Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Greatest Rulers of Germany

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Poll Question: Who was Germany’s greatest ruler?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
1 [2.13%]
3 [6.38%]
2 [4.26%]
1 [2.13%]
1 [2.13%]
3 [6.38%]
26 [55.32%]
5 [10.64%]
5 [10.64%]
0 [0.00%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
yan. View Drop Down
Consul
Consul


Joined: 15-Apr-2005
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 352
  Quote yan. Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Greatest Rulers of Germany
    Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 17:21

I am missing the biggest ruler here. IMO Helmut Kohl deserves much more credit than he is given in contemporary Germany.

I don't know how one could actually name Walter Ulbricht a leader - I think he was never more than a laughing stock... After all, he could not even resist being retired by Erich Honecker, a figure that was later retired himself by Egon Krenz of all the Zentralkomitee members. Maybe Wilhelm Pieck would have been a better choice?

I think I'd vote for Frst Otto, or for Friedrich II. Just can't decide which Friedrich.

Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Apr-2005 at 19:07
Originally posted by Master of Disaster

Originally posted by Komnenos


And, secondly, why did nobody vote for Walter Ulbricht?

Call it an old-fashioned ideal, but I simply don't like people who are ruling so badly that they have to build walls to keep the people inside their country.

Well said bro! U know that could be a quote.

We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Apr-2005 at 13:12

Originally posted by Komnenos


And, secondly, why did nobody vote for Walter Ulbricht?

Call it an old-fashioned ideal, but I simply don't like people who are ruling so badly that they have to build walls to keep the people inside their country.



Edited by Master of Disaster
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Apr-2005 at 12:41
Originally posted by Mixcoatl


Originally posted by Komnenos

And, secondly, why did nobody vote for Walter Ulbricht?

because Honecker was greater. You should have included him, I'm sure he would have won


Anymore of this and I'll start a poll on "Who was the greatest leader of the DDR?". I'm sure discussions would rage on for weeks!
Anyway,I only choose Ulbricht because of his wonderful saxonian accent!
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Apr-2005 at 12:34
Originally posted by Komnenos


And, secondly, why did nobody vote for Walter Ulbricht?

because Honecker was greater. You should have included him, I'm sure he would have won
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 19:35
Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx


Anyway I've had enough, good bye. I still say Bismark was the best among the "rulers" listed


Yeah, I agree, it got rather boring and tedious!

Anyway, we seem to have come to a rather overwhelming conclusion. Bismarck, is the greatest ruler Germany ever had. It's news to me, but we have to accept popular decision.
Two questions remain, who are these poor misguided people who voted for Hitler. Come out of the closet and argue your case, if you dare!
And, secondly, why did nobody vote for Walter Ulbricht?
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 19:22

You must have been brainwashed by very bias sources or have a very limited thinking capacity, I'm not sure which... maybe both. In any case, don't assort my statements with such an example and instead, take the time to reread what I've said and perhaps consider it for a moment. I at least read what you wrote.

And plz dude, make up your mind on what you're calling me; a Nazi, a communist, young....I'm too lazy to scroll up and see what else. It's quiet irrelevant tho, the point is you can't argue with what I've said because you simply cannot deny logic and don't know enough.

I mean with you saying there was no oppresion in Germany, I should copy and print that as the definition of ignorance. I mean it's funny how the founders of the city I live in were all germans who fled from germany during this period wishing to escape the religious persecution and excessive taxing of the german lords and constant warfare. (Written in stone at our town hall) "...arriving to a land of new hopes and free of oppression." Matter of fact my father did 5 years of research on it and wrote a book on the issue for his full professorship, so don't tell me there was no oppression.

Anyway I've had enough, good bye. I still say Bismark was the best among the "rulers" listed

We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 18:37

guy, you're too young for this, i've ever since had read about the 19th century Germany. i've had this in school, one year alone on 19th century Germany, and i've ever since had an urge to read upon the events that lead to the dissapearance of my country as an idnependennt country, in fact this is the period in history i know most about, there's no way you can tell me about that you think is history, the point is you have got the bit of information you fill every of your post with (we read the same from you in every post, so this is obviously the only thing you think to know about Germany at all) from old German history books fileld with Prussian propaganda from teh 19th century..thsi was commonplace back then, just look at the British made "Vikings have horned helemts thing" and this is basically what your writing in every post you've made so far, so stop makign a fool out of yourself!

Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 18:16

 BURNED MAN BURNED.

My advice: stop arguing, start listening and open a book.

We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 18:05
don't write in all bold mate.
Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 18:02

HAHAHAHA SO FIRST I'M A NAZI AND NOW I'M A COMMUNIST EH?

Rofl. K PLZ DO MORE READING ON THE GERMANS BEING OPPRESSED ISSUE!

 

 



Edited by The Golden Phallanx
We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2005 at 18:00
Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx

the german people was being oppressed

would have saved the german people much suffereing.

what the hell are you even talkign about? you say that in every second post but there was no opression and there was no suffering. period.

you sound like a Communist history book!

Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2005 at 19:24

Originally posted by komnenos

Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx


How did Napoleon manage to just twaddle accross Germany? You don't suppose maybe the germans would not have been oppressed so if they had a unified country to defend them eh?

The main reason Napoleon could "twaddle" through Germany, apart from his superior army, was that he was actually welcomed by large parts of the German population, mostly the bourgeoise middle classes, who sympathised with the ideas of the French Revolution and welcomed him as liberator from archaic feudal regimes that were still ruling Germany. He actually abolished quite a few of those relics from the middle ages, principalities the size of Wembley stadium and the like. ( I made some comments on that earlier. See above) Willingly or not, Napoleon did as much for German unity as Bismarck.

K, why would he be welcomed by a large portion of the population? Don't just memorize history facts but actually analize them, come on guys. Would it not make sense that since the german people was being oppressed for the various reasons I stated numerous times above as the factors to emigration to America, they would support a liberal influence in a land of tiny states where each taxes them beyond what they're capable of? If Germany had been united, perhaps living conditions would not ahve been so harsh.

You could argue that France was united and conditions were harsh anyway which led to the the french revolution. Alright, but perhaps it would have been the germans who would have had the revolution. In any case, perhaps the french army would not have been superiour if Germany had been united. Perhaps napoleon would not even have made war with germany if germany had been united, there are limitless possibilities which could have transpired if germany had been united, and most I believe, would have saved the german people much suffereing.

Anyways I agree with the rest of what you said, about Napoleon bringing much liberalism to Germany and giving birth to german pride but it did come at a high cost and a cost that might not have been necessary had the german people been united under one peaceful nation.

I still stand with working together is more helpful for all than fighting alone.

Strength in numbers my friends, in defense as much as offense.



Edited by The Golden Phallanx
We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2005 at 18:28
Originally posted by Temujin


your basically saying the EU is an attempt to politically annex all of europe? and subesequetnly the whole world? this more or less comes down to the question if you're pro-Globalisation or not, and i'm against, simply because the small countries and cultures tend to dissapear from history...

Let's stop it here. It doesn't really seem to be a discussion abouth the right and wrongs of German unification or Globalisation, but about two different concepts about the causalities of historical processes.
I'm more of a determinist who belives in certain historical inevitablities without actually judging them as positive or not. I'm more interested in observation than appraisals.
Apart from that, I seems we share opinions on the Prussian state ,which seems to be your main enemy, anyway.
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2005 at 18:15
Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx


These were completly germanic lands before the fall of the roman empire. I was also generalizing things for your sake

As you ought to know, the two terms "German" and "Germanic" mean two different ethnic entities and are not as interchangeble as you use them. The fact that "Germanic" tribes stopped over on their migrations in areas that later were settled by Slavs does not imply any claim on these lands by "Germans".
With the same logic you could claim Polish areas as British or American, both countries with a mostly "Germanic" population.
Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx


How did Napoleon manage to just twaddle accross Germany? You don't suppose maybe the germans would not have been oppressed so if they had a unified country to defend them eh?

The main reason Napoleon could "twaddle" through Germany, apart from his superior army, was that he was actually welcomed by large parts of the German population, mostly the bourgeoise middle classes, who sympathised with the ideas of the French Revolution and welcomed him as liberator from archaic feudal regimes that were still ruling Germany. He actually abolished quite a few of those relics from the middle ages, principalities the size of Wembley stadium and the like. ( I made some comments on that earlier. See above) Willingly or not, Napoleon did as much for German unity as Bismarck.
Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx


What country? There was no country!! THat's the point! Much of german speaking lands had already been eradicated. Why would it end there?

My mistake, I should have said "was a number of....countries". Apart from that, what the heck are you talking about? Do read other people's posts more carefully! In fact do some studying of German history anyway. I can send you a reading list if you want.


Edited by Komnenos
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2005 at 17:28

Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx



All of eastern France used to be german lands, much of poland, the check republik, and even as far as russia were all german at one point as well, and when I say german I mean the majority of the inhabitants were german speaking. But through being not unified other nations forced the german people off their land and into already crowded places. The seperated weak german states were extremely easy land pickings, and as land targets they served.
 

The territories east of the current German-Polish border, with the possible exception of Eastern Prussia, were never fully "German" in the sense you use it.

These were completly germanic lands before the fall of the roman empire.  I was also generalizing things for your sake.


All of eastern France used to be german lands...

Originally posted by komnenos

Don't start. The borders between France and Germany were in a constant flux, and changed regularly. If you are refering to Alsace-Lorraine, it had a mixed population, but was at the point of its annexation by Germany in 1871 more French than not.

30 years war. THe entire German border with France was pillaged to the point where 80% of the population had been killed by either french imposed slaughter or the cold when winter arrived after all homes had been destroyed. They consequently "ran away". France annexed much land throughout the post -30 years war period. (The pillaging isn't the point here it's the land being annexed afterwards through not being united) Matter of fact why don't we skip to Napoleon days, here's a classic example; How did Napoleon manage to just twaddle accross Germany? You don't suppose maybe the germans would not have been oppressed so if they had a unified country to defend them eh? (Don't even mention the holy roman empire, that wasn't an empire and the emperor couldn't do anything beyond his own castle.) If you want to contest this bring it on.

The basic point here is I'm saying through not working together we are all hurt, and that working together is always a better solution than being thick headed and beleiving one can take everything on by oneself. THat's all I'm trying to say. I'm sorry if this gravely offends any of you but if it does, oooo man...... You guys seriously missed out on an important toddler lesson.

Originally posted by Komnenos

Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx



THe german unification was the most essential thing ever to come by that country, had they not unified the german language might not even exist today, and it's ppl without rights dominated by neighbour imperialistic powers who would have conquerred the tiny states long since.

That's nonsense. By the point of it's unification Germany was a for too long established country and culture that it could have been eradicated by subsequent wars or invasions.

What country? There was no country!! THat's the point! Much of german speaking lands had already been eradicated. Why would it end there?

We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2005 at 16:14
Originally posted by Temujin

and for Golden Phallanx (btw, Phalanx is spelled with just one L)....by now i would simply call you a Nazi, because that's what your saying, but you simply just don't know better...you said something about going to the library in your previous posts...do that.

These are needless accusations and ones I will not tolerate. Quit frankly you don't know your history, and neither have you taken the time to properly read anything I've been saying because if you had, you would see and understand that I am as far as one can get from being a Nazi. How, in stating the evidence to why the german unification would have helped the german people (i.e Massive emigration to America and acceptance to giving up their identity due to extreme serfdom (i.e slavery) back in homeland devided germany, would not have taken place and many germans would have had an easier time in life) am I a Nazi? If you didn't understand that go figure and read it again.  Plz, read some w.w.2 books or something and find out who the real Nazies were, because being proud of one's identity and stating historical facts does not make me a Nazi.

Now on the other hand maybe you're just anti-culture. Meh, be that way, but if your gonna call me a Nazi you might as well call all the french and the rest of the world Nazies too because pretty much everyone else has some cultural pride and accurate sense of history besides you.

You know I think that's your solution in face to anyone who disagrees with your radical statements. Just call them a Nazi without any base why don't you eh? Way to run from the facts. Good job

PS: Phallanx*** It's called my style, or something you may have read about known as originality.



Edited by The Golden Phallanx
We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Apr-2005 at 16:05

Originally posted by Komnenos


You still don't get it. I'll try again.
I'm not justifying anything.
I just observe the tendency of capitalism to demand ever growing markets and thus the abolition of any political obstacles that will restrict this growth.
In Germany in the mid 19th century, where the market was still internal, that meant that first the economical fragmentation had to be overcome, something that was attempted in the "Deutscher Zollverein", and then the political to ensure and stabilise economic unity. Prussia, as the centre of industrialisation, was of course at the forefront of any attempts of unity.
The same process repeats itself, under different conditions, now on a European level where the economic unity will lead to a greater political unity and of course the same tendency can be observed on a global base.
It's not a question of if you like it or not, capitalism has its own laws that can't be bound by the interests of nations, neither in the splintered Germany in the 19th century, not in the present age on a global level.

your basically saying the EU is an attempt to politically annex all of europe? and subesequetnly the whole world? this more or less comes down to the question if you're pro-Globalisation or not, and i'm against, simply because the small countries and cultures tend to dissapear from history...

remember, i wouldn't have said anything against a unification under the conditions of 1848, or at least a free election of the German emperor...

 

and for Golden Phallanx (btw, Phalanx is spelled with just one L)....by now i would simply call you a Nazi, because that's what your saying, but you simply just don't know better...you said something about going to the library in your previous posts...do that.

 

and a word about the Polish territories...one part of the Bismarckian legacy was the forced (!) Germanization of the by that time still culturally Polish living in that territories... Mosquito can tell you something about that....
and i know some people from there (Silesia), they have not deserved being called Poles because that's not what they are, Poles are better than that.... or as i always use to remark, they're more German than native Germans...

Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
  Quote Komnenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Apr-2005 at 09:00
Originally posted by The Golden Phallanx



All of eastern France used to be german lands, much of poland, the check republik, and even as far as russia were all german at one point as well, and when I say german I mean the majority of the inhabitants were german speaking. But through being not unified other nations forced the german people off their land and into already crowded places. The seperated weak german states were extremely easy land pickings, and as land targets they served.


I would be careful to make statements like that.
The territories east of the current German-Polish border, with the possible exception of Eastern Prussia, were never fully "German" in the sense you use it.
Various German states "colonised" and rules countries that were first and foremost Slavic from the early Middle Ages onwards, but it was never completely "germanised".
In many of the territories east of the Oder-Neisse ruled by the Germans, there was a clear divide between the ruling nobility and the urban population, both German and smaller in numbers, and the rural, agricultural on the other side, who were Slavic and more populous.
The loss of "German" territory to the East was not the result of the fragmentation of the German states, on the contrary, of its unification and subsequent defeat in WW1.
Both successor states of the HRE, Germany and Austria ruled Slavic territory continously until 1918, and only then they lost areas you are refering to.

All of eastern France used to be german lands...

Don't start. The borders between France and Germany were in a constant flux, and changed regularly. If you are refering to Alsace-Lorraine, it had a mixed population, but was at the point of its annexation by Germany in 1871 more French than not.

THe german unification was the most essential thing ever to come by that country, had they not unified the german language might not even exist today, and it's ppl without rights dominated by neighbour imperialistic powers who would have conquerred the tiny states long since.

That's nonsense. By the point of it's unification Germany was a for too long established country and culture that it could have been eradicated by subsequent wars or invasions.
Not to mention Prussia that by 1871 on its own was one the most powerful, both political and economic, states in Europe.
Maybe history would have been different without German unification, that's pure speculation. But knowing the role that an authoritarian and militaristic Prussia played in the outbrakes of both world wars, it might have actually been for the better.

[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
Back to Top
The Golden Phallanx View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Mar-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote The Golden Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Apr-2005 at 19:11

Originally posted by Temujin

in case you haven't noticed until this point...I f**king AM german, so don't tell me what Germans think about Prussia or not or how Prussia is Germany or not, you know nothing at all about this topic so spare your breath, your talking utter nonsense galore....

Originally posted by Temujin

who needs indedpendence anyways? thats for sissies, Germany is a place for dumb sheeps that like to follow nationalist leaders like Bismarck. remember the Jedi mind trick? it only works for the weak minded...

wow, good ol national pride eh? I'm sorry my friend but I do believe you've just shot yourself in the foot

And if you're trying to claim in any way that working alone is more practical than  team work (which is the basic concept here) than I don't know what they've taught you ppl in school but it saddens me. If Germany had been united since day one, so in other words united foillowing the thirty years war and not splinterred into hundreds of tiny states; where each was trying to obtain the wealth of France by taxing it's meagre ppl excessively to the point where full out emigration to America was in process, then much of the following would not have taken place:

"Do u have any idea what the german people went through while not unified?

All of eastern France used to be german lands, much of poland, the check republik, and even as far as russia were all german at one point as well, and when I say german I mean the majority of the inhabitants were german speaking. But through being not unified other nations forced the german people off their land and into already crowded places. The seperated weak german states were extremely easy land pickings, and as land targets they served. Unification brings strength of numbers. THe german unification was the most essential thing ever to come by that country, had they not unified the german language might not even exist today, and it's ppl without rights dominated by neighbour imperialistic powers who would have conquerred the tiny states long since. That or mercantilised them like colonies."

(I ahve this perfect image I scanned that I'd like to post, none of the uploading stuff works, could someone help me with this?) (It shows all the areas in the states that are of german descent and it's like more than half of the place it seems, I could really use thast to prove my next point, it's saved under the wrong file type and I dunno how to switch it over)

And I forgot to mention here that almost 40% of modern day ethnic USA (according to "THe Human Mosaic: A thematic Introduction to Cultural Geography", a university text) is of german descent. A matter of fact when the united states declared independance from great Britain, they had a vote to decide whether the national language would be german or english, and it would have been german had the germans themselves not voted english. They did this in order to forget their past and old homeworld, which was a land of political, social, and religious devide characterized by hunger, poverty and persecutions of all sorts and of constant inter state war with their own countrymen.

You have to kind of wonder if this perfect ununified germany you two speak of was truly that great, if it led thousands of innocents citizens to leave and journey accross the stormy atlantic to work the rest of their lives in a foreign land to pay off the collosal debts of the voyage over. Come on people, it's obvious the german states let their people down, and it's obvious that if germany had been unified many of these conflicts back home would not have taken place and maybe there would have been a german colony in america for german emigrants to go to. The unification in 1871 was extremely late but as the saying goes "better late than never". It was high time the germans put their foot down and stood for their culture, their language and their identity.

 



Edited by The Golden Phallanx
We are all a result of what we have lived. Culture, attitude, perspective. For everything we do, there is a reason. There is no true evil, only the absence of proper communication.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.