Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Al Jassas
Arch Duke
Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Secularists to ban PM and ruling party Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 16:35 |
Once againt, failing through the ballot box, secularists are hell bent on dooming Turkey by banning the best performing government,despite some shortcomings, in decades despite all the warnings from the EU and the business community, today the stock market as well as the lira was down by 2% and foriegn investor have already indicated fleeing if things go bad. I know it is not my business but to see a country which is doing so good after many years of hard times go down because some unelected elites want to is sad.
Al-Jassas
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 16:55 |
Today the Constitutional court will make a decision after preliminary investigations to possibly close the AKP on grounds of anti-secular activities. The AKP is firing back by trying to change the law. They wan immunity from prosecution.
I say good riddance to the AKP!!! I could care less what Europe or the Arab world says either. This is Turkey. Tough politics for tough situations. That party (AKP) is nothing more than a guise for Sharia pretentions.
Edited by Seko - 31-Mar-2008 at 16:56
|
|
Kevin
General
AE Editor
Joined: 27-Apr-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 767
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 17:19 |
Originally posted by Seko
Today the Constitutional court will make a decision after preliminary investigations to possibly close the AKP on grounds of anti-secular activities. The AKP is firing back by trying to change the law. They wan immunity from prosecution.
I say good riddance to the AKP!!! I could care less what Europe or the Arab world says either. This is Turkey. Tough politics for tough situations. That party (AKP) is nothing more than a guise for Sharia pretentions. |
Keeo in mind though the religiois conservatives who are in the politcal body in Turkey are much more moderate then their counterparts in some other parts of the Islamic World. Indeed I may go out on a branch in saying this but many in the AKP estiblishment are more like religious conservatives in the United States from how it appears.
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 17:59 |
They are more moderate because of the secular customs that the Republic has created. Give the AKP a few years time, however, and you will see the erosion of such moderation to where Turkey will resemble her middle eastern neighbors.
Any time you have a party that is against education (AKP didn't want to accept the raising of mandatory miniminum grade levels in school) then I have a problem with that party. Any time that party spends more time on a self-made hijab issue instead EU negotiations, I have a problem with them. Any time you walk in the streets of Istanbul and see more and more black bags over women I have a problem with that party. To hell with that kind of conservatism. That is wholesale disrepsect to the customs and laws of secular Turkey. Though the issue of attempting to close a party (which Turkey is notorious for) is legal it is contrary to the majority of voters back in the last election. However, I think sympathies for the AKP has shrunk since then. Mine certainly have. Though seemingly undemocratic, closing this party is the best thing for Turkey.
Edited by Seko - 31-Mar-2008 at 18:00
|
|
Ponce de Leon
Caliph
Lonce De Peon
Joined: 11-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2967
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 19:00 |
My opinion right now of both parties on Turkey, (although I admit I lack a lot of information on both of them) secularists and conservatives, is that they are both wrong for the country and need a party thats more in the middle. One that is more concerned about sound economic policies and a moderate goal of liberal reform.
|
|
Al Jassas
Arch Duke
Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 19:07 |
Hello Seko
I wonder by which authority have you given secularists the right to supress the rule of the majority of Turks?
you are simply doing the exact thing you say Islamists are going to do with these actions. Women wear hijab, which you call black bags, out of their own conviction not because they are forced to, Turkey is not Iran and most women who wear hijab belong to middle classes. I will never forget what a Turk said to me during last years protests when he saw with his own eyes a protester throughing rotten eggs on a woman who wore hijab and was driving a new expensive Mercedes-Benz saying she doesn't deserve the car.
If Tukey's secularists continue undermining the democracy, which originally gave the party just one third of the popular vote and thanks to interference they increased their share to 47%, don't be surprised that people will go to more extremes, Saadat Party for starters and the MHP. If the party is banned then Turkey is no differnet than Saudi Arabia. Both both countries curb free speach, both countries are ruled by elites who see no farthers than their noses and want to impose their own way of life except that when elections were held 3 years ago, people actually voted overwhelmingly for people who are worse than the current regime.
AL-Jassas
|
|
Zagros
Emperor
Suspended
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 19:27 |
Why do people vote for the AKP?
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 20:13 |
Originally posted by Al Jassas
Hello Seko
I wonder by which authority have you given secularists the right to supress the rule of the majority of Turks?
Thanks for giving me so much power. I will try my best to be a good spokeperson. First off, the majority did not vote for the AKP. 53% to be exact.
you are simply doing the exact thing you say Islamists are going to do with these actions. Women wear hijab, which you call black bags, out of their own conviction not because they are forced to, Turkey is not Iran and most women who wear hijab belong to middle classes.
I am simply looking at the risk that AKP has brought. If it means tough measures then I support those measures safeguarding the republic's core values. Closure of that party sounds like a good thing at this point in time. The culture of fashionable Islam is OK as long as it it private and not in the government. I call them 'black bags' because I think that a woman should be worth more than a man's projection of insecurity. Women in Turkey always had a choice in public attire. The fear is that women will all be pressured into the latest 'bag' attire. I am against that mentality.
I will never forget what a Turk said to me during last years protests when he saw with his own eyes a protester throughing rotten eggs on a woman who wore hijab and was driving a new expensive Mercedes-Benz saying she doesn't deserve the car.
And I will never forget the day that a hijab wearing women pulled her car over stopping the car my friend drove, wanting to fight my female friend for dressing in western attire. We all can share anecdotals till it gets dark. Your point?
If Tukey's secularists continue undermining the democracy, which originally gave the party just one third of the popular vote and thanks to interference they increased their share to 47%, don't be surprised that people will go to more extremes, Saadat Party for starters and the MHP.
Yes the threat of AKP's closure seems anti democratic. This is one of those times where it is well worth it. By the way, undermining has been done by the AKP. You got it all turned around. The AKP brought the culture of relgion into the state. The sexist AKP members don't care to shake a women's hand and they promote segreation (not sitting next to a women) that is a threat to secularism among tons of other issues that interest me.
If the party is banned then Turkey is no differnet than Saudi Arabia. Both both countries curb free speach, both countries are ruled by elites who see no farthers than their noses and want to impose their own way of life except that when elections were held 3 years ago, people actually voted overwhelmingly for people who are worse than the current regime.
The people are learning what the AKP is all about. A seditious party with anti secualr intentions.
AL-Jassas |
Sincerely, Seko
I could go on all day about how I feel about the AKP. Anyway, to spare you the trouble let me put it to you this way. I am a stern secularist who happens to practice Islam. Turkey was built on those principles. I will not change my tune.
Edited by Seko - 31-Mar-2008 at 20:22
|
|
Lmprs
Arch Duke
Joined: 30-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 20:21 |
This isn't news. Constitutional court has decided that it will hear the case, but that's it.
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 20:22 |
That is good news. What do you mean it isn't news?
|
|
Lmprs
Arch Duke
Joined: 30-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 20:26 |
There was practically no way for constitutional court to refuse to hear the case.
|
|
Al Jassas
Arch Duke
Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 21:00 |
Sorry Seko but here are a few minor things you missed
The AKP won 47%, the MHP won 14%, Saadat+independent Turkey parties won 3% which means that conservatives won 64% of the national vote. All those parties and a significant membership of other secular parties support the move to lift the ban on Hijab in universities, the MHP is more openly islamist than the AKP and so is Saadat. So no, those who support Turkey's current direction aren't a minority as you say they are a majority and the AKP is the only reason why extremist parties did not win larger shares of the vote.
I am not a Turk but it saddens me that certain elitests in the society are willing to doom the country and feed the people on ideologies rather than on sound economic policies. Turkey in the 50s was in a better shape than Greece and now look where is Greece and where is Turkey. We in the Arab world tried feeding our people ideologies, leftists ideologies. Masses lead by "intellectuals" led lynchings against industrialists and large landowners in Syria, Egypt and Iraq and now look at those countries and what is the result? hideous poverty in the first two countries and a bloody civil war in the latter.
Finally, if the people know the real intentions of the AKP and support its ban, why did they overwhelmingly support the constitutional ammendements in the first place (69%) back in October?
Al-Jassas
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 21:23 |
Turkey has a vibrant economy. I wouldn't worry about the political ramifications too much.
MHP is a ultrantionalist party. Nothing in common with AKP other than staying in power and using eachother for mutual gain.
Greece is part of the EU. She is doing quite well. 1950's Turkey was a closed economy. How was it in better shape? I wouldn't compare today's Turkey to Arab countries either. Turkey, though without oil production, has much more export profits than Syria and Egypt. Double the GDP of those two countries together. More than Greece too. http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/country.cfm?id=Turkey
It saddens you? Why? Turkey is not an Islamist country. Is that why you are sad, because you want it to be? Why do you care anyway? You are just another Arab wishing to turn Turkey into an Islamist state. I am a Turk wishing to keep it secular. We are miles apart. You're sadness is my jubilation and vica versa. I will be shocked and amazed the day I see an Arab respect and support Turkey's constitution.
Edited by Seko - 31-Mar-2008 at 21:31
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 22:16 |
What lunacy, I can't believe they can even think about shutting down the pollitical party which won the majority of the votes. If Turkey is to be a proper democracy she cannot shut down parties just because some of the secular elite have some conspiracy theories.
Turkey is 99% muslim, this isn't a concern of the Arab world, most of the Arab world is secular aswell, none of Turkey's Arab neighbours have a theocratic state, neither Syria nor Egypt are fond of religous parties, the Muslim brotherhood has been in trouble in Egpyt countless times.
Turkey is on the path to prooving that religion and democracy is compatible, that the laicist system can accomodate muslims and that muslims can be modern, economically powerfull as well as have some respect for human rights.
You may or may not support AKP however, they have broken no laws and were democratically elected, this must be respected or democracy will be made a mockery.
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Theodore Felix
General
Joined: 10-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 22:50 |
What exactly makes democracy so special in a country where so many are still not properly educated, acculturated to it and still live in poverty? I see parties like the AKP as populist parties that show the inherent weak in the system.
Coming from a country thats in similar, if not worse, shape. I see these "democratic" parties as disconcerting at best. And Im disappointed to hear that Turkey removed the scarf ban. It goes to show how these parties are garnering populist support to strengthen their own hold.
I can say that I have no business and dont really know Turkey well enough to comment perhaps, but I can tell that these events in Turkey are going to echo into my country as well. For a long time the more extreme elements in the country were suppressed by people pointing to Turkey, now that this is no longer an option, perhaps a harsher solution will be best.
Edited by Theodore Felix - 31-Mar-2008 at 22:52
|
|
Al Jassas
Arch Duke
Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 22:59 |
In the 50s, the economy grew at a 9% rate doubling the size of the economy. The government opened the economy and pursued liberl economic reforms rather than the socialism of the CHP during the Ataturk and Inonu years. The MHP is semi Islamist-nationalist party, they hate Alevis and shia remember what the Grey wolves did to the Alevis in the 70s, and support religious education and lifting the ban on Hijab.
As for the Turkish economy, unfortunately the situation is more fragile than you may imagine. Reforms have still not been completed and the current situation will complicate things even more. Turkey still heavily dependent on foreign investment which will run away because of the current climate. The reason why Turkey isn't Egypt or Syria is that Turkey was the darling of the west which supported it with all possible ways including coups (remember the famous "our boys have done it") and they did their best to help the Turkish economy. My sadness is not that I wish to see Turkey become an "Islamic" country because it is an Islamic country, it is because certain people there are willing to doom their country just because the majority of people are in opposition. One can't but remember that this was the reason for the fall of France when the right wing minority preferred the nazis over their own fellow country men.
And Felix, please read more about Turkey before making judgments.
Al-Jassas
Edited by Al Jassas - 31-Mar-2008 at 23:01
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2008 at 23:18 |
Felix
And Im disappointed to hear that Turkey removed the scarf ban. It goes to show how these parties are garnering populist support to strengthen their own hold. |
Why disappointed?
Freedoms must be for everyone, if somebody has the right not to were a scarf they should also be entitled to the right of wearing a scarf in university if they wish. I'm against it in schools as girls are too young to make a decision, their families may force them into it. However, somebody educated to University level is at a stage they can decide how they want to dress.
Al Jassas
The MHP is semi Islamist-nationalist party, they hate Alevis and shia remember what the Grey wolves did to the Alevis in the 70s, and support religious education and lifting the ban on Hijab. |
The MHP has a religous and nationalist base, they support religous education, lifting of headscarf ban and many other such issues as from their Turko-Islamic perspective this is part of the heritage. However, they don't have an anti-Alevi or Shia stance today and have tried to bridge relations with them. During the fighting in the 80's they were involved in battles with leftists and got a bad reputation from this.
One can't but remember that this was the reason for the fall of France when the right wing minority preferred the nazis over their own fellow country men. |
This is going a bit far.
The party hopefully won't get banned, Turkey has made alot of progress over the past 5-10 years.
Edited by Bulldog - 31-Mar-2008 at 23:31
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2008 at 01:32 |
Originally posted by Al Jassas
In the 50s, the economy grew at a 9% rate doubling the size of the economy. The government opened the economy and pursued liberl economic reforms rather than the socialism of the CHP during the Ataturk and Inonu years. The MHP is semi Islamist-nationalist party, they hate Alevis and shia remember what the Grey wolves did to the Alevis in the 70s, and support religious education and lifting the ban on Hijab.
As for the Turkish economy, unfortunately the situation is more fragile than you may imagine. Reforms have still not been completed and the current situation will complicate things even more. Turkey still heavily dependent on foreign investment which will run away because of the current climate. The reason why Turkey isn't Egypt or Syria is that Turkey was the darling of the west which supported it with all possible ways including coups (remember the famous "our boys have done it") and they did their best to help the Turkish economy. My sadness is not that I wish to see Turkey become an "Islamic" country because it is an Islamic country, it is because certain people there are willing to doom their country just because the majority of people are in opposition. One can't but remember that this was the reason for the fall of France when the right wing minority preferred the nazis over their own fellow country men.
And Felix, please read more about Turkey before making judgments.
Al-Jassas |
Menderes experienced the boom years of 1950-53 with the election of the Democratic Party. This followed the recent importation of huge quantities of materials and machinery from the west after 1947. By 1954 the boom was over. The trade deficit in 1955 grew to eight times of that in 1950. Economic growth fell from 14% to 4%. It got so bad that in 1960 a Turkey's total external debt stood at one quarter of the gross national product. Another resaon, other than borrowing, was due to import and foreign exchange controls established in 1953. As a result inflation went up from 3% in 1950 to 20% in 1958. Demands to the IMF were eventually established.
Today's market economy is still attached to foreign investments. However, Turkey is number two in textiles to Europe and is very competitive in the home appliances realm. OF course the current political atmosphere will hamper speculation and investors in the stock market. The value of the lira will be affected too. This is a worthwhile price to pay in order to clear the stench in closing down the AKP.
Al Jassas the only people dooming the country are subversive elements that would rather bring Shariah to Turkey and not abide by the Constitution (Ana Yasa). I agree with Felix in that corrupt (cahil) people have manipulated the poor. The AKP's days are numbered. The quicker the better.
Edited by Seko - 01-Apr-2008 at 01:33
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2008 at 02:17 |
AKP are hardly extremist, they have never called for a Shariah law ruled state.
The reason they got the vote is because they have been sucesful, economy is on the up, there are more rights and democracy is improving, these are issues people care about not conspiracies about a secret religous order.
This whole charade is ridiculous and creates nothing but division. Should more religously orientated people start protesting and taking the ruling party to court if their party didn't win, should they start rioting and causing civil unrest.
The party was democratically elected that is final, the opposition must abide by the rules and get ready for the next election, you can't have democracy just for one party and not for the others.
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Seko
Emperor
Spammer
Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2008 at 03:22 |
Overturning that party is totally legal dear Bulldog. It's in the hands of the justices of the Constitutional Court now.
|
|