Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The French Army in XVIII Century

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The French Army in XVIII Century
    Posted: 27-Nov-2007 at 17:48
Originally posted by Joinville

 
You might as well claim that the British army of the 18th c. was pretty much the same as the one the Zulus chewed up at Isandlwhana in 1879.


Well....in many ways it was. But that's something for another time and another thread! Wink
Back to Top
Joinville View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 29-Sep-2006
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 353
  Quote Joinville Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Nov-2007 at 13:44
Originally posted by Jubelu

The structural army under Louis XV showed no real changes as well as innovation as seen in Prussia. It grew in an old-fashioned manner and deficit its own advantages. Until the end of Louis XV's reign, the only strong characteristic of this army was lavishness. I ought to say that there were not many differences between French Army of XVIII century and French Army on the eve of 1870.
And you base this on?
 
The same army that fought in 1870 beat up the Austrians in Italy in the 1860's. And the Russians at Sebastopol in the 1850's.
 
And supposedly this is then the self-same army that Napoleon used to fight his campaigns with.
 
You have already stated that unlike the Prussian armies, which reformed themselves, the French army didn't and suffered from it. And still this army fought the entire Napoleonic wars, where one of the conclusions was that the Prussian 18th c. model initially failed to adapt to the new ways of the French army, and paid for it. Which becomes positively weird, in view of your assertion that the French army was pretty much unchanged between the 18th c. and 1870?
 
Methinks you've stopped being consistent in your assesment of the French.
 
So either you think the French army was actually amazingly good in the 18th c., or I would think you have just given away a huge bias against the French army for some reason? Which would it be?
 
You might as well claim that the British army of the 18th c. was pretty much the same as the one the Zulus chewed up at Isandlwhana in 1879.
One must not insult the future.
Back to Top
Jubelu View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 08-Jun-2007
Location: Syrian Arab Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
  Quote Jubelu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Nov-2007 at 03:18
The fact was also more exacerbated since the shift of power from nobels and monarchy into bourgeoise. On the eve of the Revolution, the Monarchy was deeply in debt and had no ability to pay off. Totally different from Great Britain, France had no strong banking system at all. Perhaps this was the reason why Alexander Hamilton chose to drive US diplomacy toward Great Britain rather than France.

The structural army under Louis XV showed no real changes as well as innovation as seen in Prussia. It grew in an old-fashioned manner and deficit its own advantages. Until the end of Louis XV's reign, the only strong characteristic of this army was lavishness. I ought to say that there were not many differences between French Army of XVIII century and French Army on the eve of 1870.
Back to Top
Justinian View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
King of Númenor

Joined: 11-Nov-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
  Quote Justinian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Nov-2007 at 02:32
Originally posted by Jubelu

A very good reason there, Justinian
Do you think the political structure of France also hindered her from military success
I am not really acquainted with the political structure of france at this time so I am not real sure.  With that under consideration I would say yes it did.  If the nobles had not been so influential in the army (if they had been like the junkers of prussia I would have called it a positive) I think it would have been better.  I think we see a good example with the advent of the revolution and Napoleon.  Obviously the new tactics etc. played a huge role there, but you see how much better an army can be when its officer corps is promoted on talent and ability versus social standing and birth. 
 
The problem with France at this time is the nobles have not been sufficiently put under control.  They rebelled under Louis XI and they had rebelled under Louis XIV.  It was either make them high ranking officers and distract them with titles and keep them at court or risk them raising private armies and civil wars. 
 
I would say that is a result of Frances' political structure.  Hence the affirmative to your question.
 
Hope that answers your question.Smile
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann

Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 21:56
Originally posted by Temujin

Originally posted by Challenger2

 

Just for entertainment, here are the Results of the Seven Years War for the Prussian Army:

 

Lobositz 1756           Prussian Win

Prague 1757             Prussian Win

Kolin 1757                Prussian Defeat

Gross Jaegersdorf 1757 Prussian Defeat

Rossbach 1757           Prussian Win

Breslau 1757           Prussian Defeat

Leuthen 1757                     Prussian Win

Olmutz 1758             Prussian Defeat

Zorndorf 1758           Draw

Hochkirch 1758          Prussian Defeat

Kay 1759                 Prussian Defeat

Kunersdorf 1759          Prussian Defeat

Maxen 1759             Prussian Defeat

Landeshut 1760          Prussian Defeat

Leignitz 1760            Prussian Win

Torgau 1760             Prussian Win

Bukersdorf 1762          Prussian Win

Freiburg 1762           Prussian Win

 

By your logic, having lost more engagements than they won, the Prussian Army performed poorly.



you've forgotten the battles of the Austrian war of sucession. it was basically the same army and the same commanders.


No I haven't. Jubelu was disappointed at the performance of the French Army during the Seven Years War in his initial post. Smile

Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 19:05
Originally posted by Challenger2

 

Just for entertainment, here are the Results of the Seven Years War for the Prussian Army:

 

Lobositz 1756           Prussian Win

Prague 1757             Prussian Win

Kolin 1757                Prussian Defeat

Gross Jaegersdorf 1757 Prussian Defeat

Rossbach 1757           Prussian Win

Breslau 1757           Prussian Defeat

Leuthen 1757                     Prussian Win

Olmutz 1758             Prussian Defeat

Zorndorf 1758           Draw

Hochkirch 1758          Prussian Defeat

Kay 1759                 Prussian Defeat

Kunersdorf 1759          Prussian Defeat

Maxen 1759             Prussian Defeat

Landeshut 1760          Prussian Defeat

Leignitz 1760            Prussian Win

Torgau 1760             Prussian Win

Bukersdorf 1762          Prussian Win

Freiburg 1762           Prussian Win

 

By your logic, having lost more engagements than they won, the Prussian Army performed poorly.



you've forgotten the battles of the Austrian war of sucession. it was basically the same army and the same commanders.
Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 12:50
Originally posted by Temujin

Originally posted by Challenger2



Oh, you mean the battle where the Russans outnumbered the Prussians 2:1  [5:1 in artillery]. Where the Pussian attack fell into confusion, especially at Norkitteln, where Prussian battalions fired at each other and the Prussians became convinced they were attacking an enemy behind field fortifications?....Yeah , Okay. Nice try. Tongue


so where is the problem? the actual numbers of Prussians that won Rossbach were even smaller than the Prussian force at Gro-Jgersdorf. Lehwaldt had the same chances than Seydlitz to win the battle.
 
We can quibble over numbers, but the odds were about the same. Lehwaldt was clearly not Frederick. Wink
Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 12:49
Originally posted by Jubelu

Quote: well, not on the numbers of engagements won, but if two armies fight each others, i reckon that the force winning the most engagements is the best.

Well, this is particularly applicable for XVIII century warfare. Prussia won a lot engagements, so did Britain. Spain and France became obsolete force in Europe and were merely paper tiger.
 

Just for entertainment, here are the Results of the Seven Years War for the Prussian Army:

 

Lobositz 1756           Prussian Win

Prague 1757             Prussian Win

Kolin 1757                Prussian Defeat

Gross Jaegersdorf 1757 Prussian Defeat

Rossbach 1757           Prussian Win

Breslau 1757           Prussian Defeat

Leuthen 1757                     Prussian Win

Olmutz 1758             Prussian Defeat

Zorndorf 1758           Draw

Hochkirch 1758          Prussian Defeat

Kay 1759                 Prussian Defeat

Kunersdorf 1759          Prussian Defeat

Maxen 1759             Prussian Defeat

Landeshut 1760          Prussian Defeat

Leignitz 1760            Prussian Win

Torgau 1760             Prussian Win

Bukersdorf 1762          Prussian Win

Freiburg 1762           Prussian Win

 

By your logic, having lost more engagements than they won, the Prussian Army performed poorly.

Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Nov-2007 at 12:40
Originally posted by edgewaters

Originally posted by Challenger2

BTW Napoleon Bonaparte was an XVIII century General


Only barely ... 1796.
 
Still counts! Big%20smile
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Nov-2007 at 18:51
Originally posted by Challenger2



Oh, you mean the battle where the Russans outnumbered the Prussians 2:1  [5:1 in artillery]. Where the Pussian attack fell into confusion, especially at Norkitteln, where Prussian battalions fired at each other and the Prussians became convinced they were attacking an enemy behind field fortifications?....Yeah , Okay. Nice try. Tongue


so where is the problem? the actual numbers of Prussians that won Rossbach were even smaller than the Prussian force at Gro-Jgersdorf. Lehwaldt had the same chances than Seydlitz to win the battle.
Back to Top
Tancrde View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Tancrde Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Nov-2007 at 08:45
Originally posted by Temujin


after Dettingen France had to call upon Prussia again or face another siege of France.


After Dettingen (1743) France officially declared war to Austrian British,
So France began really Austrian succession war in 1744


Originally posted by Temujin

in the peace terms France had to return the Austrian Netherlands and Savoy (Austrian ally) made some gains. you can never claim this was a French victory.




Later campaigns
The last three campaigns of the war in the Netherlands were illustrated by the now fully developed genius of Marshal Saxe. After Fontenoy the French carried all before them. The withdrawal of most of the British to aid in suppressing the Forty-Five rebellion at home left their allies in a helpless position. In 1746 the Dutch and the Austrians were driven back towards the line of the Meuse, and most of the important fortresses were taken by the French. The Battle of Roucoux (or Raucourt) near Lige, fought on 11 October between the allies under Prince Charles of Lorraine and the French under Saxe, resulted in a victory for the latter. Holland itself was now in danger, and when in April 1747 Saxe's army, which had now conquered the Austrian Netherlands up to the Meuse, turned its attention to the United Provinces. The old fortresses on the frontier offered but slight resistance. The Prince of Orange and the Duke of Cumberland underwent a severe defeat at Lauffeld (Lawfeld, also called Val) on 2 July 1747, and Saxe, after his victory, promptly and secretly despatched a corps under Marshal Lowendahl (17001755) to besiege Bergen op Zoom. On 18 September Bergen op Zoom was stormed by the French, and in the last year of the war Maastricht, attacked by the entire forces of Saxe and Lowendahl, surrendered on 7 May 1748. A large Russian army arrived to join the allies, but too late to be of use. The quarrel of Russia and Sweden had been settled by the Peace of bo in 1743, and in 1746 Russia had allied herself with Austria. Eventually a large army marched from Moscow to the Rhine, an event which was not without military significance, and in a manner preluded the great invasions of 18131814 and 1815. The general Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle (Aachen) was signed on 18 October 1748.

It was a French victory that left the gateway to the Dutch Republic open to invasion and the Dutch at the mercy of the French. The allied retreat allowed Saxe to send a detachment of 30,000 north across the lowlands quickly capturing the city of Bergen-op-Zoom to finish that year's campaign season. At the opening of the Spring campaign season of 1748, the French invested Maastricht and, after a brief siege the city fell on May 7. The city's siege started the peace process in April that ended the war in October 1748 with the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. Maurice de Saxe's long series of victorious campaigns, sieges and battles in the lowlands ensured France's position as the dominant land power in the peace negotiations during which the sound of Saxe's siege guns could be heard pounding away at the city of Maastricht.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_Austrian_Succession

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Fontenoy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lauffeld



Edited by Tancrde - 13-Nov-2007 at 08:56
Back to Top
Jubelu View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 08-Jun-2007
Location: Syrian Arab Republic
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
  Quote Jubelu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 23:23
So what is about Minden, about ignominious French defeat, just as Warburg? Nice try.

Each army has its own weakness, the Prussian army might fall into that confusion, but above all, they were still the most formidable land force as the most formidable British Navy.

They already had their own Leignitz and Rossbach, and then Freiburg, Burkersdorf.

About the Russian, I admit their formidable strength and brilliant commanders such as Stepan Fedorovich Apraksin and Pyotr Semyonovich Saltykov. Their achievement in Kay, Kunersdorf is undeniable.
Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:43
Originally posted by Temujin

Originally posted by Challenger2



Remind me, which one's that?


Gro-Jgersdorf. OK, the Prussian force was rather small but there was a chance they could suceed.


Oh, you mean the battle where the Russans outnumbered the Prussians 2:1  [5:1 in artillery]. Where the Pussian attack fell into confusion, especially at Norkitteln, where Prussian battalions fired at each other and the Prussians became convinced they were attacking an enemy behind field fortifications?....Yeah , Okay. Nice try. Tongue
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:15
Originally posted by Challenger2



Remind me, which one's that?


Gro-Jgersdorf. OK, the Prussian force was rather small but there was a chance they could suceed.
Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:12
Originally posted by Jubelu

Then how do you explain the case of Warburg?


What's to explain? It's curious you've not mentioned Minden yet. Smile
Back to Top
Challenger2 View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
Suspended

Joined: 28-Apr-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 508
  Quote Challenger2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 20:10
Originally posted by Temujin

Originally posted by Challenger2

Some French units fought well at Rossbach, but there's not a lot you can do when you are caught in column of march by a fully deployed enemy.


the Prussians in one battle also caught the Russians in marching column and the Russians won.


Remind me, which one's that?
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 19:15
Originally posted by Tancrde



Prussia left the war in 1745.
French conquered lonely Austrian netherlands and invaded United provinces between 1745 1748,
in the same time they fought against British in India and North America
Austrian Dutch and British even asked russian to help them, but after th fall of Berg op Zoom it was too late for them.


after Dettingen France had to call upon Prussia again or face another siege of France. in the peace terms France had to return the Austrian Netherlands and Savoy (Austrian ally) made some gains. you can never claim this was a French victory.
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 19:13
Originally posted by Challenger2

Some French units fought well at Rossbach, but there's not a lot you can do when you are caught in column of march by a fully deployed enemy.


the Prussians in one battle also caught the Russians in marching column and the Russians won.
Back to Top
Tancrde View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Tancrde Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 06:42
Originally posted by Jubelu

The illusion that France was the most powerful mainpower was shattered right after the financial crisis of Louis XIV's reign. Not until Napoleon I enthroned did France enjoy her military peak.


France was maybe not so poweful than during the reign of Louis XIV but it remained the most powerful european state and the most populous.
Before Napoleon I during revolutionnary wars 1792 1797 despite of France was in civil war, French defeated almost all european countries on 4 differents fronts (Flanders Rhine Italia Pyrenees).
Even Romans never won against so many enemies in same time




Edited by Tancrde - 12-Nov-2007 at 06:54
Back to Top
Tancrde View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 05-Nov-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Tancrde Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Nov-2007 at 06:23

Originally posted by Jubelu



Spain and France became obsolete force in Europe and were merely paper tiger.


You speak about what war ?

Spanish weren't bad.
they won war of jenkins' against Britain
With French they defeated Austrian in Italia during Polish succession War.



Edited by Tancrde - 12-Nov-2007 at 06:36
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.