Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The New Middle East

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345
Author
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The New Middle East
    Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 13:23
Originally posted by The Grim Reaper

 
The website link you posted which makes a minor reference to Pakistani genetic makeup when compared to that of Turkey's, was written by a group of Indic Pakistanis. I would hardly lend much credence to a group of Indic Pakistanis who would do anything to shed their Hindu and Indian heritage and adopt that of peoples they viewed as superior to them, in this case, the Turks.
 
btw: That website is not credible at all. I can find some random BS on the Internet as well, just like the one you've found, anyone can post anything on the World Wide Web, but does this make it credible? Now, that is a different story. Your links are partisan, without merit, and utter nonsense. I can find you links from Hindu nationalist, White supremacist, Islamist, Zionist, etc. websites - would that make the information on these sites, accurate?? I think not! So why bother me with some link from a Pakistani nationalist website???
 
Lol!! Since when would a Pakistani be interested in making a website about the Garvery surname? LOL 
 
 
same website..clearly not Pakistani..
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
The Grim Reaper View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 08-Nov-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 136
  Quote The Grim Reaper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 14:33
No, genius. The little reference there was in the link you previously provided, directed users to a Pakistani study. Furthermore, this silly "freepages" website of your is not historically credible.
Back to Top
TeldeInduz View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
  Quote TeldeInduz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 15:48
Try again, the study was published in the American Journal of Human Genetics by researchers who've probably got more important things on their mind than to want to prove some sort of link to other ethnic groups..LOL If you read the paper you'd also find the following "Pakistanis"
 
Raheel Qamar,1,2 Qasim Ayub,1,2 Aisha Mohyuddin,1,2 Agnar Helgason,3 Kehkashan Mazhar,
Atika Mansoor,1 Tatiana Zerjal,2 Chris Tyler-Smith,2 and S. Qasim Mehdi1

1Biomedical and Genetic Engineering Division, Dr. A. Q. Khan Research Laboratories, Islamabad; 2Cancer Research Campaign, Chromosome

Molecular Biology Group, Department of Biochemistry, and 3Institute of Biological Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United

Kingdom; and deCODE Genetics, Reykjavik

The "silly" freepages site is one of the largest genealogy sites on the net, and that page is written by Western Europeans with an interest in the surname Garvey, obviously.
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
Back to Top
The Grim Reaper View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 08-Nov-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 136
  Quote The Grim Reaper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 16:55
The majority of the researchers bear Pakistani names. Your link is still not credible, genius. Try again.
 
btw:
 
 
"....over 95% of the Muslims of India are converts from Hinduism, and of Indian origin. But since they have now become Muslim, what Babar, a foreign Muslim invader built by demolishing a Hindu - Indian - shrine is more important than the Indian heritage. For an Indian once he converts to Islam, his Indian heritage is to be forgotten. Tabligh jamaat is working hard to remove all vestiges of Indianness from the daily mores of converted Indians ..."
 
^^ The same would be true of Pakistani Muslims from Kashmir, Punjab, and Sindh.


Edited by The Grim Reaper - 06-Dec-2006 at 17:00
Back to Top
bg_turk View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 28-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2347
  Quote bg_turk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 17:42
Your source is an Indian propaganda webpage. 
Back to Top
The Grim Reaper View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 08-Nov-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 136
  Quote The Grim Reaper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 17:50

His sources come from Pakistani propaganda sites as well. That was what I was trying to prove by posting that link from the Kashmiri Pundit website - the bias involved.

Back to Top
bg_turk View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 28-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2347
  Quote bg_turk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 18:02
Originally posted by shayan

LOL! Here is one Iranian who cares more about Our Nation then about Islam, and so are there many with me ;) specially the younger generation same in Turkey, but like the guy who made this thread said, Iran is excluded (luckely) in his ummah thing :) Iranians or Turks will never never never never never ever give up there language for Arabic, there culture for Arabic culture there ways of doing things for Arabic ways of doing things which is one of the main things of this Ummah thing ;) Ask a TUrk  or AN Iranian randomly on the streets about this and they will all answer they are first Iranian or Turk and then muslim ( if not before muslim a political ideology like monarchist(Iran) socialist, liberal or pragmatist) Just make sure you make yourself some arab ummah instead of a muslim one cuzz i m not seeing Turks joining it ;)


Well said. I cannot really speak about Turks in Turkey but most of my relatives who live there despise bringing religion into politics and are staunchly secular, and I am sure they would be opposed to any union or ummah with the Arabs.

I personally consider myself a Turk first, then a Bulgarian citizen, and religion plays very little role in my identity. And I can safely say this for most Turks in Bulgaria as well. Religion becomes important only  in times of confrontation with Bulgarians, as it is a useful tool to strengthen Turkish unity.

Back to Top
The Grim Reaper View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 08-Nov-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 136
  Quote The Grim Reaper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 18:12
^^ Is Islam not a significant part of Turkish identity, however? Or do you choose to sidestep the 1000 plus years of influence that Islam has had on Turkish and Turkic culture and history?
Back to Top
Mortaza View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
  Quote Mortaza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Dec-2006 at 23:57
I personally consider myself a Turk first, then a Bulgarian citizen, and religion plays very little role in my identity. And I can safely say this for most Turks in Bulgaria as well. Religion becomes important only  in times of confrontation with Bulgarians, as it is a useful tool to strengthen Turkish unity.
 
arent you atheist? why should you care for religion.
 
anyway, acording to last pools, More than 40% of Turkish people call themself as muslim, and less than 20% of Turkish people call themself turks.
 
So  I think, our people showed their decision. Other called himself as citizen of Turkey, kurd ext.
 
I remember a pool about iranians too and their preference was islam too.
 
I am sorry but changing facts are not realy possible.
 
^^ Is Islam not a significant part of Turkish identity, however?
 
Of course It is acording to last pool, 90% of Turkish people call themself as religious.
 
Or do you choose to sidestep the 1000 plus years of influence that Islam has had on Turkish and Turkic culture and history?
 
Islam and langauge are only things that bind turkish people to each other.(Except citizenship) I should also add islam is more binding power than langauge or citizenship. We can see this with the islamic votes at kurdish majority cities.
 
Of course some people does not thing so but this is only their ideas. Pool or elections dont support their ideas.
 
Back to Top
Bulldog View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
  Quote Bulldog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Dec-2006 at 08:28

 Which Polls, conducted by who, using which sampling techniques, questioning what proportion of the population, was their bias involved, was an equal socio-demographic segmentation asked etc etc

This is deeply hypocritical because if somebody was to post a poll showing the opposite you'd be the first to be ranting and raving calling everyone fascist.
 
Presenting your subjective views as being the "norm", is not only ridiculous its also mis-leading to forumer's who don't know Turkey very well. Would you like to tell me exactly where Turkish people don't refer to themselves as Turks Confused and why being a Muslim conflicts with being a Turk, ie who are you to say that a person who calls himself a Turk cannot also be a Muslim when the majority of people have this view.
 
This is nothing that discrete dicatorism.
 
 
GR
Or do you choose to sidestep the 1000 plus years of influence that Islam has had on Turkish and Turkic culture and history?
 
Good point because during those thousand years the Turkish language rose to become a major language, joining the rank of Arabic and Persian in the Muslim world. Turkic culture was enriched during this period, it became highly stylised and elaborate, literature, architecture, cuisine, the sciences etc all flourished.
      What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine

Back to Top
The Grim Reaper View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai


Joined: 08-Nov-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 136
  Quote The Grim Reaper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Dec-2006 at 16:15
Bulldog,
 
I am aware of the profound impact that the Turkish and Turkic peoples had on the spread of Islam, and the advances that were made during Ottoman rule in Asia Minor, and Turkish rule in India. It's truly a beautiful history, and very fascinating to me (especially the Ottoman and Turkic Mughal Empires).
 
And you are absolutely right, in my view, Turk and Muslim are almost interchangeable and NOT mutually exclusive, and a person can be both a Turk and a Muslim.
 
btw: Am I still invited to visit your country?Tongue
Back to Top
Mortaza View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
  Quote Mortaza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Dec-2006 at 05:38
Would you like to tell me exactly where Turkish people don't refer to themselves as Turks Confused
Where did I said this? I am talking about first thing they said about themself. I mean priority.
 
and I wont accuse anyone with fasism because of a pool. It would be stupid to accuse messenger.
 
 
who are you to say that a person who calls himself a Turk cannot also be a Muslim when the majority of people have this view.
 
where did I said this?
 
What I wont to say is that, religion is more important than nation.(For Turkish people) That is all.  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 345

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.