Is Germanic a subgroup of the Iranian languages?

What they mean is the direct evidence of Germanic speaking people . How ever in pure archeologically sense we started far earlier then that see a new culture in sour then parts of Scandinavia that did not seem to be the same as the megalith culture. This is believed by many to be the ancestors of the Germanic people or late dialectal IE speaking people. If the Corded Ware was a Indo-European speaking horizon then the tribes living in Scandinavia became Germanic those to the east became Baltic and Slavic and those in western parts of Europe became Italic and Celtic this is just one of many theories that I have read. Some believe that some IE tribes to a rather cold route and eventually settled in Europe.. probably passing trough Finno-Ugric tribes and Finnic and Germanic hade contact logically with each other trough loan words and some have argued that the Germanic stress might have develop from influence of Finno-Ugric that always have it on the first syllable and culture. And many more theories how ever Cyrus no one speaks of such an illogical argumentation and theory you have.

This old Germanic culture was very characteristically with all the burial mounds like this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gravh%C3%B6g_G%C3%A5rdst%C3%A5nga.jpg

and germanic mythology such as the horse dragging chariot with the sun in.

The Germanic people might have started to move out south according to wikiepdia.

''The Nordic Bronze Age was characterized by a warm climate that began with a climate change circa 2700 BC (comparable to that of present-day Mediterranean). The warm climate permitted a relatively dense population and good farming, for example grapes were grown in Scandinavia at this time. However a small change in climate between 850 BC and 760 BC and a more radical one circa 650 BC brought in a deteriorating, wetter and colder climate (sometimes believed to have given rise to the legend of the Fimbulwinter).It seems likely that the climate pushed the Germanic tribes southwards into continental Europe. During this time there was Scandinavian influence in Eastern Europe (and a thousand years later, the numerous East Germanic tribes that claimed Scandinavian origins (e.g. Langobards, Burgundians, Goths and Heruls) rendered Scandinavia (Scandza) the name womb of nations in Jordanes' Getica).

In fact, the Scandinavian influence on Pomerania and northern Poland from period III onwards was so considerable that this region is sometimes included in the Nordic Bronze Age culture (Dabrowski 1989:73).

Due to the climate change and the loss of population, the Nordic countries are generally described as going through a cultural recession at the end of the Bronze Age, lasting for a thousand years until the rise of another advanced civilization in the so-called Viking Age.''

Also now back to linguistics. You see you just ignore every dot of evidence we come with.

I mean acording to you Iranian also went trough grimms law and lol... I mean count to number 5 in Persian and count to number five in Germanic language and you will hopefully get what I mean.

You also seem to ignore how Proto-Germanic connects with PIE and also how very rational Iranian connects to Indic. And the fact that all IE languages have similarities.

And you say you answer all questions.. what a load of lies from you Cyrus you run from arguments. And reaped the same crap over and over again leading us to repeat ourselves over and over again.

One thing you have not answered is that you do not use the comparative method but cling on to a rather amateur lexical. comparison that is easy to do with all IE languages without taking respect to the phonological history, time depth, morphologic history and does not take respect to loans and is highly populist and is very often used by people who want to group the IE languages with a nationalistic flavour as you want.

Read THIS LINK for more in depth explanation http://www.zompist.com/chance.htm