QuoteReplyTopic: If Rome never existed Posted: 08-Mar-2013 at 04:01
Spam bots are the disease of the 21st century!
αἰὲν ἀριστεύειν
Een aristevin
“Ever to Excel“
From Homer's Iliad (8th century BC).
Motto of the University of St Andrews (founded 1410), the Edinburgh Academy (founded 1824) and others.
If Roman empire had not existed, the biggest difference in today's world would be the views on beauty, architectures, moralty and ethics but i dont think there will be much difference in technology.
I am pretty sure though, they felt they were superior to Celts or Germenics because of their different cultures.
They doubtlessly felt superior to those outside of the empire but once a territory was within the empire it was a different matter. For example in the 4th century scholars from Gaul were teaching the children of the elite in Rome Latin grammer.
Carthage would have dominated the area. probably. If they were REALLY enterprising, they might have conquered, allied with, or helped organize tha gauls. might have taken over-perhaps more in terms of cultural influence than conquest-france and perhaps even north europe.
Presumably wars between the middle east-Parthia, sassanids, pesians-and rome or greece might be replaced by wars between the middle east and the carthaginian-allied territories.
It's possible, since the carthaginians were very intensive sailors and traders, that the americas might have been discovered earlier-perhaps not by a huge amount, but there's already evidence that some phoenicians circumnavigated africa, and the americas aren't a great deal further than that.
and THAT might have resulted in a different picture of the americas as well-they might have had more chance (even with the fact that they would probably still get disease) to stay sovereign nations-which might have resulted in a hybrid fusion of cultures in the old world and the americas, each trading and learning from one another, and probably adopting pieces of culture, art, and science.
Granted, these can only ever be just educated guesses-but this kind of thing is a nice way to apply the knowledge about cultural and technological trends and human nature procured by studying history to solve a sort of puzzle.
people often get too preoccupied with LEARNING history, and not enough with USING it. A mental puzzle like this is a way to combat that tendency.
Who is the great dragon whom the spirit will no longer call lord and god? "Thou shalt" is the name of the great dragon. But the spirit of the lion says, "I will." - Nietzsche
If Rome didnt existed we still lived in a kind of Medieval Age...
Why?
Because the interpenetration of cultures, that boosted Europe, and by means of european intervention, the rest of the World, will never happen at the scale of the Roman Empire.
Romans are one of the few peolpes in History with a real civilization vocation and the Greeks or Carthaginians are traders in the heart, not interested in civilize the "other", unlike Romans.
If Rome never existed we would not be even close to where we are now. Christianity would not have progressed.
If rome didn't existed christianity to will also not have existed in the form we know it today 'cause christianity is an offspring of jewish resistance against roman invassion but who knows some kind of monoteistic belive maybe would had find the way of existence through partition from hebrewism.
If Rome had never existed, Spain would have remained as a part of the Carthagian Empire. Hispania had never existed. Spanish language wouldn't have developed, and Latin America would have a semitic name, I guess. In the east, the Bizantine Empire had not existed and Russia would not have an orthodox heritage. Lot of things would have been different, indeed.
Well, Hispania did exist, but as geographic place. Obiouly Spanish language wouln'd exist, neither Catalan nor Portuguese etc. But I believe that Moors (maybe with another religion) would have invaded the Iberian Peninsula, provoking a similar political situation as today's. Language may be Celtic or Ibero-Basque. I don't think it may be Semitic, since Carthage , as well as Greece, never showed much interest in conquering the whole land.
If Rome had never existed, Spain would have remained as a part of the Carthagian Empire. Hispania had never existed. Spanish language wouldn't have developed, and Latin America would have a semitic name, I guess. In the east, the Bizantine Empire had not existed and Russia would not have an orthodox heritage. Lot of things would have been different, indeed.
Without a Rome, I'd think that Hellenistic kingdoms would persist in the Middle East and resume their ancient feud with the Iranians (ala the Parthians and Sassanid Persia) before taking the brunt of Mohammed's Islam.
An Islam without Christianity in power doesn't seem much likely because multinational monotheism began with Christianity.
But there is another scenario: Etruscans ruled the Rome in its primeval stage. Without Rome they wouldn't fall from power and would continue expanding further south expelling Greeks. Later stages may have been a replica of RE. In such a scenario there may not be much difference from Romans' considering their similar culture.
apperantly everybody in this forum is " forgeting" a "small" detail:ALBANIANS or Albaneses
Some tribes from Latium have the names Albani, Albenses, Bolani, Abolani (Pliny, lib.III.9.16). The ancient authors often understood the entire Latin people under the terms Albani and Albanenses. Virgil calls all the cities of Latium urbes Albanae (Aen. VII. 601-2). In the oldest inscriptions of Latium we often find the family name Albus and Albius (C. I. L. vol. I. nr. 122. 129. 468. 830; Tacitus, Ann. VI. c. 34; Strabo, lib. XI. 4. 4; Isidorus, Orig. XIX. 23. 7). Alba was an ancient king of Latium, son of king Latinus Silvius (Livy, lib. I. 3; Dionys. Hal. I. 71). Finally, we note here that the national religion of the Latinii of Italy was called lex Albana (C. I. L. vol. I. nr. 807), certainly in antithesis with lex Romana and with mos Romanus
THE HISTORIE OF NATVRE, WRITTEN BY C. PLINIVS SECVNDVS.
Of old Latins, the Cascantenses, Erganicenses, Gracchuritanes, leonicenses, Ossigerdenses. Of confederates within the league, the Tarragenses. Tributaries besides, the Arcobricenses, Andologenses, Arocelitanes, Bursaonenses, Calaguritanes surnamed Fibularenses, complutenses, Carenses, Cincenses, Cortonenses, Dammanitanes, latrenses, Iturisenses, Ispalenses, Ilumberitanes, Lacetanes, Vibienses, Pompelonenses and Segienses. There resort to Carthage for law 62 severall States, besides the Islanders. Out of the Colonie Accitana, the Gemellenses, also Libisosona surnamed Foroaugustana: which two are endued with the franchises of Italie: out of the Colonie Salariensis, the Oppidanes of old Latium, Castulonenses, whom Csar calleth Venales. The Setabitanes, who are also Augustanes, and the Valerrienses. But of the Tributaries, of greatest name bee the Babanenses, the Bascianes, the Consaburenses, Dianenses, Egelestanes, Ilorcitani, Laminitani, Mentesani, the same that Oritani; and the Mentesani who otherwise are Bastuli: Oretanes who also are called Germani, the cheefe of the Celtiberians, the Segobrigenses, and the Toletanes of Carpetania, dwelling upon the river Tagus. Next to them the Viacienses and Virgilienses. To the assises or law court Cluniensis, the Varduli bring fourteene nations; of which I list to name none but the Albanenses.
Of the Ligurians, the most renowmed beyond the Alpes, are the Sallij, Deceates, and Oxubij: on this side, the Veneni, and descended from the Caturiges, the Vagienni, Statyelli, Vibelli, Magelli, Euburiates, Casmonates, Veliates, and those, whose townes wee will declare in the next coast. The river Rutuba, the towne Albium Intemelium, the river Merula, the towne Albium Ingaunum, the port or haven towne Vadum Sabatium, the river Porcifera, the towne Genua, the river Feritor, the Port Delphini, Tigulia: within, Segesta Tiguloiorum: the river Macra which limiteth Liguria. Now on the backe side behind all these townes abovenamed, is Apenine, the highest mountain of all Italie, reaching from the Alpes with a continuall ridge of hils, to the streights of Sicilie. From the other side thereof to Padus, the richest river of all Italie, all the countrey shineth with goodly faire townes, to with, Liberna, Dertona a colonie, Iria, Barderates, industria, Pollentia, Carrea, which also is named Polentia, Foro Fulvij the same that Valentinum, Augusta of the Vagienni: Alba Pompeia, Asta, and Aqu Statyellorum. And this is the ninth Canton, after the Geographie of Augustus. This coast or tract of Liguria containeth between the rivers Varus and Macra 211 miles. To it is adjoined the seventh, wherein is Hetruria from the river Macra: and it ofentimes chaunged the name. In old time the Pelasgians chased the Umbrians from thence: and by them the Lydians did the like, of whose king, named they were Tyrhheni: but soone after, of their ceremonies in sacrificing, in the Greekes language Thusci (tosk- one of two major group of Albanians-their language is the official language today in Albania)
Virgil, Aen. VII.v.219-220) and Jupiter Latiaris, worshipped on the mountain Alban, did not represent the god of the third generation, the Hellenic Jove of the theomachy, who had usurped the throne of Saturn, but the great God of the Pelasgian nation, the divinity of light and atmospheric phenomena, to whom Saturn was assimilated, the historic representative of the tilling of the earth, of prosperity and abundance. The most famous cult of the great Pelasgian god, as known by history to this day, was at Dodona in the Epirus......(albania)
What you have to consider though, are the numidians - they favoured the Romans and gave them loads of troops in their various expeditions (with the exception of the 2nd Punic war and the Jugurarthine wars), so they could have seen Carthage as a threat.
The topic is "if Rome never existed" so that wouldn't have happened. The Numidians also allied and traded with the Carthaginians on numerous occasions, so I see no reason why they wouldn't do so in the absence of Rome. The Numidians fell into the orbit of the two empires, switching allegiances at times, but in the absence of one empire, it is likely they simply would have fallen wholly into the orbit of the Carthaginians.
About the matter of Rome... I guess world woudn't be so different. The prominent place of Rome would have been taken by Greece or Carthage. The different would be stronger in linguistics, since there wouldn't be Latin languages, such as Italian, French, Catalan or Portuguese. Maybe Greek would have been the European common language, and Celtic languages still would be main languages in Western Iberian Peninsula, Southern France. About technics, civilization and so, it would be just the same. Recall tha Roman culture was daughter of Greek.
hmmm, now that is possible - it had a huge amount of domination all over the North Medditeranian, and with nobody else to really stop it - the Diodachi were to far away, and Massielles and the Latins were too small to do much, so they could have really dominated. What you have to consider though, are the numidians - they favoured the Romans and gave them loads of troops in their various expeditions (with the exception of the 2nd Punic war and the Jugurarthine wars), so they could have seen Carthage as a threat.
1. Whole of western and central europe will be at the Barbarians' Total Control
2. The Greeks and the Macedonian may expand its territories.
3. The Parthians will defeat the Egyptians and the Seleucids and rule the Middle East.
4. The Carthaginians will rule most of trade and Mediterranian Sea.
5. There will be no Constantinople.
6. The Whole of Italy mainland may be the Gaullic Tribes territory.
7. Ideas of Architectures at the Middle ages or renaissance or ideas of arts may not be founded.
8. The Jews will be more free and may spread to parts of Europe and middle east before Jesus was born and even will became an official Religion for some Barbarian tribes (!)
9. Even, maybe, without the Romans, the idea of Republic won't spread (Our countries now may be still empires or Kingdoms if there is no Rome)(!!!!!)
10. Without Rome, we will only have primitive (Ancient) Architecture and Art.
"Good quality will be known among your enemies, before you ever met them my friend"Trobadourre de Crusadier Crux
These "what if" questions are completely pointless - how can we know? You can't even speak about the Turks and over nations coming over and history continuing in such a way, because the technology and migrations which happened with such nations was also a product of Rome. It is COMPLETELY pointless to even embark on such a large scale "what if?" question of history.
If Rome never existed we would not be even close to where we are now. Christianity would not have progressed. The literature and mathematics and music and art and everything Rome gave us would be gone. Many of us would still live in our little villages, speaking different languages in each one. Without communication, we would have a measly society.
Yes, but the thing is, the Romans did not invent things like the architectural arch or the senate. The only thing that was new and unique in the Roman Empire, was the enormous administrative achievement of governing such a huge empire.
I think you largely underestimate the roman engineering with this statement. It is true that many of the roman "inventions" are actually improvements. Still I dare say that the sheer size and complexity of buildings, cities, roads, aquaducts and what nots are a unique feature in its self.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum