Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
SulcataIxlude
Knight
Joined: 04-Feb-2005
Location: Indonesia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 73
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Asians in Ancient Rome and visa versa. Posted: 25-Mar-2005 at 04:46 |
Hello I was wondering if the Chinese or other eastern asian people had
any influence on the Roman empire, and Roman culture besides the fact
they traded with one another. And the same goes for Rome if it
influenced Chinese culture or at least made any impact besides trading
between each other. Thank you for your time.
|
|
Scytho-Sarmatian
Earl
Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 290
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Mar-2005 at 06:09 |
Trade was just about the only interaction between Romans and Far Easterners, and most of that was done throught mideastern middlemen. If you consider the Huns to have been and eastern Asian people, then there was also a military interaction as well. The Huns had been mercenaries in the Roman military before Atilla's invasion of the Empire. However, I sense that you are asking about civilized East Asians such as the Chinese, in which case there is no record of any cultural influences (outside of the wearing of silk).
|
|
vagabond
Colonel
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 524
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2005 at 02:56 |
Moving thread to Greek and Roman forum - more folks who are interested in Rome will see it there.
vagabond
|
In the time of your life, live - so that in that wonderous time you shall not add to the misery and sorrow of the world, but shall smile to the infinite delight and mystery of it. (Saroyan)
|
|
Exarchus
General
Joined: 18-Jan-2005
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 16:46 |
Asian
(far asian) civilizations had little influence. I think of the "pasta"
but that's about it. The far asians who made their way to Europe were
nomads and barbarians, not the best example of a civlization.
|
Vae victis!
|
|
Imperator Invictus
Caliph
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3151
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 22:22 |
Far Eastern influence on Europe during the classical period was not as
great as it was during the medieval period.
The biggest influence is probably the exchange of materials, especially
silk, which became increasingly popular with the Roman nobility. Trade
influence was far from little, because the silk road was a very
important part of the Roman economy. The loss of Roman gold on the silk
road was one of the reasons for the increaing inflation toward the end
of the empire.
Edited by Imperator Invictus
|
|
MengTzu
General
Retired Moderator
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 957
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Mar-2005 at 02:39 |
Actually, there seems to be subtle influences of Chinese culture on Enlightenment Europe. Confucius was talked about quite often. The I Ching was studied by scholars. (It's quite possible that the binary codes, "100010101000" stuff, were derived from the I Ching, which contains symbols that essentially consist of two elements, solid lines and broken lines.) I'm surprised nobody mentioned Chinese influences of earlier times, such as various inventions like paper and gun powder. Overall, the influence of China over Europe was quite small and subtle.
|
|
Scytho-Sarmatian
Earl
Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 290
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Mar-2005 at 03:38 |
Yes, that may be true, but we are mainly talking about the classical period here.
|
|
Liang Jieming
Knight
Joined: 30-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 65
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-Mar-2005 at 06:22 |
Well, envoys from Rome are supposed to have reached the Han dynasty
though even then people were skeptical of these "envoys" and suspected
they were merely merchants posing as envoys to get better
treatment/trade rights etc. Apparently from the records, the
gifts they presented to the Han officials were not rich or precious
enough making them suspect.
As for a Chinese envoy to Rome, the Han dynasty tried sending a few but
the furthest one ever got was to the edge of the Mediterranean
somewhere along the Syrian coast. He turned back allegedly
because a local sailor told him Rome was still very, very far away and
the journey would be very dangerous. Pity. He was
practically at Rome's doorstep.
|
|
J.Caesar
Janissary
Joined: 23-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Apr-2006 at 22:25 |
Anyone heard of the loss legions. Persians could have sent Roman prisoners there as slaves to the Chinese dynasty. The Persians had enorous respect for the Romans as fighters. There was evidence I heard that there were Chinses writings of warriors wth caucsion features who used 'turtle shell' fighting style and had enormous barvery. Never know.
|
|
Elerosse
Immortal Guard
Joined: 21-May-2006
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-May-2006 at 05:40 |
Can't really find the source, but Ban Chao, the chinese general during East-Han period did send envoys to Rome. There were also some theories saying that Han traded military technology to Parthians, for instance the crossbows, for retrun of parthian horses and gold.
|
人生自古谁无死,留取丹心照汗青
- 文天祥
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-May-2006 at 12:55 |
Originally posted by J.Caesar
Anyone heard of the loss legions. Persians could have sent Roman prisoners there as slaves to the Chinese dynasty. The Persians had enorous respect for the Romans as fighters. There was evidence I heard that there were Chinses writings of warriors wth caucsion features who used 'turtle shell' fighting style and had enormous barvery. Never know. |
Yes i have heard of them also. I also read that when they fought they would have been 70 years old, 70 year old men arent brave. I also read (chinese military website) that they established a town and mixed with the locals. So these offspring would not have shown predominant caucasoid features.
|
|
Imperator Invictus
Caliph
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3151
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-May-2006 at 11:32 |
As for a Chinese envoy to Rome, the Han dynasty tried sending a few but
the furthest one ever got was to the edge of the Mediterranean
somewhere along the Syrian coast. He turned back allegedly
because a local sailor told him Rome was still very, very far away and
the journey would be very dangerous. Pity. He was
practically at Rome's doorstep. |
According to Gibbon, a Chinese envoy was present at Aurelian's triumph celebration in Rome:
"The ambassadors of the most remote parts of the earth, of thiopia, Arabia, Persia, Bactriana, India, and China,
all remarkable by their rich or singular dresses, displayed the fame
and power of the Roman emperor, who exposed likewise to the public view
the presents that he had received, and particularly a great number of
crowns of gold, the offerings of grateful cities."
However, I have not been able to track down where he got that
information. I think he referred a lot to the Historia Augusta, which
mentions something similar, but makes no reference to China.
So I think Gibbon extrapolated and made it up. (which is a technique that seems to be common in his works).
|
|
Decebal
Arch Duke
Digital Prometheus
Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-May-2006 at 13:07 |
Originally posted by Liang Jieming
Well, envoys from Rome are supposed to have reached the Han dynasty though even then people were skeptical of these "envoys" and suspected they were merely merchants posing as envoys to get better treatment/trade rights etc. Apparently from the records, the gifts they presented to the Han officials were not rich or precious enough making them suspect.
As for a Chinese envoy to Rome, the Han dynasty tried sending a few but the furthest one ever got was to the edge of the Mediterranean somewhere along the Syrian coast. He turned back allegedly because a local sailor told him Rome was still very, very far away and the journey would be very dangerous. Pity. He was practically at Rome's doorstep.
|
I believe that the closest they got was somewhere in the vicinity of the Tigris, in the Parthian empire. Had they been at the edge of the Mediterranean, they would have been in the Roman Empire already.
|
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi
|
|
The Charioteer
Colonel
Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-May-2006 at 14:48 |
Originally posted by Decebal
I believe that the closest they got was somewhere in the vicinity of the Tigris, in the Parthian empire. Had they been at the edge of the Mediterranean, they would have been in the Roman Empire already. |
Its recorded from Hou Han shu(The book of later Han), the Han emissary Gan ying sent by Ban chao(Han protector general of "western region"), travelled to the western border of Anxi(Parthia), and reached Tiaozhi, bordering "western sea".But, upon hearing tales that this "western sea" is dangerous to cross by Anxi sailors, Gan Ying turned back.(some believe its the tale of "siren" that Gan ying heard, hes apparently impressed by such tale.)
wiki identify Tiaozhi with Characene, as those who argue the "western sea" Gan ying reached is Persia Gulf.
However others disagree, they say Persian Gulf is to the south of Parthia, there is noway it should be referred as "western sea". (and this dosent seem to match the tale of "Siren")
They identify Tiaozhi with Antiochia, say Gan ying actually reached eastern shore of Mediteranean.
Other sources say he only reached Caspian sea or black sea, but are less convincing.
Gan ying didnt reach Rome, but definately not just the vicinity of Tigris.
Edited by The Charioteer - 28-May-2006 at 20:16
|
|