Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Israel vs Lebanon, the sequel

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3536373839 41>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Israel vs Lebanon, the sequel
    Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 09:09
Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

Most Israeli's are from Eastern Europe. They are the decendents of Khazar converts. No relation to the bunni Israel (who are most likely the palestinians).
 
 
Sorry Omar, here you are completely wrong.
Virtually all Eastern European Jews , the Ashkenazi, are the descendants of Western and Central European Jewish people who during the Middle Ages, having been expelled, migrated further East, to Poland and today's Russia, both countries that were then far more tolerant than the rest of Europe.
That the remnants of the Khazar Jews might have contributed to the Eastern European Jewish gene-pool on a small scale, is possible, but so far has not been proven. By the time large scale immigration from the West arrived, the Khazars were long gone.
 
 
 
Excellent. Now that a precedent has been set, let other people get back their old homeland. Hmmm alot of Pakistanis have ansestors from central asia, lets send XI Corps to "reclaim" our old "homeland". vast open spaces, a place with a predictable climate, good women etc. And the present occupants? Ah they are all Russians anyways.
 
Nobody has bothered explaining here why someone should get a piece of real estate that they supposedly occupied 2000 years ago. Simply because there is no justification. There never was.
 
Back to Top
malizai_ View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Alcinous

Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
  Quote malizai_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 09:51
Originally posted by Sparten

Omar, please never let facts get in the way of realpolitic.

Anyways, the present ceasefire is untennable, its giving Israel through diplomacy what it could not earn on the battlefield i.e a Hizb withrawl. History shows that to be a bad idea.
 
 
Good advice, might is right.
 
Originally posted by Sparten

 
Nobody has bothered explaining here why someone should get a piece of real estate that they supposedly occupied 2000 years ago. Simply because there is no justification. There never was.
 
 
The silence is because it was the crime of the century (last century). The biggest real estate scam in history. The other one is oil.
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 11:16
Originally posted by malizai_

 
The silence is because it was the crime of the century (last century). The biggest real estate scam in history. The other one is oil.
 
 
 
 
Don't blow this out of all proportions.
 
The worst crime last century was the industrialised genocide of six Million Jewish people, and a further few Million Roma and Sinti, Slavic People, Homosexuals etc. by Nazi-Germany.
 
And compared to the enterprise of European colonisation, especially in the Americas, the Jewish settlement in Palestine is a mere Sunday School Picnic.  The US Americans or Spanish ( and all the other ones) could tell the Jews a thing or two about real estate scams.
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 12:01
Sunday School picnic? The mass expulsion of a people from their homeland, you call that a picnic. Sir.
Back to Top
Cezar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
  Quote Cezar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 12:11
Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by malizai_

 
The silence is because it was the crime of the century (last century). The biggest real estate scam in history. The other one is oil.
 
 
 
 
Don't blow this out of all proportions.
 
The worst crime last century was the industrialised genocide of six Million Jewish people, and a further few Million Roma and Sinti, Slavic People, Homosexuals etc. by Nazi-Germany.
 
And compared to the enterprise of European colonisation, especially in the Americas, the Jewish settlement in Palestine is a mere Sunday School Picnic.  The US Americans or Spanish ( and all the other ones) could tell the Jews a thing or two about real estate scams.
 
Those responsible for that crime have paid, it's not for the Palestinians to suffer for what the jews endured during TrdRch. Do you think that gays have the right to attack straights only because they were killed by some nazis?
 
What's this proportion about? Do you have a referencial system to measure human suffering? Maybe even a benchmarking. What's the point from where suffering is to be considered significant? You have three kids.
How many of them should be punished or killed for what the nazis did to the jews?
 
Israel is wrong, that's the point. It certainly doesn't mean that all those against them are right. Some are better some are worse. It's not about Israel against terrorists, it's about Israel terrorising. I thought of that state as being create to provide a haven for the jews not to turn it into a non-jew killing ground.
 
And that real estate thing. Maybe Romania should attack Montenegro because we were invaded by the turks int the 14th century. China should start bombing Vietnam because they were invaded by the Japanese. And UK should attack Portugal because they were at war with Adolf Hitler.
 
I'm beginning to think that Israelis have no will of getting things to work peacefully. They hide behind their nukes and abuse of their past. I'm sorry but it really looks like they're digging their own grave.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 12:48
They have dug their own grave. Its only a matter of time, as soon as the US stops/cannot support Israel anymore, they will eirther have to fit in, or its curtains for them.]
Sad, every israeli I have met was a great guy.
 
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 13:31
Originally posted by Sparten

Sunday School picnic? The mass expulsion of a people from their homeland, you call that a picnic. Sir.
 
My flippant remark was made to counter Malizai's hyperbolic statement that said that the Jewish settlement in Palestine was the worst crime last century, and the worst "real estate scam" in history. Which, quite clearly, neither is.
Compared to other conflicts of the 20th century, and I'm not talking about the two WWs, the Palestine conflict is a realitively minor affair. There have been numerous wars and Civil wars that in extent of military casualties and civilian suffering have been far worse than Palestine. Or still are, the ongoing conflicts in the Sudan/Darfur region or in the Congo are in terms of human, cultural and economic costs far more terrible than the the Palestine war.
But, of course, they are conveniently forgotten or put on the back burner.
 
The Palestine conflict only gets its prominent treatment, because it happens on the frontline of a far more important conflict, it is the cause celebre of first a post-colonial struggle ,and now that of an ideological one between an American led economic neo-imperialism and its enemies that have chosen fundamentalist Islam as their ideology. And that is the main reason, the whole Mid-East gets up in (verbal) arms about it.
 
Does anybody still care. in the Muslim world or otherwise, about the fate of the people of the Western Sahara (Sahrwawi Democratic Republic) that were driven off their ancestral land by Moroccan settlers in the 1990s and are now rotting away in their hundreds of thousands in refuge camps in the Algerian desert? Of course not.
They are only Muslims chased away by other Muslims from their homeland, and nobody can construct a world conflict out of that.
 
As unexcusable the Israeli policies towards the Palestinian people are and have been, and as important it is to critise Israel over this, I want to see the same people who have now adopted the fate of the Palestinians as their cause, to critise the Islamic states that have practised mass expulsion of population, military agression and genocide and still are.
Until then, I understand all verbal attacks on Israel by its Islamic enemies as hypocritical propaganda.  The Palestinians have all the right to accuse Israel of all sorts of human rights contraventions. But all the other states that support them with propaganda or militarily equipment? I don't think so.....
Israel must be criticised for the suffering it has caused to the Palestinian people, but it is by far not the only and the worst country.
Criticise the Sudanese government too, who is responsible for the death of 2.2 million non-Muslims in its Southern provinces. And so on....
Then I would far more convinced by all this emotional hyperbole.
 
In the meantime, let's all hope the ceasefire will hold, and that at one point in the future, sanity will prevail, and they will come to some kind of peace-agreement.
 
 


Edited by Komnenos - 14-Aug-2006 at 14:09
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
  Quote Mila Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 13:46
RE: Morocco - interesting point of view. I never really thought about it that way before.

Do you think we're (as in people who view this conflict the way I do) are being sucked in as pawns?
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 14:53
At last - ceasefire!

By the way:

It is hard to me to believe that the israely soldiers who were taken as captives from Hizbulla, are still alive...


Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote ok ge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 14:56
Originally posted by The Chargemaster

At last - ceasefire!

By the way:

It is hard to me to believe that the israely soldiers who were taken as captives from Hizbulla, are still alive...


 
Don't you think if they were alive, they are more valuable to Israel? Hence, increasing Hezbollah's return in case of a prisoners swap.
D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
Cezar View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 09-Nov-2005
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1211
  Quote Cezar Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 14:58

So Komnenos, let's just start a thread about every wrongdoing.

This thread as far as I'm concerned is about the current situation created by Israel in Lebannon. And that's the whole and single issue. It's not about Sudan, Morocco, Sahara or whatever. What happens ther is not that it isn't happening here.
 
I will rephrase my statement again: It's not that others are right or wrong, it's just that Israel is wrong.
 
It's not about those who attacked Israel it's about what Israel has done.
 
If you are wrong then you are wrong and that's all. Try this:
  1. I am jaywalking.
  2. You are jaywalking
  3. A policeman stops you and he prepares to ... punish you.
  4. You defend yourself by saying that you saw me and that I deserve at least a likewise punishment.
  5. The policeman replys that he didn'n saw me and that it's not about you and me it's about you breaking the law and he upholding it.

Does a crime justifies another crime?

"Your honour, I did killed that guy but if you take a look at these DNA graphs you would realize that I was justified since some 5000 years ago one of my ancestors was killed by one of his."
"Ok, but his son will kill your's"
"No, your honor, that's not gonna happen, I have a daughter. It's more likely that one of his nephews will kill one of mine but when that will happen I will be 2 m down and that whole thing be the troble of your nephew."
"Really?"
"Yes, your honour, unless, of course, I consider your rule of being unfair and then a new genealogical tree of murders will start up."
"With me?"
"No, I've thought of your brother in law, it's always better to make sure that there's diversity in the gene pool."
Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote ok ge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 15:07
With both sides claiming victory, both of Lebanon and Israel will face an internal struggle on defining that victory.
 
Source "Israeli Haaretz newspaper": http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/750416.html
Bookmark to del.icio.us
Digg
Ehud Olmert (left) and Benjamin Netanyahu addressing the Knesset in Jerusalem on Monday. (Daniel Bar-On)
Last update - 19:58 14/08/2006
Olmert: Israel dealt Hezbollah harsh blow; Netanyahu: Government's goals not achieved
By Haaretz Service and Agencies

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Monday afternoon that Israel's month-long military offensive in Lebanon had dealt Hezbollah a "harsh blow," and vowed to continue to pursue the leaders of militant organization.

But speaking after Olmert, opposition leader Benjamin Netanyahu of the Likud criticized the government for what he termed a failure to meet its self-declared aims.

The conflict, which began with July 12 abduction of two Israel Defense Forces soldiers and the killing of eight others by Hezbollah, seemed to have ended Monday morning as a United Nations-brokered truce told hold.

In his first address to the Knesset plenum since the cease-fire went into effect, Olmert said that Hezbollah was no longer a state within state, saying that there was no longer a situation in which "a terrorist organization is allowed to act inside a state as an arm of the axis of evil."

A tense calm took the place of bitter fighting at 8 A.M. Monday, as the guns were stilled after a month of hostilities.

Olmert also admitted that there had been "shortcomings" in the way in which the conflict had been managed, and said that there would be a period of reflection.

"We will have to review ourselves in all the battles. We won't sweep things under the carpet," he pledged, but warned that the country "does not have the luxury of falling into endless internal disputes."

"The overall responsibility for this operation lies with me, the prime minister. I am not asking to share this with anyone," said Olmert.

Olmert vowed that Israel would continue to hunt down the Hezbollah leaders, calling it a "moral right," and said that Israel reserved the right to respond to any violation of the truce.

"We will continue to pursue them everywhere and at all times," he said. "We have no intention of asking anyone's permission."

He said, however, that the military offensive had hurt Hezbollah's long-term capabilities, its arsenal and its confidence, and that "the war changed the strategic balance against Hezbollah."

Anticipating that another war with the militant group may come in the future, he said Israel would learn the lessons of this war and "do better."

And, addressing the international community, he said that Israel would not apologize for the offensive.

He said that Israel's response to the cross-border attack against Hezbollah had proved that it would not tolerate any threat to its sovereignty.

The speech was interrupted by Arab MK Ahmed Tibi, whose repeated heckling resulted in his removal from the plenum. Several other legislators were also removed.

Olmert also paid tribute to the all soldiers involved in the fighting, from IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz to the regular and reserve soldiers who fought on the ground.

"You are the heroes of the people of Israel," he said.

He also sent wishes for a speedy recovery to all the wounded, both soldiers and civilians.

During his speech, Netanyahu said that the "doctrine of unilateral withdrawals had proven to be a failure."

Such moves give Israel's enemies "a tactical advantage," he argued.

"We left Lebanon to the last centimeter and they are firing. We left Gaza to the last centimeter and they are firing," said Netanyahu, who quit the government of Olmert's predecessor, Ariel Sharon, in protest at the 2005 unilateral withdrawal from Gaza.

Israel, under former prime minister Ehud Barak, pulled its troops out of Lebanon in May 2000, after an 18-year presence in the south of the country.

Olmert and his Kadima party were elected in March on a platform which included a plan for a possible unilateral withdrawal from large swathes of the West Bank.

"We live in a coma and we received a wakeup call," said the Likud leader, adding that he could not "fathom why a state of emergency was not declared."

"It must be said honestly, there were many failures, failures in identifying the threat, failures in preparing to meet the threat, failures in the management of the war, failures in the management of the home front," Netanyahu said.

"Without doubt we shall need later on to learn the lessons and fix the mistakes," he said.



Edited by ok ge - 14-Aug-2006 at 15:10
D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
The Chargemaster View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain

Kishokan

Joined: 02-Feb-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1066
  Quote The Chargemaster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 15:14
Originally posted by cok gec

Don't you think if they were alive, they are more valuable to Israel? Hence, increasing Hezbollah's return in case of a prisoners swap.

I think, that it will be very interesting if they are alive, because their capture was the formal occasion for the war. I want to watch the interview with them after the swap of the captives.
Back to Top
malizai_ View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Alcinous

Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
  Quote malizai_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2006 at 17:56
Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by Sparten

Sunday School picnic? The mass expulsion of a people from their homeland, you call that a picnic. Sir.
 
My flippant remark was made to counter Malia's hyperbolic statement that said that the Jewish settlement in Palestine was the worst crime last century, and the worst "real estate scam" in history. Which, quite clearly, neither is.
Compared to other conflicts of the 20th century, and I'm not talking about the two WWs, the Palestine conflict is a realitively minor affair. There have been numerous wars and Civil wars that in extent of military casualties and civilian suffering have been far worse than Palestine. Or still are, the ongoing conflicts in the Sudan/Darfur region or in the Congo are in terms of human, cultural and economic costs far more terrible than the the Palestine war.
But, of course, they are conveniently forgotten or put on the back burner.
 
The Palestine conflict only gets its prominent treatment, because it happens on the frontline of a far more important conflict, it is the cause celebre of first a post-colonial struggle ,and now that of an ideological one between an American led economic neo-imperialism and its enemies that have chosen fundamentalist Islam as their ideology. And that is the main reason, the whole Mid-East gets up in (verbal) arms about it.
 
Does anybody still care. in the Muslim world or otherwise, about the fate of the people of the Western Sahara (Sahrwawi Democratic Republic) that were driven off their ancestral land by Moroccan settlers in the 1990s and are now rotting away in their hundreds of thousands in refuge camps in the Algerian desert? Of course not.
They are only Muslims chased away by other Muslims from their homeland, and nobody can construct a world conflict out of that.
 
As unexcusable the Israeli policies towards the Palestinian people are and have been, and as important it is to critise Israel over this, I want to see the same people who have now adopted the fate of the Palestinians as their cause, to critise the Islamic states that have practised mass expulsion of population, military agression and genocide and still are.
Until then, I understand all verbal attacks on Israel by its Islamic enemies as hypocritical propaganda.  The Palestinians have all the right to accuse Israel of all sorts of human rights contraventions. But all the other states that support them with propaganda or militarily equipment? I don't think so.....
Israel must be criticised for the suffering it has caused to the Palestinian people, but it is by far not the only and the worst country.
Criticise the Sudanese government too, who is responsible for the death of 2.2 million non-Muslims in its Southern provinces. And so on....
Then I would far more convinced by all this emotional hyperbole.
 
In the meantime, let's all hope the ceasefire will hold, and that at one point in the future, sanity will prevail, and they will come to some kind of peace-agreement.
 
 
 
I am not comparing genocides, it would not be ethical to do so. Infact it would be outright insensitive to do so . All other wars are not the concern here, it is the "crime" of the century in respect to realestate. And i place emphasis on the word "scam", for that is how palestenian land was negotiated. People-A's land was negotiated/sold to People-B by People-C.  People-B and C did that without consent of People-A. Now that is a scam!!!!!!!
People-A tried the courts, which were coincidentally run by People-C. People-C couldnt care less and told them to be patient and to try to learn to live with it. People-A said NO! and tried to get their land back for themselves, invoking everybody from satan to God to help them, for they knew People-C were in it with People-B. Sudan is a place far far way from where People-A live.
 
Back to Top
R_AK47 View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
  Quote R_AK47 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2006 at 00:58
Originally posted by Sparten

They have dug their own grave. Its only a matter of time, as soon as the US stops/cannot support Israel anymore, they will eirther have to fit in, or its curtains for them.]
Sad, every israeli I have met was a great guy.
 
 
The USA will always support Israel and will always have the resources to continue to support Israel.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2006 at 01:03
And you know this because.....................
Back to Top
R_AK47 View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
  Quote R_AK47 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2006 at 01:05
Originally posted by Sparten

And you know this because.....................
 
You disagree?  Why?
Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote ok ge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2006 at 01:10
With so much hopes for the fragile truce, it does not look so promising so far.
Israel has claimed killing four Hezbollah fighters or "armed men" who approached them and they felt them "unsafe", therefor, firing the first bullets after the truce came in effect. Today, 10 rockets fired and hit near Israeli forces in occupied part of southern Lebanon. Both parties warn that they will respond to any firing. Can we say then Hezbollah is responding or attacking? What is your view and expecation to this truce?
Fragile truce holding in Lebanon
Lebanese refugee returning home brandishes poster of Hezbollah's Hassan Nasrallah
Hezbollah supporters have been celebrating victory
The truce between Israel and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah remains intact despite sporadic violence in southern Lebanon.

Israel's army said Hezbollah fired several mortars overnight but it did not respond as none landed over the border and no-one was injured.

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert defended his leadership, saying Hezbollah had been dealt a harsh blow.

But Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah is claiming a historic victory.

Wider political recriminations are also taking the place of violence on the ground, with the presidents of the US and Iran blaming each other for fuelling the conflict.

President George W Bush accused Iran of backing armed groups in Lebanon and Iraq "in the hope of stopping democracy from taking hold".

Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad blamed Washington for providing Israel with weapons which he said had been used to target women and children in Lebanon.

Since the ceasefire began on Monday morning, thousands of Lebanese refugees have been surging back to their homes.

The International Red Cross has warned that the country's humanitarian needs remain urgent.

Fragile truce

Israeli military sources say that between five and 10 mortars were fired southwards on Monday night and early on Tuesday morning.

IMPACT: 34 DAYS OF FIGHTING
Israeli soldiers relax after returning from Lebanon after the truce
Lebanon deaths:
About 1,000 - mostly civilians
No precise data on Hezbollah dead
Israeli deaths:
Soldiers: 114 (IDF)
Civilians: 43 (IDF)
Lebanon displaced:
700,000 - 900,000 (UNHCR; Lebanese govt)
Israeli displaced:
500,000 (Human Rights Watch)
Lebanon damage:
$2.5bn (Lebanese govt)
Israel damage:
$1.1bn (Israeli govt)

The Israeli military has said repeatedly that it wants the ceasefire to succeed and it is playing down this incident, says the BBC's Rob Norris in Jerusalem.

Earlier, Israeli troops clashed with Hezbollah fighters several times across southern Lebanon, killing at least one guerrilla.

Hezbollah has always maintained that it will attack any Israeli forces in Lebanon even though it has also said that it will abide by the terms of the ceasefire.

The head of the United Nations peacekeeping force in Lebanon, Gen Alain Pellegrini, warned that any provocation could quickly escalate into a major confrontation between Israel and Hezbollah.

He appealed for international reinforcements to be sent as soon as possible to prevent the ceasefire from unravelling.

Israeli fury

Ehud Olmert told the Israeli parliament on Monday there had been shortcomings in the conduct of the war.

But he insisted it had changed the region's strategic balance, ending what he called Hezbollah's state-within-a-state in southern Lebanon.

HAVE YOUR SAY
With one side achieving its aims and the other not, peace will not last.
Jeff Smith, United Kingdom

But his critics are angry that Israel has failed to crush Hezbollah as Mr Olmert had promised at the start of the campaign, our correspondent says.

They doubt that the group will ever actually give up its weapons and they worry that even if Hezbollah withdraws from southern Lebanon, it may still be able to fire long-range rockets from elsewhere.

Most of all, they are furious that the two captured Israeli soldiers still have not been released.

In an opinion poll of 500 Israelis by a leading Hebrew financial paper published on Monday night, more than half said the army had not achieved its aims in Lebanon.

The poll also suggested that support for Mr Olmert's Kadima party had dropped by a third.

Israeli political analysts say Mr Olmert's coalition government will probably survive for now, but mainly because no other coalition looks feasible at the moment.

Hezbollah celebrations

In an address broadcast on Hezbollah's television channel, Hassan Nasrallah said it was a great day for his movement which had, he said, achieved a victory against Israel that even big Arab armies had not managed in the past.

It was the wrong time, he added, for any discussion about disarming the movement - as laid down in the recent UN resolution.

Hassan Nasrallah spoke calmly and with modesty but his message was triumphant, the BBC's Kim Ghattas reports from Beirut.

As soon as the Hezbollah leader finished speaking celebratory gunfire broke out in Beirut.

Jubilant young men drove around the heart of the capital on motorbikes waving Hezbollah flags.

The leader of the guerrilla movement was also one step ahead of the Lebanese government, our correspondent notes.

He announced Hezbollah would start giving money as of Tuesday to internally displaced people to cover for one year's rent while they waited for their houses to be rebuilt.

 
Source:.http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4793177.stm
D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
R_AK47 View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
  Quote R_AK47 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2006 at 01:30
Peace with terrorist orginizations like Hezbollah will never be possible until they (the terrorists) no longer exist.  That is my opinion

Edited by R_AK47 - 15-Aug-2006 at 01:30
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2006 at 02:49
Originally posted by R_AK47

Originally posted by Sparten

And you know this because.....................
 
You disagree?  Why?
The use of the word "always".
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3536373839 41>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.