Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

"5000 years of Chinese history"

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: "5000 years of Chinese history"
    Posted: 24-Jul-2007 at 10:11

Many ordinary Chinese will tell others that they have 5000 years of history, but what is the basis for such claim? any ideas?

Back to Top
Dream208 View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 22-Jan-2006
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 176
  Quote Dream208 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Jul-2007 at 18:12

It is all depends on one's perspective on the exisitance and time period of Xia dynasty. But most of time, people says 5000 years of history simply because it sounds better than 4200, 3863, or etc years of history Cool 

Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Jul-2007 at 22:16
Standard propaganda to push the envelop on origins now days. "Our country is better than your country because we came first!"  At first is was impossible to have a Chinese civilization because of flooding by the Yellow River and  other water networks. Their sudden rise began after the invention of irrigation. No evidence  tells of advance cultural activity beforehand. But now I have opened the floodgates of telling me otherwise...
elenos
Back to Top
Preobrazhenskoe View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 27-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 398
  Quote Preobrazhenskoe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Aug-2007 at 12:45
^ What? Irrigation came long after Chinese civilization had been well established. The tradition of large-scale irrigation and hydraulic works did not come about until the early 6th century BC with engineers and statesmen such as Sunshu Ao, and a bit later with Ximen Bao in the 5th century BC. Although bronze artifacts dated before 2100 BC have been found, that is the traditionally marked date for the beginning of the Chinese Bronze Age. Already by the 16th century BC the Chinese had advanced bronze-smelting technology during the Shang Dynasty.
 
But no, the Chinese do not have 5,000 years of written history, it is more like 4,000, which is actually quite a big difference. It is pretty certain that ancient Sumerian, Egyptian, and Harappan civilizations were developed 5,000 years ago around 3,000 BC, yet China as a higher civilization under the Shang mirrored the time frame of the rise and fall of Mycenaean Greece, from the late 17th/early 16th century BC until the 11th century BC.
 
Eric


Edited by Preobrazhenskoe - 10-Aug-2007 at 12:47
Back to Top
Siege Tower View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 580
  Quote Siege Tower Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Aug-2007 at 14:06
it's very strange to me that i have never found any books ith exclusive studies on chinese society before 2500BC, maybe anyone can help me with that. 

Edited by Siege Tower - 10-Aug-2007 at 14:08
Back to Top
jebusrocks View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 09-Aug-2007
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote jebusrocks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Aug-2007 at 20:51
<QUOTE>The Xia Dynasty (Chinese: 夏朝; Pinyin: xi cho; Wade-Giles: hsia-ch'ao), ca. 2070 BC1600 BC,[1] of China is the first dynasty to be described in the Records of the Grand Historian and unofficial Bamboo Annals, which record the names of seventeen kings over fourteen generations lasted 431 or 471 years. The dynasty was preceded by the legendary Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors, and followed by the Shang Dynasty.</QUOTE>


Here you go. 2070BC to 2000CE around 4000 yrs of CIVILIZATION
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2007 at 23:20
I would agree on about 2500 BC. It would seem the question is what is a civilization? Many answers are given. Control of the Yellow River was the big task in settling the land. Even today they still have the occasional monster floods.

1) A society in an advanced state of social development (e.g., with complex legal and political and religious organizations) "the people slowly progressed from barbarism to civilization"

2) The social process whereby societies achieve civilization

3) A particular society at a particular time and place
e.g. "Indus valley civilization"

elenos
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Nov-2007 at 00:31
Originally posted by jebusrocks

...
Here you go. 2070BC to 2000CE around 4000 yrs of CIVILIZATION
 
By the way, places like Jerico and other ancient CITIES from the Middle East are from 7.000 years ago. Mohenho Dahro in India and of course the cities of Mesopotamia are a lot older than the first Chinese spark. Egypt starts closer to 5.000 years ago its PEAK. Caral in Peru, the Americas is from 2634 years ago.
 
Now, it is highly doubtful the "civilization" of the Xia is the same of the Han or the one of modern Chineses LOL. It is like saying Egypt is the same since the Pharaons, Iraq since Sumer, Britain is the same since Stoneage or Peru since Caral. Radical changed had happened since, so the idea a civilization last too 5.000 years is quite forced.
 
China civilization like we know today, with Kung Fu-Tse, Lao Tse, etc., stars in the Spring and Autum period, a couple of centuries B.C., contemporary with the Helenistic Period, and its first major empire is the Han, contemporary with the Roman.
 
The glory of China, though, is during the Tang and Sung periods of the Middle Ages, where technology, science, literature, arts and poetry flourished and reached its peak.
 
 


Edited by pinguin - 08-Nov-2007 at 00:31
Back to Top
LuckyNomad View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 02-May-2007
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 68
  Quote LuckyNomad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Nov-2007 at 04:47
Koreans believe that their country is also 5,000 years old. The proof?? Well, I've yet to see it. Though they set the date for the founding of their original Gojoseon dynasty at 2,333bc. Once again, I'm not sure if they have any proof of this other than records from later dynasties. Not sure how 4,340 years equals 5,000. A lot of nationalism comes into play with these things.
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Nov-2007 at 11:24
You can name highly organized tribal societies from all over the world that failed the "test" of civilization. Building , sculpture and all that sort of thing. On the other hand that is also branding 'civilization" as "organized materialism" for they leave much stuff behind for those of the future to find. To say a groups of people with a common heritage didn't form a civilization is a poor indication of how smart they were.

They were often enough better off living in tribal societies and didn't want to go any further in having centralized forms of government where power inevitably falls into the hands of the few. The Celts in Europe remained divided into competing tribes although having the world's first Common Market and they also worked in metal that could travel from the Black Sea the Irish Sea.

So far as China is concerned everybody would like to find more and there are some exciting early finds of casting and metal working and so on, but no real evidence of cooperation between the early clans and tribes. But then again much of the early evidence got washed away and left behind no conclusive records of what their achievements were. One always hopes to find out about ways of life we have never heard about before.


Edited by elenos - 08-Nov-2007 at 11:32
elenos
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Nov-2007 at 11:57
Originally posted by Dream208

It is all depends on one's perspective on the exisitance and time period of Xia dynasty. But most of time, people says 5000 years of history simply because it sounds better than 4200, 3863, or etc years of history Cool 

 
you are from Taiwan i reckon you would know the history of nationalist government well.
 
first of all, the so called "5000 years history" is a creation by early nationalist revolutionary government when they overthrew the Manchu Qing dynasty, although the stress of a long and continuous Chinese history is not completely unfounded, it was to a degree associated with "anti-Manchu" background of the time.
 
secondly, the so called "5000 years history" was "calculated" on the count of Huangdi period, rather than the Xia dynasty.
 
furthermore, the view that Chinese history started since the era of Huangdi was however not simply a creation by nationalist government. Sima qian in his famous history work 《record of the grand historian》considered the era of Huangdi as the begining of China's history, and based on this perception, later works tried to calculate the "exact date" of Huangdi's reign and those legendary rules(such as ZhuanXu, Yao, Shun etc) that subsequently followed him as they were also recorded by Shiji in chronicle order but without exact date.
 
Nationalist government inherited this traditional view regarding Chinese history and its "calculation" was based on previous similar works such as the one by Huangfu Mi(215-282AD)'s 《历代帝王世纪》of late Eastern Han to early Western Jin era, and that of Shao Yong(1011-1077AD)'s《皇极经世书》of Northern Song dynasty.
 
As matter of fact, when Sun Yat Sen became the Provisional President, he issued the open declaration nationwide that the year 1912, is the first year of the ROC which is the 4609th year of Huangdi. The nationalist government in reality utilized previous calculations(which are questionable to say the least) to serve its own purpose.
 
So Chinese history is approximated to around "5000 years of history" ever since.
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Nov-2007 at 19:41
What excites me and many others about Chinese culture is the ideas like "chi" force said to run through all living things. This tells of ways of thought original to the Eastern world for thousands of years. To my mind the unique ways of living with nature predates the rise of Chinese "civilization" though many tend to confuse one with the other.  
elenos
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Nov-2007 at 00:07
Originally posted by Preobrazhenskoe

But no, the Chinese do not have 5,000 years of written history, it is more like 4,000, which is actually quite a big difference.
 
some characters found on the pottery works of Taosi archaeological site(in Xiangfen County of Shanxi province) match later ones
 
 
1-   Taosi pottery
2-4 oracle bone inscription
5-9 bronze ware inscription
 
 
1-   Taosi pottery
2-5 oracle bone inscription
6-9 bronze ware inscription
 
not a big difference there between the three
 
Taosi site is carbon dated to 2600-2200BC
 


Edited by The Charioteer - 11-Nov-2007 at 01:31
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 01:31

The origin of Chinese character might be traced to even earlier stage, some charaters found on the tortoise-shell from Jihu archaeological site(7000BC-5800BC) resembles the one found on tortoise-shell of Shang dynasty, for instance, the character for "eye" could be mistaken as Shang oracle bone inscription if it wasnt actually found at Jiahu.

"Eye" from Jiahu

"Eye" from oracle bone inscription, bronze ware inscription, standardized version by Qin dynasty
http://home.htu.cn/hzdam/05bkzl/hzyy/kewen1_06/kewen1_06_mu.htm

"Eye" in modern form

 

both the Shang and Jiahu people carved characters on tortoise-shell for divination purpose,
it seems this practice may had early origin.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2956925.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiahu



Edited by The Charioteer - 11-Nov-2007 at 01:35
Back to Top
Omnipotence View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 494
  Quote Omnipotence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 02:24
3000 yrs would be the most conservative estimate. 5000 would be arguable, though it would be a VERY liberal estimate. It was previously 4000(judged by historic length through word of mouth) until they found evidence of more sophisticated cultures(although it does not contain any historical writings to a significant degree) around 5000 yrs ago. Although when it comes to the actual existence of recorded history, 3000 would make a better estimate. In short, 5000 was probably made to sound better, for usually historic length means the length of "written" history.
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 05:04

Originally posted by pinguin

Now, it is highly doubtful the "civilization" of the Xia is the same of the Han or the one of modern Chineses LOL

this is a bronze jue excavated at erlitou site(Xia dynasty)

this is a Shang dynasty bronze jue

a Ming dynasty bronze jue

a Qing dynasty Bronze jue which was casted for emperor Qianlong for rituals

"In the west of the Eurasian continent, bronze items were in most cases used for agriculture and warfare. In China, the greatest part of discovered and preserved bronze items was not forged to ploughs or swords but cast to sacrificial vessels. Even a great part of weapons had a sacrificial meaning like daggers and axes that symbolized the heavenly power of the ruler. The strong religious sense of bronze objects brought up a great number of vessel types and shapes which became so typically that they should be copied as archaic style receptacles with other materials like wood, jade, ivory or even gold until the 20th century"

"Jue - one of the oldest wine mugs, the earliest found dates the Erlitou culture. The jue's typical features are the long, canal-like beak (liu 流) and the shorter counterpart on the other side (wei 尾). On both sides, small handles (pan 鋬) are fitted. the Shang dynasty on, jue beaks are crowned by one or two zhu 柱 buttons. This vessel type has been very popular and was copied oftenly. It has been in use until the upcoming of bowls and cups during Song dynasty. "
http://www.a3guo.com/en/china/Art/Bronze/bronze.html

the three legged vessel used to contain liquors for ritual purpose by that of Qing is rather consistent with its earliest Xia counterpart.

besides the origin of Chinese script might be traced to that period, the "ancestor" of three legged vessel which is so typical of Chinese culture might be found at Jiahu as well.

 

btw, erlitou palace mirror the forbidden city in such way that we can say the basic cultural pattern for the layout of palace was already established since the Xia and was passed down all the way to Qing dynasty just like the basic idea of the bronze jue was passed down all the way to Qing.


Edited by The Charioteer - 11-Nov-2007 at 05:15
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2007 at 01:34
Originally posted by elenos

This tells of ways of thought original to the Eastern world for thousands of years
 
 
 


Edited by The Charioteer - 22-Nov-2007 at 02:09
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2007 at 01:45

 


Edited by The Charioteer - 22-Nov-2007 at 01:54
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2007 at 01:59
 
 


Edited by The Charioteer - 22-Nov-2007 at 02:03
Back to Top
The Charioteer View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 735
  Quote The Charioteer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Nov-2007 at 02:10
 
 


Edited by The Charioteer - 22-Nov-2007 at 02:15
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.061 seconds.