Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Yiannis
Sultan
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Sparta Vs. Athens Posted: 16-Feb-2005 at 01:17 |
The Peloponnesian war was (is?) being tought in US military academies.
Athens being the "good Nato" and Sparta being the "bad undemocratic USSR".
History repeats itself, either as a farce or as a tragedy!
|
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics
Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Feb-2005 at 19:45 |
In regards to the argument whether or not there are any parallels between Thucycides account of the Peloponnesian War and the Iraq War, here is a thought
chemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" />>>
On June 7, 2003 an article appeared in the newspaper the New York Times. It was by Leo Strauss daughter, Jenny Strauss Clay, a professor of classics at the University of Virginia. She writes: Recent news articles have portrayed my father, Leo Strauss, as the mastermind behind the neo-conservative ideologues who control United States foreign policy. He reaches out from his 30-year-old grave, we are told, to direct a "cabal" of Bush administration figures hoping to subject the American people to rule by a ruthless elite. I do not recognize the Leo Strauss presented in these articles. My father was not a politician.>>
>>
Leo Strauss, for those not familiar with the name, was a Political Theory professor best known for the "resurrection" of ancients scholars, namely, Thucydides and Plato. Some "anti-Straussians" have gone as far as to that claim he advocates a Thrasymachus-like wisdom (e.g. Platos Republic) and that the present-day war in Iraq is the indirect result of his disciples (the likes of Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz; Abram Shulsky of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans, and Richard Perle of the Pentagon advisory board, to name just a few) >>
>>
Personally, I dont believe the above-mentioned are acting out any of Strauss teachings, but like I said above, its just a thought.>>
>>
|
|
Spartakus
Tsar
terörist
Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Feb-2005 at 07:07 |
Athens could defeat Sparta but the last one exploited an important drawback of the Athenian democracy and of the nation's ideology,it's arrogance.
|
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
|
|
Winterhaze13
Colonel
Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 716
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Mar-2005 at 16:48 |
Well I'm torn between Sparta and Athens, so I will base my decisions of these criteria:
Political: Edge (Athens), the first true democracy was surprisingly transparent, although at times unstable. But, autocratic Sparta just can't compete.
Culture: Edge (Athens), Greek culture is Athenian culture, while Sparta had little or no culture of its own.
Military: Edge (Sparta), Sparta was the land power, while Athens was the sea power. However, Sparta won the peloponnesian war in decisive fashion and deserves the credit.
Economic: Edge (Athens), Athens was superior in this regard, they had a larger trading system. While, Sparta relied on the helots for economic prosperity.
Athens wins 3-1
|
Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.
-- Voltaire
French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)
|
|
conon394
Pretorian
Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 165
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Mar-2005 at 21:09 |
Winterhaze13
I'd give Sparta an addition -.5.
They went to war with the slogan 'Freedom for the Greeks', but only won because
they sold out to Persia.
|
|
Winterhaze13
Colonel
Joined: 11-Nov-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 716
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Mar-2005 at 11:10 |
Originally posted by conon394
Winterhaze13
I'd give LACE>SpartaLACE> an addition -.5. They went to war with the slogan 'Freedom for the Greeks', but only won because they sold out to LACE>PersiaLACE>.
|
That's a great point. But Athens also reached out to the Persians for help.
|
Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.
-- Voltaire
French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)
|
|
RED GUARD
Earl
Joined: 06-Mar-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 292
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Mar-2005 at 16:20 |
Hmm... the Spartans had the best military while Athens had the strong economy... tough choice....
|
Quotes by your's turly:
"I came, I saw, and I conquered... but only for the weekend"
"This is my tank, this is my weapon, and this is my pride."
"Power comes from a barrel of a gun."
|
|
conon394
Pretorian
Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 165
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Mar-2005 at 16:20 |
True Winterhaze 13
But Athens
certainly never consummated an alliance with Persia
during the Peloponnesian war. I would also point to the Corinthian war, where Athenians
may have allied with Persia
out of desperation, but alone among the combatants aided Evagoras (of Salamis
on Cyprus) in
his rebellion from Persian and resisted a peace that would reconfirm the Great
King as suzerain over the Greeks of Asia Minor.
Athenian actions were certainly driven by a healthy dose of
self interest, but I think it is also fair to say that seem to have had a
greater sense of pan-Hellenism than most polis, and certainly more than Sparta.
Edited by conon394
|
|
Lannes
Baron
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 439
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Mar-2005 at 21:03 |
Originally posted by Winterhaze13
Political: Edge (Athens), the first true democracy was surprisingly transparent, although at times unstable. But, autocratic Sparta just can't compete. |
And why is that? Sparta's government was stable and strong. What more do you want?
Edited by Lannes
|
τρέφεται δέ, ὤ Σώκρατης, ψυχὴ τίνι;
|
|
conon394
Pretorian
Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 165
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Mar-2005 at 21:21 |
Lannes
How about freedom of speech...
to paraphrase of Demosthenes a person was free to criticize Athens
in both Athens and Sparta,
but was not free to criticize Sparta
in Sparta.
|
|
Marcus Regulus
Knight
Joined: 21-Mar-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 54
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Mar-2005 at 10:07 |
"Sparta's government was stable and strong."
True, but inflexible. It couldn't adapt very well to changing conditions and the culture was worse in that when changes needed to be made they couldn't do so. Stability is one thing but you need to be innovative and when your telling most of your people to shut up your going to have problems. The fact is that even though they defeated Athens they couldn't hold them because of this and the fact that their economy needed the helots to survive. In the end Athens rises again from the dead. This is one thing about democracies, they bounce back well after disaster. Sparta was kicked out and when they lost some parts of their lands to helot revolt -- they couldn't recover becasue their system was ridged.
Athens was unstable at times but its economy could create wealth and it political system allowed people with skill to rise to the top. True their were some people of questionable character, but they were skilled. Sparta had good character, but skills were lacking because of lack of imagination and competition to be in leadership.
In a ground battle-- bet on Sparta, but for a long standing system of government and economy and culture -- Athens wins in the long term. At least until they run into another democracy called the Republic of Rome.
|
Marcus Regulus
"Are you still so dull?" Jesus to his disciples
|
|
Aquila
Immortal Guard
Joined: 16-Mar-2005
Location: Switzerland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-Mar-2005 at 12:49 |
If you want to know what I voted for, ask yourself which city is bigger and more important even today. (Check a map if you must)
|
Aquila©2004 Victor Chevalier
|
|
Idanthyrus
Pretorian
Joined: 03-Feb-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 188
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Mar-2005 at 05:52 |
Originally posted by RED GUARD
Hmm... the Spartans had the best military while Athens had the strong economy... tough choice....
|
I think that during the Pelopnesian war Athen had the better millitary pretty much right up to the end. In pitched battle the Spartans generally tended to have the better of things, but the Athenians generally had a better respect for strategy. Also the Spartans religious disposition tended to handicap them, reading Thucydides they never seemed to get favorable sacifices. Unfortunatly for Athens, the democracy there tended to drastically over-estimate their own strength making it inevetible that Athens would eventually overstep its bounds and come to its downfall.
|
|
Marcus Regulus
Knight
Joined: 21-Mar-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 54
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Mar-2005 at 15:39 |
Athens did have an ego problem, but in the end they were humbled by Sparta. But then again Athens kicked Sparta out and rebounded.
This debate would not even exist if Athens had won. But because Sparta won the war and Athens rebounded so the question is asked.
|
Marcus Regulus
"Are you still so dull?" Jesus to his disciples
|
|
Antiochus
Immortal Guard
Joined: 24-Mar-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2005 at 16:25 |
I think both had their good and bad sides that eventually caused their respective downfalls. From one hand, Spartans were heavily military orientated. Thus they did not leave behind much of a "culture". After Epaminodas destroyed their army at Mantinea and Leuctra and by the time of Alexander they were reduced to total unimportance.
Athens from the other hand, gave us Democracy, the Parthenon, and some of the most well known names of Western cultural and intellectual history. After the end of Peloponissian war they never managed again to gain its previous power.
|
|
RED GUARD
Earl
Joined: 06-Mar-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 292
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2005 at 17:40 |
Originally posted by Idanthyrus
Originally posted by RED GUARD
Hmm... the Spartans had the best military while Athens had the strong economy... tough choice....
|
I think that during the Pelopnesian war Athen had the better
millitary pretty much right up to the end. In pitched battle the
Spartans generally tended to have the better of things, but the
Athenians generally had a better respect for strategy. Also the
Spartans religious disposition tended to handicap them, reading
Thucydides they never seemed to get favorable sacifices. Unfortunatly
for Athens, the democracy there tended to drastically
over-estimate their own strength making it inevetible that Athens would
eventually overstep its bounds and come to its downfall.
|
Better navy, yes. But
better army, never! The Spartans are at home training for war every day
or else they get whipped while the Athenians get fat and relax while
being served by their slaves. Which person sounds more tough and
well-prepared for war?
|
Quotes by your's turly:
"I came, I saw, and I conquered... but only for the weekend"
"This is my tank, this is my weapon, and this is my pride."
"Power comes from a barrel of a gun."
|
|
Imperator Invictus
Caliph
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3151
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2005 at 18:09 |
Which person sounds more tough and
well-prepared for war? |
The Theban.
|
|
RED GUARD
Earl
Joined: 06-Mar-2005
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 292
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2005 at 18:13 |
That was after the Peloponesian War.
|
Quotes by your's turly:
"I came, I saw, and I conquered... but only for the weekend"
"This is my tank, this is my weapon, and this is my pride."
"Power comes from a barrel of a gun."
|
|
Idanthyrus
Pretorian
Joined: 03-Feb-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 188
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2005 at 19:08 |
Originally posted by RED GUARD
Originally posted by Idanthyrus
Originally posted by RED GUARD
Hmm... the Spartans had the best military while Athens had the strong economy... tough choice....
|
I think that during the Pelopnesian war Athen had the better millitary pretty much right up to the end. In pitched battle the Spartans generally tended to have the better of things, but the Athenians generally had a better respect for strategy. Also the Spartans religious disposition tended to handicap them, reading Thucydides they never seemed to get favorable sacifices. Unfortunatly for Athens, the democracy there tended to drastically over-estimate their own strength making it inevetible that Athens would eventually overstep its bounds and come to its downfall.
|
Better navy, yes. But better army, never! The Spartans are at home training for war every day or else they get whipped while the Athenians get fat and relax while being served by their slaves. Which person sounds more tough and well-prepared for war?
|
The Spartans certainly have a reputation for excelence in that area, however it begs notice that Athens won nearly as many land battles as Sparta did during the war. Sparta was even more dependent on its slave class than Athens, so that is not a very good argument.
|
|
Marcus Regulus
Knight
Joined: 21-Mar-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 54
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2005 at 20:18 |
'The Spartans certainly have a reputation for excelence in that area, however it begs notice that Athens won nearly as many land battles as Sparta did during the war.'
True, but there is a reason for this -- when the Athenians won land battles they were fighting Spartan Allies not the Spartians themselves for the most part. At least that is what I have read so far.
"Sparta was even more dependent on its slave class than Athens, so that is not a very good argument"
Very true. The fact is the Athenians did not have a economy based on slaves so much. The Spartans absolutely depended on the Helots so all of them could remain soldiers, they contantly feared slave revolts because it would ruin their economy -- this was not true of Athens. Athens had freemen at it oars of its navy as well. this was not always true with the Spartans or their Allies.
|
Marcus Regulus
"Are you still so dull?" Jesus to his disciples
|
|