Print Page | Close Window

Onggirat(Hongirat) Clan

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Regional History or Period History
Forum Name: Ethnic History of Central Asia
Forum Discription: Discussions about the ethnic origins of Central Asian peoples. All topics related to ethnicity should go here.
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6242
Printed Date: 20-Apr-2024 at 01:55
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Onggirat(Hongirat) Clan
Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Subject: Onggirat(Hongirat) Clan
Date Posted: 15-Oct-2005 at 11:20

Onggirats was one of the oldest Mongol clans, Chinggis Khaan's mother and his wife Borte just came from this clan. After Chinggis Khaan established his empire, Onggirats immigrated to different area following their leaders.

The largest part of the Onggirat clan immigrated to the south where was populated by the Khitans at that time.  They assimilated the Khitans into their group and became the most powerful tribe in South-eastern Mongolia. but, they were eventually absorbed by their northern neighbor tribes such as the Urianghai during the time of northern Yuan dynasty. Those Onggirats who stayed in their original homeland, the lower Halha river valley and Hulunbuir steppe, became one of 5 south Halha clans, who also immigrated to the south later. Tumed Mongols ever comprised a Onggirat clan too, but we have no a single Onggirat clan among the present-day Mongols today.

I heard that Kazakhs and other central asia Turkic nations have Onggirat(Hongirat) tribes, anyone could provide us some details about them here?

 

 




Replies:
Posted By: Feramez
Date Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 01:00
Good post, I never heard of this tribe.  It would be very nice if this tribe still does exist, it must be very great and proud to be from the same tribe Cengiz Hans mother and wife were from.


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 03:37

Onggirats were famous for their beautiful women among the Mongols, not only Chinggis Khaan's mother and his first queen are Onggirats,  there were also many Onggirat women as Yuan emperor's queen.

I didn't know if there were Onggirats among Azer tribes, but the Onggirats should have immigrated to central asia and other area following Chagatai Khaan, Batu Khaan and others, so, I'm waiting for Kazakh or Uzbek friends who could enlighten us here.

 



Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 04:59

I read those about Lithuania Tatars in another thread just now, I'm quite surpised to see so many familiar tribenames among Tatar people. My family was originated from Uushun clan, by the way.

I quote the post here:

Apart from such allied Tatars, many Tatars also served in the Polish army. this was especially so in Lithuania, where Grand Duke Witold had settled large numbers of Tatars at the end of the 14th century - principally around Wilno - and allowed them to intermarry with the local population. In the 16th century there were about 200,000 Tatars in Lithuania, and although they still worshipped Allah they now spoke only Byelorussian or Polish. The main Lithuanian Tatar tribes were the Uyshun, Naiman, Jalair, Kongret and Bahrin, as well as the tribal aristocracy - the Uhlans.

 

 



Posted By: cliveersknell
Date Posted: 18-Oct-2005 at 00:11
My wife, who is a Kharachin , told me that the big
portion of the Onggirats were absorbed into the Horqin
tribe whose banner is in the Tongliao region of Inner Mongolia. Empress Xiaoguang, grandmother of Kangxi
was Horqin. The Horqin are direct descendants of Qinggis
brother Khasar.

r's
Clive


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 18-Oct-2005 at 09:02

South-eastern Mongolia was populated by the Khitans and a small part of Jurchens before Mongolia conquered Altan Khanate(Jurchen empire), then Onggirats and other 4 Mongol tribes(Jalair, Uulu, Mongru and Ilykz)migrated there and absorbed those former inhabitants of Khitans and others during the time of the great Yuan Khanate. Onggirats' northern neighbours, who were Urianghai tribe and other 2 tribes Ongnut and Uqiyet, rised to power gradually during northern Yuan dynasty, migrated into the land ruled by Onggirats and other 4 tribes and, eventually absorded all of 5 Onggirat tribes. However, the 3 Urianghai tribes also couldn't maintain their power in South-eastern Mongolia. Most of Ongnuts and Uqiyets were absorbed by Chahars(the tribe directly ruled by the great Khan), 5 South Halha and Horchin, while most of Urianghai were absorbed by Yungsiyebu-Kharchin and Tumed-Mongulchin tribes in the end. So, you can say 3 Urianghai tribes absorbed 5 Onggirat tribes, then Horchins and others absorbed 3 Urianghai tribes.

I hope it's not too complex to understand. A list of the tribes in south-eastern Mongolia during the different times.

1) Eastern Huns, the eastern neighbors of Xiong-nu(Western Huns)

2) Xianbei tribes, such as Yuwen and Murong. (Note: Yunwen was a mixed tribes of Xiongnu and Xianbei)

3) Khitans and Kumusin(the descendants of Yunwen Xianbei according the opinions of many scholars) and a small part of the Jurchens.

4) Mongol tribes:

    5 Onggirat(Ongirat, Jalair, Uulu, Mongru and Ilykz)

    3 Urianghai(Urianghai, Ongnut and Uqiyet)

    the tribes from Mongols' left(east) wing: Chahar, Horchin, 5 South Halha; and the tribes from Mongols' right(west) wing: Kharchin, Tumed, Mongulchin.

Today, Horchins and Kharchins are the largest Mongolian population in the south-eastern Mongolia (or the eastern part of Inner Mongolia), btw.

 



Posted By: Seko
Date Posted: 18-Oct-2005 at 09:11
Nice info.

-------------


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 18-Oct-2005 at 09:29
A Kazakh friend from Xinjiang or E.Turkistan, told me that Qongirat(Onggirat) is a tribe of Kazakh's middle horde, there're less the Qongirats in E.Turkistan except a country named Chabuchar. and it seems that Qongirat Kazakhs get a more apparent European feature then other Kazakh people, anyone could provide us some pictures from this tribe? I know most Kazakhs of E.Turkish are the descendants of Naimans and Keriets, who have no any difference compared to the Mongols by their lookings.


Posted By: cliveersknell
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2005 at 01:07
Why are there more Mongols in Inner Mongolia than the
Republic of Mongolia?

r's
Clive


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2005 at 01:55
Originally posted by cliveersknell

Why are there more Mongols in Inner Mongolia than the
Republic of Mongolia?

r's
Clive


How is that relavant?


-------------


Posted By: Chingis
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2005 at 01:56
Maybe because chinese authorities sent many chinese to inner mongolia, and now there are many Chinezed inner mongolians who living there

-------------
The 800th Anniversary of the Great Mongolian State

Great Mongolian State (1206-2006 >>>>>


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2005 at 06:56

A full Tribe List Of Mongolia During Northern Yuan Dynasty:

 

1) Eastern Mongolians

West(right) wing: Yungsiyebu-Kharchin Tumen, Mongulchin-Tumed Tumen, Ordos Tumen.

East(left) wing: Chahar Tumen, Halha Tumen, Urianghai Tumen(a different branch of the Urianghai). Horchin Tumen.

3 Urianghai Tribes: Urianghai, Ongut, Uqiyet.

 

2) Western Mongolians, known as 4 Oirad:

Choros(Dzungar), Dorbod, Turgod, Khoshod. and Buryats in Siberia.

 

Tumen = 10,000 families.

Today's Northern Mongolians are the descendants of 7 northern clans of Halha Tumen, and also absorbed many people from Urianghai tumen and Oirad Mongols. While, today's Mongolians living in China, are the descendants of the rest: most of eastern Mongolians(including 5 southern Halha tribes), and most of 4 Oirad tribes and all of 3 Urianghai tribes.

 

The present population of Mongolians in China are only twice than Mongolia's population, so you can imagine what happened to them during Manchu conquest and China's rule. Halha Mongols hadn't been the largest Mongol tribe during northern Yuan dynasty, but they are today and they are the only Mongolians who got their own nation-state in this world.

 

 



Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2005 at 07:01

So, I have to say the Mongolians, as a whole, had a very sad history since Manchu conquest.  

 



Posted By: cliveersknell
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 00:19
Inner Mongolia has more than 5 million Mongols, the whole of
China including Inner mongolia has 7 to 8 million mongols
more than 2x the population of the Republic of Mongolia.
I personally think the Repu. of Mongolia will not last.
See for urself what China is doing there as we speak.

r's
Clive


Posted By: cliveersknell
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 00:23
A song that will drive All Mongols to tears, my wife
especially.
" My Father , the grassland, my Mother the River"

r's
Clive


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 00:47
Originally posted by cliveersknell

Inner Mongolia has more than 5 million Mongols, the whole of
China including Inner mongolia has 7 to 8 million mongols
more than 2x the population of the Republic of Mongolia.
I personally think the Repu. of Mongolia will not last.
See for urself what China is doing there as we speak.

r's
Clive


This is a thread about the Onggirat clan, not about whether the ROM will be taken over by the PRC as you seem to be suggesting.  This thread wasn't at all politically oriented until you started posting.  Please stay on topic.

On a more personal note:  I'm also a bit sick of you continually referring to your wife as if she gives you some sort of infalliable legitimacy that the rest of us arn't allowed to question.


-------------


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 09:07
Clive, there is only Inner Mongolia/Mongolian which probably will not last for 100 years or less, even as a self-ruled territory/nation within china. To see your own family, the elements from your Mongolian lady's side are disappearing so fast.  


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2005 at 09:13

Originally posted by cliveersknell

Inner Mongolia has more than 5 million Mongols, the whole of
China including Inner mongolia has 7 to 8 million mongols
more than 2x the population of the Republic of Mongolia.
I personally think the Repu. of Mongolia will not last.
See for urself what China is doing there as we speak.

r's
Clive

 

Did you read my post about Inner/Southern Mongolians? The population of Southern Mongolians should be far larger than Northern Mongolians, but they aren't today because of being ruled by Manchus, then by Chinese.  

If the descendants of 7 northern clans of Halha Tuman can reach to 2 million today, then the descendants of 5 sorthern clans of Halha tumen living in Inner Mongolia, should achieve it too, but how many are they today? Tumed tumen, Chahar tumen, Orods Tumen, Kharchin Tumen, Horchin Tumen, 4 Oirads, all of them should have a similar population compared to today's Halha(Mongolia's people), but how many are they today? Don't tell us Inner Mongolia has a larger Mongolian population than Mongolia. Mongolian's population in Inner Mongolia should reach to 20 million or more, but they are replaced by Chinese.

 



Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 20:26
The so-called Ongirrat, Ungirrat, Qongirrat etc.  are Kazakh Qongyrat - and they have no relation to the modern Khalkha-Mongols. They were Turkic speaking tribe in 12-13th centuries, and they are Turkic-speaking tribe within modern Kazakhs today as well. 
The same is valid for Kereits (or Kereis), Naimans, Jalairs, Onguts (now Uak), and of course, Kypchaks.
(Read Paul Ratchnevski "Genghis Khan - His Life and Legacy", for example, or Rene Grousset "Empire of the Steppes").
They are all main parts of the Kazakh Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). See www.elim.kz
  


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2005 at 23:21

Originally posted by Akskl

The so-called Ongirrat, Ungirrat, Qongirrat etc.  are Kazakh Qongyrat - and they have no relation to the modern Khalkha-Mongols. They were Turkic speaking tribe in 12-13th centuries, and they are Turkic-speaking tribe within modern Kazakhs today as well. 
The same is valid for Kereits (or Kereis), Naimans, Jalairs, Onguts (now Uak), and of course, Kypchaks.
(Read Paul Ratchnevski "Genghis Khan - His Life and Legacy", for example, or Rene Grousset "Empire of the Steppes").
They are all main parts of the Kazakh Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). See www.elim.kz
  

Akskl, I didn't say Halha Mongol's Onggirat tribe flee to Kazakhstan to be Kazakh's Qongirats. The Onggirats were a large group of the ancient Mongolica nomads before Mongol or Kazakh as a nation appeared in the history. Kazakh's Qongirat was a nice sample for those Turkified Mongol tribes among the Kazakhs, while Uzbek's Barlas, a tribe which Timurlenk was originated from, was another sample among the Uzbeks. On the other hand, those tribes you mentioned above, such as Keriet, Naiman, Ongud, Kipchak, are also the Mongolized Turkic groups among the modern Mongolians. Despite their Mongolica or Turkic origins, they were all very ancient tribes before Mongol nation, Kazakh nation, or other Turkic nations appeared in the history.

Thank for your link, btw.

http://www.elim.kz - www.elim.kz I try for several times, but I don't know why i can't enter this site yet, could anyone paste the content of this site here for me? thanks.

 



Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 07:32

Originally posted by Akskl

The so-called Ongirrat, Ungirrat, Qongirrat etc.  are Kazakh Qongyrat - and they have no relation to the modern Khalkha-Mongols. They were Turkic speaking tribe in 12-13th centuries, and they are Turkic-speaking tribe within modern Kazakhs today as well. 
The same is valid for Kereits (or Kereis), Naimans, Jalairs, Onguts (now Uak), and of course, Kypchaks.
(Read Paul Ratchnevski "Genghis Khan - His Life and Legacy", for example, or Rene Grousset "Empire of the Steppes").
They are all main parts of the Kazakh Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). See www.elim.kz 

 

And mongols of the 13th century were kazakhs.  And the kazakhs of today are mongols.  Mongols are not mongols and kazakhs are not kazakhs.    How do you like it?



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 12:56
The so called "Mongols" of Genghis Khan were all Turkic speaking tribes and direct ancestors of the modern Kazakhs of Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). Modern Khalkha-Mongols (as well as Kalmucks and Buryats) have almost nothing in common with the Genghis Khan and his "Mongols".
We know about the Turkic-speaking state of Mogulistan, and Turkic-speaking Empire of Great Moghuls.  The Orta Zhuz of modern Kazakhs is probably the remnants of the Mogulistan state. The Middle Zhuz consists of Uak (former Ongut), Kypchak, Kerei, Naiman, Arghyn,  and Qongyrat. Jalairs are part of the Kazakh Great Horde (Uly Zhuz).
Modern Kazakhs DO have ancestors. Kazakhs live on the same territory (of much smaller size though), they have the same language, traditional culture, cousine  (i.e. kumyss, which is always mentioned by the all 13th century's travellers), same DNA, they have thousands and thousands direct descendants of Genghis Khan and his royal sons, tumb of Zhoshy (or Juchi) stays intact on the Kazakhstan's territory and it has only Kazakh tribes tamgas imprints inside of it.  Why Genghis Khan's tumb is always closed "under conservation" by the Mongolian authorities?  What secrets they are trying to keep in?  The secret is that Genghis Khan was a Turkic speaking ruler. Otherwise how could he communicate with his suzereign Toghrul -  Khan  of Kereits, who were Turkic-speaking tribe?  Genghis Khan as a vassal have to speak only Turkic language when he was meeting with Toghrul Khan.
I have hundreds proofs of that Genghis Khan and his "Mongols" were Turkic speaking guys. If you can read Russian, please read these (or at least you can use English language links and references):

http://www.kub.kz/viewtopic2.php?topic=215&forum=10&am p;am p;start=720&status=&asc=
http://bb.ct.kz/index.php?showtopic=10532
http://www.kyrgyz.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=23&st=0



         


Posted By: HistoryGuy
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 13:27
Pretty nifty....

-------------
هیچ مردی تا به حال به شما درباره خدا گفته.


Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 23-Oct-2005 at 14:21
Please open on www.amazon.com the following book, click several times on it, and read pages 2 and 3

Genghis Khan: His Life and Legacy (Paperback)

by http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author-exact=Paul%20Ratchnevsky&rank=-relevance%2C%2Bavailability%2C-daterank/104-9880006-9379930 - Paul Ratchnevsky


and then please open

http://www.elim.kz/z_orta.php


Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 25-Oct-2005 at 10:27

Originally posted by Akskl

The so called "Mongols" of Genghis Khan were all Turkic speaking tribes and direct ancestors of the modern Kazakhs of Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). Modern Khalkha-Mongols (as well as Kalmucks and Buryats) have almost nothing in common with the Genghis Khan and his "Mongols".

I think, you are not satisfied with the history of Kazakhstan because kazakhs played no role in world history.  So you and your friend (Kazakhstan's president) are inventing an exciting history about your country?                     

I hope, you become one day the history-minister of Kazakhstan.

Originally posted by Akskl


We know about the Turkic-speaking state of Mogulistan, and Turkic-speaking Empire of Great Moghuls.  The Orta Zhuz of modern Kazakhs is probably the remnants of the Mogulistan state. The Middle Zhuz consists of Uak (former Ongut), Kypchak, Kerei, Naiman, Arghyn,  and Qongyrat. Jalairs are part of the Kazakh Great Horde (Uly Zhuz).

In Yuan the the most people of this dynasty spoke Chinese.  Were the mongols chinese?

I know someone who is of german origin and has a german family name but speaks only russian. There are many people like him in Russia. Were the germans russian?

In Mongolia there are a few turkic people of Khoton tribe and they speak only west mongolian dialect. Were they originally mongols? 

In Mongolia there are also people of Shira-Kirgiz tribe and they speak all mongolian.  Were the kyrgyz people originally mongols?  

In Mongolia there are also people of Asud clan.  They were part of Alans, who came in Mongolia during Mongke Khan's reign and later under Khublai Khan fought with mongols against chinese of Song dynasty. Were Alans mongolian just because Asud people in Mongolia speak only mongolian?      

Originally posted by Akskl

I have hundreds proofs of that Genghis Khan and his "Mongols" were Turkic speaking guys. 

Genghis became Japanese, Chinese and Russian(-> A.T Fomenko).  And now a kazakh guy?

(( ( ( (    ) ) ))))

 

PS: 

1) See Guyuk khan' seal(Genghis' grandson) on the letter sent to Pope of Rome. Now this letter is in Vatican. This was written clearly on mongolian language. Why should use the great turk guy Guyuk mongolian language instead of kazakh-turkic?  

2)  Why are there many primary sources from Yuan Dynasty written on mongolian language? 

3) Do you know so called Genghis' stone? The script was written on mongolian(short after the arrival of Genghis' army from Qwarezm).

4) Are you OK? Inferiority complex?  



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 18:39

Then open the Genghis Khan's tomb for archeologists!

Your Khalkha-Mongol propaganda (without Russian restrictions and censorship) brainwashed everybody.  And westerners do not care about the difference between Turkic nomad tribes and Khalkha Mongols - they used to call all of them as "Mongols". First they write about so-called "Turco-Mongols", who were all speaking Turkic language, and then, "for brevity", keep call them just "Mongols". The "Mongols" who were (and are) Turkic speakers!   
Khalkha-Mongols "historians" also try to  usurp heritage of all other ancient Turkic empires like Hunnu, Huns, Toba, Sha'tuo,  etc. 



Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 28-Oct-2005 at 18:51

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0631189491/ref=sib_dp_pt/002-0953619-1846451#reader-page - http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0631189491/ref=sib_dp_pt/002 -0953619-1846451#reader-page


Click on the book 7 times and read Chapter 1, please.

 

 



Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 00:19

It seems most of posts under the thread aren't on the topic. I just want to get some informations about the descendants of the Khongirats in the modern Turkic groups.

I agree with akskl with that Kazakhstan have been one of the more direct successors of Chagatai Khanate or Mongulstan in their history compared to modern Mongolia, as well as Golden Horde and other Mongol Khanate in ancient Turkistan. but as for Hsiung-nu, Sian-pei, Turuk and other ancient Khanates in Mongolia. I totally disagree with your statement. I have a statement about it in another post, I paste it here.

 

People couldn't view Hsiung-nu empire, Turuk Khanate, Uighur Khanate, Kirgiz Khanate as the foreign dynatsy of Mongolia, all of those Khanates had so many Mongolica tribes while some Turkic tribe probably got the ruling place at that time. On the other hand, Sian-pei Khanate, Ruran Khanate, Khitan empire, and Mongol empire, also had many Turkic tribes among them. It's just about that Mongolica or Turkic tribes had been the royal family in their Khanates, however, from Hsiung-nu, Sain-pei, Ruran, Turuk, Uighur, Kirgiz, Khitan, to Mongol, there're no too much difference among those Khanates at all.  so, you can view all of them as Mongolian(not Mongolica) empires/dynasty in the history of Mongolia.

 

 



Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 00:29

Back to my topic about the Khongirats. I'm glad that there're the Qongirats among the Kazakhs, Tatars, and other Turkic groups today, and it's why I hope to get some informations about them, but, on the other hand, the Khongirats didn't disappear in Mongolia but were absorbed by other Mongol tribes, as well as Nayman, Keriet, Ongut and other ancient tribes in the Mongolian steppes. I can't understant why you said that the modern Halha Mongols have nothing to do with the Khongirats while I have told you that the Kongirats were ever one of 5 Southern Halha clans. Did you read my post?

 



Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 01:56

Originally posted by cliveersknell

My wife, who is a Kharachin , told me that the big
portion of the Onggirats were absorbed into the Horqin tribe whose banner is in the Tongliao region of Inner Mongolia. Empress Xiaoguang, grandmother of Kangxi was Horqin. The Horqin are direct descendants of Qinggis brother Khasar.

r's
Clive

Manchu emperor Kangsi's Mongol grandmother was from the Gorlos clan of the Horchin Mongols. Gorlos was the name of a Khongirat chiefman, his people adopted his name as their tribename later, so the Gorlos should be a branch of the ancient Khongirat tribe, which became one of the Horchin tribes in the end. Horchin's royal family was Chinggis Khaan's younger brother Hasar and his descendants. Kangsi's grandmother, I think, should be Hasar's descendant.

Bumbutai, known as Queen Xiao_zhuang by Chinese, the queen of Hong Tayji, the first Qing emperor, and emperor Kangsi's grandmother.  

http://image2.sina.com.cn/dy/c/2004-11-12/1100225146_LnayzN.jpg -  

 



Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 06:55

Akskl,

your claim that mongols of the 13th century were turkic speaking people is very naiv and ridiculous.

Genghis' Stone is in Hermitage Museum of St.Petersburg. The script is on mongolian language.  Guyuk Khan's letter and the seal sent to Pope was on mongolian language( http://www.silk-road.com/artl/carrub.shtml - http://www.silk-road.com/artl/carrub.shtml ). Il Khan Argun's letter sent to Philip the Fair was on mongolian language. Emperors of Yuan Dynasty used officially mongolian and chinese script(there are too many documents). 

How can a normal man claim that mongols were turkic speaking?

   

 

 



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: kuralas
Date Posted: 29-Oct-2005 at 13:37

All niruns - kiyat (kiyat-kuralas), dulat (dughlat), suan, iysun (iysut), barlas, katagan, mangyt, mailto:barin@ets - barin&ets are turkic tribes.

Most  darlekins - kongirat, uryanhay, bayauyt, argyns (union darlekin tribes from argunokon) also from turkic tribes.

 

 

 



Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 30-Oct-2005 at 03:57
Originally posted by kuralas

All niruns - kiyat (kiyat-kuralas), dulat (dughlat), suan, iysun (iysut), barlas, katagan, mangyt, mailto:barin@ets - barin&ets are turkic tribes.

Most  darlekins - kongirat, uryanhay, bayauyt, argyns (union darlekin tribes from argunokon) also from turkic tribes.

Lol, then who were the Mongols? Chinggis Khaan only?

 



Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 30-Oct-2005 at 06:29
Originally posted by kuralas

All niruns - kiyat (kiyat-kuralas), dulat (dughlat), suan, iysun (iysut), barlas, katagan, mangyt, mailto:barin@ets - barin&ets are turkic tribes.

Most  darlekins - kongirat, uryanhay, bayauyt, argyns (union darlekin tribes from argunokon) also from turkic tribes.

The names of these clans are mongolian. Read secret History of Mongols, the oldest primary source about Genghis Khan.



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: kuralas
Date Posted: 30-Oct-2005 at 15:01

Today's Mongols consists of such tribes: Halha, Durved, Bayad, Hoton, Myangat, Zahchin, Torguud, Hotogoid, Darhad, Eeld, Barga, Dariganga, Tsahar, Harchin, Buriad, Sunit.
No niruns, no darlekins.

But todays Turkic nations have all niruns and darlekins + naimans, kereits, onguts, tatars, jalairs and etc.
The Mongol means a word on Turkic "the Eternal country" (mäŋgi el).

In general as believes that ancestors of present Mongols have won the world on a pony - horse. It likely a fairy tale for not Turkic people. Height, weight and speed of horses very important during war.

----------------------------------

Borte Chino means Bori Ashina.



Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 07:55
Originally posted by kuralas

Today's Mongols consists of such tribes: Halha, Durved, Bayad, Hoton, Myangat, Zahchin, Torguud, Hotogoid, Darhad, Eeld, Barga, Dariganga, Tsahar, Harchin, Buriad, Sunit.
No niruns, no darlekins.

But todays Turkic nations have all niruns and darlekins + naimans, kereits, onguts, tatars, jalairs and etc.
The Mongol means a word on Turkic "the Eternal country" (mŋgi el).

I think, you are wrong. The tribes above you mentioned consist of all possible clans.  An example: Among Durved there are many people who consider themselves as taichut.    

In general as believes that ancestors of present Mongols have won the world on a pony - horse. It likely a fairy tale for not Turkic people. Height, weight and speed of horses very important during war

Read the travel notes of Carpini and Rubruk(1245-1253). There was mentioned about mongolian horses near Wolga River. And read what John Spalato about mongol horses wrote during the Subedei's campaign in Hungary(this is btw primary source).



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 07:56

Originally posted by kuralas

Borte Chino means Bori Ashina

He was of course a kazakh-turkic guy.



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: kuralas
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 12:49

blitz wrote

I think, you are wrong. The tribes above you mentioned consist of all possible clans. An example: Among Durved there are many people who consider themselves as taichut.

Taichiuts have been destroyed.

Russia always helped you country, you have received more than 50 billion Soviet roubles within the Soviet period. You till now debt more than 30 billion.

And that we have received: more than 900 nuclear explosions, imitation starvation, emigration, russification, a virgin soil, a genocide. Because to us always revenged for the past.

Now we the independent country. Want or do not want we shall return  own history. Then we shall look "who are wrong".



Posted By: Anbalan
Date Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 12:36

Originally posted by Akskl

The so called "Mongols" of Genghis Khan were all Turkic speaking tribes and direct ancestors of the modern Kazakhs of Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). 
         

I think it is true. I have wondered why Nogai were Turkic, if they came as "mongols"? There are many words in Ossetic language adopted at the time of Golden Horde, but they are of Turkic origin, but there are almost none Mongolian.

Does anybody know which Turkic language has "kundursu" as type of yogurt?



Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 13:41

Originally posted by kuralas

Taichiuts have been destroyed.

Not at all.  Among Kalmyks too there are people of taichut.  among mongols there are also merkits.

 

Russia always helped you country, you have received more than 50 billion Soviet roubles within the Soviet period. You till now debt more than 30 billion.  And that we have received: more than 900 nuclear explosions, imitation starvation, emigration, russification, a virgin soil, a genocide. Because to us always revenged for the past.

Now we the independent country. Want or do not want we shall return  own history. Then we shall look "who are wrong".

At first, I'm not mongol.  And sorry about your country.  At last I don't think that soviets tested atom boms in your country because you kazakhs are mongols.  



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 13:45
Originally posted by Anbalan

Originally posted by Akskl

The so called "Mongols" of Genghis Khan were all Turkic speaking tribes and direct ancestors of the modern Kazakhs of Middle Horde (or Orta Zhuz). 
         

I think it is true. I have wondered why Nogai were Turkic, if they came as "mongols"? There are many words in Ossetic language adopted at the time of Golden Horde, but they are of Turkic origin, but there are almost none Mongolian.

Does anybody know which Turkic language has "kundursu" as type of yogurt?

Oh, again such sh-i-t.  Explain me, why there are many primary sources of 13th century on mongolian language, such as Guyuk Khan's letter to Pope, edicts of yuan dynasty, Letters of argun Khan to King of France etc...

In China there are a few chinese speakin russian minority. But you can't conclude that russians were chinese. It is kazakh-turkic absurd of an oxymoron.  

 



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: Seko
Date Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 14:34
If I wasn't interested in this topic I would have closed it by now. So for those who participate regularly in this discussion, do so with better respect for eachother. Too many weaky disguised swear words bother me.

-------------


Posted By: Anbalan
Date Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 16:56

Originally posted by blitz

Oh, again such sh-i-t.  Explain me, why there are many primary sources of 13th century on mongolian language, such as Guyuk Khan's letter to Pope, edicts of yuan dynasty, Letters of argun Khan to King of France etc...

It might be. I am not either Mongol nor Turk. I don't care much.  It might be Mongols in Horde, but they were probably minority, because the land of the Horde is now populated by Turkic nations mostly. I have also read something telling Chingiz Khan was a Kazah. It might be also some panturkist propagandists have confused me.



Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 23:32
My cousines are Qongyrats, my brother-in-law, my nephews and my grandmother are Genghis-Khanites, my best friend is Naiman, I know  several Kereis. And they are all Kazakhs. 
Khalkha-Mongols have about 600 small tribes - and of course within them you can find tiny tribes with the famous names.


Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 02-Nov-2005 at 06:44

Originally posted by Akskl

My cousines are Qongyrats, my brother-in-law, my nephews and my grandmother are Genghis-Khanites, my best friend is Naiman, I know  several Kereis. And they are all Kazakhs. 
Khalkha-Mongols have about 600 small tribes - and of course within them you can find tiny tribes with the famous names.

I wrote, in Mongolia there are people of Yellow-Kirgiz clan. They speak Mongolian as their mother language. But we can't conclude that the Kirgizs were Mongols.  I wrote also, there are some people of Asud(->Osyetin in Russia) clan, who were descendants of Alans. But we can't coclude that Alans were Mongols.

So there are people of mongol origin in Kazakhstan. But you can't say that the mongols of 13th century were kazakh-turks. It is absurd.  

And also there are many sources of that time that the ruling mongol khans used mongolian language on stone, on their seal, letter and in other documents(in Yuan, Ilkhanate and later in Mongolia since 1368).

How can I cocnlude that Genghis and their "Mongols" were turkic speaking guys? Is it a normal logic?



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: blitz
Date Posted: 02-Nov-2005 at 06:53

Originally posted by Anbalan

It might be. I am not either Mongol nor Turk. I don't care much.  It might be Mongols in Horde, but they were probably minority, because the land of the Horde is now populated by Turkic nations mostly. I have also read something telling Chingiz Khan was a Kazah. It might be also some panturkist propagandists have confused me.

You are right. In West Mongols occupied Turkestan, Kipchak steppe and Persia. And Mongols were minority. So they were absorbed for some hundred years  by turks and persian people.

The name "kazakh" stemmed from the 15-16th century. Genghis died in 1227.  So you can't say that he was a kazakh guy. But it is true that descendants of Jochi(Gengis' oldest son) ruled the latter kazakh tribes. Kazakhs are mostly descendants of kipchak turks, who were conquered by mongols.



-------------
Road to wisdom: err, err and err. But less, less and less!


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 02-Nov-2005 at 08:25

Originally posted by Akskl

My cousines are Qongyrats, my brother-in-law, my nephews and my grandmother are Genghis-Khanites, my best friend is Naiman, I know  several Kereis. And they are all Kazakhs. 
Khalkha-Mongols have about 600 small tribes - and of course within them you can find tiny tribes with the famous names.

Before we get a conclusion, it's better we can study from each other on those that you probably know less before. It's why I didn't get a conclusion that the modern Kazakhs are the Mongol's descendants because one of the largest Kazakh tribe Qongirat were Mongolian originated. On the other hand, I also hope you could learn some about the later history of the Mongols after Chinggis Khaan, before you get your conclusions.

1) The Khongirat tribe was one of 5 southern Halha tribes, but not one of "600 small tribes" stated by you above. It's a very large part for the Halha's tribal elements. Halha was originally a common name for those tribes who live near to the Halha river, It's not an unknown group replaced those former tribes such as the Khongirats, the Naimans, the Keriets, etc. as you imagine. Those ancient tribes which are familiar for you, live together near to Halha river, and adopted this new common tribename Halha for all of them.  

2) There were also a larger part of the Khongirats among other Mongol tribes. For example, the Khongirats was one of 12 Tumed tribes, The Gorlos, a branch of the Khongirats, was one of the Horchin tribes. And, the largest part of the Qongirats, in fact, should be the Khongirat Tumen(10,000 families) in the today's South-eastern Inner Mongolia during the great Yuan dynasty, who was absorbed by the Urianghai and others later.

 



Posted By: Akskl
Date Posted: 02-Nov-2005 at 12:29

166.     Erimbetov, Myltyqbai Mamytuly, ,  Qongyrat shezhiresi zhane oghan qatysty anggimeler: Urany - "Alatau"; tangbasy - "Bosagha" [Qongyrat genealogy...], in Kazakh, Almaty, Zhalyn, 1993, 136 pp., PB, print-run: 50000, ISBN5-610-01169-8  SUBJECT(S)/KEYWORD(S): Anthropology; History         US$16.15

http://www.meabooks.com/html/kazakhstan.HTM - http://www.meabooks.com/html/kazakhstan.HTM

301.     Erimbetov, Myltyqbai Mamytuly, ,  Qongyrat shezhiresi zhane oghan qatysty anggimeler: Urany - "Alatau"; tangbasy - "Bosagha" [Qongyrat genealogy...], in Kazakh, Almaty, Zhalyn, 1993, 136 pp., PB, print-run: 50000, ISBN5-610-01169-8  SUBJECT(S)/KEYWORD(S): Anthropology; History         US$7.8

http://www.globalserve.net/~eurasian/Kazakhstan/kazakhstan.html - http://www.globalserve.net/~eurasian/Kazakhstan/kazakhstan.h tml

 

Interesting paper about Kazakhs:

http://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/sympo/98summer/pdf/uyama.pdf - http://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/sympo/98summer/pdf/uyama.pdf

ShEZHIRE AS IDEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE TRADITIONAL SOCIETY

http://www.elim.kz/eng/about.php.htm - http://www.elim.kz/eng/about.php.htm



Posted By: kuralas
Date Posted: 02-Nov-2005 at 14:11
At first, I'm not mongol. And sorry about your country. At last I don't think that soviets tested atom boms in your country because you kazakhs are mongols.

I think and sure mongols time of Chengis Han were turkic speaking. Name "Mongol" was uniting name of Turkic speaking clans. These Turkic clans headed Chengis khan wished to create "The eternal state" the Mongol with sense "Ma'ngi el".

Genghis' Stone is in Hermitage Museum of St.Petersburg. The script is on mongolian language. Guyuk Khan's letter and the seal sent to Pope was on mongolian language

We consider their good faked documents. It was result the European colonial policy against Asiatic dynasties.
For example: Guyuk Khan's letter has appeared in days of when KGB were headed Dzerjinskiy (Pole). By the way this the letter was found by Polish monk Karalevsky when China has grasped country "Halha and Bargu". Coincidence?

2) There were also a larger part of the Khongirats among other Mongol tribes. For example, the Khongirats was one of 12 Tumed tribes, The Gorlos, a branch of the Khongirats, was one of the Horchin tribes. And, the largest part of the Qongirats, in fact, should be the Khongirat Tumen(10,000 families) in the today's South-eastern Inner Mongolia during the great Yuan dynasty, who was absorbed by the Urianghai and others later.


Each today's kazakh as well as Mongols of times Chengis khan know own clans. In Secret history and in Rashid ad din's book (Djammi-at-tawarich) are written about modern really existing Kazakh tribes.

Kuralas (gorlos) is really existing kazakh clan. One of 92 Kazakh-Uzbek tribe (clan) since XIY-XV centuries.
See http://www.kyrgyz.ru/?page=100


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 10-Nov-2005 at 09:20

In spite of the quarrel about Khongirat's Mongol or Turkish origins. I like to see many more informations about them and their descendants in Turkistan.

I have a question that, if the Gorlos(or Kuralas) were also recognized as a sub-tribe or cousin tribe of the Khongirats by the Kazakhs? There's a legend of the Gorlos/Khongirat/Ikilas about their origins in Mongolia. I didn't know if the Qongirat or Kuralas Kazakhs have the similar legend about their origins.

It said that, God's daughters turn to the swans and fly to a lake to have a bath there, but a large eagle catched the youngest one, at this time, a brave archer shoot that eagle down and save the little swan princess. The princess was very grateful and decided to marry this young archer. then, they had 3 sons, but God couldn't allow that an ordinary steppeman marry his belonged daughter, so he decided to catched this family to the heaven and executed the man and his sons, however, the queen couldn't see his grandsons were executed, She send them back to the steppe carrying them with a golden basin. When the 3 boys rise up, they became the ancestors of the 3 tribes: Khongirat, Ikilas and Gorlos.

I noticed that forum kyrgyz.ru/, provided by Kuralas, there're also some discussions about the Qongirats, I find a online translator tool to help me read those posts in Russian, it seems they also mentioned the swan ancestor of the Qongirats.

 

 



Posted By: kuralas
Date Posted: 13-Nov-2005 at 01:24
Kazakh Kuralases anything common have no with Khongirat's. At them different legends. A legend which you speak most likely belongs Khongirat's and same Argin's clans. Kuralas's are a mix kiyats and kuralases at Chagataic at court. The Chagataids together kiyat-kuralas's lived among Dulat's (nirun). Then gradually were a part of Dulat's. A legend present Kazakh Kuralas's very similar which are written in the Secret history of Mongols and in Rashid-ad-din's "Djami at Tawarich". About the same legends have Sary Uisuns (yisuts), Dulats and Suans (all niruns-Duklat, Dughlat, Sukan).
Among Dulat's there are subclan "Chagai". Some representatives them count themselves Chagataid's lost right to dominate at creation Kazakh Horde in favour of Djuchid's.

P.S.I used materials kazakh languages sources.


Posted By: SaikhaNBayar
Date Posted: 14-Nov-2005 at 06:56

Yes , Borte khatan(queen)`s father Dai Setsen were powerful and popular person in Hongirad clan. Dai setsen once helped Chingis khan, revealing that Hongirad clan and tatars were planning to kill him.

Originally posted by Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai

not only Chinggis Khaan's mother and his first queen are Onggirats

Its true that Borte queen was Hongirad, but in my view, Chingis khaan`s mother Oelun was not directly from Hongirad, as she was from Olhonud clan which was very close(almost same, well almost) to Hongirad clan.

And i found this:

There were 2 powerful tribes along with 68 others that were making Mongol tribe. One is Darligin , and other is Nirun (later Ju-Jan).
19 clans were making Nirun (Ju-Jan):
- 1. Hatangin
- 2. Saljiut
- 3. Taichud ( Ambagai khan and his son Targudai Hiriltug is from this clan)
- 4. Hartahan
- 5. Sejigud
- 6. Chonos
- 7. Noyahan
- 8. Uruchud (urud)
- 9. Mangud
- 10. Dorbed
- 11. Baarin
- 12. Barulas
- 13. Hadarhan
- 14. Jadaran (temujin`s old friend Jamukh is from this clan)
- 15. Botagad
- 16. Duklad
- 17. Iisut (besud)
- 18. Sukhan
- 19. Kuchgiyat

And 18 clans were making Darligin tribe:

- 1. Nukus (nugus)
- 2. Uriangkhan (Urianhai)
- 3. Hongirad (hongirat) (Borte ujin is from this clan)
- 4. Ihires
- 5. Olhonud (Oelun mother is from this clan)
- 6. Gorlos
- 7. Iljigan
- 8. Haranud (Kharanud)
- 9. Hongilachud (Khongilachud)
- 10. Honhotan (khonhotan)
- 11. Arulad
- 12. Hilingud
- 13. Kunjim
- 14. Gujin (ujin)
- 15. Suldusun
- 16. Ildurhin
- 17. Baychud
- 18. Ortachud (kingit)



-------------
The 800th Anniversary of the Great Mongolian State. 2006


Posted By: kuralas
Date Posted: 14-Nov-2005 at 15:05
Please read (in Russian)
http://bekd.land.ru/rashidaddin/index.html
There who is written about XII-XIII C. Mongols

Niruns:

Khiyat (now in Kazakh and Uzbek*)
Katakin (now in Kazakh and Uzbek)
Saldjiut
Taidjiut
Hartakan
Sidjiut
Chinos (nukuz)
Nuyakin
Urut
Mangut (now in Noghay and Uzbek)
Durban (now in Uzbek)
Baarin (now in Noghay and Uzbek)
Barulas (now in Kazakh and Uzbek)
Hadarkin
Djuriyat
Budat
Duklat (now in Kazakh, about 2 mln)
Yisut (now in Kazakh)
Sukhan (now in Kazakh, about 0.3 mln)
Kyngkhiyat

Argunokon tribes (Darlekins): (now in Kazakh , New name "Arghyn", about 2 mln)


Nukuz
Uriyankat (now Urianhai - most turkic)
Kungirat (now in Kazakh 0,5 mln and Uzbek 1.0 mln)
Ikiras
Olkonut
Kuralas (now in Kazakh and Uzbek)
Eldjigin
Kunkulayut
Ortaut
Konkotan
Arulat (now in Uzbek)
Kilingut
Kundjin
Ushin
Sulduz
Ildurkun
Bayaut (now in Kazakh and Uzbek)
Kingit


"Nirun" mean in Kazakh it "Nur Ul" (son of a ray of light) or Nurilla's son
From her was born the majority of clans of the Kazakh Ulu Juz.

* Uzbek - nomadic (no Sart) Uzbek

P.S. BekD my lost nic.


Posted By: NCAA
Date Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 01:29
My mother's family name is Olhonud, which is mentioned on The Secret History as Oelun's belonging tribe. My understanding is Olhonud is a sub-clan in Onggirat clan, of which both Oelun and Borte came from.


Posted By: Yungsiyebu_Uriankhai
Date Posted: 16-Nov-2005 at 09:59

Khongirat, Kuralas/Gorlos, and Ikires had same roots like that I have told above according to today's Gorlos tribal legend. They probably had many sub-clans such as the Olhonud. These 3 tribes were categorized as the Darlenkin Mongols, however, Alan-goa, a lady from the Kuralas(Gorlos), were the grandmother of all of the Nirun Mongols.

Alan-goa and her sons, the pictures from a official site of Gorlos Banner.



Posted By: Jalair
Date Posted: 10-Nov-2007 at 19:50
Qonghirat is an Uzbek tribe/clan also. See links:

http://www.spongobongo.com/zy9949.htm - http://www.spongobongo.com/zy9949.htm

http://www.spongobongo.com/zy9948.htm - http://www.spongobongo.com/zy9948.htm

Also there is a village in Balkh province, Northern Afgahnistan called qongrat qishlaghi, they speak Uzbeki.

-------------
Zarra


Posted By: alish
Date Posted: 10-Nov-2007 at 21:45
Dude,
You have got serious issues in terms of history.... I wonder if Alexander the Great was the direct ancestor of modern Kazakhs, if I should believe your opinion..... LOL
Timuchin was not turkic speaking....... Many turkic tribes (being mentioned in this forum) served in his armies..... some of them protected their lands from ChingisKhan.... take it real man..... Be more objective!
 
 
  


Posted By: alish
Date Posted: 11-Nov-2007 at 16:48
Originally posted by Akskl

My cousines are Qongyrats, my brother-in-law, my nephews and my grandmother are Genghis-Khanites, my best friend is Naiman, I know  several Kereis. And they are all Kazakhs. 
Khalkha-Mongols have about 600 small tribes - and of course within them you can find tiny tribes with the famous names.
 
LOLLOLLOLLOL  one more time LOLLOLLOLLOL
Hey man, they were kazakhs who first settled in the United States.LOLLOL
No wonder -Gagarin was also kazakh...LOLLOLLOL....
Qung'irot..... Qung'ir - type of color, ot - horse.... shut up everybody, it is uzbek urug'....



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com