The Assyrians were Semitic people
living in the northern reaches of Mesopotamia; they
have a long history in the area, but for most of that
history they are subjugated to the more powerful kingdoms
and peoples to the south. The new state grew around
four cities fed by the waters or tributaries of the
Tigris: Ashur, Arbela, Nimrud (or Calah) and Nineveh.
The god Ashur gave
his name to the city Ashur, and then to the whole of
Assyria. There, the earliest of the nation's kings had
their residence, until its exposure to the heat of the
desert and the attack of the neighboring Babylonians
led Ashur's rulers to build a secondary capital in cooler
Nineveh, named after Nina, the Ishtar of Assyria.
They took their common
language and their arts from Sumeria, but modified them
later into an almost undistinguishable similarity to
the language and arts of Babylonia. However, unlike
Babylon, from beginning to end they were a race of warriors,
more crueler and more brutal that any other race before.
Their history is one of kings and slaves, wars and conquests,
bloody victories and sudden defeat.
Early
Empires and Dependency
About 1810 BC an Assyrian
king, Shamshi-Adad I (reigned 1813-1780 BC), succeeded
in extending the territory of Assyria from the Zagros
Mountains to the Mediterranean Sea. Shamshi-Adad may
have been the first ruler to establish a centrally organized
empire in the ancient Middle East. He divided his kingdom
into districts under specially appointed administrators
and councils, instituted a system of couriers, and took
a census of the population at regular intervals. This
first Assyrian Empire did not last long, however; Shamshi-Adad's
son, Ishme-Dagan I, (reigned circa 1780-1760 BC),was
defeated about 1760 BC by the Babylonian king Hammurabi,
and Assyria became part of the Babylonian Empire.
The Babylonian Empire
was also short-lived. The Kassites, a non-Semitic people,
invaded Babylonia in the 16th century BC and seized
political power. Another non-Semitic mountain people,
the Hurrians, infiltrated practically all northern Mesopotamia
and even reached Palestine to the west. Close behind
the Hurrians, and to some extent intermingling with
them, came an Indo-European people whose name is unknown.
As a result of these migrations and wanderings, the
16th century BC was one of turmoil in Mesopotamian history.
About 1500 BC Assyria became a dependency of Mitanni,
a kingdom of imperial proportions that had extended
its sway over all northern Mesopotamia. Assyria remained
in subjection until early in the 14th century, when
the Mitanni Kingdom suffered a serious defeat at the
hands of the rising empire of the Hittites to the north.
Taking advantage of the ensuing confusion, the Assyrian
king Ashur-uballit I (reigned 1364-1328 BC) freed Assyria
from the Mitanni yoke and even annexed some of its
Altar of Tukulti-Ninurta
I
territory.
Ashur-uballit I was
succeeded by a series of vigorous rulers, notably Adad-nirari
I (reigned 1307-1274 BC), Shalmaneser I (reigned 1274-1244
BC), and Tukulti-Ninurta I (reigned 1244-1207 BC). They
were successful in extending the Assyrian boundaries
and in keeping at bay their powerful neighbors, the
Urartians, the Hittites, the Babylonians, and the Lullubi.
Beginning with the
monarch, Tukulti-Ninurta , Assyria began its first conquests,
in this case the conquest of Babylon. The Assyrian dream
of empire began with the monarch, Tiglat-Pileser I (1115-1076),
who extended Assyrian dominance to Syria and Armenia.
At the time of Tiglath-Pileser's death, Assyria was
enjoying a period of tranquillity, which did not last,
however, very long; for we find his two sons and successors,
seeking offensive and defensive alliances with the Kings
of Babylonia
Beginning
of the Neo Assyrian Empire
Ashurnasirpal
II
From about 1070 to 950 B.C., a gap
of more than one hundred years presents itself in the
history of Assyria. But from 950 B.C. down to the fall
of Nineveh and the overthrow of the Assyrian Empire (609
B.C.) the history of Assyria is very completely represented
in documents. Towards 970 B.C., Tiglathpileser II was
king over Assyria. In 935 B.C. he was succeeded by his
son, Assuhr-Dan II, and about 911 B.C. by the latter's
son, Adad-nirari II, who, in 889 B.C., was succeeded by
his son, Tukulti-Ninurta II. The last two monarchs appear
to have undertaken several successful expeditions against
Babylonia and the regions north of Assyria. Tukulti-Ninurta's
successor was his son Asshur-Nasir-Pal (884-859 B.C.),
with whose accession to the throne began a long career
of victory that placed Assyria at the head of the great
powers of that age. He was a great conqueror, soldier,
organizer, hunter, and builder, but fierce and cruel.
In his many military
campaigns he invaded, subdued, and conquered, after
a series of devastations and raids, all the regions
north, south, east, and west of Assyria, from the mountains
of Armenia down to Babylon, and from the mountains of
Kurdistan and Lake Urmi to the Mediterranean. He crossed
the Euphrates and the Orontes, penetrated into the Lebanon
region, attacked Karkemish, the capital of the Hittites
(Neo-Hittite) , invaded Syria, and compelled the cities
of the Mediterranean coast (such as Tyre, Sidon, Bylos,
and Arvad ) to pay tribute.
Asshur-Nasir-Pal was
succeeded by his son, Shalmaneser III, who during his
reign made an expedition to the West with the object
of subduing Damascus. In this memorable campaign he
came into direct touch with Israel and their king Achab
who happened to be one of the allies of Benhadad, King
of Damascus. In describing this expedition the Assyrian
monarch goes on to say that he approached Karkar, a
town to the southwest of Karkemish, and the royal residence
of Irhulini
After Shalmneser III
came his son Shamshi-Adad V (824 B.C.), who, in order
to quell the rebellion caused by his elder son, Asshur-Danin-Pal,
undertook four campaigns. He also fought and defeated
the Babylonian King, Marduk-balatsuiqbi, and his powerful
army. Shamshi-Adad V was succeeded by his son, Adad-Nirari
III (811 B.C.). This king undertook several expeditions
against Media, Armenia, the land of Nairi, and the region
around Lake Urmi, and subjugated all the coastlands
of the West, including Tyre, Sidon, Edom, Philistia,
and the "land of Omri", i.e. Israel. Adad-Nirari III
also claimed sovereignty over Babylonia. In one of his
inscriptions, which are unfortunately scarce and laconic,
he mentions the name of his wife, Sammuramat, which
is the only Assyrian or Babylonian name discovered so
far having any phonetic resemblance to that of the famous
legendary queen, Semiramis. The personal identity of
the two queens, however, is not admissible. Adad-Nirari
III was succeeded by Shalmaneser IV (782-772 B.C.),
and the latter by Asshur-Dan III (773-754 B.C.). Of
these three kings we know little, as no adequate inscriptions
of their reigns have come down to us.
World
Empire
Tiglath-pileser III in
triumph.
From Nimrud, about 730 B.C
In the year 745 B.C. Tiglath-Pileser
III seized the throne of Assyria, at Nineveh. For the
first time in history the idea of centralization was
introduced into politics; the conquered provinces were
organized under an elaborate bureaucracy at the head
of which was the king, each district paying a fixed
tribute and providing a military contingent.
The Assyrian forces became a standing
army, which, by successive improvements and careful
discipline, was moulded into an irresistible fighting
machine, and Assyrian policy was directed towards the
definite object of reducing the whole civilized world
into a single empire and thereby throwing its trade
and wealth into Assyrian hands. With this object, after
terrorizing Armenia and the Medes and breaking the power
of the Hittites, Tiglath-Pileser III secured the high-roads
of commerce to the Mediterranean together with the Phoenician
seaports and then made himself master of Babylonia.
In 729 BC the summit of his ambition was attained, and
he was invested With the sovereignty of Asia in the
holy city of Babylon.
Two years later he died but his
successor, who took the name of Shalmaneser IV, continued
the policy he had begun. Shalmaneser died suddenly in
Tebet 722 B.C., while pressing the siege of Samaria,
and the seizure of the throne by another general, Sargon,
on the 12th of the month, gave the Babylonians an opportunity
to revolt. The Babylonian prince Marduk-baladan, entered
Babylon and was there crowned legitimate king. For twelve
years he successfully resisted the Assyrians; but the
failure of his allies in the west to act in concert
with him, and the overthrow of the Elamites, eventually
compelled him to flee to his ancestral domains in the
marshes of southern Babylonia. Sargon, who meanwhile
had crushed the confederacy of the northern nations,
had taken (717 B.C.) the Hittite stronghold of Catchemish
and had annexed the future kingdom of Ecbatana, was
now accepted as king by the Babylonian priests, and
his claim to be the successor of Sargon of Akkad acknowledged
up to the time of his murder in 705 B.C.
His son and successor - Sennacherib,
did not possess the military or administrative abilities
of his father; and the success of his reign was not
commensurate with the vanity of the ruler. He was never
crowned at Babylon, which was in a perpetual state of
revolt until, in 691 B.C., he shocked the religious
and political conscience of Asia by razing the holy
city of Babylon to the ground. His campaign against
Hezekiach of Judah was as much a failure as his policy
in Babylonia, and in his murder by his sons on 681 B.C.
both Babylonians and Jews saw the judgment of heaven.
Esarhaddon, who succeeded him, was
of different calibre from his father. He was commanding
the army in a campaign against Ararat at the time of
the murder; forty-two days later the murderers fled
from Nineveh and took refuge at the court of Ararat.
But the Armenian army was utterly defeated near Malatia,
and at the end of the day Esarhaddon was saluted by
his soldiers as king. He there upon returned to Nineveh
and on the formally ascended the throne.
One of his first acts was to restore
Babylon, and to re-people the city with such of the
priests and the former population as had survived massacre.
Then he was solemnly declared king in the temple of
Bel-Merodach, which had again risen from its ruins,
and Babylon became the second capital of the empire.
Esarhaddon's policy was successful and Babylonia remained
contentedly quiet throughout his reign.
In February (674 B.C.) the Assyrians
entered upon their invasion of Egypt, and in March 670
B.C. an expedition on an unusually large scale set out
from Nineveh. The Egyptian frontier was crossed on June,
Egyptian forces, were driven to Memphis after fifteen
days of continuous fighting, during which the Egyptians
were defeated with heavy losses. Next Memphis was entered
by the victorious army and Tirhaka (Egyptian commander)
fled to the south. Two years later (668 BC) Egypt revolted,
and while on the march to reduce it, Esarhaddon fell
ill and died.
Assur-Bani-Pal succeeded him as
king of Assyria and its empire, while his brother, Samassumyukin
was made viceroy of Babylonia. The arrangement was evidently
intended to flatter the Babylonians by giving them once
more the semblance of independence. But it failed to
work, Samassumyukin became more Babylonian than his
subjects. The viceroy claimed to be the successor of
the monarchs whose empire had once stretched to the
Mediterranean. Even the Summerian language was revived
as the official tongue, and a revolt broke out which
shook the Assyrian empire to its foundations. After
several years of struggle, during which Egypt recovered
its independence, Babylon was starved into surrender,
and the rebel viceroy and his supporters were put to
death.
Ashurbanipal Killing a
Lion
Egypt had already recovered its
independence (660 B.C.) with the help of mercenaries
sent by king of Lydia. Next followed the contest with
Elam, in spite of the efforts of Assur-Bani-Pal to ward
it off.
Assyria, however, was aided by civil
war in Elam itself; the country was wasted with fire
and sword, and its capital Susa levelled with the ground.
But the long struggle left Assyria maimed and exhausted.
It had been drained of both wealth and fighting population;
the devastated provinces of Elam and Babylonia could
yield nothing with which to supply the needs of the
imperial exchequer, and it was difficult to find sufficient
troops even to garrison the conquered populations. Assyria,
therefore, was ill prepared to face the hordes of Scythinas
who now began to har
Decline
of the Empire
The rapid downfall
of the Assyrian empire was formerly attributed to
military defeat, although it was never clear how the
Medes and the Babylonians alone could have accomplished
this. More recent work has established that a civil
war occurred, weakening the empire so that it could
no longer stand up against a foreign enemy. Ashur-Bani-Pal
had twin sons. Ashur-Etil-Ilani was appointed successor
to the throne, but his twin brother Sin-Shar-Ishkun
did not recognize him. The fight between them and
their supporters forced the old king to withdraw to
Harran, in 632 at the latest, perhaps ruling from
there over the western part of the empire until his
death in 627. Ashur-Etil-Ilani governed in Assyria
from about 633, but a general, Sin-Shum-Lisher, soon
rebelled against him and proclaimed himself counter-king.
Some years later Sin-Shar-Ishkun finally succeeded
in obtaining the kingship. In Babylonian documents
dates can be found for all three kings. In 626 the
Chaldean Nabopolassar (Nabu-apal-usur) revolted from
Uruk and occupied Babylon. There were several changes
in government. King Ashur-Etel-Ilani was forced to
withdraw to the west, where he died (621?).
About the year 626
the Scythians laid waste to Syria and Palestine. In
625 the Medes under Cyaxares began to conquer the
Iranian provinces of Assyria. One chronicle relates
of wars between Sin-Shar-Ishkun and Nabopolassar in
Babylonia in 625-623. It was not long until the Assyrians
were driven out of Babylonia. In 616 the Medes struck
against Nineveh, but, according to the Greek historian
Herodotus, were driven back by the Scythians. In 615,
however, the Medes conquered Arrapkha (Kirkuk), and
in 614 they took the old capital of Ashur, looting
and destroying the city. Now Cyaxares and Nabopolassar
made an alliance for the purpose of dividing Assyria.
In 612 Kalakh and Nineveh succumbed to the superior
strength of the allies. The revenge taken on the Assyrians
was terrible. Sin-shar-ishkun, king of Assyria, found
death in his burning palace. The commander of the
Assyrian army in the west crowned himself king in
the city of Harran, assuming the name of the founder
of the empire, Ashur-Uballit II (612-609 BC). Ashur-Uballit
had to face both the Babylonians and the Medes. They
conquered Harran in 610, without, however, destroying
the city completely. In 609 the remaining Assyrian
troops had to capitulate. With this event Assyria
disappeared from history. The great empires that succeeded
it learned a great deal from the Assyrians, both in
the arts and in the organization of their states.
ASSYRIAN
WARFARE AFTER TIGLATH-PILESER III REFORMS
Tiglath-Pileser III
established the most efficient military, financial,
and administrative system the world had yet seen.
The army was its heart. He abolished the militia organization
and built the state around a standing regular army.
The principal business of the nation became war; its
wealth and prosperity were sustained by booty and
by supervision of trade and finance. A semimilitary
bureaucracy carried out the functions of government
at home and in the conquered regions, setting the
first pattern of centralized imperiał control over
far-flung provincial territories.
Assyrian Regal Chariot
With Two Horses
This was the first
truly military society of history. No effort was spared
which would contribute to the efficiency of the army,
or which would assure continued Assyrian supremacy
over all possible foes. The Assyrians were the first
to recognize fully the advantage of iron over bronze.
As early as 1000 B.C. their militia armies had been
completely equipped with weapons, chariots, and armor
made of iron. Tiglath-pileser saw to it that this
technical superiority was maintained by constant and
systematic improvement of weapons, and by the careful
training of the soldiers in the use of their arms.
The bulk of the army
was comprised of large masses of spearmen, slow-moving
and cumbersome, but relatively morę maneuverable than
similar infantry formations of other peoples of the
time. Their irresistible advance was the culminating
phase of a typical Assyrian battle plan.
In the Assyrian Army
the archers were more highly organized than their
counterparts elsewhere and evidently had stronger
bows, from which they fired iron-tipped arrows with
deadly accuracy. They created confusion in the enemy
ranks in preparation for a closely coordinated chanot
and cavalry charge.
The main striking
force of the Assyrian Army was the corps of horse-drawn,
two-wheeled chariots. Their mission was to smash their
way through the ranks of enemy infantry. Like their
contemporaries, the Assyrians used chariots in simple,
brute force, but employed them in larger numbers,
with more determination, and in closer coordination
with archers, spearmen, and cavalry.
The cavalry was the
smallest element of the army, but probably the best
trained and equipped. The noble horsemen fought with
a combination of discipline, skill, and ingenuity
not possible in the other elements of the army. Only
the cavalry could be employed in the occasional maneuvers
attempted in battle.
The art of fortification
had been well developed in the Middle East before
1000 B.C. The great walls of the large cities were
almost invulnerable to the means of attack available
within the limited technology of the times.
The Assyrians greatly
improved the techniques of siegecraft and attack of
fortifications. Accompanying their armies were siege
trains and various forms of specialized equipment,
including materials for building large movable wooden
towers (protected from the flaming arrows of defenders
by dampened leather hides) and heavy battering rams.
Assyrian Besiegers
From the tops of the wooden towers,
skilled archers would sweep the walls of the defenders,
to prevent interference with the work of demolition,
while nearby other archers, sheltered by the shields
of spearmen, would fire arrows-some of them flaming
in a high trajectory over the walls, to harass the
defenders and to terrify the population. The methods
used by the Assyrians did not originate with them,
but were pparently borrowed from the Sumerians. But
it was the skill and organization of mployment which
brought success to Assyrian siegecraft.
The high degree of organization
of the Assyrian Army is clearły evidenced by its ability
to fight successfully over all kinds of terrain. The
organizational details have not been preserved in
the fragmentary records available to us, but their
field armies may occasionally have approached a strength
of 50,000 men. Forces of such size would have required
large suppły trains for desert or mountain operations,
and could have functioned only with smoothly operating
start and logistical systems.
Terror was another factor contributing
greatly to Assyrian success. Their exceptional cruelty
and ferocity were possibly reflections of callousness
developed over centuries of defense of their homeland
against savage enemies. But theirs was also a calculated
policy of terror-possibly the earliest example of
organized psychological warfare. It was not unusual
for them to kill every man, woman, and child in captured
cities. Sometimes they would carry away entire populations
into captivity. The policies and procedures of Tiglath-Pileser
III were employed with vigor and ferocity by his successors
and proved invaluable in maintaining security.
List
of Kings
House of Shamshi-Adad
Shamshi-Adad I c. 1813-1781
Ishme-Dagan I c. 1780-1741
Mut-Ashkur, c. 1740-1730
Rimu......, c. 1730-1727
Asinum, c. 1726
Usurpers Puzur-Sin, c. 1726-1707
Ashur-dugul, c. 1706-
Ashur-apla-idi
Nasir-Sin
Sin-namir
Ipqi-Ishtar
Adad-salulu, -1701
House of Adasi*
Adasi, c. 1701
Belu-bani, c. 1700-1691
*Adasi was the last
of the usurpers.
His dynasty lasts until 1014 BC
Libaia 1690-1673
BC
Sharma-Adad I 1673-1661 BC
Iptar-Sin 1661-1649 BC
Bazaia. 1649-1621 BC
Lullaia 1621-1615 BC
Kidin-Ninua 1615-1601 BC
Sharma-Adad II 1601-1598 BC
Erishum III 1598-1585 BC
Shamshi-Adad II. 1585-1579 BC
Ishme-Dagan II. 1579-1563 BC
Shamshi-Adad III 1563-1547 BC
Ashur-Nirari I. 1547-1521 BC
Puzur-Ashur III 1521-1497 BC
Enlil-Nasir I. 1497-1483 BC
Nur-Ili1483-c. 1475 BC
Mitanni vassalage
Ashur-Shaduni. 1475 -1472 BC
Ashur-Rabi I. 1472-1452 BC
Ashur-Nadin-Ahhe I. 1452-1432 BC
Enlil-Nasir II. 1432-1426 BC
Ashur-Nirari II. 1426-1419 BC
Ashur-Bel-Nisheshu 1419-1410 BC
Ashur-Rim-Nisheshu. 1410-1402 BC
Ashur-Nadin-Ahhe II 1402-1392 BC
Eriba-Adad I. 1392-1365
BC
Ashur-Uballit I. 1365-1329 BC
Enlil-Nirari. 1329-1319
BC
Arik-Den-Ili 1319-1307 BC
Adad-Nirari I. 1307-1274 BC
Shalmaneser I 1274-1244 BC
Tukulti-Ninurta I. 1244-1207 BC
Ashur-Nadin-Apli 1207-1203 BC
Ashur-Nirari III. 1203-1197 BC
Enlil-Kudurri-Usur. 1197-1192 BC
Ninurta-Apil-Ekur I. 1192-1180 BC
Ashur-Dan I. .1180- ?
Ninurta-Tukulti-Ashur (?)
Mutakkil-Nusku. 1179-1133 BC
Ashur-Resh-Ishi. 1133-1115 BC
Tiglathpileser I (Tukulti-apal-Esharra), 1115-1077
Ashared-apil-Ekur, 1076-1075
Ashur-bel-kala, 1074-1057
Eriba-Adad II, 1056-1055
Shamshi-Adad IV, 1054-1051
Ashurnasirpal I, 1050-1032
Shalmaneser II, 1031-1020
Ashur-nirari IV, 1019-1014
House of Ashur-rabi
II
Ashur-rabi II, 1013-973
Ashur-resha-ishi II, 972-968
Tiglathpileser II, 967-935
Ashur-Dan II 935-911 BC
Adad-Nirari II. 911-889 BC
Tukulti-Ninurta II. 889-884 BC
Ashur-Nasir-Pal II. 884-859 BC
Shalmaneser III. 859-824 BC
Shamshi-Adad V. 824-811 BC
Adad-Nirari III 811-782 BC
Shalmaneser IV. 782-772 BC
Ashur-Dan III 772-754 BC
Ashur-Nirari IV. 754-745 BC
Tiglath-Pileser III. 745-727 BC
Shalmaneser V. 727-722 BC
House of Sargon
II
Sargon II. 722-705 BC
Sennecherib 705-681 BC
Esarhaddon. 681-669 BC
Ashur-Bani-Pal. 669-626 BC
Ashur-Etil-Ilani. 626-621 opposed by Sin-Shum-Lishir
the Usurper 626 -? BC
Sin-Shar-Ishkun. 621-612 BC
Ashur-Uballit II. 612-609 BC
SOURCES
http://www.angelfire.com/nt/Gilgamesh/assyrian.html
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02007c.htm
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/RefArticle.aspx?refid=761564347
http://ellone-loire.net/obsidian/ancmesop.html
http://www.betnahrain.org/Gallery/Ancient_Assyrian_Art/assyria_art_1.htm
http://www.hp.uab.edu/image_archive/ue/uer.html
Mark Healy, Agnus McBride "the Ancient Assyrians" Trevor&Ernest
Dupuy "
The Encyclopedia of Military History"