Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Nuclear Arm Race Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 00:35 |
USSR and USA built tons of nuclear-related weapons throughout Cold War. Both sides know how destructive nuclear warheads are, so why do they bother nuclear arm race? All the nuclear stocks from USSR and USA would easily wipe out the world, so why do they need to spend billions and trillions of dollars for nuclear warheads?
Edited by pekau - 19-Dec-2007 at 00:35
|
Join us.
|
|
Knights
Caliph
suspended
Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 01:02 |
Are you asking this because you don't know or because you do, and are interested in hearing other's opinions and ideas (or both...)?
Well for starters, having a lot of nukes allows you to spread out your stock, which is important in geographically enormous countries like Russia and the US. It enables you to have nukes mobilised and on hand quicker.
A lot of it is just scare tactics - who creates the more imposing figure by having more nukes. This is the part I find questionable...
|
|
Lmprs
Arch Duke
Joined: 30-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1869
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 02:02 |
You can never have enough of weapons.
|
|
Kamikaze 738
Baron
Joined: 26-Mar-2007
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 463
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 06:06 |
It goes well on paper I guess...
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 06:10 |
Simple reason. You must presume that most of your weapons will not survive an enemy attack and thus you must have enough left and in various delivery methods (aircraft ballistic launchers etc) to ensure that you can still retaliate.
|
|
Cezar
Chieftain
Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 08:40 |
Actually the race was/is in fact the nuke olympics. It started with numbers, continued with size, then with effects and now we're witnessing the fine tuning. Next?
|
|
Illirac
Colonel
Joined: 23-Jun-2007
Location: Ma vlast
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2007 at 16:12 |
Originally posted by pekau
USSR and USA built tons of nuclear-related weapons throughout Cold War. Both sides know how destructive nuclear warheads are, so why do they bother nuclear arm race? All the nuclear stocks from USSR and USA would easily wipe out the world, so why do they need to spend billions and trillions of dollars for nuclear warheads? |
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, and anyone who does not have it must fear the one who have it. The USA started a massive production, and since there was already a conflict between communists and capitalist, the USSR started it also. If they did not started the production, probably the soviets(and anyone else) would have to dance the American music if they like it or not.
|
For too long I've been parched of thirst and unable to quench it.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2007 at 00:05 |
Originally posted by Illirac
Originally posted by pekau
USSR and USA built tons of nuclear-related weapons throughout Cold War. Both sides know how destructive nuclear warheads are, so why do they bother nuclear arm race? All the nuclear stocks from USSR and USA would easily wipe out the world, so why do they need to spend billions and trillions of dollars for nuclear warheads?
|
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, and anyone who does not have it must fear the one who have it. The USA started a massive production, and since there was already a conflict between communists and capitalist, the USSR started it also. If they did not started the production, probably the soviets(and anyone else) would have to dance the American music if they like it or not.
|
Both side had enough nukes to wipe out the planet. How is getting more going to help with the security? Kill the Americans/Soviets twice?
|
Join us.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2007 at 00:06 |
Originally posted by Sparten
Simple reason. You must presume that most of your weapons will not survive an enemy attack and thus you must have enough left and in various delivery methods (aircraft ballistic launchers etc) to ensure that you can still retaliate. |
That's a valid point. Nuclear weapons are useless if you can't deliver it to enemies. However, I'd like to just talk about the # of nuclear warheads for all intense of purposes.
|
Join us.
|
|
Sun Tzu
Consul
Joined: 31-Oct-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 362
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2007 at 12:52 |
To me its a way of keeping other nations in check, its like insurance in case of a rainy day.
|
Sun Tzu
All warfare is based on deception - Sun Tzu
|
|
Illirac
Colonel
Joined: 23-Jun-2007
Location: Ma vlast
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2007 at 17:04 |
Originally posted by pekau
Originally posted by Illirac
Originally posted by pekau
USSR and USA built tons of nuclear-related weapons throughout Cold War. Both sides know how destructive nuclear warheads are, so why do they bother nuclear arm race? All the nuclear stocks from USSR and USA would easily wipe out the world, so why do they need to spend billions and trillions of dollars for nuclear warheads?
|
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, and anyone who does not have it must fear the one who have it. The USA started a massive production, and since there was already a conflict between communists and capitalist, the USSR started it also. If they did not started the production, probably the soviets(and anyone else) would have to dance the American music if they like it or not.
|
Both side had enough nukes to wipe out the planet. How is getting more going to help with the security? Kill the Americans/Soviets twice? |
That's the point! The more one had of those the more the other feared
|
For too long I've been parched of thirst and unable to quench it.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2007 at 18:35 |
Originally posted by Illirac
...
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, |
Americans invented?
Come on, Einstein, Sziland, Oppenheimer and the 99.99% of the scientists of the nuclear program were europeans.
|
|
Illirac
Colonel
Joined: 23-Jun-2007
Location: Ma vlast
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Dec-2007 at 20:11 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Originally posted by Illirac
...
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, |
Americans invented?
Come on, Einstein, Sziland, Oppenheimer and the 99.99% of the scientists of the nuclear program were europeans.
|
That's why in the () i wrote produced
|
For too long I've been parched of thirst and unable to quench it.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2007 at 00:13 |
Originally posted by Illirac
Originally posted by pekau
Originally posted by Illirac
Originally posted by pekau
USSR and USA built tons of nuclear-related weapons throughout Cold War. Both sides know how destructive nuclear warheads are, so why do they bother nuclear arm race? All the nuclear stocks from USSR and USA would easily wipe out the world, so why do they need to spend billions and trillions of dollars for nuclear warheads?
|
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, and anyone who does not have it must fear the one who have it. The USA started a massive production, and since there was already a conflict between communists and capitalist, the USSR started it also. If they did not started the production, probably the soviets(and anyone else) would have to dance the American music if they like it or not.
|
Both side had enough nukes to wipe out the planet. How is getting more going to help with the security? Kill the Americans/Soviets twice? |
That's the point! The more one had of those the more the other feared
|
Making more nukes are expensive. I don't understand why they bother to make more of them when they already had enough missiles to wipe out the planet. Making more missiles don't make Americans and Russians more powerful. They just have nuke surplus... for what? Who's gonna use them by the time the first nuclear war ends? Monkeys?
|
Join us.
|
|
Cezar
Chieftain
Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2007 at 08:12 |
Pekau, they weren't building the nukes to have more, they were building them to have a better chance to a successful strike and off course, counterstrike. If you wish, technology adveanced faster than the ability to get rid of the old warheads. Try to fit a 1945 device in a 1980 MIRV. And nukes aren't just that. There are different types for different purposes. Therefore there are more warheads. Just counting them gets you to state that they could wipe eachother several times. There is no limit to the yield of a termonuclear device. What would you expect them to do? Build only one such thing for each potential enemy?
Think of the boomers. One Typhoon can raze half of the USA. Should the USSR have built only two subs, 40 missiles and 120 500kt warheads?
|
|
Illirac
Colonel
Joined: 23-Jun-2007
Location: Ma vlast
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2007 at 13:41 |
pekau That was only to show their power and their "growing" power, and perhaps, in some future(if there will be one) they'll use it against some alien invasion
|
For too long I've been parched of thirst and unable to quench it.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Dec-2007 at 19:26 |
Originally posted by Cezar
Pekau, they weren't building the nukes to have more, they were building them to have a better chance to a successful strike and off course, counterstrike. If you wish, technology adveanced faster than the ability to get rid of the old warheads. Try to fit a 1945 device in a 1980 MIRV. And nukes aren't just that. There are different types for different purposes. Therefore there are more warheads. Just counting them gets you to state that they could wipe eachother several times. There is no limit to the yield of a termonuclear device. What would you expect them to do? Build only one such thing for each potential enemy?
Think of the boomers. One Typhoon can raze half of the USA. Should the USSR have built only two subs, 40 missiles and 120 500kt warheads? |
This is my understanding. If they explode all the bombs they have in USA and USSR, all civilizations die. If they build more, the Earth will have more radiations and more holes. Everyone will be screwed whether they have 100 or 1000 missiles, because 50 is the overkill.
|
Join us.
|
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Dec-2007 at 19:27 |
Originally posted by Illirac
pekau
That was only to show their power and their "growing" power, and perhaps, in some future(if there will be one) they'll use it against some alien invasion
|
But aliens are immune to nuclear strikes... haven't you watched Independence Day?
And that's assuming that aliens are living creatures like us. What if they are spirits? What if they are wavelengths? What if they are ethers? Because if they are ethers, we are screwed. We can't prove ethers, because once be prove it... it doesn't exist.
Edited by pekau - 29-Dec-2007 at 19:28
|
Join us.
|
|
Illirac
Colonel
Joined: 23-Jun-2007
Location: Ma vlast
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 526
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 29-Dec-2007 at 20:39 |
Originally posted by pekau
Originally posted by Illirac
pekau
That was only to show their power and their "growing" power, and perhaps, in some future(if there will be one) they'll use it against some alien invasion
|
But aliens are immune to nuclear strikes... haven't you watched Independence Day?
And that's assuming that aliens are living creatures like us. What if they are spirits? What if they are wavelengths? What if they are ethers? Because if they are ethers, we are screwed. We can't prove ethers, because once be prove it... it doesn't exist. |
Not mine concerne right now, they will become a problem when they invade us...As for the nukes, they probably played: who will have more
|
For too long I've been parched of thirst and unable to quench it.
|
|
Hebrewtext
Knight
Joined: 24-Jan-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 88
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Jan-2008 at 19:48 |
Originally posted by pinguin
Originally posted by Illirac
...
Why? The Americans "invented"(produced) that powerful weapon, |
Americans invented?
Come on, Einstein, Sziland, Oppenheimer and the 99.99% of the scientists of the nuclear program were europeans.
|
and even were Jews
|
|