Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Creation of Israel.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 10>
Author
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Creation of Israel.
    Posted: 25-Jan-2008 at 16:05
 
Originally posted by Peteratwar

The fact that the current arab nations are as artificial in their boundaries as anywhere else in the Middle East
or in the rest of the world, even including quite a few islands.
 
appears to be conveniently forgotten.
 
They were all part of the Ottoman Empire
Back to Top
erkut View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
Persona non Grata

Joined: 18-Feb-2006
Location: T.R.N.C.
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 965
  Quote erkut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Feb-2008 at 00:33
First i would like to remind words of pekau;
''Just a note: This has nothing to do with antisemtism or any other negative attitude towards current Israel. It's just another typical "What if" question.''
(And also i think the place of israel is really good now.)
 
Now; maybe allied powers would create their own İsraels, USSR İsrael in Birobidzhan, and the Western one would be some where in Germany...
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Serge L View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 485
  Quote Serge L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2008 at 22:27
Oh, since this topic has been "resurrected" i can reply to edgewater Clap


Actually there were proposals that were entirely amenable to the Jews in the post-war period that suggested Western Canada as a potential location. It was sparsely populated, had great resources, and it was a good spot to do trade from.

But Canada objected vociferously. Which was entirely unfortunate in hindsight - it would have been so simple, so easy.

There was a similar Jewish-led intiative to establish a state in Australia, by purchasing land in the Kimberley region (called the Kimberley Plan). The Australians, too, objected, stating that they would not accept "alien settlement", despite the fact that the landowners, the Durack family, strongly supported the idea. But newspapers of the period are rife with scaremongering about Jews "swarming" into the cities "even if they have to burrow under wire netting."

I can only imagine that there would be even more vociferous objection from anywhere in western Germany. Eastern Germany - well they'd taken so many lumps that they weren't going to put up a fight about another, but, that would put the new state in the Soviet bloc, which would probably be unacceptable to Jews of the West, especially after the war and their recent brush with European totalitarianism.


Canada and Australia would have been better (or less bad) than Palestine just because their lands are less densely populated, so you would have needed to evict less people to make space for Jews. However, every people would object what  present time Palestinians do: "Jews could have been persecuted and deserve a state of their own and compensations, yet this was not our fault, so why should we be penalized in the process?"
This is the core of the problem.

The only place where this rationale does not apply is Germany, because Hitlerian Germany was the main, if not the only (Mussolini and other satellites of Nazi Germany had no real issues with Jews, when they cooperated in the persecution they did it just to please Hitler and his maniacal hate) culprit of what happened to their Juden.

So it would be fair and consistent with war laws that the loser had to suffer territorial loss to compensate for war crimes.

The Jewish state could have been originally created as a buffer  between West and East Germany, "protected by troops of the four main winning powers", and eventually become a neutral buffer state between the blocks during cold war -- similar to Switzerland or Finland.

Eventually, after the end of cold war, it could have Joined the EU.

I would bet this solution would have worked a lot better than our world one.

Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-May-2008 at 20:13
Originally posted by Serge L

Canada and Australia would have been better (or less bad) than Palestine just because their lands are less densely populated, so you would have needed to evict less people to make space for Jews. However, every people would object what  present time Palestinians do: "Jews could have been persecuted and deserve a state of their own and compensations, yet this was not our fault, so why should we be penalized in the process?"

This is the core of the problem.

 
We should remember that many tragic incidents occured throughout history because nations tried to avoid international responsibility. The instability and conflict in the Balkans, for instance, was a major contribution to the beginning of WWI... where nation as far as India and Canada were dragged in with hundreds and thousands of human loss...
 
Originally posted by Serge L

The only place where this rationale does not apply is Germany, because Hitlerian Germany was the main, if not the only (Mussolini and other satellites of Nazi Germany had no real issues with Jews, when they cooperated in the persecution they did it just to please Hitler and his maniacal hate) culprit of what happened to their Juden.

So it would be fair and consistent with war laws that the loser had to suffer territorial loss to compensate for war crimes.

 
Defeat in war does not justify the violation of moral obligation of humanity. We do live in civilized world of 21st century, no? The whole point here is to end or resolve the conflict, not to decide that winner gets everything in war. Wouldn't that encourage other nations to focus on their war effort... and create more conflicts that we tried to resolve? Isn't that like going back to sqaure one?
 
Originally posted by Serge L

The Jewish state could have been originally created as a buffer  between West and East Germany, "protected by troops of the four main winning powers", and eventually become a neutral buffer state between the blocks during cold war -- similar to Switzerland or Finland.

Eventually, after the end of cold war, it could have Joined the EU.

 
Whoa, let's not forget that this kind of partition aroused Germans to support Hitler after WWI. When international organization carelessly divide up the land like they did to Weimar Republic and Yugoslavia, we merely delay the inevitable conflict. And it just so happens that delayed conflicts tend to get much worse...Unhappy
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-May-2008 at 07:59
Let us not forget that it was, quite honestly, the fault of the Jewish population of Judea that they lost the territory in the first place. While the Jews certainly did suffer, that does not entitle them to any land. The Jewish population were, in fact, not really a Jewish population. They were citizens of Germany, Poland, France, Russia. They all had a country to return to. Dividing nations along religious/cultural grounds is something Western nations would typically describe as racist and totalitarian.
Back to Top
Super Goat (^_^) View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 22-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 180
  Quote Super Goat (^_^) Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-May-2008 at 08:09
A- Israel is the oldest nation on planet earth ( language,traditition,religion).      
where  Hebrews/Jews live non stop for the past 4000 years.
 
B- Israel was created by the Jews (amovment called Zionism) for self determination since the 19th cen. and not "given" nor created by the British after WW2.
 
C-prior to WW2 Israel was organised as autonomous future state by the Jews. with organisations,institutions facilities ,and cities were already built like Tel Aviv etc.
 
D- the Palestinians never formed an ethnic national  entity nor  astate.
 
E- the Arab states are artificial  creation of the west ,by giving lands to local "kings and Sheiks" for oil and support.  "states" with no historical ethnical basic. Jordan Syria Lebanon Iraq the Gulf etc.


And the sky is purple....


Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-May-2008 at 08:40
I say give it to Lebanon, where the descendants of the Canaanites reside.
Back to Top
Hebrewtext View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 24-Jan-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 88
  Quote Hebrewtext Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 20:04
Originally posted by Super Goat (^_^)

A- Israel is the oldest nation on planet earth ( language,traditition,religion).      
where  Hebrews/Jews live non stop for the past 4000 years.
 
B- Israel was created by the Jews (amovment called Zionism) for self determination since the 19th cen. and not "given" nor created by the British after WW2.
 
C-prior to WW2 Israel was organised as autonomous future state by the Jews. with organisations,institutions facilities ,and cities were already built like Tel Aviv etc.
 
D- the Palestinians never formed an ethnic national  entity nor  astate.
 
E- the Arab states are artificial  creation of the west ,by giving lands to local "kings and Sheiks" for oil and support.  "states" with no historical ethnical basic. Jordan Syria Lebanon Iraq the Gulf etc.


And the sky is purple....


 
 
face it   , ignorant one.
Back to Top
ArmenianSurvival View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
  Quote ArmenianSurvival Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 20:40
Israel was created by the Jews (amovment called Zionism) for self determination since the 19th cen. and not "given" nor created by the British after WW2.
 
The Zionist movement was neither a religious nor nationalistic movement. It was an artificial movement, in that most of the movement was dedicated to figuring out where their 'homeland' was going to be. Once they decided on Palestine in the early 20th century, their main task was figuring out how to convince world Jewry to move to the land. If Zionism was a national movement, they would have already had a 'homeland' and all they would have to do was gain independence, like any other normal country. This was not the case, since Zionism was not a national movement.
 
Israel was not solely 'created by the Jews'. The proto-Israeli state was established when the British gave the Zionists certain authority in the British Mandate in Palestine, and removed the cap on Jewish immigration. Israel, from its moment of conception, was in bed with European imperialism, unlike every other national movement which was opposed to imperialism. Another example of how Zionism is not a national or religious movement.
 
 
prior to WW2 Israel was organised as autonomous future state by the Jews. with organisations,institutions facilities ,and cities were already built like Tel Aviv etc.
 
Yes, because the British allowed them to.
 
 
the Palestinians never formed an ethnic national  entity nor  astate.
 
Useless rhetoric, only advocated by those who support the artificial state of Israel in their attempt to make it look more "natural" than the native Palestinian state.
 
 
the Arab states are artificial  creation of the west ,by giving lands to local "kings and Sheiks" for oil and support.  "states" with no historical ethnical basic. Jordan Syria Lebanon Iraq the Gulf etc.
 
No other country was conceived more by the west than any other, except maybe Kosovo. Politically, financially and diplomatically made possible by western nations and with western capital. Even the Zionists themselves coming to Palestine considered themselves Europeans and not Semites. Its clearly written in Zionist literature.
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance

Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2009 at 05:56
"Self Determination", if not a recent invention, has been promoted in recent times as a high goal for the good of all man-kind. In reality it is a racist, bigoted and xenophobic concept that encourages false divisions, ideological conflict and persecution.

The "Jewish People" do not need a homeland. I can guarantee that if someone announced today that Europe would now be for "white people only" there would be a huge international out-cry. Just because a religious or ethnic group exists does NOT mean that it requires self-governance.

People like to argue that the Jewish people have been persecuted throughout history. This is a fallacy. Examples that are brought up include the following: Egypt; Alexandria; Rome; Russia and, of course, the Holocaust.

It is indeed true, if you believe religious texts, that the ancient Israelites were enslaved by Egypt. They would hardly have been the only ones though. Slaves were routinely traded in Africa for millenia, often sourced from the same villages or communities over and over again.

When considering Roman administered Judea and later Alexandria you could only ever argue that they brought it upon themselves. In the case of Rome they were indeed suffering some minor religious persecution under the Empire, but their violent rebellion invited the Romans to act as they did. Many of the Judeans could only have been described, in the modern vernacular, as terrorists. Similarly in Alexandria the Jewish instigated massive gang-violence and ethnic conflict that damaged the city severely.

In modern times the persecution is much less justified. Persecution and death at the hands of Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were inexcusable. In this case it was probably the self-imposed cultural isolation (and elitism) as well as the relative wealth of many Jewish communities that made them easier targets. While The Holocaust was truly terrible, the Jewish deaths actually comprised a relatively small amount when compared to the number of Slavic deaths during the war.

Besides all of this, it comes down to the injustice inflicted upon the Palestinians. The Palestinians, pre-existing nation or not, helped win World War 2 and end the Holocaust with the promise they would be allowed to govern themselves afterward. They even opened their doors to a number of Jewish immigrants. The Jewish communities literally flooded the country though, ignoring the limits in place and brutally betraying the generosity of the Palestinian people. They then resorted to terrorism and violence in order to take control of the country based on the fact that they lived there almost 2 millennia ago, and upon a religious and culturally elitist opinion that they held some right over the land.

The international community SHOULD have stopped it there. Regrettably they were still feeling guilty for not intervening in the holocaust sooner and because none of them would willingly open their doors to such a number of immigrants, persecuted or not, they let the Palestinian people suffer. Such is "self-determination".
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2009 at 14:35
Originally posted by Super Goat (^_^)

 
B- Israel was created by the Jews (amovment called Zionism) for self determination since the 19th cen. and not "given" nor created by the British after WW2.
It certainly wasn't created by the British. Britain did not even vote for the UN Resolution that created it.
 
The countries that voted for the setting up of the two states were Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Byelorussia, Canada, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Haiti, Iceland, Liberia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, Ukraine, Union of South Africa, USSR, USA, Uruguay, Venezuela.
 
Which, perhaps notably, included the entire Soviet block (Cuba abstained but of course wasn't Communist at the time).
 
Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, Greece, India, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Yemen voted against.

Argentina, Chile, China, Colombia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia abstained.

Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2009 at 14:52
Originally posted by Zaitsev


The "Jewish People" do not need a homeland. I can guarantee that if someone announced today that Europe would now be for "white people only" there would be a huge international out-cry. Just because a religious or ethnic group exists does NOT mean that it requires self-governance.
Nobody needs a homeland. Nobody needs a home. However, you need a reason to deny him one.

People like to argue that the Jewish people have been persecuted throughout history. This is a fallacy.
No it isn't. It's a slight exaggeration that's all. It wouod only be a fallacy if they had never been persecuted at all.
 
'Throughout history' the Jews have been frequently persecuted. That 'throughout' doesn't mean at every single moment. Throughout England there are public houses: that's not a fallacy, even though lots of buildings are not public houses.
 
Buy a dictionary. And given your signature, look up 'straw man' while you're about it.
While The Holocaust was truly terrible, the Jewish deaths actually comprised a relatively small amount when compared to the number of Slavic deaths during the war.
Figures? References? Sources?

Besides all of this, it comes down to the injustice inflicted upon the Palestinians. The Palestinians, pre-existing nation or not, helped win World War 2 and end the Holocaust
No they didn't, not that it's particularly relevant.
with the promise they would be allowed to govern themselves afterward.
References? Sources? The British were trying to get them (and the Jews) to accept a single, self-governing state as a discharge of their mandate. Nobody would accept that, so the UN took back the mandate and split the country between the two.
They even opened their doors to a number of Jewish immigrants. The Jewish communities literally flooded the country though, ignoring the limits in place and brutally betraying the generosity of the Palestinian people. They then resorted to terrorism and violence in order to take control of the country based on the fact that they lived there almost 2 millennia ago, and upon a religious and culturally elitist opinion that they held some right over the land.
You're somewhat forgetting the Arab terrorism that bedevilled the country before WW2 (and threatened during it). And, specifically, the Arabs attacked Israel in 1948, not the other way around. 
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 00:59
Originally posted by Zaitsev

"Self Determination", if not a recent invention, has been promoted in recent times as a high goal for the good of all man-kind. In reality it is a racist, bigoted and xenophobic concept that encourages false divisions, ideological conflict and persecution.

The "Jewish People" do not need a homeland. I can guarantee that if someone announced today that Europe would now be for "white people only" there would be a huge international out-cry. Just because a religious or ethnic group exists does NOT mean that it requires self-governance.

People like to argue that the Jewish people have been persecuted throughout history. This is a fallacy. Examples that are brought up include the following: Egypt; Alexandria; Rome; Russia and, of course, the Holocaust.

It is indeed true, if you believe religious texts, that the ancient Israelites were enslaved by Egypt. They would hardly have been the only ones though. Slaves were routinely traded in Africa for millenia, often sourced from the same villages or communities over and over again.

When considering Roman administered Judea and later Alexandria you could only ever argue that they brought it upon themselves. In the case of Rome they were indeed suffering some minor religious persecution under the Empire, but their violent rebellion invited the Romans to act as they did. Many of the Judeans could only have been described, in the modern vernacular, as terrorists. Similarly in Alexandria the Jewish instigated massive gang-violence and ethnic conflict that damaged the city severely.

In modern times the persecution is much less justified. Persecution and death at the hands of Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were inexcusable. In this case it was probably the self-imposed cultural isolation (and elitism) as well as the relative wealth of many Jewish communities that made them easier targets. While The Holocaust was truly terrible, the Jewish deaths actually comprised a relatively small amount when compared to the number of Slavic deaths during the war.

Besides all of this, it comes down to the injustice inflicted upon the Palestinians. The Palestinians, pre-existing nation or not, helped win World War 2 and end the Holocaust with the promise they would be allowed to govern themselves afterward. They even opened their doors to a number of Jewish immigrants. The Jewish communities literally flooded the country though, ignoring the limits in place and brutally betraying the generosity of the Palestinian people. They then resorted to terrorism and violence in order to take control of the country based on the fact that they lived there almost 2 millennia ago, and upon a religious and culturally elitist opinion that they held some right over the land.

The international community SHOULD have stopped it there. Regrettably they were still feeling guilty for not intervening in the holocaust sooner and because none of them would willingly open their doors to such a number of immigrants, persecuted or not, they let the Palestinian people suffer. Such is "self-determination".


This has got to be one of the best posts I have yet seen in this thread.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 03:01
^

I concur with CXI on that.

Originally posted by Zaitsev


Besides all of this, it comes down to the injustice inflicted upon the Palestinians. The Palestinians, pre-existing nation or not, helped win World War 2 and end the Holocaust with the promise they would be allowed to govern themselves afterward. They even opened their doors to a number of Jewish immigrants. The Jewish communities literally flooded the country though, ignoring the limits in place and brutally betraying the generosity of the Palestinian people. They then resorted to terrorism and violence in order to take control of the country based on the fact that they lived there almost 2 millennia ago, and upon a religious and culturally elitist opinion that they held some right over the land.


Good analogy and summary. This indeed is the root of the problem, not to mention that these same people involved ended up living and having their children and grandchildren born in tents, and shelled out refugee camps. That is 60 years of living in a sub-standard sub-nomadic lifestyle that would not give much hope of resolve to anyone. The problem is that Israel plays the victim card a bit too often, it is not the sole ambasador nor protector of Jewish peoples - nor are the Jewish people to be viewed by the example that Israel sets out for itself.



Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 03:13
One small correction - Gcle was indeed right one one small thing. It was in WW1 that the Palestinian people were most assistance in the Allied war effort. It was late at night, and my mind was not as sharp as it could be. I shall elaborate on sources later as I must currently see Praetor and Knights off at the airport.

Thankyou es_bih and constantine on your kind words.
Back to Top
Al Jassas View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
  Quote Al Jassas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 05:41

Hello to you all

 
I think gcle got his history mixed up some how so here are a few reminders.
 
First, Palestine was a mandate, not a colony. However, Britain treated it as HM colony and rather than direct administration it outsourced the management of the mandate to the Jewish agency. Most of the civil service people were member of that organization or were ardent zionists so were the commissioners. The Brits confiscated huge swathes of the best agricultural lands, now called the Plains of Sharon and Esdraelon, from the Palestinians and gave them for free to Jewish colonists coming from europe who had the money to buy them but instead were given these lands for free. 
 
The second point about Terror. Obviously you haven't heard about the Haganah, Irgun, Stern and of course good old Wingate. All these were terrorist organization and this isn't me, this is the British government calling them that (have you forgotten the famous wanted terrorist poster of Shamir in Madrid in 92?). Since 1920 until 1946 their hands is soacked in the blood of at least 2000 Palestinians (killed more Palestinians than all the "terrorist Palestinians" ever killed from jews).They began terror first by killing Palestinians who refused to sell their lands to them, which instigated the 1920 riots by the way, and then a huge number of bombing that lead to the 36 rebellion. Do you know why they rebelled in 36? Because the British authorities turned the left cheek while many within the British like Wingate lead death squads against Palestinians for no other reason other than they were so (the toll above doesn't include the death squads). The mandate government was totally complacent with zionist terror and did utterly nothing. The problem is that zionist terror came to bite them where it heart and still didn't do anything (King David Hotel masterminded by none other than the men of peace, Rabin and Begin). Is it a wonder that Arabs in Palestine were sympathetic to the Nazis?
  
 
Al-Jassas
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 11:24
Originally posted by Al Jassas

Hello to you all

 
I think gcle got his history mixed up some how so here are a few reminders.
 
First, Palestine was a mandate, not a colony. However, Britain treated it as HM colony and rather than direct administration it outsourced the management of the mandate to the Jewish agency. Most of the civil service people were member of that organization or were ardent zionists so were the commissioners. The Brits confiscated huge swathes of the best agricultural lands, now called the Plains of Sharon and Esdraelon, from the Palestinians and gave them for free to Jewish colonists coming from europe who had the money to buy them but instead were given these lands for free. 
Apart from the bit about Palestine being a mandate (which I said myself), the rest is unfounded propaganda.
 
The second point about Terror. Obviously you haven't heard about the Haganah, Irgun, Stern and of course good old Wingate.
That's silly. Of course I have. I was reading the newspapers at the time, al Jassas, and the newspapers were full of them. They're one reason the UK government (and people on the whole) were so anti-Jewish at the time. I remember the King David Hotel being blown up, I remember Ben Hecht saying that every time he heard a british soldier had been killed, a rose bloomed in his heart.
 
Of course I'm aware of Jewish terrorism, as much as I'm aware of Arab terrorism, and IRA terrorism. That remark of yours would be insulting if it wasn't so childish.
 
I have no sympathy for anyone involved in the Palestine conflict, except the children.  
All these were terrorist organization and this isn't me, this is the British government calling them that (have you forgotten the famous wanted terrorist poster of Shamir in Madrid in 92?). Since 1920 until 1946 their hands is soacked in the blood of at least 2000 Palestinians (killed more Palestinians than all the "terrorist Palestinians" ever killed from jews).They began terror first by killing Palestinians who refused to sell their lands to them, which instigated the 1920 riots by the way, and then a huge number of bombing that lead to the 36 rebellion. Do you know why they rebelled in 36? Because the British authorities turned the left cheek while many within the British like Wingate lead death squads against Palestinians for no other reason other than they were so (the toll above doesn't include the death squads). The mandate government was totally complacent with zionist terror and did utterly nothing. The problem is that zionist terror came to bite them where it heart and still didn't do anything (King David Hotel masterminded by none other than the men of peace, Rabin and Begin). Is it a wonder that Arabs in Palestine were sympathetic to the Nazis?
I merely pointed out that they were.
Back to Top
Al Jassas View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 07-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1810
  Quote Al Jassas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 14:30
Hello Graham
 
First of all, do you know Herbert Samuel? he was the a member of the Jewish agency and the longest serving comissioner in Palestine. It was he who began the large scale land confiscation and prevented Palestinians who were stationed outside Palestine from returning. This isn't propaganda it is the truth and it is well documented and if you want I wil provide you with the names of books and their refrences from the foreign office released documents that prove that.
 
My second point is the British did turn the left cheek and actively helped zionists in the lead up to the end of the mandate. Zionists were accumilating mass weapons and even building air fields under the very nose of the British while they disarmed Palestinians and this is too well documented even though the zionist organizations were terrorising the British.
 
AL-Jassas
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 16:24
Did you ever see or read 'Exodus'? (The film and novel, not the Biblical book.)
 
The Palestinians say the British favoured the Jews; the Jews say they favoured the Palestinians. And of course it is true there were Zionist Jews in Britain (like Samuel) and there were antisemites in Britain (like Bevin). That diesn't mean Britain was either pro or anti Jewish or Palestinian. (The army was against Samuel, even when he was in office, as Allenby among others made plain.)
 
Samuel was High Commissioner for Palestine from 1922 to 1925. He was not a member of the Jewish Agency. The mandating authority offered to set up two different agencies, a Jewish and an Arab Agency, through which each communty could run its own affairs. The Jews accepted, and the Jewish Agency was set up. The Arabs refused to set up their own agency. It was not the fault of the British nor the Jews for that matter that the Arabs refused the same privileges.
 
Samuel's appointment is sometimes given as from 1920, which is when he was nominated to the post. However he did not take office until the mandate was established in 1922. He left in 1925. In any case Sir Harold MacMichael (1938-44) and Sir Arthur Wauchope (1932-37) both served longer as High Commissioner.
 
There were ten commissioners other than Samuel, and none of them, as far as I know, Jewish. MacMichael in fact left office after an assassination attempt on him by Jewish terrorists.
 
Given that you're wrong on those counts, I'd like to know where you get the 'large-scale land confiscation' from? And for that matter the prevention of Palestinians from returning home?
 
Your second paragraph about actively helping the zionists 'up to the end of the mandate' is simply ridiculous. Again, see or read 'Exodus'. If Britain was helping the Zionists, why did it not vote for the creation of an Israeli state?
Back to Top
Hebrewtext View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 24-Jan-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 88
  Quote Hebrewtext Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Jan-2009 at 22:42
 
the Jewish miltias erected the first place to protect the Jews from the Palestinian terror, later used contra terror .and help to bring the refugees runing for their life from Europe,against the British will.
 
list of atrocities pre 1948 war
 
 


Edited by Hebrewtext - 15-Jan-2009 at 22:53
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.