the Popol Vuh , as document , is compiled by a catholic native in post contact times. There are references to Dios, Cristianoil and and the visit of a bishop. But the histories , legends, myths etc have older roots, ofcourse.
Originally posted by PINGUIN
Nope. The Popol Vuh was writen post-contact, based on ancient legends. Now, it is true there is some degree of synchretism in there, but not as much as expected |
I see. I have the idea that it aint so much either but even then, what is this syncretism then?
For example, if there are giant flood stories or ' in the beginning there was darkness '- like phrases in passages that are related to Creation , then I dont see why this betrays biblical influences. They might sound similar to the Genesis passages, but such things are archaisms that will appear in many (creation )myths. After all, before creation there is supposed to be a certain nothingness etc. And ...themes like the the creation of animals and men are ony natural to expect in creation myths as well. The Bible can hardly claim a monopoly on such things.