louis vuitton handbags online casque beats maizitang tiffany jewelry cheap louis vuitton taschen online shop louis vuitton cheap handbags
Which country in ww2 kicke the most...... - History Forum ~ All Empires - Page 5
 

Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Which country in ww2 kicke the most......

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>
Poll Question: Italy
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
34 [41.98%]
2 [2.47%]
5 [6.17%]
1 [1.23%]
19 [23.46%]
16 [19.75%]
3 [3.70%]
1 [1.23%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Which country in ww2 kicke the most......
    Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 09:02
Man for man the most "arse kicking" is probably a small country, such as Australia or Canada. Overall it is likely to be either Germany or Russia.
Back to Top
Cezar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
  Quote Cezar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 11:15

Cleared that *&^$*$*%^! table!

Domain                              Germany                                  USSR                                          USA                                       UK

                              Rating                score           Rating                score            Rating                 score           Rating             score

Leaders (politics)      Excellent              5                  Excellent              5                  Good                   3                  Good                3

Leaders (military)      Terrible                0                  Average*             1.5                N/A                     5                  (In) competent*  0.5

Supreme command   Terrible                0                  Average               2                  Very good            4                  Very good         4

High level command

 (ground forces)        Excellent              5                  Average               2                  Average               2                  Good                3

 

High level command

(air forces)               Terrible                0                  Competent            1                  Excellent              5                  Excellent          5

 

High level command

(Navy)                    Good                   3                  Good*                  3.5                Very good            4                  Very good         4

 

Intermediate level

command

 (ground forces)        Excellent              5                  Average               2                  Average               2                  Good                3

 

Intermediate level

command (air forces)                           Competent     1                         Competent     1                         Excellent       5                     Excellent    5

 

Intermediate level

command (navy)      Good                   3                  Good*                  3.5                Good                   3                  Very good         4

 

Low level command

(ground)                  Excellent              5                  Average               2                  Competent            1                  Good                3

 

Low level command

(air)                        Good                   3                  Competent            1                  Excellent              5                  Excellent          5

 

Low level command

(navy)                    Very good            4                  Good*                  3.5                Good                   3                  Excellent          5

 

Units (ground)          Excellent              5                  Very good            4                  Good                   3                  Very good         4

Units (air)                Average               2                  Average               2                  Good                   3                  Good                3

Units (navy)            Good                   3                  Good                   3.5                Very good            4                  Excellent          5

 

Overall rating         Good                  2.933            Very good           4.000            Better than good 3.433            Very good       4.066

 

Military rating        Good                  3.000            Almost very good                   3.769                   Better than good                 3.384         Very good                4.076

 

Ground forces

rating                     Excellent             5.000            Average+            2.500            Average+             2.250            Better than good              3.250

 

Air forces rating     Competent+        1.500            Competent+        1.250            Almost excellent 4.750            Excellent         5.000

 

Navy rating            Better than good 3.250            N/A *                  -                   Better than good 3.500            Very very good 4.500

 

A few comments about the ratings:

         Japan wasnt included but we gave her an all in all of about 2+.

         We considered that the involvement of the politics in military command is a bad thing, thats why we rated USA with 5. Why Germany takes a 0 is obvious, since Hitlers meddling with the military lost the war since 1940. Churchill to has had a little too much bad influence (Greece 1940)

         Germanys OKW is by far the worst example of a joint headquarters. Both Jodl and Keitel were nothing but buttkissers. I rated USSR at 2 since its supreme command only began to work fine since autumn 1942.

         High level commanders (Manstein, Halder, Zhukov, Bradley, Monty, Nimitz, etc.). USSR is so badly rated on ground forces because the best of them came up after the initial debacle. For the USA, I think Ike is to be considered rather an exception than a standard. Only if Douglas wouldnt have been around, maybe we would have thought of USA differently.

         Intermediate level (Rommel, Model, Bittrich, Patton, Horrocks, Halsey, etc.). Same thing for the USSR and the USA. Patton may look good but he is overrated in my opinion. We considered the marines to be related with the navy.

         Low level command (as much as for a colonel in the army) and individual units. This, I think is a quite subjective scoring, but we were not trying to make a scientific work.

         We rated USSR with 3.5 at naval. That was to compensate the fact that they werent very much involved in naval warfare in order to make a general score. Frankly I would think that naval warfare was not very significant on the eastern front.

 



Edited by Cezar - 02-Feb-2007 at 10:21
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 11:19
I would argue that the USSR's ground leadership was of extremely high quality with Zhukov and his comrade (who's name escapes me but I will find it).
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Location: Luxembourg
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7050
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 11:21
Germany's political leaders were excellent?
 
We are talking about planet earth, aren't we?
 
PS: what's gone wrong with the layout of this thread?
 


Edited by gcle2003 - 01-Feb-2007 at 11:34
Citizen of Ankh-Morpork
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied - Sir Humphrey Appleby, 1984.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 11:41
Well in a way Germany's political leaders were excellent. Hitler was a brilliant speaker and politician. However, he was not a very good military leader and his descent into insanity crippled even his political abilities.
Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3342
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 14:09

Yes, Hitler wasn't a good military leader... but Germans were so successful because he invited the brilliant military generals, like Rommel and Gudarian, to share their military ideas and allowing them to design German invasion and army in their way. Fortunately, Hitler's pride and ambition as well as his burning hatred towards Slavik clouded the right judgements that he was suppose to take.

Russian leadership was excellent. Stalin was able to brainwash and unite Russian and non-Russians such as Ukranians to resist the Germans. The worst leadership seen in WWII was France... in general. They had enough manpower and supplies to counter the Germans.
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Cezar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
  Quote Cezar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 14:26
Originally posted by Zaitsev

I would argue that the USSR's ground leadership was of extremely high quality with Zhukov and his comrade (who's name escapes me but I will find it).
 
Konev?
Back to Top
Cezar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
  Quote Cezar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 14:30
Originally posted by gcle2003

Germany's political leaders were excellent?
 
We are talking about planet earth, aren't we?
 
PS: what's gone wrong with the layout of this thread?
 
 
Excellent means effective and efficient not good. Don't misunderstand me. Hitler and Stalin were both very good in making people go with them right up to the end. That's politics.
Excellent is not a moral/ethical rating, it only deals with how good those leaders were at implementing their will.
Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3342
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 14:40
Hitler was great because he listened to the excellent generals and his advisors. I think when he conquered much of Europe, he became arrogant. He thought the great Nazi Germany was his achievement, and he began to follow the advise from his own judgement and his hatred. That's when Nazi Germany began to decline...
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Cezar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
  Quote Cezar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 15:09

What's going wrong?

When I first posted on this topic there was no harm!
 
That thing was written with Microsft Word 2002 (I have even the product ID if necessary). Now I can't even read it all. Did I do something wrong?
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Location: Luxembourg
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7050
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 15:23
The first, chronologically, of Hitler's biggest blunders was figuring that Britain and France would not fight over Poland. That was a purely political mistake.
 
The second came after the invasion of the Soviet Union, when he allowed - indeed encouraged - the Slavs to be treated as non-persons. We've seen enough of the importance of 'hearts and minds' lately: Hitler made the political error of not recognising it, much more than the US has in Iraq.
 
The third one came in December 1941 when he declared war on the US. That was unutterably stupid and also a purely political mistake. It compounded the mistake he made with the Jewish persecution, which alienated potential backers world-wide even before the worst excesses of it became well-known.
 
Publishing Mein Kampf was arguably a naive political mistake too, but he got away with that one because not enough people took him seriously.
 
You might also care to take a look at his confrontations with Hjalmar Schacht over the conduct of the economy in the 1930s.
 
Hitler was an overwhelmingly good rabble-rouser, but it takes more than speech-making to make a politician. Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin ran rings around him.
 
PS For that matter Chiang was a better politician, though maybe the real talent there was Mme Chiang.
 
 
 
 


Edited by gcle2003 - 01-Feb-2007 at 15:24
Citizen of Ankh-Morpork
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied - Sir Humphrey Appleby, 1984.
Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3342
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 18:55
The first, chronologically, of Hitler's biggest blunders was figuring that Britain and France would not fight over Poland. That was a purely political mistake.
 
The second came after the invasion of the Soviet Union, when he allowed - indeed encouraged - the Slavs to be treated as non-persons. We've seen enough of the importance of 'hearts and minds' lately: Hitler made the political error of not recognising it, much more than the US has in Iraq.
 
The third one came in December 1941 when he declared war on the US. That was unutterably stupid and also a purely political mistake. It compounded the mistake he made with the Jewish persecution, which alienated potential backers world-wide even before the worst excesses of it became well-known.
 
Publishing Mein Kampf was arguably a naive political mistake too, but he got away with that one because not enough people took him seriously.
 
You might also care to take a look at his confrontations with Hjalmar Schacht over the conduct of the economy in the 1930s.
 
Hitler was an overwhelmingly good rabble-rouser, but it takes more than speech-making to make a politician. Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin ran rings around him.
 
PS For that matter Chiang was a better politician, though maybe the real talent there was Mme Chiang.
 
 
I am still unsure about the first and the last mistakes that Hitler made. First one was, from my point of view, a huge success. From the conflicts in Poland, Germans improved their war tactics and their errors and well as the flaws of German army that they did not see in Spanish Civil War. Plus, the Allies absolutely did nothing except in the seas above Poland... that such impact was minimal for the invasion of Poland.
 
What suprised me is this. The Allies actually still hoped for peace, even after Poland was invaded. Remember that there was no war for few weeks even after Poland was conquered? It wasn't Hitler that made the mistake. If he was to attempt a world domination, he better do it fast before the political pacifists of Allies lose their power. Besides, Nazi Germany was ready for war.
 
Lastly, his published Mein Kampf was not a mistake. It was, rather, one of his major success. Without his published book, he would not have earned as much popularity as he would have in elections. Germans saw Hitler as Germany's salvation, and the crisis of Germany after WWI was so horrible that many Germans were convinced that Jews were really to blame. Extreme nationalism, the Germans fell for it.  
 


Edited by pekau - 01-Feb-2007 at 18:56
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3342
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 18:57

Mein Gott, hell's breaking lose in this post... what's happening to the layout???

     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Dilvish View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Jan-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 102
  Quote Dilvish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 20:31

has anyone ever read the book wine and war?

Back to Top
Dilvish View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Jan-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 102
  Quote Dilvish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 20:34
Originally posted by pekau

Mein Gott, hell's breaking lose in this post... what's happening to the layout???

yeah what did happen to the layout? This may be on purpose though, but if it is id rather stay wit the old 1.
Back to Top
Lmprs View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke


Joined: 30-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1872
  Quote Lmprs Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 21:24
Cezar should edit his post and delete the chart. Hopefully the layout will be fixed.
Back to Top
Dilvish View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Jan-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 102
  Quote Dilvish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 21:25
ohh!! so thats teh problem!!, delete the thing now, some1 send him a private message
Back to Top
Dilvish View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 16-Jan-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 102
  Quote Dilvish Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Feb-2007 at 21:26
plz this is messin up my post
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Location: Luxembourg
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7050
  Quote gcle2003 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2007 at 06:18
Originally posted by pekau

 
I am still unsure about the first and the last mistakes that Hitler made. First one was, from my point of view, a huge success.
The Germans and the Soviets between them conquered Poland. Big deal.
From the conflicts in Poland, Germans improved their war tactics and their errors and well as the flaws of German army that they did not see in Spanish Civil War. Plus, the Allies absolutely did nothing except in the seas above Poland... that such impact was minimal for the invasion of Poland.
 
What suprised me is this. The Allies actually still hoped for peace, even after Poland was invaded.
 
Remember that there was no war for few weeks even after Poland was conquered?
The 'Phony War' was actually several months, from September 1939 to at least April 1940. During which time Germany wanted peace (not that we all didn't, but it was the Allies that refused peace unless Germany got out of Poland. And of course it gave Britain in particular another six months in which to build up its defences.
 
Hitler had figured that with Poland conquered, Britain and France would just accept the fait accompli as they had in Austria and Czechoslovakia. Otherwise he would have gone on the offensive in the fall of 1939.
 
It wasn't Hitler that made the mistake. If he was to attempt a world domination,
If true that of course was absolutely his biggest mistake of all. Any halfway competent politican would have realised that was ridiculous. To do him justice though, I don't think he was after world domination. He really did want expansion to the east plus collaboration with the Anglo-Saxon countries. He completely misreckoned the attitude of Britain in particular. Which was a political mistake.
 
he better do it fast before the political pacifists of Allies lose their power. Besides, Nazi Germany was ready for war.
 
So by 1939 were Britain and France. On the basis of that argument he should have attacked after Mnich. In fact, continualling signalling what he intended to do was a frequent error Hitler made.
 
In any case though I was challenging the assertion that he (or the other Nazi leaders) were 'excellent politicians'. Military strategy is another matter.
 
Lastly, his published Mein Kampf was not a mistake. It was, rather, one of his major success. Without his published book, he would not have earned as much popularity as he would have in elections. Germans saw Hitler as Germany's salvation, and the crisis of Germany after WWI was so horrible that many Germans were convinced that Jews were really to blame. Extreme nationalism, the Germans fell for it.  
I said he was a great rabble-rouser.
 
'Mein Kampf' was a political mistake because it alerted people (notably of course Churchill) to the danger he presented internationally: Mussolini for instance, though internally also a dictator, kept his cards much closer to his chest with regard to any external ambitions (apart possibly for Ethiopia, but that didn't really pose any threat to the other major European nations).
 
Citizen of Ankh-Morpork
Never believe anything until it has been officially denied - Sir Humphrey Appleby, 1984.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Feb-2007 at 08:15
I mostly agree with gcle on this issue. I have studied appeasement and its associated issues in quite some depth. It is, in my opinion, quite plain to see that Hitler miscalculated what the Allied response would be when he entered Poland. Poland, I imagine, was probably going to be his last move in the process of 'rebuilding' German territory. The previous appeasement attempts by the Allied nations led Hitler to believe that he would also get away with Poland. An interesting thing to note is that Stalin repeatedly told the Allies that they had to destroy Hitler. When the Allies didn't listen, Stalin believed they were deliberately ignoring him to weaken his position, and decided to side with Germany instead.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.