Print Page | Close Window

AEDip04: Versailles Diplomacy

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: All Empires Community
Forum Name: Gaming and Information Technology
Forum Discription: Technology and Computer-related discussions; PC and Video Games…
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7873
Printed Date: 20-Apr-2024 at 01:19
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: AEDip04: Versailles Diplomacy
Posted By: Maju
Subject: AEDip04: Versailles Diplomacy
Date Posted: 26-Dec-2005 at 13:29
It's my pleasure to officially announce the start of the new All Empires Diplomacy game, this time in the Europe of the 1930s.

Previous recruitment, discussion and country assignements has been done in the context of http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=7596&PN=1 - THIS TOPIC .


Starting map (Winter 1928)

The major powers will be played by the following people:
  • Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (General Secretary Josif Brod Stalin): TheDiplomat
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain (PM Stanley Baldwin*): Bishop
  • French Republic (President Gaston Doumerge): TheGeneral
  • Federal Republic of Germany (President Paul von Hindenburg): Kapikulu
  • Kingdom of Italy (PM Benito Mussolini): Magua
  • Republic of Poland (Strongman Józef Pilsudski***): Rider
  • Republic of Turkey (President Mustafa Kemal Ataturk): Hugoestr
Historical notes:
* Baldwin was replaced in June 1929 by Ramsay McDonald.
** Though a parlamentary republic, France passed these years by a rapid succession of Prime Ministers, so I found easier to name the more stable figure of the President.
*** Pilsudski held various offices, including that of Prime Minister occasionally, nevertheless he was always the strong man behind.


The rules applied to this variant are the same as in standard Diplomacy (read them http://www.diplomacy-archive.com/resources/rulebooks/1992AH3rd.pdf - HERE ) with one exception: there are 7 minor powers (Spain, Sweden, Czechoslovakia, Rumania, Yugoslavia, Greece and Egypt) each one owning one army or fleet. These minor powers will be controlled according to the following rule:

Special rule for the management of armed minor powers in variants that provide for them:


Each major power (player) has as many Influence Points (IPs) as centers it owns. Every Winter the player can allocate them for any available minor power(s) at will. 

Each winter then the GM will count the IPs allocated at each minor power ruling its allaince for the upcoming year to the power that more "votes" has achieved in that particular "poll" or "influence struggle". Players are not obligued to "vote" for themselves (default) but can also explictly allocate their IPs for other major powers.

IP allocation will remain secret in any case. 

The major power obtaining single majority in each individual votation, gets the alliance (total cotrol) of the minor power for the full following year. A tie on top votes causes the minor power to stay neutral for the subsequent year.

Examples (using Versailles variant) in Winter 1928 (prior to the game start):

(1) Czechoslovakia:

  • Germany 3 IPs
  • Poland 2 IPs
  • Italy 1 IP

Germany obtains alliance (control) of Czechoslovakia for all 1929 (3 vs 2)

(2) Spain:

  • France: 3 IPs
  • Britain: 2 IPs
  • Italy : 1 IP for Britain

Spain stays neutral in 1929 (3 vs 3)

(3) Greece:

  • Italy: 1 IP

Italy attains the Greece alliance for 1929

(4) Yugoslavia:

  • Turkey: 2 IPs
  •  USSR: 1 IP

Turkey obtains Yugoslav alliance in 1929 (2 vs 1)

(5) Rumania:

  • Poland: 2 IPs
  •  USSR: 1 IP 

Poland obtains Rumanian alliance for 1929 (2 vs 1)

(6) Sweden:

  • USSR: 2 IPs
  • Britain 1 IP
  •  Poland: 1 IP for Britain

Sweden stays neutral in 1929 (2 vs 2)

(7) Egypt: 

  • Turkey: 1 IP 

Turkey obtains Egyptian alliance for 1929

Yet (IMPORTANT!), the votation or IP allocation remains secret. Only the results are published by the GM along the Winter adjustments' adjudication.


Continuity vote: minor powers will cast a special ˝ vote for their previous allies. This rule is intended to encourage alliance continuity and minimize the posibilities that a minor power reverses to neutrality. 

Examples (Winter 1929): 

Greece: 

  • Turkey: 1 IP
  • Italy: 1 IP
  •  Greece (continuity vote): ˝ IP for Italy

Italy retains control over Greece in 1930 (1˝ vs 1)

Egypt: no IPs invested by any major powers

  • Egypt (continuity vote): ˝ IP for Turkey

Turkey retains control over Egypt

Rumania:

  • Poland: 3 IPs
  • USSR: 4 IPs
  • Rumania (continuity vote): ˝ IP for Poland>

USSR takes control of Rumania (4 vs 3˝)


Betrayal penalty
(loss of credibility): 

A power can of course occupy its minor ally's owned centers, yet this will cause the following penalty: the traitor major power loses all IPs in the subsequent Winter and will recover only half of them (rounded down) in the second year after the wrongdoing. The third year after the stab, the traitor power will have again all its IPs, unless it has comitted new acts of treason towards its minor allies.

The continuity vote rule is not affected by this provision. Minor powers will remain casting their ˝ IP for their former allies equally.


Provisions for minor powers reverting to neutrality

The unit(s) of such minor power will act as follows:

  • If it is at their home SC, it will hold
  • If it is adjacent to their home SC, it will move to it
  • If it is two provinces away from their home SC, it will also move to it via the shortest possible path, deciding the GM on random bases if two or more paths are equally available.
  • If it is more than 2 provinces away, it will hold

If a neutralized minor power owns more than one SC, the unit most distant from its home center will move towards the other owned SC following the same provisions as above. If both units are equally distant, the GM will decide on random bases. 

Example: Yugoslavia controls Belgrade (home) and Athens and has its two armies in Macedonia and Albania. One army will move to Blegrade and the other to Athens on random choice (flipping a coin, for instance).


When a minor powers can become major (played) and when an abandoned major power can turn minor:


Any minor power that achieves 3 SCs becomes a major power and will be assigned to a new player. The new player will then name a second home center for his new power. 

An abandoned major power with 2 or less SCs can become minor on GM's decission applying then the previous rules.

Also, complemenarily to the previous rules, here are my own house rules:

House rules
:
  1. In case of doubt the GM will have the last word, always applying the rulebook and any special rules (as for above).
  2. If a player fails to send orders (NMR/NBR), he will be notified by the GM and must reply declaring if he wishes to follow with the game. Two succesive NMRs in regular or adjustments turns (retreats won't apply) will cause the player to be deposed and replaced - no excuses. If the NMRing player doesn't reply to the GM's mail, he will be deposed and replaced without any second opportunity.
  3. Regular turns (Spring and Fall) will be scheduled with terms of about 5 days. Weekends can stretch these terms a little.
  4. Retreats' turns will have a maximum term of 48 hrs. Only for these, the GM will adjudicate earlier if all orders are in. If they fall fully in weekend, the term can be stretched a little bit too. This is up to the players' needs largely.
  5. For this variant, Winter turns will have an intermediate length of about 3-4 days, as the control of minor powers can be an important matter of discussion.
  6. Deadline extensions will be conceded upon request but I ask the players not to abuse of them. Conditional adjustments/retreats can be sent as alternative for short sub-turns extensions and I encourage them.
  7. I also encourage to send preliminary orders as soon as you recieve the adjudication. You can send as many different sets of orders as you need. The last one arriving will erase the previous. Please send always full sets of orders: it doesn't matter what you sent in previous ones.
  8. Orders will be interpretated benevolently but any order that is confuse enough will be declared invalid. Still I will notify the players if there is time for that, so this should not be a problem for novices.
  9. Press: I will accept white press (signed) and grey press (anonymous). I won't accept black press (on other's name). The press should be written with the orders' set and will be published with the adjudication. The GM will try to write some press too and "the gallery" (observers) can also write press (white only). Alternatively you can post in the All Empires - General Gaming topic open for this game's purpose (this one).
  10. I may add new rules in the future if necessary, always after consulting the players.
The first deadline, for Winter 1928, affecting only the Influence Action ("vote" for control of the minor powers), will be on Friday 30th of 2005, at 20:00 GMT. Spring deadline will be probably scheduled for Wednesday 4th of 2006, unless we face some sort of delays.

As always, I encourage all you to send preliminary orders as soon as possible. You can always change them later on.

Have fun!

PS: Map with province abbreviations:



-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!



Replies:
Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 26-Dec-2005 at 17:29
So, for example, if Yugoslavian army invades Hungary next turn, the control of Hungary will be obtained by whomever gets the alliance of Yugoslavian minor nation,right?

-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 26-Dec-2005 at 20:29
Hungary will become a Yugoslav center enabling Yugoslavia to build a second unit in Belgrade. This build will be ordered by the player who holds Yugoslavia's alliance in 1929 but, if Yugoslavia changes alliances that same Winter, then another player will have control of both units.

The case is that Yugoslavia (in this example) is played as a separate power but not by diferent players but by one of the players ruling a major power. (Notice that if Yugoslavia achieves the control of a third center, then it becomes a new major power).

I believe that players are mostly interested in using minor allies to support their own units or to block rival ones but there is room for creativity and in some circumstances a player can consider interesting to make his "puppet" grow.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 01:43

MAybe we could make it even more harder and you, Maju would not tell anyone except the players who got which minor powrer. That would make wars much easier for you would only be worried by your invasion army. In some ways this might be logical but if players want to tell who they got then they can tell it. Otherwise it is a secret.

Now, is the Polish Józef Pilsudski a Marshal?. Must check wikipedia.



-------------


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 01:47
THEDIPLOMAT, YOUR INBOX IS TOTALLY FULL FOR THE SECOND WEEK. CLEAN IT!!!!

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 07:22
Originally posted by rider

MAybe we could make it even more harder and you, Maju would not tell anyone except the players who got which minor powrer. That would make wars much easier for you would only be worried by your invasion army. In some ways this might be logical but if players want to tell who they got then they can tell it. Otherwise it is a secret.


I was thinking in the same (this would allow for obstructionist maneouvres without open implication of the leading power). But I would like everybody to agree with it before implementing it.


Now, is the Polish Józef Pilsudski a Marshal?. Must check wikipedia.



A General, I think. He was President in an earlier period, PM till 1928 and also in 1930 but often he occupied other ministries, such as that of Defense.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 09:58
But I am more handsome than Stalin

-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Thegeneral
Date Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 18:29

Originally posted by TheDiplomat

But I am more handsome than Stalin

I'd rather be Stalin.  Look who I am.....



-------------


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 19:16

Thegeneral you shall thank God that you are not Aristide Briand,who had been France's PM for a few times

Wait!!!Look, Mr.Briand is coming...A disaster of nature, or shall I say wonder , what an image, what a charisma



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 02:51
Yes, more like a wondeR!

-------------


Posted By: Kilikya
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 06:11

 

Maju

ThedÝPLOMAT told me about this game and Ý read through some of the material.  Sounds interesting, much more complex and subtle than ours.

I wanted to throw out one thought;

don't you think that making the competition for minor powers Cumulative rather than re-computed every turn from zero more realistic?  In other words, the IP's given each turn would be added to the score already recieved in previous turns.  This would reward constancy, fidelity as well as longterm strategy.

In this sense, using IP's would be a long term investment, reflecting the economic, diplomatic, military, or technological assistance given over time.

 

 



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 07:00
Originally posted by Maju


When a minor powers can become major (played) and when an abandoned major power can turn minor:


Any minor power that achieves 3 SCs becomes a major power and will be assigned to a new player. The new player will then name a second home center for his new power. 

An abandoned major power with 2 or less SCs can become minor on GM's decission applying then the previous rules.

Can already I register to play a minor power in case one will turn major in the future?


-------------


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 08:30

So, Maju, if a great power passes through a country, does that also give the same result like invading a minor power?

What I mean is, for example Polish army in Krakow passing through Slovakia,which is not a SC.



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 09:42

We can do a formula like this for my latest question:

If a country gets alliance of a minor power, that means that he gets the right of passage. Isn't that a good solution?Otherwise, such a move would mean a decline in diplomatic power.



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 10:19
Originally posted by Kilikya

 

Maju

ThedÝPLOMAT told me about this game and Ý read through some of the material.  Sounds interesting, much more complex and subtle than ours.

I wanted to throw out one thought;

don't you think that making the competition for minor powers Cumulative rather than re-computed every turn from zero more realistic?  In other words, the IP's given each turn would be added to the score already recieved in previous turns.  This would reward constancy, fidelity as well as longterm strategy.

In this sense, using IP's would be a long term investment, reflecting the economic, diplomatic, military, or technological assistance given over time.



Sounds interesting. In any case it would have to be pondered somehow: I mean it's not the same the influence you exerted 5 years ago than the one that you exert right now. So far, I've solved it partially with the continuity vote: all allied minors cast 1/2 vote for their former ally.

It's an experimental rule anyhow, so, depending how it works in this game, I may modify it for future games. Also, if there's consensus, we can modify the rule in the middle of the game too.

So far the only simmilar rules that I know of are: that of Mandate of Heaven, which allows for players to vote the movement of neutral armies/fleets, and that of Ambition & Empire, that works the same way but neutral units can't move, just support or hold. The issue of allied minor powers only happen in Versailles, but the alliances are fixed (though secret).

It's been suggested above that alliances should be secret also with this rule but I'm not sure this is realistic: normally alliances are public, specially the relations of dependence of minor powers towards major ones. What is secret is the diplomatic effort that precedes alliance.

Btw, do you want to be added to the mailing list as observer? You would be also candidate for replacement or to take over a minor power that becomes major (by gaining its 3rd center).


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 10:51
Originally posted by Kapikulu

So, Maju, if a great power passes through a country, does that also give the same result like invading a minor power?

What I mean is, for example Polish army in Krakow passing through Slovakia,which is not a SC.



No. Only centers are taken in account. But it doesn't matter if they are their home centers or any other center they may have conquered. Militarly undermining the power of your ally is what counts as invasion.

Also, if you occupy your ally's center in Spring and move out in the Fall, that's not treason. But make sure you move out in the Fall unless you want to be penalized.

Finally, to become a "traitor" (and be penalized) you must invade a minor power that is your ally. You can invade any other minor power at will without any penalty. This is intended to prevent that, for instance, Germany takes control of Czechoslovakia and orders it to move away only to occupy Prague. If you would do that, then you would be penalized, even if Czechoslovakia conquers Hungary "as compensation".


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 10:53
Originally posted by Mixcoatl

Originally posted by Maju


When a minor powers can become major (played) and when an abandoned major power can turn minor:


Any minor power that achieves 3 SCs becomes a major power and will be assigned to a new player. The new player will then name a second home center for his new power. 

An abandoned major power with 2 or less SCs can become minor on GM's decission applying then the previous rules.

Can already I register to play a minor power in case one will turn major in the future?


Yes, I will add you to the observers' list. Also in the event that a player drops out you would be considered first to replace him.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 10:57
Originally posted by Kapikulu

We can do a formula like this for my latest question:

If a country gets alliance of a minor power, that means that he gets the right of passage. Isn't that a good solution?Otherwise, such a move would mean a decline in diplomatic power.



Well, that could be another idea. But I chose this format to make things easier for people playing or adjudicating with RP. Anyhow, changing the basic mechanics of the game was something I wanted to avoid. I also want to allow the possibilty of "treason"... with a due cost. Stabbing the last minor power around may be an option, anyhow.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 15:38
Originally posted by Kilikya

don't you think that making the competition for minor powers Cumulative rather than re-computed every turn from zero more realistic?  In other words, the IP's given each turn would be added to the score already recieved in previous turns.  This would reward constancy, fidelity as well as longterm strategy.

In this sense, using IP's would be a long term investment, reflecting the economic, diplomatic, military, or technological assistance given over time.

 


Brilliant!

I really like this idea, this makes a lot of sense!

I vote for this as an option.

Good work Kilikya!

This is a very interesting rule. First it muddies the water, so it wont be obvious how many votes are needed to take control of a minor. Because no one has any idea what kinda influence it's going to take to sway one. I like it...



-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 28-Dec-2005 at 18:04
But it requires more work from the GM. And the event of a major computer crash most likely all that info would be lost.

Also as I said before if I invest in Rumania in 1928, what kind of effect will it have in 1936? Obviously it is not the same that investing in 1935. At most the value of the old investments would be depreciated by half each year, which is even more work for the GM, because it involves complex maths (fractions! ) and serious accountance.

Also if you have 3 IPs and invest them all in Rumania but your enemy has 5 and invests 4 in Rumania, you're done anyhow. The current system provides for most of the fun with the greatest simplicity possible.

The idea is not bad (I have a simmilar idea myself some time ago) but for the sake of simplicity, I think it doesn't add so much to the game. Also if you are losing, no matter how much was your influence in the past, it is likely that minors will defect from your side, and that's also reflected in this system: IPs aren't accumulative but they reflect your actual power - they give a little extra advantage to big guys.

Finally the question is not only how much you invest. But how well you invest. For that you require to find out how will the other players act and where can you have the best expectations from the smaller investing. For instance, if you find out that everyone is going to invest in "super-strategic" Rumania, you may choose to invest in Yugoslavia and Greece isntead, so, if succesful, you get two allies whith little effort.

By the way. I have very few orders so far. Let's everybody start sending prelims now!


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Kilikya
Date Posted: 29-Dec-2005 at 05:18

I don't think I want to join this waiting list Maju, but thanks for the offer.  I already bit off more than I can chew with the first game. 

Maybe the next one though.....



Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 04:34
Originally posted by Maju


Also as I said before if I invest in Rumania in 1928, what kind of effect will it have in 1936? Obviously it is not the same that investing in 1935. At most the value of the old investments would be depreciated by half each year, which is even more work for the GM, because it involves complex maths (fractions! ) and serious accountance.


Not necessarily, because at the beginning of the game the ip's are distributed evenly so three ip points is almost the most anyone can vote with. But after the game progresses and we start having super powers in play they will have the ablity to vote with six or seven ip's per turn. This makes the initial three point investments seem small in comparison, and this alone has an inflationary effect. For a small power to have control over a minor he would need to invest fully over time.

We could also make all territories to have ip points. Even the ones that have no supply centers. This would give the game an even bigger inflationary effect.


-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 11:38
I think that we'll keep it this way by the moment. 

I also think that the IP investment in the initial turns, when powers are smaller, are more important because they can have the inmediate effect of adding one or more troops to your army, giving you some help in expanding faster or blocking others' expansion. Also being so many minors around, it's more likely that each one gets one minor (this is merely an statistical estimate).

As the game evolves, most probably there will be significatively less minors left, so it's logical that they allign with one of the greatest powers, unless diplomacy makes up for something diferent.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 12:20
Please wait until January the 2. for the checking.

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 15:37
Originally posted by rider

Please wait until January the 2. for the checking.


If this was a request of extension, sorry but you should have emailed me. All players sent their orders in time and I have already adjudicated.

GM.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 15:40
Winter 1928 Adjudication (Corrected!):

Here is the result of your IP allocations. Remeber that the major powers controlling each minor power will have that control for the full year of 1929 and will get an extra automatic 1/2 vote next year for those allies.

The results are as follow:
  • Sweden signs alliance with the Soviet Union, despite rumors about its neutrality.
  • Spain signs alliance with Italy
  • Czechoslovakia signs alliance with Poland
  • Yugoslavia signs alliance with Turkey
  • Rumania signs alliance with the Soviet Union
  • Greece remains unalligned
  • Egypt signs alliance with Turkey

The New York Times

Diplomatic success for Ataturk and Stalin

Western powers fail to attract allies. Revolution extends through Europe.




The map remains the same (Spring 1929):


Let's the rough verb of weapons talk now, alongside the sweet speech of ambassadors.

Btw, here there is a map showing the known alliances and the territory they control (updated!):



-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 15:57
Good god Turkey got 2 minors with only 3 ip points? Did everyone send in their votes? 

-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 16:07
Everyone sent in their votes. Can't say anything more.  

-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 16:11
Ammendment! Just realized that I commited one error: Sweden is not neutral but allied of Russia. Worst for some, better for Stalin, I guess.

I'll update the post above inmediately.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 19:07

I could not really understand...So interesting IP results came out.

And of course, as nobody knows who had done what, there are some blamings,assumptions,but nothing is certain.



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 30-Dec-2005 at 21:23
Originally posted by Kapikulu

I could not really understand...So interesting IP results came out.

And of course, as nobody knows who had done what, there are some blamings,assumptions,but nothing is certain.



... and only I know what happened exactly.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 05:04
But some have great guesses too. Anyways, wasn't Morocco French too? And France is with the second largest territory after Russia.

-------------


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 10:55

It is not Russia...It is The USSR



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Thegeneral
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 10:59

Hmm, hard to decipher just exactly what is going on.....

My guess is Russia, pardon, the USSR blackmailed Poland into giving him his IPs in exchange for not attacking.  My case is similar, but not through blackmail.  I simply handed one to help Turkey.  Now Italy is knocking.



-------------


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 11:05
Then your guess is wrong.Blackmailing is not part of SOVIET diplomacy.

-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 11:23
I really like this variant, the dynamics of the map and the IP's make it very interesting.

-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 12:21
Well, Poland had no IP's in USSR diplomatic relations but he did have some in his own. And why should I care if Sweden is USSR? If Sweden has Finland and Norway, then I might become suspicious but not before as there is a sea between the two nations.

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 12:21
Originally posted by rider

Anyways, wasn't Morocco French too?


Well, the map is not very accurat historically. Turkey wasn't any great power, nor was Poland either. Tunis and Syria were French and Egypt was "de facto" a British protectorate, as was Palestine-Transjordan. I just tried to make it seem closer to real by coloring Algeria, Lybia and Cyprus.

Morocco though wasn't wholly French. Spain had a protectorate over some areas too.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 31-Dec-2005 at 12:22
Originally posted by TheDiplomat

It is not Russia...It is The USSR



Of course, sorry.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 01-Jan-2006 at 03:34

Originally posted by Maju

Turkey wasn't any great power, nor was Poland either.

I and hugoestr thank you greatly!!!



-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 01-Jan-2006 at 11:38
Originally posted by rider

Originally posted by Maju

Turkey wasn't any great power, nor was Poland either.

I and hugoestr thank you greatly!!!



I was talking about historicity, nothing else. I'm a fanatic of historical accuracy in games and particularly in Diplomacy variants. Would I re-create this scenario, I would make significative changes:
  • UK, France and Germany would have 4 SCs. French would be Algeria and British would be Egypt.
  • Poland, Turkey, Spain and Iran would be played powers with 2 SCs each. Special victory conditions would allow them to get victory in alliance with a major or something of the like.
  • Most neutrals would be armed minors, including Austria, Hungary, Netherlands, Belgium, Bulgaria, Portugal and Iraq.
  • The map would be a little more accurate geographically.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 02-Jan-2006 at 12:29

Yes, Livonia is total nonsense. There were different countries then: EStonia and Latvia and many other idiotic things that I hate.

 

Lets make that the deadline is on Wednesday? This week? If it isn't already, you haven't posted it in this topic.



-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 02-Jan-2006 at 16:54
Yes the deadline is Wesdnesday 4th at 22:00 GMT. Sorry for not posting that here but I did post that to you all via email. Please consider always email notifications as the oficial ones and this just as a billboard.

-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 03-Jan-2006 at 01:59
Well, I do it mostly, but I am not used to search e-mails. I do save all the ones I need in hundreds of different folders but only after the turn... and even when I did so with one file the other was forgotten and now is amongst 300 e-mails...

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 03-Jan-2006 at 03:08
On request I'm posting the full list of provinces with their abbreviations:



Adr - Adriatic Sea
Aeg - Aegean Sea
Alb - Albania,        &nbs p;         
Alg - Algeria
Ank - Ankara
Apu - Apulia
Arm - Armenia
Ath - Athens
Aus - Austria
Bar - Barents Sea
Bel - Belgium
Beo - Beograd
Ber - Berlin
Bla - Black Sea
Bre - Brest
Buc - Bucharest
Bul - Bulgaria
Bur - Burgundy
Bye - Byelorussia
Cat - Catalonia
Cly - Clyde
Con - Constantinople
Cro - Croatia
Dan - Danzig
Den - Denmark
EBS - East Baltic Sea
EMS - Eastern Mediterranean Sea
EPr - Eastern Prussia
Edi - Edinburgh
Egy - Egypt
Eng - English Channel
Fin - Finland
Gal - Galicia
Gas - Gascony
GOB - Gulf of Bothnia
GOL - Gulf of Lyon
Ham - Hamburg
Hel - Heligoland Bight
Hol - Holland
Hun - Hungary
Ion - Ionian Sea
Ire - Ireland
Iri - Irish Sea
Kie - Kiev
Kur - Kurdistan
Kra - Krakow
Lap - Lappland
Lat - Latvia/Estonia
Len - Leningrad
Lib - Libya
Lit - Lithuania
Liv - Liverpool
Lon - London
Mad - Madrid
Mar - Marseilles
MAO - Mid Atlantic Ocean
Mol - Moldavia
Mor - Morocco
Mos - Moscow
Mun - Munich
Nap - Naples
Nav - Navarre
NAO - North Atlantic Ocean
Nth - North Sea
Nwg - Norwegian Sea
Osl - Oslo
Pal - Palestine
Par - Paris
Pic - Picardy
Pie - Piedmont
Por - Portugal
Pra - Prague
Pri - Pripet
Pru - Prussia
Rhi - Rhineland
Rom - Rome
Sev - Sevastopol
Sil - Silesia
Ska - Skagerrak
Slo - Slovakia
Smy - Smyrna
SOG - Straits of Gibraltar
Swe - Sweden
Swi - Switzerland
Syr - Syria
The - Thessaly
Tra - Transylvania
Tri - Trieste
Tun - Tunis
Tus - Tuscany
Tys - Tyrrhenian Sea
Wal - Wales
War - Warsaw
WBS - West Baltic Sea
WMS - Western Mediterranean Sea
Wie - Wielpolska
Yor - Yorkshire



-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 04-Jan-2006 at 20:13
Adjudication Spring 1929:


The New York Times


Little European nations in Danger.

 German Anschluss in Austria, French take control of Switzerland, Turks invade Bulgaria, Poles occupy Vlinus.

Czechoslovakia has launched a preventive attack against Germany, occupying Silesia.
Rumania annexes Bessarabia with Politburo's  permission.
Naval clashes in the Black Sea and the English Channel.



Other Press:

An anonymous leaflet said:
France didn't help Russia get Sweden.


Deadline for Fall 1929: Monday 9 at 23:59 GMT.



Adjudication Spring 1929:

Poland:
F Danzig - East Baltic Sea
A Krakow - Slovakia
A Warsaw - Lithuania

Britain:
F Edinburgh - North Sea
A Liverpool - Yorkshire
F London - English Channel (*Bounce*)

France:
F Brest - English Channel (*Bounce*)
A Marseilles - Switzerland
A Paris - Burgundy

Germany:
A Berlin - Hamburg
F Hamburg - Heligoland Bight
A Munich - Austria

Italy:
F Naples - Tyrrhenian Sea
A Rome - Trieste
A Trieste - Piedmont

USSR:
A Kiev Hold
F Leningrad(sc) - Gulf of Bothnia
A Moscow - Leningrad
F Sevastopol - Black Sea (*Bounce*)

Turkey:
F Ankara - Black Sea (*Bounce*)
A Constantinople - Bulgaria
A Smyrna - Kurdistan

Czechoslovakia:
A Prague - Silesia

Egypt:
F Egypt - Eastern Mediterranean Sea

Greece:
A Athens Hold

Rumania:
A Bucharest - Moldavia

Spain:
F Madrid - Catalonia

Sweden:
F Sweden - Skagerrak

Yugoslavia:
A Beograd Supports A Constantinople - Bulgaria

Operational map (Spring 1929):


New map (Fall 1929):



-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 05-Jan-2006 at 01:37
Please, everyone look at the Baltic Sea on this map: doesn't it look like a crocodile? It sure looks to me that way...

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 05-Jan-2006 at 01:57
Originally posted by rider

Please, everyone look at the Baltic Sea on this map: doesn't it look like a crocodile? It sure looks to me that way...


Stop smoking that stuff...


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 06-Jan-2006 at 01:42

Well, doesn't it. Kattegat and SKagerrak are it's tail, Bothnia is his upper jaw, Gulf of Finland is the lower jaw and central Baltic is his body. And he is about to eat Finland.



-------------


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 06-Jan-2006 at 01:52

Oops, I gotta announce that I will be abroad next week due to religious feast holiday here in Turkey and I won't have internet access next week.

So, I will send orders for this turn, but for the next turn, after the retreat season, if you can stretch the deadline a little bit,I would be most happy

I will go on this Sunday and return the next Saturday...



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 06-Jan-2006 at 02:21

I agree with Kaipkulu.

Next week is religious holiday and a break for final exams and we may be off the game.

I would like to ask for an extension lasting at least 1 week after this turn.



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 06-Jan-2006 at 03:37
If you want an extension, please send an email with the request and details. It will be granted but let's do things right, ok?

-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 06-Jan-2006 at 11:20
Calm down.

-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 06-Jan-2006 at 18:17
I'm calmed: I just want the request to be made oficially.

-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2006 at 11:00
And I officially made it so that ''everyone'' could udnerstand the situation.

-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2006 at 11:02

And how can that be? I believe that every single person who knows English even a little, can understand:

Next week is religious holiday and a break for final exams and we may be off the game.

 

___

You think otherwise?



-------------


Posted By: Thegeneral
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2006 at 12:13
Originally posted by Maju



Other Press:

An anonymous leaflet said:
France didn't help Russia get Sweden.



Oddly enough, I did not wright this.  Are we still sending in secret anonymous news letters who is this just a GM note?



-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2006 at 23:04
I remind that my House Rules allow for white (signed) and gray (anonymous) press. They don't allow for black (under a false identity) press. Aditionally I also write my own press that is (in this game) "The New York Times", commenting rather neutrally on the last turn's moves in a way that "colors" the game but does not favor any side nor disclose any secret clue I may have.

Only what is under the NYT's header is GM press, the rest, as this "leaflet", is players' or observers' press (though observers can only write white press). The mentioned case is a clear case of grey anonymous press by a player on whose identity I just can't comment.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 07-Jan-2006 at 23:13
Originally posted by TheDiplomat

And I officially made it so that ''everyone'' could udnerstand the situation.


I haven't recieved yet any oficial request via email or anything.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 03:46

There is no need for e-mail...it does not make a difference.

because not only GM should be informed about the extension,but all players ..so the best way to make a request is to put it on the thread.

I dont like bureacracy on internet forums as well



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 04:30
Well, I believe Maju was thinking of the mailing of all players on the list that he usually mails us.

-------------


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 04:34
doesnt everybody in this game follow this thread?

-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 05:28
Originally posted by TheDiplomat

doesnt everybody in this game follow this thread?


Not necessarily. It's a billboard: just that. All oficial stuff goes via email. Also you haven't made any sort of clear and detailed request. Something like:

Dear GM:

Could we postpone the deadline for (season) until (day)? The reason is that this and that...

I just know that it seems that Turkey has a national holiday some day next week but I have no idea on how this may affect the developement of the game and I'm thinking that we may well be in the middle of that holiday and still not knowing when exactly happens what.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 07:39

It is no doubt that evryone saw the request of both Kapikulu and me.

On Tuesday a ''religious ''holiday is starting which will last till the beginning of the following week...

so I repeat the request of extention for 1 week here...I will not make a so-called ''official'' request again.It is up to you..You may even ignore.But what can I do ?



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 12:35
Is the Turksih proudness so unbindable? Can they not bow to the higher lords?

-------------


Posted By: Thegeneral
Date Posted: 08-Jan-2006 at 13:44
Originally posted by TheDiplomat

It is no doubt that evryone saw the request of both Kapikulu and me.

On Tuesday a ''religious ''holiday is starting which will last till the beginning of the following week...

so I repeat the request of extention for 1 week here...I will not make a so-called ''official'' request again.It is up to you..You may even ignore.But what can I do ?

Oh come now, is it so hard to PM the GM?  Yes, it was posted, and what happens when that page is covered by three other pages of talks about the game.  PM the GM, it won't take more than 30 seconds to say please extend the game because there is a holiday!



-------------


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 05:05
Originally posted by Thegeneral

Originally posted by TheDiplomat

It is no doubt that evryone saw the request of both Kapikulu and me.

On Tuesday a ''religious ''holiday is starting which will last till the beginning of the following week...

so I repeat the request of extention for 1 week here...I will not make a so-called ''official'' request again.It is up to you..You may even ignore.But what can I do ?

Oh come now, is it so hard to PM the GM?  Yes, it was posted, and what happens when that page is covered by three other pages of talks about the game.  PM the GM, it won't take more than 30 seconds to say please extend the game because there is a holiday!

He has already seen the request...so why the hell this IDEEFIXE for?(a question to u theGeneral)



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 06:21
Because I have no idea when do you expect me to set the new deadline to. Because I am still waiting to ajudicate this turn first (for which I'm still missing some orders, including yours). And because you insist in being so annoying that I'm seriously tempted of not making any extension and NMRing you and finding a replacement.

In fact 'm so annoyed at this attitude of you that I'm tempted of quting GMing Diplomacy games in AE since now.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 06:46

I had already said the beginning of the the following week which means 16th January Monday...

well,if u get so annoyed about everything,(I did not show any personal disrespect,no insult)then I doubt your maturity.



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 07:01

Guys,this is just an internet forum...Relax..

we don't have to be too ''official'' as in the real life...

I hang out forums to relax,to have fun...thats why I play these games as well...But If I am also supposed to be bureauratic,where is the point of having fun for all of us.



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: Thegeneral
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 07:03
Originally posted by TheDiplomat

I had already said the beginning of the the following week which means 16th January Monday...

well,if u get so annoyed about everything,(I did not show any personal disrespect,no insult)then I doubt your maturity.

For Christ sakes send a stinkin PM!  Is your pride so big?!



-------------


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 07:04
Originally posted by Thegeneral

Originally posted by TheDiplomat

I had already said the beginning of the the following week which means 16th January Monday...

well,if u get so annoyed about everything,(I did not show any personal disrespect,no insult)then I doubt your maturity.

For Christ sakes send a stinkin PM!  Is your pride so big?!

for Moses' sake what pride are u talking about ?what has pride to do with this.this is biassnes.I already made the request to be seen by everyone...



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 07:18

Originally posted by Maju

And because you insist in being so annoying that I'm seriously tempted of not making any extension and NMRing you and finding a replacement. 


May I remind you the fact that the request made by KAPIKULU first,and secondly by me.

Same request was also made for the 1600 game,but we didn't see such tension there..plus I am not annoyed..if u read my messages,u will understand...But you always take it personal..as if I have matter with you.as if I wrote in anger. 



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: hugoestr
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 10:07
Okay, I made the request for the extension. It took me all of 20 seconds.


-------------


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 12:02

Thanks Hugo. Terrible conversation.

I would still recommend to do like it is officially done as it is BETTER that way. If you can't send your orders on deadline AND if you then go against the GM then you just have a problem. I think that this has been a public aggression.



-------------


Posted By: Thegeneral
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 16:15

Originally posted by hugoestr

Okay, I made the request for the extension. It took me all of 20 seconds.

Thank you, I was about to do it myself.  (but I'd prefere just to poke and Russia )



-------------


Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 18:26

London Times



The Soviet lead Swedish fleet just off the south coast of Norway has made threats of an impending invasion of the mainland. Oslo sends an appeal to the English government for protection. Sweden has no claims on Norwegian soil, Norway's sovereignty will be protected. England promisses full support in the defense of Norway. England will obtain allies in the effort to remove the Soviet hegmony over Scandinavia.







-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 10-Jan-2006 at 01:42
Adjudication Fall 1929:

The New York Times

Great powers of Europe struggle to consolidate their positions while points of tension seem to change

Britain, Germany and Russia secure positions in Northern Europe.
Italy invades Austria, neutralizing the German Anschluss. It also incorporates Tunis to its colonial empire.
Poland invades Hungary with Yugoslavian support while the Red Army occupies Galitzia.
Clashes between Turkey and the Moscow-Bucarest alliance along the Black Sea coasts.



Other press
:

An anoymous leaflet said:                                            
Italy and Germany are not allies.


Retreat: Germany must retreat  A Austria to Munich, Croatia or OTB. Yet it seems that Kapikulu is not around and an extension till the 16th has been requested.

If there was only one choice, I would use of GM's discrection and auto-retreat it but there are several options. Therefore, I will set a deadline for Winter (adjustments and IPs) as soon as Kapikulu broadcasts his retreat, which must be before 23:59 GMT of Monday 16th in any case. Probably the Winter deadline will be placed on Wednesday 28th, so let's start thinking on how do you want to order for that season.

The Adjudication for Fall 1929 is as follows:

Poland:
F East Baltic Sea Hold
A Lithuania Hold
A Slovakia - Hungary

Britain:
F London - English Channel
F North Sea - Oslo
A Yorkshire Hold

France:
F Brest - Picardy
A Burgundy - Marseilles
A Switzerland Supports A Burgundy - Marseilles

Germany:
A Austria Supports A Trieste - Switzerland (*Dislodged*)
A Hamburg - Holland
F Heligoland Bight - Denmark

Italy:
A Piedmont Supports A Trieste - Austria
A Trieste - Austria
F Tyrrhenian Sea - Tunis

USSR:
F Gulf of Bothnia Hold
A Kiev - Galicia
A Leningrad - Finland
F Sevastopol - Black Sea (*Bounce*)

Turkey:
F Ankara - Black Sea (*Bounce*)
A Bulgaria - Bucharest (*Bounce*)
A Kurdistan - Syria

Czechoslovakia:
A Silesia - Prague

Egypt:
F Eastern Mediterranean Sea - Ionian Sea

Greece:
A Athens Holds

Rumania:
A Moldavia - Bucharest (*Bounce*)

Spain:
F Catalonia - Madrid

Sweden:
F Skagerrak - Sweden

Yugoslavia:
A Beograd Supports A Slovakia - Hungary

(As always, please check for any possible errors)


The new center count (affecting builds and IPs and indiferent to the German retreat) is:

Ownership:

Poland:    Danzig, Hungary, Krakow, Lithuania, Warsaw.
Britain:   Edinburgh, Liverpool, London, Oslo.
France:    Brest, Marseilles, Paris, Switzerland.
Germany:   Berlin, Denmark, Hamburg, Holland, Munich.
Italy:     Austria, Naples, Rome, Trieste, Tunis.
USSR:      Finland, Kiev, Leningrad, Moscow, Sevastopol.
Turkey:    Ankara, Bulgaria, Constantinople, Smyrna, Syria.
Czechoslovakia: Prague.
Egypt:     Egypt.
Greece:    Athens.
Rumania:   Bucharest.
Spain:     Madrid.
Sweden:    Sweden.
Yugoslavia: Beograd.
Unowned:   Belgium, Ireland, Portugal.

Adjustments:

Poland:    Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
Britain:   Supp  4 Unit  3 Build  1
France:    Supp  4 Unit  3 Build  1
Germany:   Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
Italy:     Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
USSR:      Supp  5 Unit  4 Build  1
Turkey:    Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
Czechoslovakia: Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Egypt:     Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Greece:    Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Rumania:   Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Spain:     Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Sweden:    Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Yugoslavia: Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0

Remember that the number of your IPs is equal to that of Supply center owned.

Operational map:



Current map (retreat pending but centers already adjusted):





-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 10-Jan-2006 at 12:04

I as Józef Piłsudski, marszałek Polski, Naczelnik Państwa, minister obrony, Generalny Inspektor Sił Zbrojnych rename the city of Danzig as Gdanks and ask all others to forwardly call the province Vilnius instead of Lithuania. I thank every single person.

Now, where shall I built stuff? Dmaned, you can't build air divisions? I was hoping already. And I can't found new cities?



-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 12-Jan-2006 at 02:47
GM Directive:

With the additional rules (IPs) of this variant and with people sending orders before the previous deadline has been exausted I am having problems to keep track adequately and I fear I will commit an unwilling error unless I count with your cooperation: I need the players to be more formal when sending orders. Particularly I need you to do the following:

  1. Do not send orders before the proper season has started, that is before the previous adjudication has been done. So don't send winter orders before the Fall retreats are in, unless there's a special reason for that (in which case you should explain).
  2. Send ALWAYS full sets of orders. Please, do not send one set and then small modifications to this or that movement unless you want me to end wearing a straight jacket or to adjudicate only on your last partial set whichever. As I don't want to end in a mental hospital, from now on I will require all sets to be complete: each new set totally overrides the previous ones. If there are orders lacking, sorry: your fault (I will still try to tell you that you have comitted an error but it's your responsability anyhow).
  3. Try not to send orders as reply mails but as brand new mails with a header like the following: "AEDip04: <country> orders <season - year>". I will accept other sets but I must ask you to do this way for the sake of my mental health and adjudication accuracy. If you send several sets in a short time, specify which order they have, so I don't have to check the time they have been sent in the mail properties.
  4. All orders should be sent by email. I can't grant that I will check the forum before I adjudicate and PMed orders are plainly impossible to organize.
  5. Extensions will be granted on request (unless someone is abusing of that, what I dont think will be the case) but the request should be made like any other oficial game correspondence: by email. It should also specify which date would be good to place the new deadline at, though GM discrection always has the last word.
  6. To prevent avoidable distractions like this one, with an extension in a retreat subturn, I would ask you to send conditional retreats when you think that you may not be around near the adjudication date. Conditional retreats can be sent with the regular orders or (better) in a separate mail with the appropiate header.
I'm sure that all you will try to comply and make the GMing activity more easy to carry. Thanks,

GM.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 12-Jan-2006 at 05:21
I will do as has been said!

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 14-Jan-2006 at 10:06
The so much expected German retreat is already here:

The New York Times

German forces retreat via Graz into Slovenia, Croatia and Bosnia, where it places puppet governments.
Yugoslavia vows to regain those lands and fortifies its positions un Slavonia, Sandjak and Montenegro.




Deadline for Winter 1929 (adjustments + IP allocation) is:
Wednesday January 18th

Adjudication
:

Germany A Austria retreats to Croatia


Status
:


Ownership:

Poland:    Danzig, Hungary, Krakow, Lithuania, Warsaw.
Britain:   Edinburgh, Liverpool, London, Oslo.
France:    Brest, Marseilles, Paris, Switzerland.
Germany:   Berlin, Denmark, Hamburg, Holland, Munich.
Italy:     Austria, Naples, Rome, Trieste, Tunis.
USSR:      Finland, Kiev, Leningrad, Moscow, Sevastopol.
Turkey:    Ankara, Bulgaria, Constantinople, Smyrna, Syria.

Czechoslovakia: Prague.
Egypt:     Egypt.
Greece:    Athens.
Rumania:   Bucharest.
Spain:     Madrid.
Sweden:    Sweden.
Yugoslavia: Beograd.
Unowned:   Belgium, Ireland, Portugal.

Adjustments:

Poland:    Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
Britain:   Supp  4 Unit  3 Build  1
France:    Supp  4 Unit  3 Build  1
Germany:   Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
Italy:     Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2
USSR:      Supp  5 Unit  4 Build  1
Turkey:    Supp  5 Unit  3 Build  2

Remember that you now have as many IPs as Supply Centers: Poland, Germany, Italy, the USSR and Turkey have 5 IPs each, Britain and France have 4 IPs each. You should now allocate these IPs along with the adjustment orders this Winter.

Czechoslovakia: Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Egypt:     Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Greece:    Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Rumania:   Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Spain:     Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Sweden:    Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0
Yugoslavia: Supp  1 Unit  1 Build  0

New Map (Winter 1929):



Don't forget to send your prelims as soon as possible.

Remember that you can change your orders as much as necessary, only that you are required to send a full new set each time, with both adjudications and IP allocation (in this Winter turn) together. Thanks.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 14-Jan-2006 at 21:23
I thought we took the week off?




-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 15-Jan-2006 at 04:31
Well, Germany was here and then the retreat could be done and as much as they talked they were still online the whole time I was here (every day soem two hours)

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 15-Jan-2006 at 07:57
Originally posted by Bishop

I thought we took the week off?


We were waiting only for Kapikulu's retreat. I had an unspecific request for a delay till the 16th but it wasn't clear if that refered to the retreat or to the Winter season. If someone still have problems with the new deadline, please tell me.


-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 15-Jan-2006 at 13:18

Originally posted by rider

Well, Germany was here and then the retreat could be done and as much as they talked they were still online the whole time I was here (every day soem two hours)

Who was here??? I was in Paris for a whole week till Friday night and never had internet access there if that was for me...



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 15-Jan-2006 at 19:13
I mean you are now here and you were when I adjudicated and set the new deadline. I guess I'm right in this, am I not? 

-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 16-Jan-2006 at 08:20
NO, he was talking to me. I wonder who I sent those fiftreen PM's to... and all got a reply....

-------------


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 16-Jan-2006 at 08:28

Originally posted by rider

NO, he was talking to me. I wonder who I sent those fiftreen PM's to... and all got a reply....

Yes I was talking to you, if you look at the dates of the PMs, you will be able to see when they are sent or replied. Yes, I replied or sent THOSE FÝFTEEN PMs,but did all that after Friday evening(for Turkey), the time I returned and issued the retreat on Saturday, so I don't understand your point you are blaming me. I had never replied or sent any mails between the last Saturday evening and this Friday evening.



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 16-Jan-2006 at 12:24

Hmm. it seems suspicious but I might have sent everyone else fifteen PM's... anyone had some???

 

Okay, are we continueing... and when is the date?



-------------


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 16-Jan-2006 at 13:56
Originally posted by rider

Hmm. it seems suspicious but I might have sent everyone else fifteen PM's... anyone had some???

 

Okay, are we continueing... and when is the date?

Just look at the dates instead of crossing out...All is after January 13.

Isn't the date Jan 18?



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: Kapikulu
Date Posted: 16-Jan-2006 at 19:34

 

BERLINER POST:

Hindenburg's addressing to the folk:

German president Hindenburg adressed to his people in the central square of Berlin. Masses are now wowing for the Anschluss to be restored.

Italian atrocities in Salzburg and Graz:

The fascist administration of Italy is told to be taking action against our citizens in cities in Salzburg and Graz. 50.000 Germans in Austria,including the women and children, had been harshly murdered by Italian oppressors. Germany has taken action in the League of Nations and called the nations to intervene on Italy, who is disrupting the peace and harmony in Europe

International Jackalism:

Rumors had been going around the corridors of foreign ministry that allied nations of Germany has been filled by some aggressor countries to take action of Germany. German minister of foreign affairs had today declared that all his neighboring countries,France,Poland,England and including Czechoslovakia, whom Germany had several conflictive issues of soil,will not be touched as long as they stand honorable and trustworthy towards Germany.And he added: " The young German Republic will always be granting peace in Europe".

 

 



-------------
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 18-Jan-2006 at 09:18
Except when he is to defend his honour and rights. But if Europe's balance will be disturbed, it will be such that it will be equally, so equality would be restored.

-------------


Posted By: Maju
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2006 at 04:49
Adjudication Winter 1929 (Corrected!):


The New York Times


Ataturk voted the most popular ruler of Europe

Ankara manages to remain allied to Yugoslavia and Egypt, attracting also Sweden to their cause
Greece breaks isolation by signing an alliance with Poland. Germany improves relations with Czechoslovachia
Republic proclaimed in Spain: the provisional government finds a friend in Paris




Deadline for Spring 1930: Monday 23rd at 22:00 GMT




Adjudication
:

Adjustments:

Poland:
Build A Danzig
Build A Krakow

Britain:
Build F Edinburgh
France:
Build A Paris

Germany:
Build F Berlin
Build A Munich

Italy:
Build A Trieste
Build F Naples

USSR:
Build A Leningrad

Turkey:
Build F Smyrna
Build A Constantinople

Please check for any possible errors.


Minor Powers' Alliances
:

Sweden allies to Turkey
Spain allies to France
Czechoslovachia allies to Germany
Yugoslavia remains allied to Turkey
Rumania remains allied to USSR
Greece allies to Poland
Egypt remains allied to Turkey


New Map (Spring 1930):


Map of alliances 1930:



-------------

NO GOD, NO MASTER!


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2006 at 05:13
It seems that unexpected things have happened. I feel that new unexpected things will happen.

-------------


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2006 at 07:35
Lol...what a diplomatic comment!

-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!



Posted By: hugoestr
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2006 at 12:44
I see that there is a conflict developing between Germany and Italy. This saddens me deeply since I consider both countries our friends and allies.

I declare neutrality in this conflict, and will do my best to work on creating greater peace in the area.



-------------


Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2006 at 13:20

Originally posted by TheDiplomat

Lol...what a diplomatic comment!

 

Wow. I think the same...



-------------


Posted By: Bishop
Date Posted: 19-Jan-2006 at 23:15
I would of thought it was imposible for someone with only 5 IP votes to gain 3 minor powers!

Truely amazing diplomatic skills on you're part Hugo. I must be the first to congradulate you. And on top of that you never once asked me for anything. I'd be a little less impressed if I helped you at all, when in fact I voted for my own minor against you and you still got it!

You have a gift, I hope you use it for good and not evil like your father before you. ( Cheap Starwars reference)


-------------
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.


Posted By: TheDiplomat
Date Posted: 20-Jan-2006 at 05:35

WORKERS OF EUROPE UNITE!

The Soviet call to the workers of Europe:''...Unite!Time to take action against Turkey,who has surrounded the common good of the workers!''



-------------
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!




Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com