Scythians

the term iranic is diffrent form what Iranian are today.Iranian peopel are mostly assimilated by Iranic Tribes.

Originally posted by Kipcak Originally posted by the_oz Originally posted by Nick Originally posted by EGET�RK sakas were turkic...   Egeturk we still havn't found the root of Turks and you think Scythains were Turks????   All we know about Turks is their massive expantion during central Asian Massive waves of movement less then 1700 years, and the second Turkish movement known as Mongols, and then 3rd one into modern Turkey and intermarriages with Europeans (And with Native  Aryanics)   you still havent found the root of Turks or you didnt want to learn? root of turks is written here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orhon_inscriptions sorry for disturbing you white aryanic friend Aryanic friend ? :) since when iranians are aryan. as all we know they are arabic, indian mixture who consider they are actually white :D

Originally posted by shinai We do not need to consider ourselves white because we have contributed to the world more than many nation around us.

Show me the scale of "regional comparative contribution to the world" better known as RCCTTW...

Originally posted by Bulldog Shinai We do not need to consider ourselves white because we have contributed to the world more than many nation around us.   Oh hasn't everyone, ask any hardcore nationalist and he/she'll tell you exactly the same, just instead of Iranian they'll be another nation  Sorry but that was a very silly and childish comment.   Most Persians I know arn't particularly "white", standing next to an Englishmen they look Arab or Indian, most Persians I know have pretty dark skin. Infact the Iran Turks I know in general have lighter skin.

Iranian do not have the inferiority problem, we look like arabs or Indian, so?

Hi, i was searching about Scythian suits, and found here. I like your topics. Moderator is right, it doesnt matter who we are. Because the most important thing in our lives is to die in one day. All of us has the same things, we are from the same origin, humanbeings. And we are going to go to the same place, ground. On the other hand, cultures are important in history. In the last 200 years mostly western people searched old history. So their ideas are very different, we can say that their opions are little selfish, and politic. Most of the scientists are thinking everything from their own angle. So science must be for science, not for other purposes. We have to search and learn everything for science, not for politic orientation. Otherwise we lie. Or it is not a history science, it will be a official history like Kurdish history. Then we may look at to history in the right way. You can not erase historical realities by accepting they are absent. Culture is important, genealogy also. We must notice history in cultural angle. And we must accept that everything about our ancestries are logical acceptance. Who can say 50 step ancestries? :)

THE SCYTHIANS MIGRATED ORIGINALLY FROM SIBERIA (WIKIPEDIA.COM) AND THEY LATER ON INVADED THE SOUTHERN REGIONS WHICH THEREFORE CONTRIBUTES TO THE PERSIAN IN THEIR BLOOD.  PLEASE DO NOT CONFUSE THEM AS BEING iRANIAN, THEY WERE MIGRANTS FROM NORTH SIBERIA.

STUDY PROPERLY BEFORE POSTING REPLIES.

No, this is just one of theories about the origin of Saka's , that they may be are descendants of Sakha Yakuts. But not proven though. I believe, according to Rene Grousset, Huns are also seperated from Scythians, as did German tribe (only German).

Originally posted by Kerimoglu No, this is just one of theories about the origin of Saka's , that they may be are descendants of Sakha Yakuts. But not proven though. I believe, according to Rene Grousset, Huns are also seperated from Scythians, as did German tribe (only German).

Were the Hun branch of Doqquz Oghuz Hun-Xiongu?