Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Documentray: Stolen Kosovo

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 10>
Author
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Documentray: Stolen Kosovo
    Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:41
I do the question is if the JNA did that or not. Seems kind of a waste of resources to be honest.


waste? It through thousands upon thousands into neighboring countries and created huge problems for NATO, which now had to deal with a mass of refugees, not to mention nearly completely distabilizing Albania and Macedonia. My family, btw, in Albania held refugees during this time. Over two families between 2 apartments.

The general conclusion is about 2,000 from BOTH sides because that is how many people have been found.


Im going to stop arguing this now since Im only repeating myself: there are thousands more still missing. What happened to all of them. If you want to see their names, they are today in central Prishtina, their pictures and names are posted on a wall. I posted a documentary on Kosova which was made a few months back. Its in one of the old topics on it.

They did have a pretty central core or at least a few heads such as Hashim "The Snake" Thaci that got through his war crimes with a slap on the wrist. I know the KLA is loved now because the Albanians romanticize them as heroes when really they are terrorists tied to the Albanian Mafia.


Simply throwing insults doesnt really help your case too much...
Back to Top
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:46
Except my source which you must have skipped over, was your souce also. The difference was that yours was out dated, and it contradicted it, directly.


No, your source is the "emperors new clothes" which is essentially devoted towards attacking anything America on the Balkans. Just as I stated before.
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:47
"waste? It through thousands upon thousands into neighboring countries and created huge problems for NATO, which now had to deal with a mass of refugees, not to mention nearly completely distabilizing Albania and Macedonia. My family, btw, in Albania held refugees during this time. Over two families between 2 apartments."

Yes a waste with no proof. The facts show that refugees starting moving because of the NATO bombing campaign.
 
"Im going to stop arguing this now since Im only repeating myself: there are thousands more still missing. What happened to all of them. If you want to see their names, they are today in central Prishtina, their pictures and names are posted on a wall. I posted a documentary on Kosova which was made a few months back. Its in one of the old topics on it. "

Missing and dead are two very different things. There were "missing" people in Srebrenica too that were counted dead, only to be found voting during the elections.

Hmmm.
 
Interesting fact. Out of all the Balkan nations, Serbia has the most refugees displaced of any nation.
 
"Simply throwing insults doesnt really help your case too much..."
 
What insults? I didn't insult you at all.
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:47
"No, your source is the "emperors new clothes" which is essentially devoted towards attacking anything America on the Balkans. Just as I stated before."

Right right, well regardless of what their agenda is they quoted the Finnish team, the exact lady you quoted in 2003, to say in 2007 that there was no massacre.
 
In any case no I didn't get it from Emperor's New Clothes.


Edited by Carpathian Wolf - 16-Jun-2008 at 05:48
Back to Top
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:50
Interesting fact. Out of all the Balkan nations, Serbia has the most refugees displaced of any nation.


Interesting... perhaps you should really think about why it happened.

to say in 2007 that there was no massacre.


From Russian and Serbian sources of course.
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:59
"Interesting... perhaps you should really think about why it happened. "
 
Krajina, Bosnia, Kosovo. How's that?
 
"From Russian and Serbian sources of course."

Ah okay ;) And they're lying right? Instead of just admiting that your source was out dated now you want to say they lied?
 
One more time what insult did I use?
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:03
"And here is what its commander in chief Hashim Thaci had to say to the BBC regarding Racak: “We had a key unit in the region. It was a fierce battle. We regrettably had many victims. But so did the Serbs.”
 
Thaci himself said it was a battle. Doesn't mention a massacre.
 
Perhaps you want a French perspective?:
 

The images filmed during the attack on the village of Racak contradict the Albanians' and the OSCE's version Racak.

Did the American ambassador William Walker, chief of the OSCE cease-fire verification mission to Kosovo, show undue haste when, last Saturday, he publicly accused Serbian security forces of having on the previous day executed in cold blood some forty Albanian peasants in the little village of Racak?

The question deserves to be raised in the light of a series of disturbing facts. In order to understand, it is important to go through the events of the crucial day of Friday in chronological order. At dawn, intervention forces of the Serbian police encircled and then attacked the village of Racak, known as a bastion of UCK (Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA) separatist guerrillas.

The police didn't seem to have anything to hide, since, at 8:30 a.m., they invited a television team (two journalists of AP TV) to film the operation. A warning was also given to the OSCE, which sent two cars with American diplomatic licenses to the scene. The observers spent the whole day posted on a hill where they could watch the village. At 3 p.m., a police communique reached the international press center in Pristina announcing that 15 UCK "terrorists" had been killed in combat in Racak and that a large stock of weapons had been seized.

At 3:30 p.m., the police forces, followed by the AP TV team, left the village, carrying with them a heavy 12.7 mm machine gun, two automatic rifles, two rifles with telescopic sights and some thirty Chinese-made kalashnikovs. At 4:40 p.m., a French journalist drove through the village and met three orange OSCE vehicles. The international observers were chatting calmly with three middle-aged Albanians in civilian clothes. They were looking for eventual civilian casualties. Returning to the village at 6 p.m., the journalist saw the observers taking away two very slightly injured old men and two women. The observers, who did not seem particularly worried, did not mention anything in particular to the journalist. They simply said that they were "unable to evaluate the battle toll".

The scene of Albanian corpses in civilian clothes lined up in a ditch which would shock the whole world was not discovered until the next morning, around 9 a.m., by journalists, soon followed by OSCE observers. At that time, the village was once again taken over by armed UCK soldiers who led the foreign visitors, as soon as they arrived, toward the supposed massacre site. Around noon, William Walker in person arrived and expressed his indignation. All the Albanian witnesses gave the same version: at midday, the policemen forced their way into homes and separated the women from the men, whom they led to the hilltops to execute them without more ado. The most disturbing fact is that the pictures filmed by the AP TV journalists -- which Le Figaro was shown yesterday -- radically contradict that version. It was in fact an empty village that the police entered in the morning, sticking close to the walls. The shooting was intense, as they were fired on from UCK trenches dug into the hillside.

The fighting intensified sharply on the hilltops above the village. Watching from below, next to the mosque, the AP journalists understood that the UCK guerrillas, encircled, were trying desperately to break out. A score of them in fact succeeded, as the police themselves admitted. What really happened? During the night, could the UCK have gathered the bodies, in fact killed by Serb bullets, to set up a scene of cold-blooded massacre? A disturbing fact: Saturday morning the journalists found only very few cartridges around the ditch where the massacre supposedly took place. Intelligently, did the UCK seek to turn a military defeat into a political victory? Only a credible international inquiry would make it possible to resolve these doubts. The reluctance of the Belgrade government, which has consistently denied the massacre, thus seems incomprehensible.

-- Renaud Girard for Le Figaro

Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:07
Some more? Why of course! :)
 

Where the Racak Dead Really Coldly Massacred?

Le Monde, 21 January 1999
by Christophe Chatelot

======================================================

The version of the facts spread by the Kosovo Albanians leaves several questions unanswered. Belgrade says that the forty-five victims were UCK "terrorst, fallen during combat, but rejects any international investigation.

Isn't the Racak massacre just too perfect? New eye witness accounts gathered on Monday, January 18, by Le Monde, throw doubt on the reality of the horrible spectacle of dozens of piled up bodies of Albanians supposedly summarily executed by Serb security forces last Friday.

Were the victims executed in cold blood, as UCK says, or killed in combat, as the Serbs say? According to the version gathered and broadcast by the press and the Kosovo verification mission (KVM) observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the massacre took place on January 15 in the early after-noon. "Masked" Serbian police entered the village of Racak which had been shelled all morning by Yugoslav army tanks. The broke down the doors and entered people's homes, ordering the women to stay there while they pushed the men to the edge of the village to calmly execute them with a bullet through the head, not without first having tortured and mutilated several. Some witnesses even said that the Serbs sang as they did their dirty work, before leaving the village around 3:30p.m.

The account by two journalists of Associated Press TV television (AP TV) who filmed the police operation in Racak contradicts this tale. When at 10 a.m. they entered the village in the wake of a police armored vehicle, the village was nearly deserted. They advanced through the streets under the fire of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UCK) fighters lying in ambush in the woods above the village. The exchange of fire continued throughout the operation, with more or less intensity. The main fighting took place in the woods. The Albanians who had fled the village when the first Serb shells were fired at dawn tried to escape. There they ran into Serbian police who had surrounded the village. The UCK was trapped in between. The object of the violent police attack on Friday was a stronghold of UCK Albanian independence fighters.

Virtually all the inhabitants had fled Racak during the frightful Serb offensive of the summer of 1998. With few exceptions, they had not come back. "Smoke came from only two chimneys", noted one of the two AP TV reporters. The Serb operation was thus no surprise, nor was it a secret. On the morning of the attack, a police source tipped off AP TV: "Come to Racak, something is happening". At 10 a.m., the team was on the spot alongside the police; it filmed from a peak overlooking the village and then through the streets in the wake of an armored vehicle.

The OSCE was also warned of the action. At least two teams of international observers watched the fighting from a hill where they could see part of the village. They entered Racak shortly after the police left. They then questioned a few Albanians about the situation, trying to find out whether there were wounded civilians. Around 6 p.m., they took four persons -- two women and two old men -- who were very slightly wounded toward the dispensary of the neighboring town of Stimje. The verifiers said at that time that they were "incapable of establishing the number of casualties of that day of fighting".

The publicity given by the Serbian police to that operation was intense. At 10:30 a.m., it gave out its first press release. It announced that the police had "encircled the village of Racak with the aim of arresting the members of a terrorist group who killed a policeman" the previous Sunday. At 3 p.m., a first bulletin announced fifteen Albanians killed in fighting. The next day, Saturday, it welcomed the success of the operation which, it said, had resulted in the death of dozens of UCK "terrorists" and the capture of a large stock of weapons.

The attempt to arrest an Albanian presumed to have murdered a Serb policemen turned into a massacre. At 5:30 p.m., the police evacuated the site under the sporadic fire of a handful of UCK fighters who continued to hold out thanks to the steep and rough terrain. In no time, the first of the Albanians who had got away come back down into the village, those who had managed to hide came out in the open and three KVM vehicles drove into the village. One hour after the police left, night fell. The next morning, the press and the KVM came to see the damage caused by the fighting.

It was at this moment that, guided by the armed UCK fighters who had recaptured the village, they discovered the ditch where a score of bodies were piled up, almost exclusively men. At midday, the chief of the KVM in person, the American diplomat William Walker, arrived on the spot and declared his indignation at the atrocities committed by "the Serb police forces and the Yugoslav army". The condemnation was total, irrevocable.

And yet questions remain. How could the Serb police have gathered a group of men and led them calmly toward the execution site while they were constantly under fire from UCK fighters? How could the ditch located on the edge of Racak have escaped notice by local inhabitants familiar with the surroundings who were present before nightfall? Or by the observers who were present for over two hours in this tiny village? Why so few cartridges around the corpses, so little blood in the hollow road where twenty three people are supposed to have been shot at close range with several bullets in the head? Rather, weren't the bodies of the Albanians killed in combat by the Serb police gathered into the ditch to create a horror scene which was sure to have an appalling effect on public opinion? Don't the violence and rapidity of Belgrade's reaction, which gave the chief of the KVM forty-eight hours to leave Yugoslavia, show that the Yugoslavs are sure of what they are saying?

Only an international inquiry above all suspicion will make it possible to clarify these obscure points. Finnish and Belurussian legal doctors were expected to arrive in Pristina on Wednesday to attend the autopsies being carried out by Yugoslav doctors. The problem is that the Belgrade authorities have never been cooperative in this matter. Why? Whatever the conclusions of the investigators, the Racak massacre shows that the hope of soon reaching a settlement of the Kosovo crisis seems quite illusory.

-- Christophe Chatelot for Le Monde

Back to Top
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:21
Ah okay ;) And they're lying right? Instead of just admiting that your source was out dated now you want to say they lied?

One more time what insult did I use?


They played down Ranta's findings from the very moment they came out. In fact, before they were even seen. So, Im not saying that they are lying, but I dont have the context of anything said.

You clearly just attacked the KLA with one claim after another.

"And here is what its commander in chief Hashim Thaci had to say to the BBC regarding Racak: “We had a key unit in the region. It was a fierce battle. We regrettably had many victims. But so did the Serbs.”

Thaci himself said it was a battle. Doesn't mention a massacre.


He mentioned that there was fighting in Racak, he didnt say that the massacre didnt happen. This is completely taken out of context. Again its well known that the area was held by the KLA and there was major support for the KLA in the region as well. All the more reason to despise the populous.

So what about Tim Judah's account:

[quote]On January 8, in a well planned ambush, the KLA killed 3 Serbian policemen at the village of the town of Stimlje. Two days later, in another nearby village, they killed another policeman. Early on January 15th fighting broke out around the village of Racak. A few hours later the KLA retreated and the police entered the village. Several people were shot over the next few hours. A group of 30 men and boys hid in the cellar of a house." pg. 193 Kosovo: War and Revenge

The boy was sparred, as Judah goes on to say, since the intention was to kill the men, who were perceived as KLA troops whether they were or not.

Like I said before, people will right articles for different sides to back whichever one. Its the actual studies that carry weight. You have a nasty tendency to follow one particular side, you seem to source primarily from those websites which have an interest in putting blame on the US. I have yet to read a book on Kosovo, whether its from Misha Glenny or Tim Judah, or any other major writer on the area, that has given true credence to NATO being the cause of the flight or things along those lines.

The attacks by Albanians that happened after the campaign were directed toward Serb institutions since they were seen as a fault, not NATO. In fact that population praised the NATO bombing more then anything and considering it an end to things. But ofcourse their view on the event matters little. Why dont you go ask the people in the region what made them flee?

Edited by Theodore Felix - 16-Jun-2008 at 06:27
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:33
"They played down Ranta's findings from the very moment they came out. In fact, before they were even seen. So, Im not saying that they are lying, but I dont have the context of anything said. "
 
With good reason. The Finnish team even said there was no massacre (as well as every other team there.)
 
"You clearly just attacked the KLA with one claim after another."

Well what do you call people that abduct innocent civilians and take their body apart for the black market, get their funding through heroin and sex slave trade, start international wars by attacking police etc? I tend to call those terrorists.
 
"He mentioned that there was fighting in Racak, he didnt say that the massacre didnt happen. This is completely taken out of context. Again its well known that the area was held by the KLA and there was major support for the KLA in the region as well. All the more reason to despise the populous."

I don't think at the time there was such a notion as a massacre then. It was fabricated later on on a wider scale. Again the two journalists there explained it quite clearly. If there had been a massacre he would have mentioned it.
 
You assuming tha the Serbs would dispise the populace is a fallacy, you just want that to be true, but it doesn't act as proof.
 
"So what about Tim Judah's account:"
 
The account shows the KLA to be terrorists and provides no proof of civilians being executed. Only those men there and the Serbs knew if they were KLA or not. I tend to think that they are since attacking the police and hide amongst the populations is a typical KLA cowardly tactic.
Back to Top
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:35
With good reason. The Finnish team even said there was no massacre (as well as every other team there.)


The Finnish team's reports concluded that there were: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/298131.stm

Even the Contact Group came out and showed disdain for what happened, the UN came out to acknowledge it.

The account shows the KLA to be terrorists and provides no proof of civilians being executed. Only those men there and the Serbs knew if they were KLA or not. I tend to think that they are since attacking the police and hide amongst the populations is a typical KLA cowardly tactic.


The account says that the men who remained in the village were taken and killed. The killing could have very well been a retaliatory attack. The account mentions that the KLA retreated. The remaining men may have been they may have not been. What matters is that they were executed....

PS: Tim Judah acknowledged the massacre as well, if you read the book. Along with acknowledging that Serb forces pushed Albs out. But Im guessing that its all propaganda.


Edited by Theodore Felix - 16-Jun-2008 at 06:40
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:40
"Like I said before, people will right articles for different sides to back whichever one. Its the actual studies that carry weight. You have a nasty tendency to follow one particular side, you seem to source primarily from those websites which have an interest in putting blame on the US. I have yet to read a book on Kosovo, whether its from Misha Glenny or Tim Judah, or any other major writer on the area, that has given true credence to NATO being the cause of the flight or things along those lines. "
 
And the actual studies like the forensic ones say there was no massacre. So i'm asking you now, why do you still believe it?
 
"The attacks by Albanians that happened after the campaign were directed toward Serb institutions since they were seen as a fault, not NATO. In fact that population praised the NATO bombing more then anything and considering it an end to things. But ofcourse their view on the event matters little. Why dont you go ask the people in the region what made them flee? "
 
Yea the Albanians did attack Serbs even after the war. Destroying hundreds of churches as hundreds of mosques go up, funded by Saudi Wahabis, gold leafed and all when the Albanian population is what? 60 percent unemployed? Maybe more?
 
I have no doubt that the KLA supporters in Kosovo won't admit that NATO was the cause of the refugees. Perhaps it was the Serbs and they feared vengeance for what they had done to the Serbs from WW1 until the present.
 
Ask someone in the region? Like the Albanian girl i mentioned whos Gorani boyfriend was beaten up while she was sold off to the Arab Emirates by the KLA? I will next time I get a chance.
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:45
"The Finnish team's reports concluded that there were: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/298131.stm "

Dated 1999. Nice try. :)
 
Again the team said quite the opposite in 2007.
 
"The account says that the men who remained in the village were taken and killed. The killing could have very well been a retaliatory attack. The account mentions that the KLA retreated. The remaining men may have been they may have not been. What matters is that they were executed.... "

And how does he know?
 
Summery executions are nothing new nor illegal especially under the circumstances.
 
"PS: Tim Judah acknowledged the massacre as well, if you read the book. Along with acknowledging that Serb forces pushed Albs out. But Im guessing that its all propaganda. "

I'd have to see the exact wording. Serb forces pushed albs out. Pushed out? Out of a door way? Airplane? Car? And which Serb admited this? For example a "Serb" admited to executing civilians in Srebrenica. It was found out he was actually a Croatian soldier and was never in Srebrenica alone. He had lied.
Back to Top
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:04
Summery executions are nothing new nor illegal especially under the circumstances.


Execution of unarmed civilians is a crime under any book. There is no evidence that they were or werent, they were simply men( and one woman) who were in the wrong place.

Dated 1999. Nice try. :)


Thats when the report came out. In 2003 she was still sticking to her story, but according to an unsourced article that quotes from another Serbian source, they said it was a lie... suddenly. I have no direct evidence where she came out and suddenly denied it. If this was so plausible, why hasnt it become such a scandal yet. Compare this to the recent Carla Del Ponte event.

I'd have to see the exact wording. S


Read the book and stop basing your views on biased commentaries and articles then.

Yea the Albanians did attack Serbs even after the war. Destroying hundreds of churches as hundreds of mosques go up, funded by Saudi Wahabis, gold leafed and all when the Albanian population is what? 60 percent unemployed? Maybe more?


What do Mosques have to do with what happened? Why are you jumping from one thing to another like this, stick to the issue at hand. The fact is that the Albs saw Serbs as the cause of what happened, not NATO.

Edited by Theodore Felix - 16-Jun-2008 at 07:12
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:13
"Execution of unarmed civilians is a crime under any book. There is no evidence that they were or werent, they were simply men( and one woman) who were in the wrong place."
 
You don't know they were simply men and the fact that one was a woman doesn't pull at my heart at all. Women can be KLA just as much as men. In the documentary they had one of the old men being beat up by two KLA women.
 
"Thats when the report came out. In 2003 she was still sticking to her story, but according to an unsourced article that quotes from another Serbian source, they said it was a lie... suddenly. I have no direct evidence where she came out and suddenly denied it. If this was so plausible, why hasnt it become such a scandal yet. Compare this to the recent Carla Del Ponte event. "

Actually it says where the article was from. As far as we know in 2007 she has denied there was any massacre as well as the rest of the forensic teams.
 
Carla Del Ponte, what does that have to do it with it? Interesting that you bring her up.
 
"Read the book and stop basing your views on biased commentaries and articles then."

Pot. Kettle. Black.
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:15
"What do Mosques have to do with what happened? Why are you jumping from one thing to another like this, stick to the issue at hand. The fact is that the Albs saw Serbs as the cause of what happened, not NATO."

Germans in WW2 saw the Jews as the source of their problem too due to the propaganda being used.
 
I'm bringing it up because I personally think it is disgusting to say that the Serbs tried to ethnicly cleans Kosovo of Albania when we take into consideration the history of the province for the last 500 years. Or even just the last 100 years. How Kosovo got turned from a Serb majority to a Serb minority. How you can claim ethnic cleansing when Serbs are driven out churches destroyed as wahabi funded mosques go up. If this doesn't raise any alarms to you, i'm sorry friend but you're walking the same pattern as the tricked Germans in WW2.
Back to Top
Theodore Felix View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
  Quote Theodore Felix Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:16

Actually it says where the article was from. As far as we know in 2007 she has denied there was any massacre as well as the rest of the forensic teams.

Carla Del Ponte, what does that have to do it with it? Interesting that you bring her up.


Meaning that as of yet there has been no major pieces that have come out by any large credited news sources of this denial. Del Ponte's claims have made the media all over, by contrast. Why has this apparent denial not made headlines?

How you can claim ethnic cleansing when Serbs are driven out churches destroyed as wahabi funded mosques go up.


Its called Revenge. And its dealt with extensively in Tim Judah's book. The mosques been funded by Saudi's are mostly restorations. 200+ mosques were destroyed during the war.

Pot. Kettle. Black.


Its not. Im asking you to look at a major study instead of simply giving me sources that are so obviously pro-Serb biased,

Edited by Theodore Felix - 16-Jun-2008 at 07:21
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:23
"Meaning that as of yet there has been no major pieces that have come out by any large credited news sources of this denial. Del Ponte's claims have made the media all over, by contrast. Why has this apparent denial not made headlines?"
 
With the trend of disinformation concerning the situation at hand are you surprised? I havn't heard anything about Carla Del Ponte in America either. I had to watch outside news for it.
 
"Its called Revenge. And its dealt with extensively in Tim Judah's book. The mosques been funded by Saudi's are mostly restorations. 200+ mosques were destroyed during the war."

Revenge? I call it continuation of hundreds year old trend of Albanian expansion into Serbian territory. For there to be revenge, the Serbs would have had to start something.
 
200+ mosques destroyed? I havn't seen any of this. Can you show me? I can flood this thread with hundreds of pictures of churches destroyed.
 
And even if they are restorations, funny that the saudis are funding it, but I guess since they sent mujehadeen too there is no surprise. IT still doesn't excuse why churches and monestaries are attacked and destroyed, why the monks, nuns and priests have to live under the protection of KFOR.
Back to Top
Carpathian Wolf View Drop Down
General
General

BANNED

Joined: 06-Jun-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 884
  Quote Carpathian Wolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:24
"Its not. Im asking you to look at a major study instead of simply giving me sources that are so obviously pro-Serb biased,"

The UN forensic teams are pro-Serb biased? Spain is pro Serbian for example?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:25
How exactly is B92 unreliable or biased? It is about one of the few channels in Serbia that has remained unbiased throughout the years. Unless of course something like serbianna.com suites your fancy.




Edited by es_bih - 16-Jun-2008 at 07:25
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.