Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLunacy of Afrocentrism II: Black Ireland

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Lunacy of Afrocentrism II: Black Ireland
    Posted: 04-May-2007 at 11:31
 
Originally posted by Decebal

Actually Reginmund, that perception started in the 12th century, when the Al-Murabit (or Alomravids as they are known in Spanish), an islamic warrior monk group from the Upper Niger/Senegal valleys, went on a holy jihad and ended up conquering most of North Africa, including Muslim Spain (which had been conquered by Arabs 500 years previously). They were removed from power half a century later by a Berber group, the Almohads, but in the time that they controlled Spain, Western Europeans were under the impression that the Moors were black (since they formed the bulk of the Almoravid armies and leaders). Couple that with the contingents of black slaves that were always present in other periods of muslim Spain, and you have one enduring myth.
 
I didn't know that. Maybe it sheds some light on what has puzzled me for some time - the fact that Othello is always portrayed as black. The play is of course subtitled The Moor of Venice, and given it is set in Renaissance or late medieval times, I therefore always felt he should have been presented as an Arab or possibly a Berber.
 
Shakespeare however has his characters refer to him as 'black' which gives some legitimacy to directors showing him as black African, though I always felt it really only meant dark-complexioned.
 
Could Shakespeare or his source have been thinking of the Almoravids?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-May-2007 at 13:21
Probably Shakespeare was thinking in Ludovico, the so called "Moor". That's my guess.
 
Pinguin
Back to Top
JanusRook View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-May-2007 at 01:10

Could Shakespeare or his source have been thinking of the Almoravids?


From Wikipedia (the fount of all knowledge, LOL )


Although the play is very much concerned with racial difference, the protagonist's specific race is not clearly indicated by Shakespeare. Othello is referred to as a "Moor", but for Elizabethan English people, this term could refer either to the Muslim Berbers (or Arabs) of North Africa, or to the people now called "black" (that is, people of sub-Saharan African descent). In his other plays, Shakespeare had previously depicted both a Berber Moor (in The Merchant of Venice) and a black Moor (in Titus Andronicus). In Othello, however, the references to the character's physical features do not settle the question of which race Shakespeare envisioned.

In his Arden edition of the play, E.A.J. Honigmann summarises the contradictory evidence. The various uses of the word 'black' (for example, "Haply for I am black") do not help, since 'black' could simply mean 'swarthy' for Elizabethans.[2] Iago twice uses the word 'Barbary' or 'Barbarian' to refer to Othello, apparently referring to the Barbary coast inhabited by the "white" Moors. Yet Roderigo also calls him 'the thicklips', which seems to refer to (perhaps) African physiognomy. Honigmann says that since these comments are all insults, they need not be taken literally.[3]

Honigmann also notes one piece of external evidence: an ambassador of the Arab King of Barbary with his retinue stayed in London in 1600 for several months and occasioned much discussion. Honigmann wonders whether Shakespeare's play, written only a year or two afterwards, might have been inspired by the ambassador.[4] Also, it should be noted that a real Othello might be a Berber or Arab (northern-African) rather than of entirely sub-Saharan African ancestry. On the other hand, sub-Saharans had visited the Mediterranean long before the time in which the events of the play are set, and a portrayal of Othello as sub-Saharan adds much to the feelings of alienation and suspicion that the audience must sense from him -- here is truly a stranger in a strange land, which makes his psychological plight all the more striking and his final inability to trust his wife the more explicable if he is constantly reminded of the fact that the two of them are from what would then be considered almost literally two different worlds. A Barbary Arab would probably not experience the same emotions; he might not be trusted but he would not be considered totally alien by the Venetians. Therefore when a Barbary Othello cannot trust Desdemona, the audience would be more likely to blame him and not pity him.

Also, interpretations of Othello's origins as "Black" were current as of the 1930s, when a performance of the play was banned in a southern U.S. state due to the prejudices against representing an idealized, inter-racial love. The performance included a middle-age African-American performer.

Social predispositions and/or prejudice among modern-day, typical readers and theatre directors lean towards the "black" interpretation, and "white" Othellos have been rare.[5] One exception is Patrick Stewart, who had wanted to play the title role since the age of 14, so he (along with director Jude Kelly), inverted the play so Othello became a White man in a Black Society.



Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.