with heavy insults)

Whatever kind of person Hitler was, he really had studied about a non-sense racist Aryan thingy, and according to him, Aryan was the superior European race, and he even considered the meditarrennean people of Spanish and Italians as Aryans. But he didnt consider Greeks as pure Aryans. It isnt such important what kind of categorization he used. But we know that it was about being pure Europeans. So even a guy like him could say that the Greeks arent pure Aryans.

He didnt even consider Iranians as Aryans. And he didnt consider Greeks as Aryans, but some Greeks still believe they are pure blooded Aryans... 

I do not defend Hitlers actions or anything like that. Hitler however did a lot of reseach on races and peoples and he claimed that Greeks are not a pure race however Albanians are. Thus you can disprove him or his statement. Thats your choice.

Originally posted by vulkan02 I do not defend Hitlers actions or anything like that. Hitler however did a lot of reseach on races and peoples and he claimed that Greeks are not a pure race however Albanians are. Thus you can disprove him or his statement. Thats your choice.

What irritates me the most, is that you don't possess the basic intelligence to comprehend that since Albania was an ally to Fascist Italy (protectorate) and the Nazis, Hitler had every reason to support something like that. There were Albanian divisions fighting alongside the Vermacht.

Let's also not forget that Hitler in WWII created greater Albania, by giving it Kossovo and W. Macedonia and exterminating hundreds of thousands of Slavs...

 

 

 

Albania was an ally to Fascist Italy but only on paper... partizans in Albania fought against the Nazis just like any other partizans in the Balkans. Quite a few villages were wiped out in the north after German soldiers were killed. While it is true that he had Albanian Kosovars fighting for him this does not prove that Albania itself had in mind to become "Greater Albania". Thats an idea that to this day has little appeal to people living in Albania. Most of the people who like that idea are Albanians outside living in Macedonia and Kosovo because well they don't want to be outside of Albania plus the Albania is small as it  can't support 3 other million people. Most of the Slavs were exterminated by their own brethen tho, the Croats might have killed up to 500000 Serbs during WW2.

like i said it has little appeal amongst the general Albanian populace inside Albania...BDK and UNIKOMB have been around for a while but most of the votes either go to the Democratic or Socialist Party when there's elections.