Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedEvolution or Creationism?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 18>
Author
QueenCleopatra View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 03-Apr-2006
Location: Ireland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Evolution or Creationism?
    Posted: 18-Oct-2006 at 12:31
Ok as a student of Archaeology who has studied the deveolpment of Humanity I am always curious as to others peoples beliefs.I think its interesting when Relgion and Science coincide or conflict on a topic and this is prime example. Here also religion conflicts with Archaeology which is obviously my area on interest.

Personally I'm for the Theory of Evolution. The evidence to support Darwins ideas is overwhelming.

Embryology-the study of Embyros

Studies of the embyros of many different creatures including fish, birds and even humans have shown that at the very earliest stages of life they are strikingly similer in anatomy for example may have tails. This would suggest a pattern of evoltuion inherited from a common ancestor.

Also the study of the Human Embryo in particular has shown soem patterns of development during Pregnacy that can only have come from evolution from a common ancestor. In its early stages gills appear in the neck ( those lines we have are the remnents of these). Next the the baby grows a tail as I expalined above. The baby will then grow a downy covering of hair which most of the time will disappear before birth. Its like it goes through its own Mini-Evolution.

The Fossil records

The fossil most commonly used as an example is the limb of the common horse. Horse limbs have been studied closely and can be arranged Chronologically from the earliest horses that were no bigger than a dog to our modern species Equus. We can observe the development of the limb from thin and many-toes to a larger bone and only one toe, the hoof. Only through evolution could this have occurred.

The same has been done, in so far as its possible, with the Human Skull and has shown how our brains have grown larger and evolved in complexity as a result over time , the artefacts found during investigations worldwide from the earliest peoples up to the modern age show this to be the case..

The Pendactyl Limb

The study of the fore-limb eg arm, fin , wing, paw of many species has shown similarities in the phisiology. Most limbs will have two long bones , 4 digits and a thumb-like feature. This suggests common ancestory and again evoltuion into many different forms.

Development and exticntion of species

Evolution, by Darwin's theory, is natures way of selcting the strongest individuals of a species to survive and breed. This expalins why many ( not all I stress!) species of animals have died out. I know poaching has much to do with it. But the creatures we see today are the products of this survival of the fittest idea.Stronger species develop and change according to their environments and so they live on and breed and so the species becomes stronger and better equipped to deal with its changing habitat. And it still occurrs today. Its such a slow process that we will likely not see it our lifetime however

So what do you think?

Her Royal Highness , lady of the Two Lands, High Priestess of Thebes, Beloved of Isis , Cleopatra , Oueen of the Nile
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Oct-2006 at 13:08
The notion of creationism is an insult to even an idiot's intelligence... No offence intended to anyone who ardently adheres thereto.  This is just my opinion.
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 00:46
Another thread on this?

I struggle to understand why there is a debate in the first place. Are you living in a quantized world?
Back to Top
QueenCleopatra View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 03-Apr-2006
Location: Ireland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Oct-2006 at 03:46

What do you mean by that? I was just curious about other people's opinions. Isn't that what this forum is for?

Her Royal Highness , lady of the Two Lands, High Priestess of Thebes, Beloved of Isis , Cleopatra , Oueen of the Nile
Back to Top
Vivek Sharma View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 22-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Oct-2006 at 05:27
Creationism is a creation of the humans, an attempt to explain those things that fall out of the realm of contemprory knowledge. We are fortunate enough to be living in an age when we do knw what would have happened fairly accurately. The Evolution theory as also the  theory of Natural selection has too overwhleming logic for almost every rationale question that can be thrown at it. Untill we are able to come up with a better account of the facts, the theory will hold good.

PATTON NAGAR, Brains win over Brawn
Back to Top
Goban View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 09-Mar-2006
Location: Subterranea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 581
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Oct-2006 at 08:39
Originally posted by QueenCleopatra

What do you mean by that? I was just curious about other people's opinions. Isn't that what this forum is for?

 
 
I think he meant that there were a few threads about this topic running at the same time a little while ago. It was nothing personal.Wink
The sharpest spoon in the drawer.
Back to Top
Siege Tower View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Location: Edmonton,Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 580
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 16:32
if God did create Human race, what was his purpose?(i am not an Athiest)
Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Jan-2007 at 22:32
I believe that Creationism and Evolution, in a long run, explains the divine work of perfect being (Whether you call it God or Nautral Law). For instance, the word "water" is still water, whether it's spoken in English, Korean, Japanese, Arabic, etc.
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Jan-2007 at 22:58
Originally posted by Zagros

The notion of creationism is an insult to even an idiot's intelligence... No offence intended to anyone who ardently adheres thereto.  This is just my opinion.
 
 
Extremely well said, but with me offense intended. You simply can't compare the notion as if they are equal opposites. One is intelligent reason the other hocus pocus for the braindead.
 


Edited by Paul - 01-Jan-2007 at 22:58
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Yiannis View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 05:14
Moving the question forward: If God has not created the world as we know it and the Bible is wrong, does Christianity have a reason of existence? I mean if the basis of Christian Theology is fundamentally wrong, why should anyone believe in Christianity at all?
(apart for the obvious fact that some people need to believe in something bigger than themselves in order not to be crushed by the simple burden of their existence)
 
In anciant times, God(s) had penty of space. they were responsible for life and death, for rising and setting the Sun, bringing the rain or destroying crops if not properly served etc. Now that we know that God(s) does not do these things any more, and Science is responding to more and more unanswered question is (and is it indeed?) God needed at all or is technology the new God?
 
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics

Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Back to Top
gcle2003 View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 06:10
God is never needed.

He is sometimes useful, especially to politicians and other power-seekers and fund-raisers. Tp that end, men make God in their own image.
    

Edited by gcle2003 - 02-Jan-2007 at 06:11
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 06:15
OK....well, who knows my fate once I say this...but as a Christian, I support Creationism.

Pinch
Back to Top
Yiannis View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 06:20
Originally posted by Knights

OK....well, who knows my fate once I say this...but as a Christian, I support Creationism.

Pinch
 
If you'd add some arguments to you post you'd make it more interesting... Trying to help you, I'd say that there're Christian Theologists (serious academic ones, not the kind supporting Creationism) that support the idea that Science and God go hand in hand and that the Bible was merely speaking allegorically.
 
 
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics

Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 06:23
Fair enough, I've begun putting together some stuff for you/this topic. Yes there definatly are Christians that believe God used Evolution and things like that, I know some personally, and I enjoy listening to their ideas and arguments, as I do with Evolutionists and the like.


Edited by Knights - 06-Jan-2007 at 04:22
Back to Top
Decebal View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Digital Prometheus

Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 13:36

I am an agnostic but I suspect that the book of Genesis is a sort of metaphor. If you are a very intelligent person, who has a good grasp of evolution and believe that there is some sort of intelligence acting upon the universe, how would you explain it to a bunch of sheep-herdsmen? You would write an epic, easy to remember poem, and phrase complex concepts in simple terms which the herdsmen could understand.

 

Let's take Genesis, for instance, and treat it as a metaphor for the scientific explanation we use today. Please look for the italics as the explanation in modern language. Of course, the interpretation below is my own and it is rather liberal. Theres absolutely no guarantees that it is what the author meant. But is a good guess nonetheless, or so I think. I have a lot more respect for Christians who understand Genesis in these terms, as opposed to those who take it literally. If they do take it literally, it means that they havent really evolved much beyond those illiterate sheep-herdsmen for which this book was intended.

 

 

Genesis 1

 

 

 

1 First God made heaven & earth 

First the universe and then earth appeared

2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters.

The primitive earth had no features as we know them today, the atmosphere did not allow light to get through, but life was forming in the oceans.

3 And God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light.

The atmosphere changed enough for light to penetrate to the surface of the earth

4 And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness.

5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.

Light had a positive impact on life, which started to be affected by day and night. An era passed

6 And God said, "Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters."

The first continent took shape amidst the oceans

7 And God made the firmament and separated the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament. And it was so.

The cycle of water started to occur, as the water in the oceans was separated from the water in the atmosphere (clouds)

8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, a second day.

The early earth was an amazing place. Another era went by.

9 And God said, "Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear." And it was so.

10 God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was good.

The continents and the oceans as we know them took shape.

11 And God said, "Let the earth put forth vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind, upon the earth." And it was so.

Vegetal life now appeared on dry land and diversified.

12 The earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed according to their own kinds, and trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.

Each vegetal life form had different adaptations for reproduction.

13 And there was evening and there was morning, a third day.

Another era passed

14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years,

15 and let them be lights in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth." And it was so.

The stars could be seen from Earth and also had a role to play in the ecosystem

16 And God made the two great lights, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night; he made the stars also.

17 And God set them in the firmament of the heavens to give light upon the earth,

18 to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good.

The cycle of life was determined by the sun and the moon, each with a specific role to play.

19 And there was evening and there was morning, a fourth day.

Another age passed.

20 And God said, "Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the firmament of the heavens."

Life diversified in the oceans. The first insects on earth started to fly.

21 So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, with which the waters swarm, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.

The first great marine reptiles and dinosaurs appeared. The first birds also started to diversify.

22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth."

These animals continued to reproduce and diversify.

23 And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day.

Another age passed

24 And God said, "Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds." And it was so.

25 And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the cattle according to their kinds, and everything that creeps upon the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.

The modern land animals appeared and diversified.

26 Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth."

Eventually, the human animal appears, endowed with the ability of abstract thought.

27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth."

The early humans appeared and started to migrate across the surface of the Earth.

29 And God said, "Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food.

The basis of their alimentation was vegetal

30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food." And it was so.

All animals ultimately depend on the plants for energy

31 And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, a sixth day.

Another age passed.

 

 

Now, Genesis 2 is somewhat redundant, as it repeats the explanation for the appearance of the Earth and life, in somewhat different terms, in verses 1-7. Lets start again at 8.

 

Genesis 2


1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. 2 And on the seventh day God finished his work which he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had done. 3 So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all his work which he had done in creation. 4 These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created. In the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens, 5 when no plant of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up--for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no man to till the ground; 6 but a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground-- 7 then the LORD God formed man of dust from the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.

8 And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east; and there he put the man whom he had formed.

Early man formed somewhere in the East [of Africa]

9 And out of the ground the LORD God made to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

Early mans native environment was quite rich. Primitive humans reproduced [tree of life] and developed religion.[knowledge of good and evil]

10 A river flowed out of Eden to water the garden, and there it divided and became four rivers. 11 The name of the first is Pishon; it is the one which flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; 12 and the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. 13 The name of the second river is Gihon; it is the one which flows around the whole land of Cush. 14 And the name of the third river is Tigris, which flows east of Assyria. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.

Out of the original homeland, several streams of migration occurred. The first went up the Nile. The second colonized Ethiopia (to the east of the original Rift Valley). The third and fourth migration waves went to the Middle East.

15 The LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to till it and keep it.

16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "You may freely eat of every tree of the garden;

17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die."

Life was plentiful for ancestral man. However, Death held a special mystery, for which religion provided an explanation and put it into perspective.

18 Then the LORD God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him."

19 So out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.

Complex language also appeared at this time, with humans having the ability to transmit names given to the world around them.

20 The man gave names to all cattle, and to the birds of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for the man there was not found a helper fit for him.

Some animals were domesticated. With the appearance of language and animal domestication, social structures emerged, as some people were needed to take upon subordinate positions in society.

 21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh;

22 and the rib which the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.

In the meantime, out of human DNA [a rib], God had created women.

 23 Then the man said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man."

24 Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh.

Men and women are meant to create strong bonds (marriage), if they procreate.

25 And the man and his wife were both naked, and were not ashamed.

At this time, religion had not created the idea that reproduction is sinful.

What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi

Back to Top
Decebal View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Digital Prometheus

Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 14:10

Another example would be

John 1:1
The Word Became Flesh
 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.


Now this is an apparently obtuse and confusing statement, which has been debated, but nevertheless constituted a cornerstone of Christian religion.

Now, if we take DNA as "The Word" (which even in modern science it is - CTTAGGTACTGGT... etc), this statement makes a lot more sense. If we say instead: In the beginning there was DNA, and DNA was with God, and DNA was God. Or perhaps: In the beginning there was DNA, and everything which has DNA is a part of God, and DNA is God himself.

All of a sudden, we have a very modern statement, which today's science has difficulty refuting. The only debatable point (and what a big point it is!), is whether we can define God as some sort of consciousness residing in the ensemble of DNA in the universe, which is a matter of faith and philosophy. Alternatively, that statement could be interpreted: as humans started to develop a language, the idea of God appeared in their heads. If only most christians would read between the lines, instead of stubbornly (and somewhat stupidly) clinging to a literal interpretation of the Bible, then we'd be much further ahead, wouldn't we?

 

What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi

Back to Top
JanusRook View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 16:08
In the beginning there was DNA, and everything which has DNA is a part of God, and DNA is God himself.


But an orthodox (not eastern orthodoxy) christian cannot believe in this. This is a pantheistic belief, since DNA is contained in all living organisms and DNA is God it means that we are all a part of God....very heterodox.

"The Word" or Logos "is the underlying order of reality of which ordinary people are only unconsciously aware." Therefore Logos is the natural order of all things, not just genetics as prescribed by God.

The Greeks did not try and assign atoms to God, and I don't believe it would be right to assign DNA to God. Although being human he would obviously have to have DNA, just not be contained in everyone elses DNA.
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.
Back to Top
Decebal View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Digital Prometheus

Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Jan-2007 at 16:42

Orthodox christians: who's to say that the current post-chalcedonian version of christianity actually interpreted the various books in the Bible the way they were meant to be interpreted? The version of christianity that we know as orthodox is the result of deliberations at various ecumenical councils (Nicea I & II, Chalcedon). There were a lot of other variants (heresies) which abounded before these councils, some of which (I forget which ones right now), actually believed that God was in some way a part of humans as well. Anyway, the version currently used is the one that allowed for the best collaboration between the church and the state. That does not make it correct. Perhaps the time would be right for another council, which could reconcile christianity with science. 

We could also look at the various heresies derived from Gnosticism, whoch believed that there is a deeper meaning behind the teachings of Jesus and the prophets, which was not revealed to ordinary converts.

 
 
Anyway, the point here is not necessarily about what an orthodox christian should believe: it's rather about the possibility of reconciling creationism and evolution.
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi

Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Jan-2007 at 02:39
Originally posted by Decebal

Another example would be


John 1:1The Word Became Flesh In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.


Now this is an apparently obtuse and confusing statement, which has been debated, but nevertheless constituted a cornerstone of Christian religion.


Now, if we take DNA as "The Word" (which even in modern science it is - CTTAGGTACTGGT... etc), this statement makes a lot more sense. If we say instead: In the beginning there was DNA, and DNA was with God, and DNA was God. Or perhaps: In the beginning there was DNA, and everything which has DNA is a part of God, and DNA is God himself.


All of a sudden, we have a very modern statement, which today's science has difficulty refuting. The only debatable point (and what a big point it is!), is whether we can define God as some sort of consciousness residing in the ensemble of DNA in the universe, which is a matter of faith and philosophy. Alternatively, that statement could be interpreted: as humans started to develop a language, the idea of God appeared in their heads. If only most christians would read between the lines, instead of stubbornly (and somewhat stupidly) clinging to a literal interpretation of the Bible, then we'd be much further ahead, wouldn't we?





Brilliant analysis, Decebal.
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
JanusRook View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Jan-2007 at 02:50

Anyway, the point here is not necessarily about what an orthodox christian should believe


Oh, sorry, I didn't mean it that way. I meant Orthodoxy, in the sense of what the consensus of Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox christians have in common belief. Pantheism is very unorthodox in Christian teaching, in nearly every denomination.
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 18>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.