Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Norse tech and the settlement of the Americas

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 9>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Norse tech and the settlement of the Americas
    Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:02

Here there are more reasons why the Norse could conquer the Americas, Russia and large part of Western Europe: theirs ship technology. First, let's see the tools norse have to build theirs ships and other products. It is very surprising they had very advanced tools for the time, particularly if compared with other peoples of the time.

 
longships,
 

Master shipbuilders had complete sets of iron tools for woodcrafts

 
They had complete sets of tools that included drilling tools and saws. They had a modern appareance.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:13
Originally posted by pinguin

Here there are more reasons why the Norse could conquer the Americas



Well, I don't know about that ... they came off rather badly in most of their violent encounters with the Skraelings.
Back to Top
Count Belisarius View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Magister Militum

Joined: 25-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
  Quote Count Belisarius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:17
Somebody said something about the vikings losing to Christianity I was under the impression that they converted to Christianity, In Beowulf it sounded like they were Christian anyway. 


Defenders of Ulthuan, Cult of Asuryan (57 Kills and counting)


Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:22
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

Somebody said something about the vikings losing to Christianity I was under the impression that they converted to Christianity, In Beowulf it sounded like they were Christian anyway. 


I wouldn't say they "lost" so much as they assimilated (and subsequently ceased to be a dynamic, expanding power).

As far as Beowulf - I don't really think the references are Christian at all. "God" is named but he has all the qualities of Odin, he grants victory to warriors, demands that leaders support the tribe, and gives rewards to those who embrace the values of the pagan warriors: valour, courage, and pride. I think he was just renamed for an Anglo-Saxon audience in the copies that we have.


Edited by edgewaters - 16-Nov-2008 at 03:31
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:22
On skraelings:
 
Well, that´s sort of tragic and funny at the same time. Just imagine, they were the people that caused fear in Europe, where the faithfull praid "Save us god from the violence of vikings". They were respected as tough warriors from Scandinavia and Russia to the Mediterranean sea.
 
However, norse didn't do pretty well against the Skraelings, who were probably Inuits, Amerindians or both. One should not forget that against theirs enemies in Greenland and the Americas they didn't have horses, firearms or full iron armors. Fighting at foot, and even with iron swords, they could be defeated by hard fighters as theirs enemies were.
 
 


Edited by pinguin - 16-Nov-2008 at 03:24
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:29
Originally posted by edgewaters

Originally posted by Count Belisarius

Somebody said something about the vikings losing to Christianity I was under the impression that they converted to Christianity, In Beowulf it sounded like they were Christian anyway. 


I wouldn't say they "lost" so much as they assimilated (and subsequently ceased to be a dynamic, expanding power).
 
Well, Christianity not only weakened theirs identity but also introduced monarchy. Besides, the demographic drain produced by the abstinence of catholic religious people, probably helped to control the Norse demographic boom, that was one of the reason why they wanted to conquer new lands.
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 03:40
Originally posted by pinguin

However, norse didn't do pretty well against the Skraelings, who were probably Inuits, Amerindians or both. One should not forget that against theirs enemies in Greenland and the Americas they didn't have horses, firearms or full iron armors. Fighting at foot, and even with iron swords, they could be defeated by hard fighters as theirs enemies were.


There's one account of an encounter with a Dorset hunting party, who are thought not to have been armed with weapons of war at all - just fishing harpoons (perhaps used in conjunction with atlatls). The Norse were terrified. It's actually a rather amusing account from one the Iceland saga:

Now it came to pass that a bull, which belonged to Karlsefni's people, rushed out of the wood and bellowed loudly at the same time. The Skrælingar, frightened thereat, rushed away to their canoes, and rowed south along the coast. There was then nothing seen of them for three weeks together. When that time was gone by, there was seen approaching from the south a great crowd of Skrælingar boats, coming down upon them like a stream, the staves this time being all brandished in the direction opposite to the sun's motion, and the Skrælingar were all howling loudly. Then took they and bare red shields to meet them. They encountered one another and fought, and there was a great shower of missiles. The Skrælingar had also war-slings, or catapults.

Then Karlsefni and Snorri see that the Skrælingar are bringing up poles, with a very large ball attached to each, to be compared in size to a sheep's stomach, dark in colour; and these flew over Karlsefni's company towards the land, and when they came down they struck the ground with a hideous noise. This produced great terror in Karlsefni and his company, so that their only impulse was to retreat up the country along the river, because it seemed as if crowds of Skrælingar were driving at them from all sides. And they stopped not until they came to certain crags. There they offered them stern resistance.

Freydis came out and saw how they were retreating. She called out, "Why run you away from such worthless creatures, stout men that ye are, when, as seems to me likely, you might slaughter them like so many cattle? Let me but have a weapon, I think I could fight better than any of you." They gave no heed to what she said. Freydis endeavoured to accompany them, still she soon lagged behind, because she was not well; she went after them into the wood, and the Skrælingar directed their pursuit after her. She came upon a dead man; Thorbrand, Snorri's son, with a flat stone fixed in his head; his sword lay beside him, so she took it up and prepared to defend herself therewith.

Then came the Skrælingar upon her. She let down her sark and struck her breast with the naked sword. At this they were frightened, rushed off to their boats, and fled away. Karlsefni and the rest came up to her and praised her zeal.


It may give some hints as to why they came off badly ... we see that first of all, they were not a war-party and were about rather peaceful endeavours. We also see that the Vikings were practically as superstitious as the Aztecs later would be, and had a difficult time dealing with the unfamiliar: mere fishing harpoons with the float bladders attached frightened them terribly.

Back to Top
Count Belisarius View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Magister Militum

Joined: 25-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
  Quote Count Belisarius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 04:00
Originally posted by edgewaters

Originally posted by Count Belisarius

Somebody said something about the vikings losing to Christianity I was under the impression that they converted to Christianity, In Beowulf it sounded like they were Christian anyway. 


I wouldn't say they "lost" so much as they assimilated (and subsequently ceased to be a dynamic, expanding power).

As far as Beowulf - I don't really think the references are Christian at all. "God" is named but he has all the qualities of Odin, he grants victory to warriors, demands that leaders support the tribe, and gives rewards to those who embrace the values of the pagan warriors: valour, courage, and pride. I think he was just renamed for an Anglo-Saxon audience in the copies that we have.
 
 
But it does say that when Grendel came the people turned away form God and to pagan idols and superstitions which just made matters worse, and God grants victory and blessings to anyone who has faith in him and Beowulf did and he is frequently giving God thanks for his victories, and leaders supporting their people and warriors being brave and courageous isn't nessesarily a pagan value. Besides why would the anglo saxons have givne it a second glance if it was pagan? but we are getting of topic here so let's go back to viking tech  


Defenders of Ulthuan, Cult of Asuryan (57 Kills and counting)


Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 04:10
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

But it does say that when Grendel came the people turned away form God and to pagan idols and superstitions which just made matters worse


Well who knows ... the original may have just said that when Grendel came, the people turned to Christianity which made them weak.

Besides why would the anglo saxons have givne it a second glance if it was pagan?


In the 9th or 10th century? Anglo-Saxons were just barely Christian in this period. Most of the population remained pagan, Christianity was sometimes the "public" religion and the religion of the rulers, but not the private religion of most of the people. They still celebrated pagan festivals, retold pagan legends associated with landmarks, and so on. For public purposes, they would just swap out the pagan figure of any story for God, the Devil, or a saint. Very, very common.

They're finding pagan sites in England dating as late as the 1600s ...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3517036.ece

Not to mention that during the period the poem was written, England was being settled (and, at times, ruled) by Danes who brought their pagan religion with them.


Edited by edgewaters - 16-Nov-2008 at 04:20
Back to Top
Count Belisarius View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Magister Militum

Joined: 25-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
  Quote Count Belisarius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 04:18
Originally posted by edgewaters

Originally posted by Count Belisarius

But it does say that when Grendel came the people turned away form God and to pagan idols and superstitions which just made matters worse


Well who knows ... the original may have just said that when Grendel came, the people turned to Christianity which made them weak.




 
 
No it very clearly states that they were christian pre-Grendel, and as
I said before we're getting off topic so lets get back on topic 


Edited by Count Belisarius - 16-Nov-2008 at 04:18


Defenders of Ulthuan, Cult of Asuryan (57 Kills and counting)


Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 11:51
Originally posted by edgewaters

...
It may give some hints as to why they came off badly ... we see that first of all, they were not a war-party and were about rather peaceful endeavours. We also see that the Vikings were practically as superstitious as the Aztecs later would be, and had a difficult time dealing with the unfamiliar: mere fishing harpoons with the float bladders attached frightened them terribly.

 
Yeap. However, spearthrowers and composite arpoons should had produced a terrible impression on Norse if one of them was hit directly. Those weapons are designed to kill whales! The spearthrower is an ancient weapon that was still used by Aztecs in battle, and that Australian Aborigines never abandoned for one reason: they were efficient.
 
Anyways, it is likely Norse settlement on Greenland contributed to the extinction of the Dorset culture, anyways. But it is true, the Norse that came to Greenland were mainly merchants and town people, they were not the Vikings that went to attack Europe.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Jams View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

Suspended

Joined: 06-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 365
  Quote Jams Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 12:08
I don't know about Beowulf, but the Danes weren't Christians, including those in the Danelaw area. They were christened around 980 or so, by the king Harald Bluetooth. Many of the Norse remained pagan, espeicially in remote places of Sweden And Norway. I suppose some of the earlier kings were allies with the Christrian world,
whatever that means.
 
The Anglo-Saxong were Christians, and England already were Christian to some extent before even the Anglo-Saxons came.
 
It's not like Grendel actually existed.
 
Originally posted by pinguin

 
Anyways, it is likely Norse settlement on Greenland contributed to the extinction of the Dorset culture, anyways. But it is true, the Norse that came to Greenland were mainly merchants and town people, they were not the Vikings that went to attack Europe.
  
 
That is true, calling them Vikings is false. They were settlers, and they thought the came to virgin land. They were obviously few people, and they were overwhelmed by numbers in that conflict.


Edited by Jams - 16-Nov-2008 at 12:12
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 12:16

Details of the norse ship construction. Before turning to iron, Norse used the traditional techniques known in Europe and the Mediterranean since Roman times.

Using wood trenails to ensure ribs:
*%20Trenails%20used%20to%20anchor%20ribs%20and%20stakes.
 
Using lashes:
 
Three%20strakes%20lashed%20perpendicularly%20to%20one%20of%20the%20ribs%20of%20the%20uncompleted%20vessel
 
 
These techniques were used by people around Eurasia. Romans preffered trenails, while arabs used mainly ropes to put together the hulls. Norse, however, started to use iron nails to put the ship together.
 
 
And this is from Nova:
 
 
The secret of the Viking ship lay in its unique construction. Using a broad ax rather than a saw, expert woodworkers would first split oak tree trunks into long, thin planks. They then fastened the boards with iron nails to a single sturdy keel and then to each other, one plank overlapping the next. The Vikings gave shape to the hull using this "clinker" technique rather than the more conventional method of first building an inner skeleton for the hull.
So the differences in shipbuilding were:
 
(1) By putting a plank overlapping the other it gaves better hydrodinamics to the norse ship than any other kind of ship build in Europe or the Mediterranean.
 
(2) By using iron nails they build stong and light ships as any other.
 
 
rivets%20and%20washers
clinker%20construction
rivets
 
So, Norse had the more advanced ship of theirs times, up to the Age of Discovery. And that's was one of the main secrets of theirs success.
 
Just a thought. The cultures that reached the Americas (Norse) and that conquered the Pacific (Polynesians) were the BEST sailors in the world. They were so because they had the more advanced technology of theirs time, Norse had the longship; Polynesians the catamaran.
 
Crossing the oceans was possible for those people alone because of technology. If other cultures had attempted the same they had ended at the bottom of the seaLOL . So, forget about Romans or Phoenicians reaching the Americas; they didn't 
 
 
 


Edited by pinguin - 16-Nov-2008 at 12:28
Back to Top
Jams View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

Suspended

Joined: 06-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 365
  Quote Jams Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 12:33
The ships were very much the reason for the success. Tests have shown that they were very fast, and that they were essentially huge dinghies.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 12:44
And what a success. These are maps of the Norse expansion. They contributed to the rise of some of the most important European superpowers of today: Russia, Britain and France, for instance, and they even had an important role to play in Sicily and Turkey. Besides, the knowledge they had about Greenland and Newfoundland probably helped Columbus to reach the Americas.
 
Maps:
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 15:57
Two things:

Beowulf was written down by Christians, that's the reason of all the links to the good Christian god and the evil Grendel, descendant of Cain. The original story did probably not contain these things.

---

The settlers of Greenland and Vinland were not Vikings. They weren't even regular warriors: they were farmers, fishermen and craftsmen who brought their women to settle in a new land. Though the ancient Scandinavian society was very martial, and any free man - at least in theory - were supposed to be able to fight the settlers had probably very little experience with outright battle. These voyages were as said not Viking raids, so they're not comparable to what was going on in Britain and France.
Back to Top
Count Belisarius View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Magister Militum

Joined: 25-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
  Quote Count Belisarius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 16:07
I've pointed a bunch of stuff out on Beowulf, now since no one seems to be listening could we get back on topic...please?


Defenders of Ulthuan, Cult of Asuryan (57 Kills and counting)


Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 17:04
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

I've pointed a bunch of stuff out on Beowulf, now since no one seems to be listening could we get back on topic...please?


I read it, and I pointed out that it is believed that all the Christian elements were added later. Neither the Danes, Geates or Swedes were Christians when the story is set.
Back to Top
Count Belisarius View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Magister Militum

Joined: 25-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1109
  Quote Count Belisarius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 18:57
According to Jams during the time the story is set they were christian, now could we get back on topic,
 
 
BTW what is the latest on the heavner rune stone? 


Defenders of Ulthuan, Cult of Asuryan (57 Kills and counting)


Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2008 at 19:10
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

According to Jams during the time the story is set they were christian, now could we get back on topic,

Not at all. The story is set in the 6th century, Christianity arrived several centuries later.
 
 
Originally posted by Count Belisarius

BTW what is the latest on the heavner rune stone? 

Still considered a fraud, as far as I know.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.