Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Europe oldest village

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Europe oldest village
    Posted: 30-Apr-2006 at 20:31

In the late 60's -early 70's archaeologist Henry de Lumley uncovered a series of 10 huge buildings ranging from 7-16 m. long and 4 -7 m. wide, at Terra Amata near Nice in France. The buildings all had hearths, a sleeping area, fossilized human faeces, piles of bones and coprolites and considerable amounts of Acheulean stone tools as well as their debitage was found in a work area.

The bones found mostly came from ancient elephants, meadow rhinoceros, deer, stag, rabbit, and wild boar as well as smaller mammals. In addition lots of seasonal seed were found too.

The buildings have been estimated as being between 380,000 and 400,000 thousand years old and the culprit for the construction Homo Erectus. Apart from the obvious value of the finds, giving the finest insight into the life of Homo Erectus and showing them to be far more advanced than anyone ever perceived, another issue was raised.

Just how much communication would these ancestors of man have needed to create a community of this complexity. When speech was first used has been a constant topic of debate amongst archaeologists. The first clear evidence being 50,000 year ago and modern humans responcible. However there are no biological reason why ancestors of humans couldn't talk. So Terra Amata may be the first evidence that language wasn't a human invention.

 

Homo Erectus (middle)



Edited by Paul
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Goban View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 09-Mar-2006
Location: Subterranea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 581
  Quote Goban Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2006 at 03:33

It would definitely indicate an advanced form of communication, most logically speech.

This means of course that sapiens were telling jokes and swapping sea stories with neandertals around the campfire...

The sharpest spoon in the drawer.
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2006 at 08:03
Least we know what a Neanderthal might say "Oh no, Cromagnons have moved into the neighbourhood, that'll bring the cave prices down"
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
malizai_ View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Alcinous

Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
  Quote malizai_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-May-2006 at 19:36

good humour

Back to Top
Maljkovic View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
  Quote Maljkovic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-May-2006 at 15:39
I don't think it required speach to acomplish the task.
Back to Top
Goban View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 09-Mar-2006
Location: Subterranea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 581
  Quote Goban Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-May-2006 at 00:26

I don't know. Such a structure would probably have been built by multiple individuals. Certainly some advanced form of communication had to have been used. Vocal communication makes sense, even if actual speech was 'theoretically' impossible (improbable). But millions of people today can express themselves admirably using sign language.

Primates too for that matter...



Edited by Goban
The sharpest spoon in the drawer.
Back to Top
Athena View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 28-Sep-2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
  Quote Athena Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Jan-2011 at 21:27
Why is it thought this complex living is Homo Erectus?  
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jan-2011 at 09:25
There being no physiological reason that they couldn't speak, why not?  Communication between individuals does not need a complex vocabulary.  Has anyone ever had an experience with "Twin Speak"?  My wife's nieces wre Ident. twins, by the time they were 2 they had their own language which they used to communicate with each other.  Their mother was able to pick up some of it and she used it to communicate with them until they were about 3-4.  This isn't uncommon.
 
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
medenaywe View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Master of Meanings

Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
  Quote medenaywe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jan-2011 at 09:33
Topic: Europe oldest village

    Now i know my ansestors were citizens for sure.Smile
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jan-2011 at 09:33
Originally posted by Athena

Why is it thought this complex living is Homo Erectus?  
 
 
I assume that they found remains buried close enough to the habitation site.  But that's a good question.  Another good question is, if they could achieve that level of sophistication, What went wrong?  Why did they not continue into the present? 
 
 
 
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Jan-2011 at 09:37
And yet again, another good question,  Could they have evolved enough to have established a civilization?  Only to be wiped out by the Toba eruption?  Hmmm.
 
 
 
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
Athena View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 28-Sep-2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
  Quote Athena Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jan-2011 at 10:22
I questioned if the inhabitants were Homo Erectus, because of the discovery of other human species.  So unless there are bones that clearly identify the inhabitants, I don't think we should jump to the conclusion the site is Homo Erectus.  I checked a few sites and see no mention of the inhabitants being Homo Erectus.

Also I think there is a difference between communication and have a language.  My dog has learned to stay to the right, because I get very upset if he goes to the left.  But he has no idea why I get upset if he goes to the right or crosses the street to chase a squirre, so he doesn't pay attention to the rules, it he thinks I am not looking.   My 2 year old great grandson was even harder to train and at age 3 still doesn't get it.  Come to think of it, it is quite amazing language caught on, considering the difficulty in associating mean with a sound, beyond communicating pleasure or displeasure with another.

"Put the pole here, large end down", can only be communicated with pointing and pleasure or displeasure.  It can not become language, such as a modern day foreman would use, without an intellectual leap.  I don't think Homo Erectus made that leap, but Neanderthal did.  

Apes make nest and they work together as social beings,  and bonobo are even better at cooperation.  I would expect Homo Erectus to do was well, but I think building a hut is beyond the intellectual of Homo Erectus, because of the complexity of getting everything together, so the sticks don't fall.   That would be pushing the IQ limits. 

And then because there are different species of everything else, we might expect different species of humans. 
Back to Top
Cryptic View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 05-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
  Quote Cryptic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jan-2011 at 10:36
Originally posted by Athena


Apes make nest and they work together as social beings,  and bonobo are even better at cooperation.  I would expect Homo Erectus to do was well, but I think building a hut is beyond the intellectual of Homo Erectus, because of the complexity of getting everything together, so the sticks don't fall.   That would be pushing the IQ limits. 
I agree.  As a side note, some early claims of sophisticated tool manufacture / use  by Homo Erectus have also been refuted or retracted.
Back to Top
Athena View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 28-Sep-2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
  Quote Athena Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jan-2011 at 10:45
Yes, at least one Internet site about the huts argued, later camps could have gotten mingled with the earliest ones, because of natural causes over time. 

However, I may have to eat my words, because evidently Homo Erectus did swim.   According to the aquatic theory, during an extremely long heat wave some ape like creatures took to the water, and these would be the ones that became humans.  Here is that theory:

http://survive2012.com/index.php/aquatic-ape.html

This could have given Homo Erectus all the experience and abilities I doubted he had. 

Also remember Cro-Magnon?  Checking out the subject, I came along an explanation of Cro-Magnon, in the same area.  The term Cro-Magnon has fallen out of favor, but for me it makes sense to speak of them as a tribe that once occupied area.  They are thought to come much later than Homo Erectus which appears to be the only known species old enough to have built the huts,  but I don't think at this point we have enough evident to be sure Homo Erectus built the huts.  

Edited by Athena - 25-Jan-2011 at 11:47
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jan-2011 at 11:50
The claims about the campsites being mingled early with later is a bunch of hogwash.  They are saying that later worked it's way to the level of early? And early came to the top?  It doesn't work that way.
 
After seeing Athena's post, I went off on a quest to find an opposing view.  Couldn't find anything worth the effort.
None of the sites I visited even mentioned Erectus in relation to Terra Amata.  The Smithsonian skirts the issue entirely. 
I think what's happened[my opinion only] with the realization that Human Ev. isn't linear a lot of earlier discoveries were reviewed and some conclusions had to be thrown out or drastically adjusted.  It also has made a few folk a little cautious about radical claims.
 
Athena wrote-
 
I can not imagine an animal that can not swim venturing into boats to cross water. 
 
Why not? Humans do it all the time.  If you want to cross the water to see what's on the other side and you can't swim, a boat is the only alternative.  And I think that a more accurate statement would be, Some apes can't swim, as there are 2-3 species that have been known to take to the water under certain circumstances.  If not more accurate, certainly less contentious.Big smile
 
Old Anthropological proverb- " Avoid absolutes. It makes you a smaller target". Author Unknown.
 
 
 
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
medenaywe View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Master of Meanings

Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
  Quote medenaywe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jan-2011 at 12:36
You are missing first universal speaking language in the world.Signs that are positions of fingers and arms,also characteristic lines of human body.We still  use them like "body talk".But once they were part of
official social communication.Two persons communicated parallel using there voices and arms.


Edited by medenaywe - 25-Jan-2011 at 13:29
Back to Top
Athena View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 28-Sep-2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 403
  Quote Athena Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Feb-2011 at 16:41
I just watched a movie called Ice World.  It is a NetFlix DVD about how the ice age effected humans.  It is a fiction about two men and woman based on the latest discoveries, and it brings these three from an isolated hunting site, where everyone else died because of the ice conditions, to a meeting place for hunter gathers where things did not go so well, to the first village.  All humans are portrayed as modern humans.  The movie did stress the village meant a significant change in the way of life and social organization.

What kind of changes might we expect between the hunter gathers and settled people? 


Edited by Athena - 08-Feb-2011 at 16:52
Back to Top
medenaywe View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Master of Meanings

Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
  Quote medenaywe Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Feb-2011 at 17:12
Let us define question backwards:What will happen with few survived units after large scale disaster on earth?Modern supply with living products they will loose,clothes,heating systems etc.etc.They need to start again from zero point.After few generations their ancestors will have Atlantis story like a past. Generations after them this will become myth of lost civilization,different than one they belong.
  Survival erase memories no matter whatever you were before.All that are parts of so called transitional countries have seen that with their own eyes:Professors with degree were driving taxi one shift more to earn for life in night shift.On daylight they were professors.But here everything that was their world is gone.Welcome to the world of basic instincts and technology improvisations!You know to build a gun but you can't cause it is not a time for that.
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Feb-2011 at 09:55
I'm not sure I agree with you on the bit about survival erasing memories.  I might agree that it loses details.  I truly believe that we are cursed with the collective memory of a mega disaster that occurred sometime in the last 30,000 years.  There are people who believe we are missing a huge chunk of our past.  I'm one of them.
Why are we so quick to attribute advanced technology to alien visitations?  We have a tendency to underestimate our own abilities.
 
Here is another idea to chew on,  is it possible that Homo Erectus had a choice?  Could he have lived in the manner that he did because he wanted to?  Not having thought of this until now, I don't offhand have any alternatives lined up.  But as a near human ancestor choice can't be ruled out.
 
  
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
Pytheus View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 10-Jul-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 135
  Quote Pytheus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2011 at 18:41
Why the last 30,000 years. There was the Toba super volcano that erupted 70,000 years ago and killed almost every human on earth, they estimate only 10,000 survivors.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.