Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Cyrus Shahmiri
Administrator
King of Kings
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Mughal and Safavid Empires Posted: 20-Aug-2004 at 10:05 |
Founder of Mughal Empire, Babur, is kissing the hand of founder of Safavid Empire, Shah Ismail
It seems Safavids always wanted to point this event out to Mughals!
I found this Safavid minature on cover of an Iranian magazine, it has many things to say, I think it shows when Sheibani Khan defeated Babur and captured Samarkand for the Uzbeks, it was the time that Babur has lost everything but in 1510 Shah Ismail attacks Samrkand and kills Babur's Uzbek foe, Sheibani Khan. Shah Ismail recognises Babur's desire to control Samarkand, the ancestral Timurid capital, and thus offeres Babur the chance to claim the city, on the condition he enters it wearing traditional Shiite dress, as a token of the shah's true rule over the city. Babur agrees to the terms, despite being a Sunni Muslim himself, and enteres Samarkand early in 1511.
Edited by Cyrus Shahmiri
|
|
|
demon
Chieftain
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Aug-2004 at 13:40 |
Hmmmm. Did Mughals use elephants?
|
Grrr..
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Aug-2004 at 17:40 |
Babur wanted to be the ruler of Samarkand. Ismal killed Sheibani but the Uzbeks were not finished. They still had an powerful army (about 150 000 men) and had reconquested the Transoxiane. Ismal was gone to the west against the Ottomans, but everybody knew he would come back and he looked invincible (and he was the master of 3 millions square kilometers). So, the Babur's tactic was to become chiite in order to have the protection of Ismal. Then, Babur took Samarkand. But not for long time because the Samarkandis had understood that he was under Ismal's protection. After that, Uzbeks devastated an Safavid army in 1512, and in 1514 Ismal was defeated by the Ottomans.
Edited by Noacyl
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 00:45 |
Baburs great grandson Jehangir and a view of the world as he saw it. The great Moghul emperor stands on a lion, and is towering above the spindly Sassanian king shah abbas of persia, who is standing on a goat.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Oct-2005 at 00:54 |
sorry... Safavid
|
|
oTToMAn_TurK
Pretorian
Joined: 19-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 05:43 |
Founder of Mughal Empire, Babur, is kissing the hand of founder of Safavid Empire, Shah Ismail
Why dont u talk about what Yavuz Sultan Selim did to Shah Ismail?
Edited by oTToMAn_TurK
|
Either your a slave to what MADE-MAN
Or your a slave to what MAN-MADE
|
|
Bakma
Janissary
Joined: 13-Sep-2005
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 07:49 |
Originally posted by oTToMAn_TurK
Founder of Mughal Empire, Babur, is kissing the hand of founder of Safavid Empire, Shah Ismail
Why dont u talk about what Yavuz Sultan Selim did to Shah Ismail? |
what did he do? i realy don't know it
|
Inson borki insonlarning naqshidir, inson borki hayvon undan yaxshidir
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 14:21 |
After Yavuz became the khan, he began his eastern mission. He met with the Safavid army near Chaldiran. During the war, most of the Safavid army was destroyed by Ottoman forces and two wives of Shah were captured. Ali Mirza, a man who shouted as "shah menem", meaning "the shah is me!" saved the life of Shah Ismail.
But anyway, Shah Ismail was an honorable and courageous man, he never kissed the hand of an Ottoman or accepted their authority. He didnt beg for mercy like the kings in Balkans and Europe. He was a true ruler and man of high knowledge...
It is said that Yavuz and Shah Ismail were good friends before the battle, they were writing teasing letters to each other. Yavuz have defeated Shah Ismail in a chess game they played in Tabriz, when Yavuz was the Sancakbey of Trabzon, secretly passing through Safavid border as a regular Iranian villager. And about the letters; the irony is that Yavuz was writing his letters in Persian, and Shah Ismail was writing his letters in Turkish...
Altough Yavuz was a great conquerer and military man, but a lot of the actions he took are violent and not necessary. For example, he captured the wives of Shah Ismail, he killed most of the Sfavid army, massacred 150.000 Turkmens in Anatolia. He also hanged the Turkish Mameluk sultan, Tumanbay, after he captured Egypt and the caliphate.
|
|
oTToMAn_TurK
Pretorian
Joined: 19-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 19:17 |
well what i herd from my turkish history teacher was that when the ottoman and safavid forces met, the ottomans pushed them so far in that they reached the palace of Shah Ismail. from there yavuz sultan selim as to teach him a lesson not to act cocky to the ottomans, got his seat (taht) and brought it to istanbul to embarress him.
he killed most of the Sfavid army, massacred 150.000 Turkmens in Anatolia. He also hanged the Turkish Mameluk sultan, Tumanbay, after he captured Egypt and the caliphate.
its a war what u expect and those turkmens sided with the safavids didnt they? im not that sure but i know for a fact that yavuz sultan selim was one of the most religuis padisah's the ottomans ever saw.
|
Either your a slave to what MADE-MAN
Or your a slave to what MAN-MADE
|
|
Mortaza
Tsar
Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 09:36 |
oTToMAn_TurK
Yavuz fought mainly with muslims, So how can he be most religious one?
Most probably most religious and intellectual patisah is Murat 2 or Beyazt 2.
For killing 150.000 Turkmen, some killed(They were rebellions) but 150.000 was not a realistic number, Noone accept such huge killing, except some alevis.
|
|
Cyrus Shahmiri
Administrator
King of Kings
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Iran
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6240
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 13:18 |
Battle of Chaldiran was really a disaster for Iran, Iranians were fighting with sword and bow and arrows, but Ottomans had Cannons and guns. So Ottomans scared Iranians and defeated them in a totaly unequal battle!
|
|
|
Mortaza
Tsar
Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 14:09 |
Well If war was equal, It would not become a disaster.
|
|
oTToMAn_TurK
Pretorian
Joined: 19-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-Oct-2005 at 03:34 |
Yavuz fought mainly with muslims, So how can he be most religious one?
he fought with muslims but that was neccasary to prevent another muslim empire to over run them from behind while there campaign in europe. if sultan selim didnt overrun the mamlukes and teach the persians a lesson then it was more then likely that one of these empires would plot to destroy the ottomans. remember tamerlane? it was just a matter of time that another muslim empire would rise and belive they shud control the whole muslim world. besides it was much more suitable that a strong muslim empire like the ottomans to control the holy lands.
i think i did exagerate when i sed he was the most religuios, i ment in the sence that he was the first ottoman caliph.
Edited by oTToMAn_TurK
|
Either your a slave to what MADE-MAN
Or your a slave to what MAN-MADE
|
|
Mortaza
Tsar
Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-Oct-2005 at 11:42 |
Sure that is true, He was a good patisah too. But becoming a good patisah and becoming a religious man mostly contradict each other.
For opening a war to memluks, because They would attack ottomans, If ottomans didnt destroy them, is something what USA did in Iraq.
It was an expansionist war.
For Iran, I dont say same. It was iran who was agressive side.
|
|
Kapikulu
Arch Duke
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1914
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 30-Oct-2005 at 19:01 |
Babur is coming from the descent of Tamerlane actually. So,he has Turkic origins either.
|
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;
A Strange Orhan Veli
|
|
khalid bin walid
Knight
Joined: 31-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 01:44 |
Baburs mother was descended from Genghis Khan, making Babur part Mongol. However I agree that the dynasty was mainly turki.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 11:15 |
and teach the persians a lesson |
Which Persians? How do you define Persian? Yavuz was sending his letters and had a divan in Persian, and Shah Ismail was sending his letters and had a divan in Turkish. So, which one is Persian, or which one is more Turkish?
Lets say Sunnis instead of Ottomans and Shias instead of Safavids...
|
|
Zagros
Emperor
Suspended
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 12:14 |
Babur actually claimed his mother's side from Temur and his father side from Ghengis, or maybe the other way around.
Edited by Zagros
|
|
khalid bin walid
Knight
Joined: 31-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 62
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 18:06 |
Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur, popularly known as "Babur", meaning lion, was the founder of Mughal Empire in India. He was born in Farghana, now in Uzbekistan, on February 14, 1483. The Mughal Empire founded by him lasted for 331 years.
Babur was a descendant of Timur on his father's side and of Chengez Khan on his mother's side. When Babur's father Umar Sheikh Mirza died in 1494, he inherited the ancestral kingdom of Farghana. He was only 14 years old at that time. Babur faced many hardships during this period of his life. He was driven out of his father's state and for two years became a wanderer. In 1504, he came to Afghanistan and occupied Kabul. Here he assumed the title of Padshah.
Zahiruddin Muhammad Babur
Babur( persian miniature 16th cent.)
http://www.storyofpakistan.com/person.asp?perid=P053
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~dee/MUGHAL/BABUR.HTM
|
|
Zagros
Emperor
Suspended
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 18:14 |
Babur / Babr means tiger in modern Persian, I am not sure of the words etymology though, Iran used to have tigers in the Caspian region until the early 20th century.
|
|