Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Topic: The French Army in XVIII Century Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 18:48 |
Originally posted by Challenger2
Suvorov was only a Colonel during the Seven Years War and had no influence on Russian operations.
Do you seriously base an army's performance purely on the number of engagements won?!
|
Suvorov was heavily influenced by the commanders that fought int he 7YW and i considder him part of the tiem period we talk about. well, not on the numbers of engagements won, but if two armies fight each others, i reckon that the force winning the most engagements is the best.
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 23:21 |
Originally posted by Jubelu
If you need more concrete evidence to the disintegration of French military, then review their case at Liegnitz or Rossbach.
Austria, in some senses, still better than France
|
The French never fought at Leignitz and Rossbach was more a case of poor Generalship on the part of the Imperial and French armies than a disintegration of the French military. Some French units fought well at Rossbach, but there's not a lot you can do when you are caught in column of march by a fully deployed enemy. It's a bit like saying the Roman army was rubbish because they lost at Trasimene.
|
|
Jubelu
Immortal Guard
Joined: 08-Jun-2007
Location: Syrian Arab Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 23:55 |
Then how do you explain the case of Warburg?
|
|
Jubelu
Immortal Guard
Joined: 08-Jun-2007
Location: Syrian Arab Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 23:57 |
Quote: well, not on the numbers of engagements won, but if two armies fight
each others, i reckon that the force winning the most engagements is
the best.
Well, this is particularly applicable for XVIII century warfare. Prussia won a lot engagements, so did Britain. Spain and France became obsolete force in Europe and were merely paper tiger.
|
|
Jubelu
Immortal Guard
Joined: 08-Jun-2007
Location: Syrian Arab Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 00:02 |
Allied army: 30,500 French, 10,500 Kreis in 49/14
Bns, 40/41 Sqns, 36/12 Field guns, approx 120 Battalion guns. Charles de Rohan, Prince
Soubise, Marshal of France AC (for French troops), Prinz von Sachsen-Hildburghausen,
Prince of the Empire AC (for Kreis troops, may command and rally French cavalry)
Franco-Kreis 1st Cavalry Column, Ex = 6
- Austrian Cuirassier Regts Brettlach & Trautmansdorff
M5 [ ][ ][ ]hvy
- Austrian Carabinier Companies
M5 [ ]hvy
- Kreis Cuirassier Regt Pfalz
M4 [ ]hvy, pt
- Kreis Cuirassier Hohenzollern
M4 [ ]hvy, pt
- Kreis Dragoon Regt Wurttemberg
M3 [ ]med, pt
- French Cavalry Brigade
M5 [ ][ ]hvy (La Reine/Bourbon-Busset/Fitz-James)
- French Cavalry Brigade
M5 [ ][s]mxd (Commissaire-Gnral, No.69 Volontaires Ligois & No.22 Bourbon)
Franco-Kreis 2nd Cavalry Column, Ex = 3
- Kreis Cuirassier Regt Bayreuth
M3 [ ]hvy, pt
- Kreis Dragoon Regt Anspach
M3 [ ]med, pt
- French Cavalry Brigade
M5 [ ][ ]hvy (Penthivre, Mstre de Camp Gnral, Cuirassiers du Roi)
- French Cavalry Brigade No.19 Berry & No.58 Escars
M5 [ ][ ]hvy
Franco-Kreis Main Infantry Columns, Lt Genl de Chevert
CC
Right Column, Ex = 7
Advance Guard
- Inf Regt No.4 Pimont, Right Wing
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
Body of Right Column
- Inf Regt No.21 Saint-Chamond
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt No.57 Coss-Brissac
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Allemandes No.92 Deux-Ponts
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt No.37 Royal Roussillon
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Suisse No.51 Reding
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Suisse No.63 Planta
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
Right-Centre Column, Ex = 8
- Inf Regt No.47 Royal Artillery/No.11 Mailly, Rt. Wing M5 [
][ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt No.11 Mailly, Left Wing
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Allemandes No.66 La Marck
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Royal-Pologne/Saint-Germain
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Suisse No.52 Castellas
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Suisse No.87 Salis
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Suisse No.55 Wittemer & No.77 Diesbach
M5 [ ][ ][ ]bg-g
Centre Column, Ex = 4
- Inf Regt No.14 Poitu
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt No.61 Provence
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt Montbazon
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt No.41 Beauvoisis
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
Left-Centre Column, Ex = nil
- French 1st Field Artillery Battalion
M5 [ ][ ]sb-fld
- French 2nd Field Artillery Battalion
M5 [ ][ ]sb-fld
- French 3rd Field Artillery Battalion
M5 [ ][ ]sb-fld
Left Column, Ex = 4
Advance Guard
- Inf Regt No.4 Pimont, Left Wing
M5 [ ][ ]bg-g
Body of left Column
- Kreis Inf Regt Blau Wurzburg
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g, pt
- Kreis Inf Regts Hessen-Darmstadt & Trier
M4 [ ][ ][
]bg-g
- Kreis Inf Regt Varell
M3 [ ][ ]bg-g, pt
- Kreis Light Artillery Battalion
M4 [ ][ ]sb-lt, pt
- Kreis Inf Regts Cronegk & Ferentheil
M3 [ ][ ]bg-g, pt
Saint Germains Detached Wing, Lt Genl Saint
Germain DC, Ex = 7
First Line
- French Cavalry Brigade
M5 [ ][ ]hvy (Aquitaine, Royale & Royal-Roussillon)
- Inf Regt No.38 Cond
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- Inf Regt No.18 Touraine
M4 [ ][ ]bg-g
- French cavalry Brigade Colonel General, Conde & Poli
M5 [ ][ ]hvy
Second Line
- Inf Regt No.6 Royal La Marine
M5 [ ][ ][ ]bg-g
Flank Guard
- Hussars No.69 Royal Nassau
M4 [s]lt
- Dragoons No.13 Royal Apchon
M4 [ ]med
Generaleutnant Loudons Austrian Light Column,
GL Loudon DC, Ex = 2
- Szecheny Hussars
M5 [s]lt
- Grenzer Karlstadter Otocaner
M4 [ ]sk-bg
- Grenzer Warasdiner Creuzer
M4 [ ]sk-bg
This perhaps convinces you enough the engagement of France in Rossbach. "Fought well" meant nothing, since Prussian forces fought very well, did it not?
|
|
Tancrde
Janissary
Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 06:09 |
Originally posted by Temujin
this is one-dimensional. France was only sucessfull as long as there was Prussia. after prussia left the war by separate peace and Saxony joined Austria, the French were beaten back, so they asked Prussia to re-enter the war. without Prussian intervention France would have lost the Austrian sucession war. |
Prussia left the war in 1745.
French conquered lonely Austrian netherlands and invaded United provinces between 1745 1748,
in the same time they fought against British in India and North America
Austrian Dutch and British even asked russian to help them, but after th fall of Berg op Zoom it was too late for them.
Edited by Tancrde - 12-Nov-2007 at 06:10
|
|
Tancrde
Janissary
Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 06:23 |
Originally posted by Jubelu
Spain and France became obsolete force in Europe and were merely paper tiger.
|
You speak about what war ?
Spanish weren't bad.
they won war of jenkins' against Britain
With French they defeated Austrian in Italia during Polish succession War.
Edited by Tancrde - 12-Nov-2007 at 06:36
|
|
Tancrde
Janissary
Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 06:42 |
Originally posted by Jubelu
The illusion that France was the most powerful mainpower was shattered right after the financial crisis of Louis XIV's reign. Not until Napoleon I enthroned did France enjoy her military peak. |
France was maybe not so poweful than during the reign of Louis XIV but it remained the most powerful european state and the most populous.
Before Napoleon I during revolutionnary wars 1792 1797 despite of France was in civil war, French defeated almost all european countries on 4 differents fronts (Flanders Rhine Italia Pyrenees).
Even Romans never won against so many enemies in same time
Edited by Tancrde - 12-Nov-2007 at 06:54
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 19:13 |
Originally posted by Challenger2
Some French units fought well at Rossbach, but there's not a lot you can do when you are caught in column of march by a fully deployed enemy.
|
the Prussians in one battle also caught the Russians in marching column and the Russians won.
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 19:15 |
Originally posted by Tancrde
Prussia left the war in 1745.
French conquered lonely Austrian netherlands and invaded United provinces between 1745 1748,
in the same time they fought against British in India and North America
Austrian Dutch and British even asked russian to help them, but after th fall of Berg op Zoom it was too late for them. |
after Dettingen France had to call upon Prussia again or face another siege of France. in the peace terms France had to return the Austrian Netherlands and Savoy (Austrian ally) made some gains. you can never claim this was a French victory.
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:10 |
Originally posted by Temujin
Originally posted by Challenger2
Some French units fought well at Rossbach, but there's not a lot you can do when you are caught in column of march by a fully deployed enemy.
|
the Prussians in one battle also caught the Russians in marching column and the Russians won.
|
Remind me, which one's that?
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:12 |
Originally posted by Jubelu
Then how do you explain the case of Warburg?
|
What's to explain? It's curious you've not mentioned Minden yet.
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:15 |
Originally posted by Challenger2
Remind me, which one's that?
|
Gro-Jgersdorf. OK, the Prussian force was rather small but there was a chance they could suceed.
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:43 |
Originally posted by Temujin
Originally posted by Challenger2
Remind me, which one's that?
|
Gro-Jgersdorf. OK, the Prussian force was rather small but there was a chance they could suceed.
|
Oh, you mean the battle where the Russans outnumbered the Prussians 2:1 [5:1 in artillery]. Where the Pussian attack fell into confusion, especially at Norkitteln, where Prussian battalions fired at each other and the Prussians became convinced they were attacking an enemy behind field fortifications?....Yeah , Okay. Nice try.
|
|
Jubelu
Immortal Guard
Joined: 08-Jun-2007
Location: Syrian Arab Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 23:23 |
So what is about Minden, about ignominious French defeat, just as Warburg? Nice try.
Each army has its own weakness, the Prussian army might fall into that confusion, but above all, they were still the most formidable land force as the most formidable British Navy.
They already had their own Leignitz and Rossbach, and then Freiburg, Burkersdorf.
About the Russian, I admit their formidable strength and brilliant commanders such as Stepan Fedorovich Apraksin and Pyotr Semyonovich Saltykov. Their achievement in Kay, Kunersdorf is undeniable.
|
|
Tancrde
Janissary
Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Nov-2007 at 08:45 |
Originally posted by Temujin
after Dettingen France had to call upon Prussia again or face another siege of France. |
After Dettingen (1743) France officially declared war to Austrian British,
So France began really Austrian succession war in 1744
Originally posted by Temujin
in the peace terms France had to return the Austrian Netherlands and Savoy (Austrian ally) made some gains. you can never claim this was a French victory. |
Later campaigns
The last three campaigns of the war in the Netherlands were illustrated by the now fully developed genius of Marshal Saxe. After Fontenoy the French carried all before them. The withdrawal of most of the British to aid in suppressing the Forty-Five rebellion at home left their allies in a helpless position. In 1746 the Dutch and the Austrians were driven back towards the line of the Meuse, and most of the important fortresses were taken by the French. The Battle of Roucoux (or Raucourt) near Lige, fought on 11 October between the allies under Prince Charles of Lorraine and the French under Saxe, resulted in a victory for the latter. Holland itself was now in danger, and when in April 1747 Saxe's army, which had now conquered the Austrian Netherlands up to the Meuse, turned its attention to the United Provinces. The old fortresses on the frontier offered but slight resistance. The Prince of Orange and the Duke of Cumberland underwent a severe defeat at Lauffeld (Lawfeld, also called Val) on 2 July 1747, and Saxe, after his victory, promptly and secretly despatched a corps under Marshal Lowendahl (17001755) to besiege Bergen op Zoom. On 18 September Bergen op Zoom was stormed by the French, and in the last year of the war Maastricht, attacked by the entire forces of Saxe and Lowendahl, surrendered on 7 May 1748. A large Russian army arrived to join the allies, but too late to be of use. The quarrel of Russia and Sweden had been settled by the Peace of bo in 1743, and in 1746 Russia had allied herself with Austria. Eventually a large army marched from Moscow to the Rhine, an event which was not without military significance, and in a manner preluded the great invasions of 18131814 and 1815. The general Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle (Aachen) was signed on 18 October 1748.
It was a French victory that left the gateway to the Dutch Republic open to invasion and the Dutch at the mercy of the French. The allied retreat allowed Saxe to send a detachment of 30,000 north across the lowlands quickly capturing the city of Bergen-op-Zoom to finish that year's campaign season. At the opening of the Spring campaign season of 1748, the French invested Maastricht and, after a brief siege the city fell on May 7. The city's siege started the peace process in April that ended the war in October 1748 with the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. Maurice de Saxe's long series of victorious campaigns, sieges and battles in the lowlands ensured France's position as the dominant land power in the peace negotiations during which the sound of Saxe's siege guns could be heard pounding away at the city of Maastricht.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Austrian_Succession
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fontenoy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lauffeld
Edited by Tancrde - 13-Nov-2007 at 08:56
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Nov-2007 at 18:51 |
Originally posted by Challenger2
Oh, you mean the battle where the Russans outnumbered the Prussians 2:1 [5:1 in artillery]. Where the Pussian attack fell into confusion, especially at Norkitteln, where Prussian battalions fired at each other and the Prussians became convinced they were attacking an enemy behind field fortifications?....Yeah , Okay. Nice try.
|
so where is the problem? the actual numbers of Prussians that won Rossbach were even smaller than the Prussian force at Gro-Jgersdorf. Lehwaldt had the same chances than Seydlitz to win the battle.
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 12:40 |
Originally posted by edgewaters
Originally posted by Challenger2
BTW Napoleon Bonaparte was an XVIII century General |
Only barely ... 1796. |
Still counts!
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 12:49 |
Originally posted by Jubelu
Quote: well, not on the numbers of engagements won, but if two armies fight each others, i reckon that the force winning the most engagements is the best.
Well, this is particularly applicable for XVIII century warfare. Prussia won a lot engagements, so did Britain. Spain and France became obsolete force in Europe and were merely paper tiger.
|
Just for entertainment, here are the Results of the Seven Years War for the Prussian Army:
Lobositz 1756 Prussian Win
Prague 1757 Prussian Win
Kolin 1757 Prussian Defeat
Gross Jaegersdorf 1757 Prussian Defeat
Rossbach 1757 Prussian Win
Breslau 1757 Prussian Defeat
Leuthen 1757 Prussian Win
Olmutz 1758 Prussian Defeat
Zorndorf 1758 Draw
Hochkirch 1758 Prussian Defeat
Kay 1759 Prussian Defeat
Kunersdorf 1759 Prussian Defeat
Maxen 1759 Prussian Defeat
Landeshut 1760 Prussian Defeat
Leignitz 1760 Prussian Win
Torgau 1760 Prussian Win
Bukersdorf 1762 Prussian Win
Freiburg 1762 Prussian Win
By your logic, having lost more engagements than they won, the Prussian Army performed poorly.
|
|
Challenger2
Colonel
Suspended
Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 12:50 |
Originally posted by Temujin
Originally posted by Challenger2
Oh, you mean the battle where the Russans outnumbered the Prussians 2:1 [5:1 in artillery]. Where the Pussian attack fell into confusion, especially at Norkitteln, where Prussian battalions fired at each other and the Prussians became convinced they were attacking an enemy behind field fortifications?....Yeah , Okay. Nice try.
|
so where is the problem? the actual numbers of Prussians that won Rossbach were even smaller than the Prussian force at Gro-Jgersdorf. Lehwaldt had the same chances than Seydlitz to win the battle.
|
We can quibble over numbers, but the odds were about the same. Lehwaldt was clearly not Frederick.
|
|