Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
morticia
Sultan
Retired AE Editor
Joined: 09-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2077
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Women and Religion Posted: 14-Nov-2006 at 17:01 |
To some degree, all major world religions deprecate women (both East and West).
Christian/Catholic:
In the Catholic religion, women are not allowed in the priesthood, therefore, no woman could ever become POPE (the highest ranking position in the Catholic religion). In most Christian religions, women are the mainstay and yet are prohibited from holding leadership positions. Even though there is ample evidence of womens leadership in the early church, such leadership became increasingly prohibited as the church became a public institution, as it was not considered proper for women to hold leadership positions in public.
Judaism:
In the Jewish religion, although there are now some women Rabbis, the morning prayer is a daily deprecation of women, as stated: Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, King of the universe, who hast not made me a woman.
Islam:
In Islam, according to the words [of Allah in the Koran], Men are superior to women [34:4]. It also states that, A woman is prohibited from holding high office, because doing so requires mingling with men, and being alone with them. Also, she must bear a heavy burden, which is not suitable for the character of a woman. [8]
IMO, the only way for a woman to deal with a misogynistic institution, is to leave it. And maybe that is why I am not a member of any religious groups!
If you were a woman, how would you feel about this? Would you participate in said organizations knowing that women are considered inferior and not permitted to hold office in said organization? If so, why would you want to participate?
Edited by morticia - 14-Nov-2006 at 17:02
|
"Morty
Trust in God: She will provide." -- Emmeline Pankhurst
|
|
Siege Tower
Colonel
Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 580
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2006 at 17:34 |
i dont suppose Buddism have anything to do with it
|
|
|
Aelfgifu
Caliph
Joined: 25-Jun-2006
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3387
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2006 at 17:43 |
Well, there seems to be a curious lack of female Buddist monks...
|
Women hold their councils of war in kitchens: the knives are there, and the cups of coffee, and the towels to dry the tears.
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2006 at 18:46 |
There are quite a few Buddhist nuns though....
Formerly nuns were considered 2nd rate and did little more than the monk's housework at the temples, but these days are on a much more even footing.
The main problem for women in Buddhism is only monks can earn karma, and women can't become monks. Men earn their karma by becoming a monk at some point in their lives, usually for only a few months. When a man becomes a monk he not only earns karma for himself, but for his mother too. This is the only way women can earm karma. It's of course problematic, if the women only has daughters, or has no children at all. Hence the fact male children are more prized by mother's than daughters.
Recently this has changed in modern looking Buddhist countries who are gradually accepting the idea nuns can earn karma too. Also it's becoming accepted there are other methods of earning karma, such as charity work, donations to templesor joining one of an increasing number of Buddhist cults.
Edited by Paul - 14-Nov-2006 at 18:49
|
|
|
Siege Tower
Colonel
Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 580
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2006 at 20:31 |
hello paul, mind telling me what is karma
|
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Nov-2006 at 21:12 |
'Merit' I believe is what they translated it as where I lived. Though more accurate to a local it's more confusing to a westerner. Karma in English is a very general term that includes many concepts in eastern religions so perhaps too general to be accurately descriptive if used in English.
dialect, you made 'Bwj' by becoming a monk and
in English it's all karma.
Edited by Paul - 14-Nov-2006 at 21:37
|
|
|
morticia
Sultan
Retired AE Editor
Joined: 09-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2077
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Nov-2006 at 14:22 |
|
"Morty
Trust in God: She will provide." -- Emmeline Pankhurst
|
|
morticia
Sultan
Retired AE Editor
Joined: 09-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2077
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Nov-2006 at 14:26 |
Originally posted by Paul
...in modern looking Buddhist countries who are gradually accepting the idea nuns can earn karma too. Also it's becoming accepted there are other methods of earning karma, such as charity work, donations to templesor joining one of an increasing number of Buddhist cults. |
Finally, some words of encouragement for women!
|
"Morty
Trust in God: She will provide." -- Emmeline Pankhurst
|
|
Siege Tower
Colonel
Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 580
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Nov-2006 at 15:48 |
Originally posted by morticia
Originally posted by Siege Tower
i dont suppose Buddism have anything to do with it | Hello Siege Tower and welcome to the women's history forum. Well, as Paul has indicated on this topic, Buddhism is another religion which deprecates women. |
it is a pleasure of my.
from what i know, the fundamental principle of buddism is that all beings are equal, so don t think buddidm have any thing to do with it because it violates its principle.
as Paul mentioned that traditionally buddist nuns weren t allowed to earn Karmar(the concept is still unclear to me) well since we are talking about the principles rather than facts, i suppose it is just that people have different understanding to the principle of buddism, and plus, there are traditionally more monks than nuns, i guess that's where the discremination came from.
|
|
|
morticia
Sultan
Retired AE Editor
Joined: 09-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2077
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Nov-2006 at 14:06 |
|
"Morty
Trust in God: She will provide." -- Emmeline Pankhurst
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Nov-2006 at 22:53 |
Should have done this before, but I checked my understanding of the topic with the girl I live with, who is both Chinese and a Buddhist. Bwj is something that can only be earnt by a man while he is a monk and primarily for his mother. It controls reincarnation in the next life. Gum can be earned by giving temples money and controls luck in the near future.
Women were unable to earn karma for the next life. The only way to do this was from a son becoming a monk. Nowadays nuns can earn it too. Good fortune for the present can be earnt by anybody, by feeding monks, gifting temples or doing good, but doesn't count towards the next life.
Negatives such as killing [anything] is against a Buddhist commandment so bwj not gum. So effect the next life not present fortune. Hence in restaurants when a cook needs to cook seafood alive, they hire a child to drop it in the boiling water. The theory being the child has a lifetime to [if male become a monk] [if female have a son] and work off the poor reincarnation. Similarly most slaughterhouse hire Muslims because Buddhists refuse to work in these places garunteed a poor reincarnation if they do.
Ironically Buddhist countries have some of the most inhumanely killed and factory farmed animals of any country. Because the Buddhist commandment says you shouldn't kill animals but says nothing about eating animals killed by other people. Even Buddhist monks, in contrast to popular myth, eat meat this way.
Edited by Paul - 16-Nov-2006 at 23:07
|
|
|
Vivek Sharma
Arch Duke
Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Nov-2006 at 00:42 |
Originally posted by Paul
'Merit' I believe is what they translated it as where I lived. |
Where do you live Paul ?
KARMA is an Indian word. The actual word is not Karma but KARM. English usage tends to add an A to the end of most Indian words. The literal meaning of the word KARM is action / deeds / work. The Philosophical meaning of Karm is " the result / thinking / gist of the Act". Theologically the word Karm is a combination of KARYA = Work / Action / Act & MA RM = Result / Thought process / Conclusion. & refers to the MARM (Result / Thought process / Conclusion) of the KARYA ( Work / Action / Act) The Indian religion places KARM as the most important part of the religion. In Hinduism Gods are not supreme, Karm is. Any person can attain Godly / divine status by virtue of his good Karms (good deeds). Gods remain Gods, only as long as they excel in virtuous Karm.
Edited by Vivek Sharma - 17-Nov-2006 at 02:32
|
PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
|
|
Lotus
Samurai
Joined: 17-Aug-2006
Location: England
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 116
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Nov-2006 at 06:20 |
Well at least things now seem to be changing, and not before
time
In 1975 Synod decided there were no theological objections
to the ordination of women
1987 first women deacons appointed
In 1994 the first women priests were ordained into the Church
of England.
In 2004 the number of women priests ordained outnumbered men.
Britain
still lacks behind the US,
Canada and New
Zealand in not yet ordaining women bishops.
|
|
The_Jackal_God
Pretorian
Joined: 13-Dec-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 157
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Dec-2006 at 15:15 |
meh, not ordaining women misogynistic. i guess if you're seeking power, best not to use religion, cuz that road's been abused enough already.
you may have heard of women like Mother Teresa and Catherine of Siena, Teresa of Avila, or a lil lady named Mary who all wielded influence comparable or more than the most influential of Popes. non-ordination hasn't been an issue hindering women's influence and role in Christianity. but as the above has noted, that door has been opened, so maybe you should join and go for it.
judaism may be misogynistic, not as far as i know, but the one little line must be very powerful. i am impressed with your belief in the power of prayer.
islam - yes, it's like the Amish trade-off of respecting women by putting them on a pedestal, and draped by curtains. yes, not very enlightened.
there have also been cases of wrongdoing against women in the name of these religions much worse than the ones you mentioned. the joys of not living in black and white.
you seem also to ignore the role religion has played in bettering the condition of women the world over. but such is the nature of narrow generalizations. if we could get away from these black & white generalizations, that would truly be something praiseworthy.
|
|
Siege Tower
Colonel
Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 580
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Dec-2006 at 05:22 |
i still don t think that religion is the origin of gender discrimination, i think that gender discimination is the the reflection of the public opinion at the time.
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Dec-2006 at 08:18 |
agree with ST
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 06-Jan-2007 at 23:33 |
Originally posted by Morty
In Islam, according to the words [of Allah in the Koran], Men are
superior to women [34:4]. It also states that, A woman is prohibited
from holding high office, because doing so requires mingling with men,
and being alone with them. Also, she must bear a heavy burden, which
is not suitable for the character of a woman. [8] |
Wrong on both accounts. [34:4] is "That He may reward those who believe and work deeds of
righteousness: for such is Forgiveness and a Sustenance Most Generous."" [34:4] [8] is not a reference, but I have heard that sort of opinion before. It doesn't have a foundation in religion.
|
|
morticia
Sultan
Retired AE Editor
Joined: 09-Aug-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2077
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Jan-2007 at 15:09 |
Omar, I don't know which book you are reading, but this is what I found:
translations of Qur'an 4:34:
"Men are superior to women on account of the qualities with which God has gifted the one above the other, and on account of the outlay they make from their substance for them. Virtuous women are obedient, careful, during the husband's absence, because God has of them been careful. But chide those for whose refractoriness you have cause to fear; remove them into beds apart, and scourge them: but if they are obedient to you, then seek not occasion against them: verily, God is High, Great!" (Rodwell's version of the Koran, Quran, 4:34)
Sorry, maybe I just inadvertently transposed the numbers!
Edited by morticia - 09-Jan-2007 at 15:11
|
"Morty
Trust in God: She will provide." -- Emmeline Pankhurst
|
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2007 at 01:28 |
^noone reads the Rodwell version, it has a lot of errors. I think he was a church rector from London when he wrote it.
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
malizai_
Sultan
Alcinous
Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2007 at 01:57 |
Tele
There are no versions of the Koran only various translations. There is huge difference.
Cahaya
Do u think that your religion deprecates women?
|
|