Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
warhead
General
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Trajan invading India? Posted: 26-Aug-2004 at 10:28 |
"It wasn't a failure, he successfully took Mesopatamia."
The goal of Trajan was not just to conquer Mesopatamia, but the rest of Iran as well, and in that aspect he failed, whether due to health or defeat.
"Oh I wasn't talking about invading the WHOLE of India, I meant like a little piece of Pakistan (modern Pakistan) that Alexander conquered. But I truly think he would have been able of destroying the entire Parthian civilization, that I am sure of. Although he may have not been able to hold all of Parthia."
Not even possible, north western India at this time is held by the Kushans a greater power than Parthia, and perhaps under the great king Kanishaka who subjugated most of western central asia and has hundreds of thousand of troops whose quality is no way inferior to the Legions.
|
|
Imperatore Dario I
Shogun
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 204
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Aug-2004 at 13:02 |
OK so you mean on a technicallity, I guess that's fair. But militarily, Trajan was successful in driving the Parthians out of the way.
|
Let there be a race of Romans with the strength of Italian courage.- Virgil's Aeneid
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-May-2005 at 23:39 |
Not a chance, as every historian who has studied this has noted, once you get past the Euphrates there isnt a single defence barrier to the east to protect your territories from the various peoples to the east.
|
|
Ahmed The Fighter
Chieftain
Lion of Babylon
Joined: 17-Apr-2005
Location: Iraq
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1106
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 06-May-2005 at 12:39 |
with my respect to his military ability he didn't invade india becauseinhis rieghn roman empire reached it maximum size and it greatest point in the east was tigres river(mesopotamia)
|
"May the eyes of cowards never sleep"
Khalid Bin Walid
|
|
Jazz
Baron
Joined: 29-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 410
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-May-2005 at 01:43 |
Originally posted by Cornellia
The capture of Ctesiphon marked the official
culmination of Trajan's third campaign and the war. When he
arrived in Charax (now modern Basra), there is the story that he'd
arrived just in time to see a merchant ship sailing for India and he
publically lamented he was too old to follow in Alexander the Great's
footsteps.
If true, this would indicate even he didn't think it was possible. |
I've once read this as well. Only what I read went once step
further saying that his lament was to the point of crying because he
was too old. I agree with virtually everyone else here in that it
would have over-streched the Roman Empire at that time...
Just a note, but with tectonic action causing the slow closing of the
Persian Gulf, at the time of Trajan, it is highly likely that both the
Tigris and Euphrates flowed into the Gulf separately. So it is
likely that what is now modern day Basra might have been on the Gulf
coast.
|
|
|
ArmenianSurvival
Chieftain
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-May-2005 at 23:14 |
I read somewhere that Trajan once occupied the shores of the Persian
Gulf, but he was only able to hold it for a couple of months until
revolts broke out.
As for India....Given the emotional toll for the soldiers of such an
attempt to take India, i think that one major Roman loss on the
battlefield would have demoralized Trajans army and left them
dumbfounded. And i cant see them going undefeated through Central Asia
like Alexander the Great did. And it was simply too far. Too much
cavalry in Central Asia, and too many elephants in India. If they
survived Central Asia, which i think they would have, i really doubt
they
would have enough in them to go much past the Indus River. Not to
mention that India was equal to Rome in power at this time. If Rome
achieved such a thing it would have been the most hardfought campaign
in world history because there were too many obstacles in the way, not
to mention India itself.
Edited by ArmenianSurvival
|
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance
Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։
|
|
Herodotus
Samurai
Joined: 14-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 130
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-May-2005 at 09:20 |
I voted yes, seeing no reason why he could'nt have reached india. Of course, he would have had no hope of conquering it or even successfuly attacking it.
|
"Dieu est un comdien jouant une assistance trop effraye de rire."
"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh."
-Francois Marie Arouet, Voltaire
|
|
Idanthyrus
Pretorian
Joined: 03-Feb-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 188
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 15:58 |
Lol, was'nt the Kushan Empire at the peak of its power during Trajans reign? Their Empire was nearly as big as that of the Parthian's themselves.
|
|
Zagros
Emperor
Suspended
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Aug-2005 at 18:00 |
They would have starved to death, even if he took every Parthian city, they still had a huge pastoral element and would have attacked Roman supply lines left and right, fighting a guerilla war, quickly cutting them off and and finishing them slowly. The terrain East of Mesopotamia is unlike any the Romans would have had much experience of.
|
|