Just out, if N. Carolian teachers have their way, High School students will be taught American History beginning with Rutherford B. Hayes and the year 1877!

What happens to those who went before?

I.e. Washington, Adams (two), Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln, etc.?

Ah! Modern "progressive education" at its best!

Last reported on Fox News Channel, at 1735 hours!

Regards,

Well, "eaglecap" I guess I shan't provide the quotes available from Savage on his radio show today?
As to any restrictions that "Redclay" has added, I have no idea!

I do not think he would do so?

Regards to all,



Edited by opuslola - 03-Feb-2010 at 16:44

Hello the Great Simba- I will have time tomorrow to research a few sites I found to support my premise. I hope to show case law against some school districts. I have too much going on today to read over the articles I will choose.

One is:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/casearchives

Oh eaglecap, dont worry, I'll have a post for you soon. 

< ="-" ="text/; =utf-8"> < name="GENERATOR" ="Office.org 3.1 Linux"> < ="text/">

I will go through these articles and SHOW YOU how these sources are OVER EXAGERATING and even FEAR MONGERING about a problem that IS NOT THAT BIG AN ISSUE.

Lets start with this one:

http://www.newswithviews.com/public_schools/public_schools1.htm

Title: Homosexual Agenda Escalates in Public Schools (Scary!!!!)

First of, this article deals mostly with issues regarding high schools. We are talking about kids aged 14 and up, they can handle themselves.

Whoever wrote this article is anti-homosexual, as in not just what it represents, but homosexuals in general. He is essentially against equal rights and equal treatment for homosexuals. He is, an essence, a homophobe. I quote:

Yet it could be worse. There are as yet no openly "gay" teachers at the school who might pose a risk to students as poor role models, or worse -- the threat of sexual molestation. People who profess a homosexual preference are much more likely to molest children and adolescents, especially males.

Now on to the article titled: School Sued Over Homosexual Tolerance Training

http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=20157

First of all, if the title alone in combination with the website shows the deep hatred against homosexuality that even “tolerating” them is unacceptable...

are forced to participate in diversity training, are told homosexuality cannot be changed and are warned not to say otherwise..."There is a specific attempt by the school to change the belief system of these students, who believe that the Bible teaches ... that homosexuality can be changed,"...

First of all, KEEP RELIGION OUT OF OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS!

Second of all, the proponents of this suit argue that its a students right to harrass and be prejudiced against homosexuals in school and to confront them in school. This is wrong and unacceptable in a school argument. Their lawsuit is without merit and absolutely disgusting.

I also find it funny how they call the fight for human equality a “homosexual agenda”. Homosexuals are humans too, they deserve to be treated equally and have all the same rights as anyone else.

Regarding the article about the students suing Georgia Institute of Technology, that is a freedom of expression issue, not a “they're spreading homosexuality” issue. I'm sure the university would have barred students who were anti-black or anti-Islam as well, as those would also have been freedom of expression issues.

Eaglecap, several issues are really disturbing me at the moment. Your homophobia (possible homophobia?) and support of those who are against the homosexual civil rights movement. Why can you not provide any legitimate reliable neutral news organizations that support such fears?

I can tell you why. Because these fears are completely unfounded and all this is FEAR MONGERING. Tell me, do think the civil rights movement of the 60's was a good thing? Why are you against the civil rights movement going on now?

By the way, stop worrying about the straight kids in our schools. Homosexuals probably do not form more than 5% at any public school in America. Its the homosexuals who are constantly getting harassed and attacked.

“gay”, “fag”, “faggot”, etc... are all commonly used on a daily basis. I even say them from time to time (its not something I'm proud of). This is a result of our culture. You know, 50 years ago they were saying "nigger"now they're saying "faggot", and you oppose Gay people fighting for their right to be treated like human beings and to be accepted?

Why would anyone choose to be homosexual in a society that persecutes them and insults them? THEY ARE BORN THIS WAY, ITS NOT A CHOICE, use common sense...

Edited by TheGreatSimba - 05-Feb-2010 at 13:24

Uh! Cough! I actually thought you might have actually read the article, where it states that a "Canadian" leader is having his medical proceedure done here in the good old USA, since there is quite a line up there in "perfect" healthcare heaven, which you believe is Canada!

Sorry you missed that part of the article!

Since you have not preferred to answer in the hours this has been exposed to the world, I shall place in quotation marks, the part that I thought might well apply to my view! Thus;

"And even while many U.S. liberals lament the missed chance to introduce a single-payer health insurance plan of the sort that keeps Canadian health expenditures lower and life expectancy higher, events in Canada this week have spotlighted that system's drawbacks. The premier of Newfoundland, Danny Williams, is heading to the U.S. this week for heart surgery he can't get under his province's health plan (although The Toronto Sun has reported that Williams, a public health care critic, could have had the procedure done elsewhere in the country)."

Do you remember when I said that "world leaders" come to the USA for medical work?

As OPUS, might well have said in "Bloom County" Pbfleeef! Or something close? (I think that meant tounge out and bleating, etc.)




Edited by opuslola - 05-Feb-2010 at 19:47

It's "not over untill the fat lady sings!" is an old USA football slogan!

"I've not yet begun to fight!"

"Wait until you see the whites of their eyes!"

And other slogans ad infinitum!

But, for now, you really do not interest me anymore!

But, it has been "real", and it has been "fun", but it is, as of now, not been "Real Fun!" chuckle!

My regards,


Edited by opuslola - 06-Feb-2010 at 14:30

Since you place such weight in the price of one's home, then you should see my home, which I would suggest might well be considered as a "multi-million dollar home?

And then TGS, you wrote;

"Stop trolling, you have already been warned once. You're comments, such as the above, are not productive and do not add to this discussion. Stop with the nonsense."

Hey, young guy! Are you a moderator?, or site regulator? Just what gives you, as a very young and "virginal poster", the "balls" to call any of us out?

The word "nonsense" seems mostly to apply to any and all legislation proposed by our current "Progressive" administration?

Let's see now, the national debt is now somewhere above 13 thousand billion dollars! And, inevtibally due to become some where in the area of 20 thousand billion dollars! And even more!!!

I am very glad that I have no children who might well be expected to pay such a debt to China, etc.!

So, if you like it, then please start to donate to your own children your fair share! I would suppose 85% if your pay might well do?

But, then just what would you live on? chuckle! (of course I assume that you actually earn enough money to actually not partake of the "earned income tax credit?")

But since the "nanny" state already exists, then maybe your "nanny" should also contribute her or his 85%?

Would not that all be fair?

Your Nanny! With all due regards!
By the way, my wife and I pay over $15,000 per year in just "income tax!"
Did we pay your salary?

Whose salary did you pay?

Edited by opuslola - 06-Feb-2010 at 18:03

Above TGS wrote concerning the National Debt;

"It was $1.3 trillion when BUSH was in office, so why are you blaming Obama?"

Hey, that Obama is even better than a Wall Street investor, he was able to turn a $1.3 trillion debt, into a 13.0 trillion debt in just one year! Hip Hip Hooray! If you had New Math, this means that Obama and the Democrats took the terrible Republican and Bush debt and multiplied it by a factor of ten! 10x!

Yes, it seems it was all the fault of Bush!

I totally agree!

Regards,

Hey TGS, I already said in the post above that "Yes, it seems it was all the fault of Bush!" Just how much more support should I give your posts than that?

All wrongs were done by one Bush or another Bush, therefor, we must "burn the Bush!" Chuckle! And a wink!

TGS also wrote these words;

"Because the American system as a whole is broken, Obama has to spend money to fix it, which causes more debt. Its a perpetual cycle that can only be stopped if we fix this broken system."

By "fixing a broken system", I suppose you mean that America must change to "Socialism?"

Take care of yourself TGS!

Regards,

Edited by opuslola - 09-Feb-2010 at 11:01