Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

A History of Sargon of Akkad

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: A History of Sargon of Akkad
    Posted: 12-Dec-2004 at 11:15
Sargon the Great

Sargon the Great (of Akkad) lived 2334-2279 B.C.E. and turned out to be the first great ruler, the first great military tactician and stratetician, and is still amongst the greatest men ever born on this green Earth. 

By the time Sargon was born the cities of Sumeria had already sprouted quite a legacy of intercity warfare, and these tools of war have already been found in graves, such as copper axes and blades.  Of excessive use was the first chariot, and the Sumerians would not leave out such a valuable design from their always expanding, always changing, military.  Chariots, as early cavalry would later do when first implimented by Cyrus of Persia, were designed as shock troopers, needed to punch holes into the enemy lines to allow infantry to merely dig through and isolate pockets and eliminate them.  They were also used to harass enemy flanks, and sometimes outflank enemies, and most armies trembled at the site of a chariot force.  As infantry the Sumerians used a heavy infantry phalanx, which is depicted on the Stele of Vultures, which commemorates the victory over Umma by Lagash in 2525 B.C.E.  These were very similar to the later Macedonian phalanx, although the ordnance wasn't quite as advanced.  They carried spears and large rectangular wooden shields an wore conical copper helmets.  Armor was composed of mere leather, which proved hot and uncomfortable.  Sumerian armies also made great use of skirmirshers to harass an opponent.

Sumerian imperialism first sprung out under Lugalzagesi, who brought most of Sumer under his thumb, with Erech as his capital.  And the long legacy of Mesopotamian imperialism would only sprout their - it would never die.

Sargon was left by his mother in a basket floating on a river, and was found a poor Summerian worker who trained the young boy to be the palace gardener.  The king at the time, King Ur-Zababa of Kish noticed the young man and appointed him his personal cup bearer, a position of high esteem, and it could be that Sargon now had direct access to the king, and had his chance to flash genius.  Shortly afterwards Zaggisi, chief priest of the city of Umma, proclaimed himself king of all of Sumer.  Zaggisi continued to harass Akadian power by raiding cities and villages in an almost near constant war.  Consequently, Sargon moved to defeat him - although he soon emerged as king of a poor city-state.  Sargon quickly relocated his capital to Agade, 70 miles north of Kish, which distanced his capital from the threat of Zaggisi.  He put himself to design a new army of mixed Akkadians and other Sumerians along the lines of conventional Sumerian warfare, and instead of directly facing Zaggisi he marched north and sacked Asshur, capital of Assyria, and then overran Gutium in a ferocious, and speedy, campaign of destruction.  Following these seemingly easy conquest the king marched back south and annexed Malgium, and following this conquest Sargon organized a rapid advance into the heart of Zaggisi's Sumer and took Lagash for himself, leaving a garrison behind.  Then, in a masterly planned campaign he left Sumer and with the bulk of his army overran lower Anatolia.

Following his conquests Sargon felt he had the coffers and the manpower to defeat Zagissi, and soon enough invaded lower Sumer, hitting Erech in a suprise attack.  Erech's defenders apperently ran and Sargon razed the city walls.  Erech's army then stood, however, it was routed and mostly destroyed in pitched battle.  Zagissi organized a relief force and marched south to meet Sargon in battle and the ensuing conflict appeared to have been located near Erech.  The following happenings are unclear, however, it seems that Zaggisi was defeated, and his body sent to Uruk, and the walls of Uruks razed as well.  Following this battle Sargon continued his campaign north and captured the remaining cities of Zaggasi's Sumerian Empire.  Sargon himself boasted of winning thirty-four battles.

After some years of peace Sargon continued his wars and conflicted with Elam, and then launched a seperate attack on Syria and Lebanon, and quite suprisingly, was the first to launch amphibious warfare in recorded history.  The key to Sargon's victories, however, always lay with his coordination in army movement, his ability to improvise tactics, his combined arms strategy, and his skill a siege warfare, as well as the keeping of intelligence, and always relying on heavy reconaissance.  After Sargon's conquest of Sumer the area enjoyed a relatively peaceful and prosperous era - perhaps their golden age.  International trade flourished, merchants going from Sumer to the expanses of the east, and also to the vast resources of the west.  Goods from Egypt, Anatolia, Iran and elsewhere flowed into Sargon's gargantuan kingdom.  Sargon's legacy was one of trade and one of forming the standing army which later rulers would use to spread their own havoc.  When Sargon died Rimush, his son, inherited the empire, however, he was plagued by constant uprisings - after he died his brother took the throne.  He too was plagued by constant rebellion, and was later usurped by Naram-Sin.  Naram-Sin quickly destroyed and dispersed the Sumerian rebels and also went on a vast campaign of conquest taking his armies to Lebanon, Syria and Israel, and then to Egypt.  However, after Naram-Sin the dynasty went into decline, and soon fell altogether, left to the annals of history.

Little sources remain available to piece together a more complex history, and long battle narratives are impossible to record.  It must be remembered that this was right after the Sumerian prehistoric age, and little survives - or what does is stored and not easily accesible - to record more accurately.


--------------

Sources
Saggs, H.W.F., The Babylonians
Mears, Douglas, The First Great Conqueror.  Military History Magazine


Edited by DuxPimpJuice
Back to Top
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Dec-2004 at 11:38



Back to Top
azimuth View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
SlaYer'S SlaYer

Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
  Quote azimuth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Dec-2004 at 13:39

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sargon_of_Akkad

that is a short nice bio about him

what matters to me that he made the first empire in the world and he is semitic like me

semitic Not jews only,     Arabs too

Back to Top
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Dec-2004 at 19:36
Lugalzegesi made the first 'empire' in the world - it just wasn't too large.
Back to Top
azimuth View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
SlaYer'S SlaYer

Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
  Quote azimuth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Dec-2004 at 07:15

i didnt find anything about him in the web are you sure the spilling is right?

anyway who was he?

Back to Top
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Dec-2004 at 21:55
Hmm..an article I have from Military History has around a paragraph on him, and the book by Saggs has about a page on him - I'll just reiterate what he says - I'm not too familiar with him either (and that's the spelling in the book, although he might be spelling it in a different way)...

-----

--- 3 minutes later ---

It seems I left the book at my dad's house - I'll come up with something tomorrow, or something.
Back to Top
azimuth View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
SlaYer'S SlaYer

Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
  Quote azimuth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Jan-2005 at 08:32

did you find the book yet

iam waiting

 

Back to Top
J.M.Finegold View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
  Quote J.M.Finegold Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Jan-2005 at 16:03
I completely forgot about this thread... will do..heh.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-May-2005 at 19:40

Originally posted by Dux

Lugalzegesi made the first 'empire' in the world - it just wasn't too large.

Lugalzagesi "King who fills the sanctuary" Ensi of Umma, who partly destroyed Girsu (reconstructed later by Gudea) and who became later king of Uruk, reigned for 24 years (2340-2316).

As you can see on the map, we could call that an empire or at least that Sumer was under his control!! I say at least because an inscription refers to Lugalzagesi as the one who conquered Mesopotamia and Syria... wich is not evident because Mari (semitic) was quite powerful and also syrian nomads were present in the paysage of Mesopotamia.... So he might had good relationship with Mari who applied political influence over the syiran nomads (semites aslo) ... ALL THIS until Sharru-kin comes and marks Mesopotamia and beyond forever or at least for 55 yeas.

Back to Top
Sharrukin View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
  Quote Sharrukin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2005 at 04:35

The idea that Lugalzagesi may have preceded Sargon in creating an empire stems from one of his inscriptions which he declares:

"When Enlil, king of all lands, gave to Lugalzegesi the kingship of the nation, directed all the eyes of the land (obediently) toward him, put all the lands at his feet, and from east to west made them subject to him; then, from the Lower Sea, (along) the Tigris and Euphrates to the Upper Sea, he (Enlil) put their routes in good order for him.  From east to west, Enlil permitted him no rival; under him the lands rested contentedly the people made merry, and the suzerains of Sumer and rulers of other lands ?conceded sovereignty to him at Uruk."

The problem is that there is no corresponding archaeological evidence of such an empire, like we do have for the Akkadians.  What is lacking in this declaration is specific wording implying warfare (conquest) and some sort of administration of the foreign territories.  In fact the opposite is mentioned:  that the "rulers of other lands" remained in power but simply "conceded sovereignty". 

What may actually been described was a punitive expedition by Lugalzagesi to the west as much to show his power as well as to "put their routes in good order", (i.e. ensure that the trade routes are firmly controlled).  This is actually a culmination of several hundred years of the securing of the northwestern trade routes, accomplished even earlier by both the Marians and the Eblaites.  They controlled the trade routes for economic advantage, and not really to create "empires".  Having local rulers favorably disposed to them ensured that desired goods reach the home territory.  The Assyrians before Shamshi-Adad I had such a control of trade-routes going into central Anatolia, where they established karums, "trading posts" attached to local Anatolian cities for the flow of goods from Anatolia to Assyria, but this situation is not considered "imperial".

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.