Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Komnenos
Tsar
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
|
Quote Reply
Topic: "Philosopher Kings" Posted: 15-Oct-2006 at 13:46 |
Originally posted by Leonardo
Originally posted by Komnenos
Julian the Apostate, who had immense philosophical pretensions, but was more of a caricature of a Hellenic thinker. |
I disagree totally with you
|
Yeah, I know, we have discussed that before. But as it is your birthday today, I'm not gonna argue with you!
Happy Birthday, you old heathen!
|
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
|
|
Hellios
Arch Duke
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 15:41 |
Originally posted by Bulldog
We could debate about what "might" and "might not have" happened but unfortunately can only go on what we have.
Which is that Alexander the Great is known for fighting and not philosophy. |
It's not a 'might or might not'. It's going on what we have, which is that he wasn't known for fighting only. If you still feel like pursuing it, open another thread called "Is fighting the only thing Alexander is known for?" and you'll see the results, my friend.
Anyhow, sorry for jousting with you on somebody else's thread dude.
Edited by Hellios - 13-Oct-2006 at 19:54
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 15:30 |
We could debate about what "might" and "might not have" happened but unfortunately can only go on what we have.
Which is that Alexander the Great is known for fighting and not philosophy.
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Hellios
Arch Duke
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 14:18 |
Originally posted by Bulldog
True but the teachers of a later age were knowledgable of the famous Greek philosophers as well as other world philosophers. However, their education must have had some impact on him somewhere along the line. |
Thanks for agreeing. Yes, what philosopher wouldn't want to have been personally tutored by the Aristotle-Plato-Socrates lineage?
Originally posted by Bulldog
I think its safe to say he destroyed more or at least as many cities as he built. |
He's known for being a destroyer of cities just as much as he's known for being a builder of cities. This might be a case of how one looks at the cup that is 'half full' or 'half empty'.
Originally posted by Bulldog
Genghiz Khan had the secret history of the Mogols written, was an expert in millitary philosophies being bought up in a millitaristic environment. However, ultimately they were "Warrior Kings". Not all philosopher kings are great rulers and not all warrior kings are great leaders. Each category has its greats, I wasn't trying to be derrogative about "Alexander the Great", he's one of the greatest "warrior kings". |
If you prefer to call him a "warrior king", go ahead, but most people will think that you're under the impression that fighting is the only thing he was good at. I've accepted that he was a product of both; his father's military excellence, and his philosopher educators. The latter was surely going to be more evident today if he hadn't died so soon, because it's quite logical that in his old age he would've started to write more & fight less. The philosophical writings would surely have been something comparable to his philosopher educators', with the added elements of his experiences as a great conqueror.
Edited by Hellios - 13-Oct-2006 at 14:36
|
|
Hellios
Arch Duke
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 13:32 |
Originally posted by gcle2003
Philosophers can be idiots too. |
Agreed.
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 13:31 |
Hellios
Yes, most monarchs had a good education & privileged background, but (in terms of philosophy) that's not the same thing as personal tutoring by the Aristotle-Plato-Socrates lineage. In terms of philosophy, that's something quite extraordinary.
True but the teachers of a later age were knowledgable of the famous Greek philosophers aswell as other world philosophers. However, their education must have had some impact on him somewhere along the line.
Hellios
Most conquerors destroyed cities, but not all of them built as many as he did. Try to look at the big picture.
I think its safe to say he destroyed more or at least as many cities as he built
Hellios
You must have some political or favoritistic issues to be saying that his interest in cultures & sense of philosophy were the same as Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan. All Ive been trying to say is that he wasnt as un-philosophical as you portrayed him in your earlier post.
Genghiz Khan had the secret history of the Mogols written, was an expert in millitary philosophies being bought up in a millitaristic environment.
However, ultimately they were "Warrior Kings". Not all philosopher kings are great rulers and not all warrior kings are great leaders.
Each category has its greats, I wasn't trying to be derrogative about "Alexander the Great", he's one of the greatest "warrior kings".
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Hellios
Arch Duke
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 13:02 |
Hey BD,
Originally posted by Bulldog
The same can be said about any Conqueror, Monarch, Leader though. Most recieve the top education and have quite a privallaged background. |
Yes, most monarchs had a good education & privileged background, but (in terms of philosophy) that's not the same thing as personal tutoring by the Aristotle-Plato-Socrates lineage. In terms of philosophy, that's something quite extraordinary.
Originally posted by Bulldog
You comment on some of the great cities he founded, yet he also destroyed probobly the greatest and most advanced city of the era "Persepolis" and countless other cities. |
Most conquerors destroyed cities, but not all of them built as many as he did. Try to look at the big picture.
Originally posted by Bulldog
Alexander the Great is among the warrior kings, for more focused with millitaristic actions rather than philosophies and culture. He belongs in a group with, Atilla the Hun and Genghiz Khan. |
You must have some political or favoritistic issues to be saying that his interest in cultures & sense of philosophy were the same as Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan. All Ive been trying to say is that he wasnt as un-philosophical as you portrayed him in your earlier post.
Remember, I didn't jump in this thread to propose Alexander as a 'Philosophical King', I jumped in because another member mentioned him and you replied "What did Alexander write?", so I said philosophy isn't only about writing & tried to explain why I thought so...
Edited by Hellios - 13-Oct-2006 at 13:31
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 12:20 |
The same can be said about any Conqueror, Monarch, Leader though. Most recieve the top education and have quite a privallaged background. There are ofcourse exceptions, one that springs to mind is Timurlenk and Nadir Shah, they had to be doubly as intellegent as getting to become a leader when your a shephard would be tough today let along in back in the middle-ages.
You comment on some of the great cities he founded, yet he also destroyed probobly the greatest and most advanced city of the era "Persepolis" and countless other cities.
Alexander the Great is among the warrior kings, for more focused with millitaristic actions rather than philosophies and culture. He belongs in a group with, Atilla the Hun and Genghiz Khan.
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Hellios
Arch Duke
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 10:04 |
Originally posted by Bulldog
What did Alexander the Great write? |
Alexander didn't live long enough to produce many philosophical written works, but philosophy isn't only about writing.
He grabbed any opportunity he could (during his hectic military campaigns) to philosophize with the local philosophers of the various kingdoms he conquered. This probably had something to do with his background & education; he was personally educated by Aristotle, follower/student of Plato, follower/student of Socrates. Alexanders philosophical background/education and sense of philosophy were probably as good as any other King mention in this thread.
He also contributed greatly to philosophy by creating many foundations for its development, such as some of the great cities/schools he founded, which became famous for the development of philosophy.
People who try to distance Alexander from philosophy are probably from the "I think Alexander was overrated..." gang. He was greatly philosophical in both his upbringing and his actions (during his short life). Those "written works" historians love to see, would've come later. It shouldn't be doubted that somebody with his philosophical background/experience and philosophical sense, would've also produced some fine philosophical "written" work if he has reached an older age.
There are so many greatly philosophical monarchs.
Edited by Hellios - 13-Oct-2006 at 10:13
|
|
Leonardo
General
Joined: 13-Jan-2006
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 778
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 08:38 |
Originally posted by Komnenos
Julian the Apostate, who had immense philosophical pretensions, but was more of a caricature of a Hellenic thinker. |
I disagree totally with you
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Oct-2006 at 03:05 |
In England, Alfred the Great.
And James I of England VI of Scotland was known as the 'wisest fool in Christendom'.
Philosophers can be idiots too.
|
|
malizai_
Sultan
Alcinous
Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 17:10 |
Ulugh Beg, how can we forget.
|
|
Chilbudios
Arch Duke
Joined: 11-May-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1900
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 17:05 |
Some surprising testimonies of intellectual achievements come from the early Barbaric kingdoms:
In Italy, maybe Theodoric the Great not so, but Amalasuntha knew not only Latin, but also Greek (which was a mark of exquisite literacy in the Latin West of those times) and as Cassiodorus says, she was quite knowledgeable in the Classical Culture. Theodat was also named the "philosopher king" and Procopius said about him he was more skillful in Plato than in miltary.
In Spain, Sisebut, the Visigothic king was also erudite both in theology but also in laic literature. He knew not only the Christian Holy Books, but also theology, classical philosophy as his letters and poems prove. In fact several of the later Visigothic kings enjoyed the royal library which contained both religious and laic literature.
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 16:05 |
Richard III, who assemble the largest collection of books in England and seems to have read them all.
|
|
|
Bulldog
Caliph
Joined: 17-May-2006
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 15:46 |
What did Alexander the Great write?
More additions-
- Suleyman the Magnificent, master poet, patron of the arts and architecture, creater of of one of the greatest justice system combinating a balance between Turkic Yasa and Ture and Islamic Shariah Law.
- Ulugh Bey/Beg/Bek, great scientist, ruler of the timurids, builder of the famous Samarkent observatory, calculated the length of a year, achieved mathmatical advancments and catelogued a thousand stars and the motions of the planets.
Edited by Bulldog - 12-Oct-2006 at 15:48
|
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 15:40 |
I would not call Stalin, Hitler or Mao Tse Tung "phylosophers" because they wrote the Main Kampf or the Red Book.
Pinguin
|
|
Maharbbal
Sultan
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 15:37 |
True and we could also mention Stalin's "on Yougoslavia" maybe the only piece of litterature able to make Main Kampf look like a seminal essay on human condition.
|
I am a free donkey!
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 15:36 |
Originally posted by rider
I wouldn't say that Ptolemaios Soter was much of a philosopher, pinguin. |
Yes, you are right. He was more like a "manager" of events
Yep, I change him by King Solomon, then. I mantain, though, Nezahualcoyotl and King Alphonse the Wise. And, of course, Marcus Aurelius, the Roman Emperor.
Pinguin
Edited by pinguin - 12-Oct-2006 at 15:38
|
|
Komnenos
Tsar
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 15:22 |
Originally posted by Maharbbal
Trotsky. His "My Life" is regarded as one of the best piece of Russian litterature in the 20th century. Churchill, De Gaule, and the Prince of Ligne are also highly praized for the quality of their memoir.
|
I though we are restricted to monarchs.
Anyway, if you mention Trotsky, how about Lenin who thrilled the Russian workers and peasants with works like " Materialism and Empirio-Criticism" , a seminal piece of Marxist philosophy.
|
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
|
|
Kids
Shogun
Joined: 19-Nov-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 238
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Oct-2006 at 14:53 |
Alexander the Great
|
|