Sounds fanciful Zaitsev!
Sorry about the huge delay in responding here, Hugo - funnily enough, it is this very project which has been occupying most of my time lately.
I apologise to everyone in advance that this isn't history-related in the least - feel free to ignore it
For the paper, I am of course investigating leaf litter biodiversity and abundance. The main objectives are twofold;
Null hypothesis 1: There is no difference in invertebrate community composition between deep leaf litter and pine leaf litter
Null hypothesis 2: There is no difference in collection results between a direct count method and the use of a Tulgren funnel (using deep leaf litter as a controlled variable)
I am testing these for falsification, and in doing this, I am looking at three main aspects of the biological assemblages - diversity, species richness and abundance. I am using the Shannon Index (
H) to measure diversity, which basically looks at relative proportions of species within an assemblage. For those who care:
proportion = number of individuals of species / number of total individuals in assemblage
diversity index = - sum of {proportion * (natural logarithm * proportion)}
Each of the 3 experimental setups have been repeated 23 times for increased reliability. I'm also using some other statistics to test the hypotheses, like standard deviation.
I'm just writing up the discussion section at the moment, so the paper's almost finished
Regards,
- Knights -