Draft for membership on Academic members

 

 

..oh, right, the 'candidates' already exist on a 'list', so the criteria is already set then?.....

 

....i think my question still stands, when i said 'us', i meant will other forum members have a say in nominating others to be on the 'list', not just those in loftier circles? or is this criteria to be presented to all forum members as a 'goal' to obtain? (which is my way of thinking, encourages the forward momentum of the academic mentality of the site)or is the list only relevant to existing academically sighted members?.....

 

...if the 'list' is already drawn up, nothing to comment on then.....

 

 

..thanks Hugoestr for replying to my enquiry...

 

..personally, i do see any problems with what you have outlined....the level seems about right, not too little that is does not encourage more productive activity, and not too much restriction that it discourages most members from attempting a claim to the new title....

 

..a step in the right direction i think...it will be interesting to see how well it is received......

 

....nominating other members is a good idea i think as modesty may prevent some from putting themselves forward when they deserve some form of forum recognition.......for now, and i know there are many others, but i would obviously point to Decebal, but i would also  suggest consideration for Zagros, Paul, Marhabbal(sp?),  and glce2003, who i feel regularly increases the academic bar throughout most the forums he posts in...not sure if the criteria fits though, perhaps someone else maybe better informed about this than me?.....

 

.good luck with this Hugoestr...you have my whole-hearted support

 

 

..So far, your suggestions have got my support Hugoestr, and it seems there is not much dissent, although i did initially think there would have been  more contributions from members regarding the ideas and proposals...does it need a bit more time for others to put their opinions forward?..what do you think Hugoestr?...