Print Page | Close Window

Documentray: Stolen Kosovo

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Scholarly Pursuits
Forum Name: The Minefield
Forum Discription: Controversial topics. Only mods can start new topics
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=24648
Printed Date: 28-Apr-2024 at 03:58
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Documentray: Stolen Kosovo
Posted By: Bankotsu
Subject: Documentray: Stolen Kosovo
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2008 at 09:05
Stolen Kosovo - Oteto Kosovo

Here is Czech documentary movie called "Stolen Kosovo". This movie was created by Czech TV. It documents the plight of serbs in Kosovo and NATO's agenda to tear away Kosovo from Serbia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCkL3cJGTTk - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCkL3cJGTTk
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Uloupene+Kosovo+-+Stolen+Kosovo%2C+English+subtitles+%28ENG%29+&search_type=&aq=f - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query



Replies:
Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2008 at 09:11

Ok. Nice. I think this belongs in the minefield. Or better yet, should be integrated with the 40 odd page Kosovo topic already there.



-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2008 at 09:32
As time passes more and more of the world is seeing the lies of Clinton and his manipulation in the Balkans. How the supposed war criminals painted as black as coal were actually the victims that fell prey to Tito's boarders and the west's ambitions. I say this as a person who grew up within this propaganda and believed the Serbs were evil and I remember when I saw on CNN how Belgrade was being bombed and I said "who cares if they die, they started the war." And I shudder today at those words.
 
Another good documentary is one about Slobodan Milosevic, Glosses at the Trial, made by the Dutch. Eye opening to say the least. It should be on google videos in two parts.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2008 at 16:39
Milosevic the victim? Bah. That is hilarious.

Serbs as a people get a bad reputation due to him and his actions, but he deserves his bad reputation




-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 14-Jun-2008 at 17:54
We'll discuss it in due time.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 02:04
This documentary is pretty much a one-sided, very pro-Serb docimentary meant to try and portray the Serbs as victims of the whole thing. The big mistake was that it was banned, now because of this it has been hailed as some sort of great work, when in fact its just pro-Serb bias that ignores the other side of the spectrum. Rather the banning it, they should have just shown it alongside something far more moderate in view to even out the perspective.

There already is a topic on the issue and its many pages long. If you want to discuss you are more then welcome to revive it.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 02:12
The rest of the series from the same guy in the first two sections:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO7CyIGXIhE&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO7CyIGXIhE&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbSsEows6Y0&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbSsEows6Y0&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysJZJKyBQww&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysJZJKyBQww&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Sq7kA6XuNo&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Sq7kA6XuNo&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luzJqEojgBk&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luzJqEojgBk&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahcsl0Tn3_0&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahcsl0Tn3_0&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMhuj30Qhyw&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMhuj30Qhyw&feature=related
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo0L9SYE8mI&feature=related - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo0L9SYE8mI&feature=related
 
Perhaps an admin could edit the opening post with this list if needed? I don't know.
 
As for me i've done quite a bit of research on the situation here and even though I got the general gist of what happened in Kosovo I never saw it this up close. It's really sad, and the sad fact is that Krajina and Bosnia are very similar in the way disinformation was used and truth was distrorted.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 02:15
One sided really? I don't think so. I think it explains pretty much exactly what is happening and i'm glad they go back into history to show exactly how the Serb majority in Kosovo became a minority. How Racak was a staged massacre. How America and the KLA terrorists worked together.
 
In any case I havn't noticed the Czechs really big pro Serbian over anything. The Dutch made a very good documentary too.


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 02:35

That documentary is biased and even the Czech TV that sponsored it,realised that.

 
This news is from the Serbian News Agency B92:
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/world-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=06&dd=12&nav_id=51028 - http://www.b92.net/eng/news/world-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=06&dd=12&nav_id=51028
 
This is what they said:
 
Kosovo film sparking controversy in Czech Rep.
12 June 2008 | 10:15 | Source: FoNet
Czech TV is to go ahead with screening a documentary entitled “Stolen Kosovo”, TV spokesman Ladislav Stich has told daily Pravo.

Czech TV has kept Vaclav Dvorak’s documentary under lock and key since March, because it “contains the viewpoints of only one (Serbian) side,” and does not refer to the Kosovo problem, even though the station itself participated in the financing of its production.

Despite disagreements and arguments with Dvorak and producer Aleš Bednarž, the station has decided to show the documentary along with a film giving the viewpoints of the Albanian side. Both documentaries will be shown during a special televised political debate, featuring historians and political analysts.

Czech TV is now searching for a suitable film giving the other side of the debate, for which there are five candidates, so the precise time and date of the broadcast has yet to be set.

This documentary and the refusal of Czech TV to broadcast it has been stirring controversy for several months now between the film’s makers and Czech TV’s producer. The filmmakers claim that the station promised to broadcast the documentary on at least two occasions. However, the station claimed that it could not set an exact date for the broadcast because the documentary was “not balanced” and could not be shown without giving the other side’s point of view and an expert discussion.

Meanwhile, an anonymous YouTube user has already posted the documentary under the title, “Czech Conscience”, where it was watched by almost 100,000 people during three weeks in May, until it was withdrawn.

Czech TV admitted that it insisted on the film being withdrawn from YouTube, since its contract rights with the makers were being breached. Stich added that further legal action could be taken against the makers who deny posting the film on the internet.
 
 


-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 02:45
b92 is a very bias liberal news paper that is pro west and apologetic to "the other side".
 
But you are right it should show how Albanians are suffering under the KLA also. I know an Albanian girl who's boyfriend was Gorani and he was beaten up and she was shipped to the Arab Emirates to work as a slave. They found her about half a year ago and now are both living in Serbia. He joined the Serb military.
 
I wish the documentary was also more specific concerning how the Albanian refugees were due to NATO bombing and how many times the NATO air planes didn't even know whom they were bombing in Kosovo. They got their intended target most of the time however.
 
Also in the history portion they could have went over how the KLA eradicated the more peaceful Albanian side in Kosovo.
 
But in large it did explain the mass disinformation campaign circulating the world at the time. 250,000 Albanians all lined up and shot was the echo of the news paper in the west before anyone even stepped foot in Kosovo. The UN forensic team found around 2,000 dead from all sides in battle. Racak was a staged massacre and every nation participating in the investigation concluded it as such.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 02:53
Kind of chilling in video 9 I think when the albanian children were telling the catholic child "shut up or we'll cut your throat." and they couldn't have been more then 7 or 8 maybe 10 at most i'd say. Really shows what enviroment they have been growing up in and it's very sad.


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 03:54

Carpathian do you live in Serbia?



-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 04:16
East coast USA. Never been to Serbia.
 
Why are you asking? I mean I know why but I just rather you answer it for everyone yourself. LOL


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 04:29
I wish the documentary was also more specific concerning how the Albanian refugees were due to NATO bombing and how many times the NATO air planes didn't even know whom they were bombing in Kosovo. They got their intended target most of the time however.


BS designed to incriminate NATO. Fact is that no Albanian will ever say that the NATO bombing was the reason why he or she fled. The reason was that Milosevic saw a gap in the NATO campaign: no ground support. This allowed him to make a swift land campaign that threw the thousands of Albanians into neighboring countries as a means of making problems more difficult for NATO.

Also in the history portion they could have went over how the KLA eradicated the more peaceful Albanian side in Kosovo.


If the KLA can be guilty of one thing: it aimed at making all Albanians side with them and attacked those who were perceived as traitors. Guerilla movements are known to do this and this isnt particularly unique among Albanians. Even today in Serbia you have various groups being threatened for not supporting the nationalist cause. However, the truth is that the KLA had the support of nearly 90%+ of Albanians in the region. This very often happens when nationalism rises and a community becomes exhausted.

The UN forensic team found around 2,000 dead from all sides in battle.


Forensics cant yet account for those still missing. There are thousands of Albs still missing

See this: http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-06-11-voa14.cfm

A recent article on the issue.

Racak was a staged massacre and every nation participating in the investigation concluded it as such.


Bold claim, when the chief forensic analyst stated otherwise.

http://www2.hs.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20030313IE2


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:10
"BS designed to incriminate NATO. Fact is that no Albanian will ever say that the NATO bombing was the reason why he or she fled. The reason was that Milosevic saw a gap in the NATO campaign: no ground support. This allowed him to make a swift land campaign that threw the thousands of Albanians into neighboring countries as a means of making problems more difficult for NATO."
 
Probably afraid to say other wise because the KLA will cut their throats.
 
Ah a "swift" land campaign that came in and bused Albanians to the boarder. Gotcha. ;)
 
I personally disagree that NATO didn't have ground troops. They were called KLA and they were trained by the CIA.  The west provided training and assistance just like they did in Krajina via "private contractors", retired US generals and such.
 
"If the KLA can be guilty of one thing: it aimed at making all Albanians side with them and attacked those who were perceived as traitors. Guerilla movements are known to do this and this isnt particularly unique among Albanians. Even today in Serbia you have various groups being threatened for not supporting the nationalist cause. However, the truth is that the KLA had the support of nearly 90%+ of Albanians in the region. This very often happens when nationalism rises and a community becomes exhausted. "
 
If they can be guilty of anything it is also heroin and sex slave trade, trading organs on the black market, murder, acts of terrorsim, the list goes on. And 90 percent of Albanians didn't support the KLA. These are fairly tales. Maybe the same way how Kim Jong gets 99.9 percent of the vote in his country? The family of the girl I brought up weren't KLA supporters. But maybe thats because they kidnapped her and sold her.
 
"Forensics cant yet account for those still missing. There are thousands of Albs still missing
 
http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-06-11-voa14.cfm "
 
This is non sense. It starts off saying 10,000 people died in Kosovo. This is pure garbage, only 2,000 some people were found. 10,000 is just one of the media catch phrase numbers spit out which seemed more reasonable then "250,000 albanians lined up and shot."
 
"Bold claim, when the chief forensic analyst stated otherwise.

http://www2.hs.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20030313IE2 - http://www2.hs.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20030313IE2 "
 
Awesome article, the problem is the Finnish forensic team was found guilty or at least under the investigation of taking bribes from Albanian officials. I could be wrong. But I know one of the nations had bribery issues. One of the ones around Finland or Finland itself.
 
The Spanish foresnic team specifically stated that there was no massacre.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:16

Shameless Double Standards Most Westerners Refuse to See

It has been painfully obvious to the greatest majority of Serbs for couple of decades now that shameless double standards are a dominant feature of Western mainstream media and politicians in relation to every aspect of dissolution of former Yugoslavia, civil wars that followed and Serbian people in general.

So, the exact same people that will tell you that 1993 http://byzantinesacredart.com/blog/2008/01/christmas-massacre.html - Christmas Day massacre in Bosnian village Kravice by Srebrenica-based Muslim troops, when 49 Serbian civilians were killed, was an episode which indeed never warranted more than a (cautious) condemnation — and certainly not any outrage or, God forbid!, direct military intervention by the NATO — those same self-righteous, pompous gnomes won’t blink an eye when reminded that 19 NATO states launched a merciless three-month bombardment over Federal Republic of Yugoslavia under a pretext that Serbian police has massacred 45 Albanians in the village of Racak, on January 15, 1999.

You see, 49 massacred Serbs at the beginning of the war are easy to forget, 45 Albanian Muslims at the end of a war are deemed a sufficient cause to start a 78-day aggression on a sovereign state, dealing with foreign funded and trained terrorists who seek to dismember that state. So much so, that then-German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer called Racak “the turning point” when the moral imperative of making war on Serbia became apparent.

To make things worse and to show how thoroughly brainwashed Western masses really are, after completely losing their capacity for critical thinking, the alleged “Racak Masacre” that instigated NATO carnage was no more than a rather clumsy hoax.

Nine Years Since Racak Hoax, a CIA-Staged Excuse for NATO Aggression

On today’s day in 1999, head of OSCE Mission in Kosovo and Metohija, American http://globalresistance.com/analysis/meetmr.htm - “diplomat” William Walker , accused Serbian police (although it was, actually, a multi-ethnic, Yugoslav police that conducted anti-terrorist actions in Serbian province of Kosovo) for “massacre” of 45 Albanians in the village Racak. It turned out that the victims were not civilians, but members of the Albanian terrorist KLA (UCK in Albanian) and that the entire incident was staged by Walker and KLA to serve as a pretext for NATO’s one-sided air war against Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

Belgrade daily Glas javnosti offers http://www.glas-javnosti.co.yu/clanak/glas-javnosti-15-01-2008/laz-koja-je-pokrenula-agresiju-na-jugoslaviju - detailed report about the CIA-setup under Walker’s directorship that caused untold misery, pain and suffering to Yugoslav citizens and state.

Anti-Terrorist Action by Yugoslav Police Observed by OSCE, Two Foreign TV Crews and a Number of Foreign Reporters: None of Them Saw a Massacre, Until William Walker Saw it

At the beginning of January 1999, the command post of the KLA terrorist brigade comprising of 126 members was set up in Racak. Among 126 terrorists, notorious terrorist family Mujota, responsible for the assassinations of six policemen, was also based in Racak. The surrounding villages Petrovo, Luzak and Rance were under the KLA control as well.

Yugoslav police informed the OSCE mission about its intention to carry out an anti-terrorist action in the village of Racak. These were the so-called ‘verifiers’, who had to be invited to observe every action of the Yugoslav police against the Albanian terrorists, so they make sure the use of force is not “disproportionate” and civilians are not being harmed. The anti-terrorist action started at 8 a.m. After a battle that lasted whole day, Yugoslav police has defeated the Albanian terrorists in Racak, who have suffered casualties.

This is how http://www.srpska-mreza.com/ddj/Racak/Tiker/RacakFile.html - French daily Le Figaro , which had its special reporter Renaud Girard on the ground, described the action by the Yugoslav police and the events reporters witnessed on that day:

“[...] At dawn the Serb police surrounded and attacked the village of Racak, known to be a base of the separatist KLA. The police had nothing to hide, since at 8:30 a.m. they invited a television crew (two reporters of the American Associated Press) to film the operation. Members of the OSCE mission were also present: on location were two vehicles with American diplomatic plates. The OSCE observers stayed on location the whole day, situated in a valley from where they were able to observe the village.

“At approximately 3:00 p.m., a police report was made public via the International Press Center in Pristina, which stated that, during the course of fighting at Racak, 15 KLA terrorists were killed and a significant quantity of weapons was confiscated. At 3:30 p.m. the police forces, accompanied by the television crew of Associated Press, left the village, taking with them a heavy artillery piece of 12.7 mm caliber, two hand-held artillery pieces, two sniper rifles and approximately 30 Kalashnikovs manufactured in China. At 4:30 p.m., a French reporter drove through the village, where he encountered three orange OSCE vehicles. The international observers were calmly talking with three adult Albanians in civilian clothes. They were looking for possible injured civilians. Upon returning to the village at 6:00 p.m., the French reporter saw the observers taking away two women and two old men, who were very lightly injured.”

In the center of the village, in a house where the KLA base was set up, police has found a computer containing data about the Racak KLA brigade and the list with 126 terrorists based in the village. The list included four foreigners, with American or British names. It was determined that those were KLA foreign instructors.

When Yugoslav police started pouring through the village and securing the roads and trenches, Albanian terrorists from the Lake Mountain (Jezerska planina) and the surrounding villages attacked them. They opened fire from the hills above the trenches and Yugoslav police was forced to withdraw from Racak due to strong offensive and unfavorable, low-ground position. That is when the grand hoax started, to be launched into the world as an alleged massacre of civilians by the Serbian police.

Walker Personally Sets the Stage Before Inviting Reporters

Bodies of the Albanian terrorists killed during the battle were being pulled out of ravines and creaks by the other KLA troops seizing the village, to be placed in a field where there were no bodies before. Associated Press TV crew which entered the village with Yugoslav police earlier has recorded that the very field where allegedly executed Albanians were piled up, was empty at the time police was in the village. Albanian terrorists have redressed some forty bodies, replacing their KLA uniforms with civilian clothing. They drove the other killed terrorists in their uniforms towards Budakovo village, where they probably buried them.

Early next morning, William Walker came to the field to instruct the Albanian terrorists surrounding him on how to position the bodies, so that the scene appears as a massacre, i.e. the execution of the civilians. After the stage was set, Walker brought the TV crews and reporters over. Detailed description of the whole setup is available in the book titled “Second Kosovo Battle” by reporter Milorad Drecun, under the “Racak Hoax” chapter.

Finnish Forensic Specialists Find No Evidence of Massacre, i.e. the “Executions”

A team of Finnish forensic specialists headed by doctor Helena Ranta arrived to Racak to determine the cause of death of the Albanians found. The final report submitted by the Finnish forensic experts contained no evidence that on January 15, 1999 Albanian civilians were massacred, wrote German daily Berliner Zeitung which received the report prior to official publishing.

German daily informed that the initial report by the Finnish forensics contained half-truths and contradictory claims, later admitted by Helena Ranta, but without any qualms regarding the dishonorable role she played. She said that her report had to be approved by William Walker before being submitted.

That is when it became obvious that Racak hoax was a planned action by all those who took part in the aggression on FR Yugoslavia, since the alleged Racak massacre served as a pretext to Western and German politicians to give their consent to NATO attack.

Helena Ranta Reveals the Truth 9 Years Later

Marking the shameful anniversary of Racak Hoax, Tanjug reminds how then US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told CSB that “dozens of people had their throats slit in Racak” and that the only solution was in “humanitarian air strikes” on Yugoslavia.

On the other hand, reports Tanjug, three teams of forensic experts — from Yugoslavia, Belarus and Finland — found only firearm wounds on the bodies of the victims.

Special tests revealed gunpowder residue on the hands of 37 of the 40 bodies initially examined, proving that the victims were using firearms immediately prior to their death.

The head of the Finnish forensic team, Helena Ranta, backed Walker's statement prior to the bombings, saying that she was expressing her personal view. However, on Jan 23, 2007, Ranta admitted to Belgrade daily Blic that the final Finnish forensic report "did not contain proof about either a massacre or execution taking place in Racak."

In a Russian television documentary titled "End - condemned to exile", recently broadcast on the Serbian television (RTS), Ranta admitted that Walker was horrified by the results of the investigation of the Finnish forensic team and that, at the time, she was unprepared to oppose him, but that now she is ready to speak out.

KLA Chief Confirms: Racak was a Fierce Battle. Nothing More.

According to three Berliner Zeitung reporters who investigated Racak hoax (Bo Adam, Roland Heine and Claudius Technau), “UCK [KLA] is in the best position to bring light to the case.”

And here is what its commander in chief Hashim Thaci had to say to the BBC regarding Racak: “We had a key unit in the region. It was a fierce battle. We regrettably had many victims. But so did the Serbs.”



Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:23
If they can be guilty of anything it is also heroin and sex slave trade, trading organs on the black market, murder, acts of terrorsim, the list goes on. And 90 percent of Albanians didn't support the KLA. These are fairly tales. Maybe the same way how Kim Jong gets 99.9 percent of the vote in his country? The family of the girl I brought up weren't KLA supporters. But maybe thats because they kidnapped her and sold her.


Guerilla groups are not organized and generally do not have a central core to take orders from; at the same time, you dont know where recruits are coming from. Your personal experience is not indicative of the population of the country. Go there yourself and ask each and every person in Prishtina what they think of the KLA and if they support it. That the ex-members are so popular still is very revealing. KLA soldiers are viewed upon as heroes in pretty much all Albanian inhabited lands and busts of them are constantly springing up. The masses love them.

Ah a "swift" land campaign that came in and bused Albanians to the boarder. Gotcha. ;)


You dont think that an organized large army can displace people quickly? Germans of east Germany started fleeing their homes well before the Russians even entered.

I personally disagree that NATO didn't have ground troops. They were called KLA and they were trained by the CIA. The west provided training and assistance just like they did in Krajina via "private contractors", retired US generals and such.


KLA was a guerilla army, it could not operate in a direct conflict with the Serbian army. It was essentially powerless to stop Milosevic outside of the local level.

This is non sense. It starts off saying 10,000 people died in Kosovo. This is pure garbage, only 2,000 some people were found. 10,000 is just one of the media catch phrase numbers spit out which seemed more reasonable then "250,000 albanians lined up and shot."


10,000 is the general conclusion that was reached a few years ago. 250,000 was when the media was hyping up the event in the 1999 and people still didnt know what was going on.

Awesome article, the problem is the Finnish forensic team was found guilty or at least under the investigation of taking bribes from Albanian officials.


Care to provide evidence? Are you talking about Ahtisaari. In no case have I seen so far have the Finnish groups been declared guilty, unless Im missing some sources.

And as for other countries admitting that it was a lie, I suggest you look at this: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/1999/19990119.sc6628.html

PS: Helena Ranta was the only EU forensic. The other two groups were Yugoslav and Belorus.




Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:31
You can find me a hundred articles of the kind. Their chief purpose is to place guilt on America and to discredit their campaign in Kosovo. You can find many articles that go with the Albanian side or the Serb side, its not hard.

You havnt even given me the source of your article. Not only that but the article doesnt even give direct evidence, just secondhand sources from generally pro-Serb places(Russian and Serb)

And here is what its commander in chief Hashim Thaci had to say to the BBC regarding Racak: “We had a key unit in the region. It was a fierce battle. We regrettably had many victims. But so did the Serbs.”


This doesnt discredit the event. Its well known that Racak was a KLA stronghold, however it doesnt mean that the crimes committed were necessarily KLA troops. Massacres often happen in regions of intense fighting. Srebrenica happened along similar lines as well.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:35
"Guerilla groups are not organized and generally do not have a central core to take orders from; at the same time, you dont know where recruits are coming from. Your personal experience is not indicative of the population of the country. Go there yourself and ask each and every person in Prishtina what they think of the KLA and if they support it. That the ex-members are so popular still is very revealing. KLA soldiers are viewed upon as heroes in pretty much all Albanian inhabited lands and busts of them are constantly springing up. The masses love them. "
 
They did have a pretty central core or at least a few heads such as Hashim "The Snake" Thaci that got through his war crimes with a slap on the wrist. I know the KLA is loved now because the Albanians romanticize them as heroes when really they are terrorists tied to the Albanian Mafia.
 
"You dont think that an organized large army can displace people quickly? Germans of east Germany started fleeing their homes well before the Russians even entered."

I do the question is if the JNA did that or not. Seems kind of a waste of resources to be honest.
 
"KLA was a guerilla army, it could not operate in a direct conflict with the Serbian army. It was essentially powerless to stop Milosevic outside of the local level."

KLA got beaten up and almost destroyed had it not been for NATO and the imported jihadist soldiers refilling the ranks.
 
"10,000 is the general conclusion that was reached a few years ago. 250,000 was when the media was hyping up the event in the 1999 and people still didnt know what was going on."
 
The general conclusion is about 2,000 from BOTH sides because that is how many people have been found.
 
"Care to provide evidence? Are you talking about Ahtisaari. In no case have I seen so far have the Finnish groups been declared guilty, unless Im missing some sources. "

You are right I am mistaking the Finish team with another group. I'll get you a link when I can. But your data about the Finnish team is out dated, 2003.
 
From the above article dated 2007:
 
"The head of the Finnish forensic team, Helena Ranta, backed Walker's statement prior to the bombings, saying that she was expressing her personal view. However, on Jan 23, 2007, Ranta admitted to Belgrade daily Blic that the final Finnish forensic report "did not contain proof about either a massacre or execution taking place in Racak."


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:39
"You can find me a hundred articles of the kind. Their chief purpose is to place guilt on America and to discredit their campaign in Kosovo. You can find many articles that go with the Albanian side or the Serb side, its not hard.

You havnt even given me the source of your article. "
 
Except my source which you must have skipped over, was your souce also. The difference was that yours was out dated, and it contradicted it, directly.
 
"This doesnt discredit the event. Its well known that Racak was a KLA stronghold, however it doesnt mean that the crimes committed were necessarily KLA troops. Massacres often happen in regions of intense fighting. Srebrenica happened along similar lines as well."

Well proof is that bodies were moved and dressed in civilian clothing. Such as bodies with bullet holes but no matching holes in the shirt the man is wearing.
 
I wouldn't bring up Srebrenica if I were you because it would derail the conversation even further. You have more of a chance argueing Racak's case of a massacre then Srebrenica. I'll leave you with that. Again i'm working on a rather lengthy post concerning the entire situation. Might be up tomorrow.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:41
I do the question is if the JNA did that or not. Seems kind of a waste of resources to be honest.


waste? It through thousands upon thousands into neighboring countries and created huge problems for NATO, which now had to deal with a mass of refugees, not to mention nearly completely distabilizing Albania and Macedonia. My family, btw, in Albania held refugees during this time. Over two families between 2 apartments.

The general conclusion is about 2,000 from BOTH sides because that is how many people have been found.


Im going to stop arguing this now since Im only repeating myself: there are thousands more still missing. What happened to all of them. If you want to see their names, they are today in central Prishtina, their pictures and names are posted on a wall. I posted a documentary on Kosova which was made a few months back. Its in one of the old topics on it.

They did have a pretty central core or at least a few heads such as Hashim "The Snake" Thaci that got through his war crimes with a slap on the wrist. I know the KLA is loved now because the Albanians romanticize them as heroes when really they are terrorists tied to the Albanian Mafia.


Simply throwing insults doesnt really help your case too much...


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:46
Except my source which you must have skipped over, was your souce also. The difference was that yours was out dated, and it contradicted it, directly.


No, your source is the "emperors new clothes" which is essentially devoted towards attacking anything America on the Balkans. Just as I stated before.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:47
"waste? It through thousands upon thousands into neighboring countries and created huge problems for NATO, which now had to deal with a mass of refugees, not to mention nearly completely distabilizing Albania and Macedonia. My family, btw, in Albania held refugees during this time. Over two families between 2 apartments."

Yes a waste with no proof. The facts show that refugees starting moving because of the NATO bombing campaign.
 
"Im going to stop arguing this now since Im only repeating myself: there are thousands more still missing. What happened to all of them. If you want to see their names, they are today in central Prishtina, their pictures and names are posted on a wall. I posted a documentary on Kosova which was made a few months back. Its in one of the old topics on it. "

Missing and dead are two very different things. There were "missing" people in Srebrenica too that were counted dead, only to be found voting during the elections.

Hmmm.
 
Interesting fact. Out of all the Balkan nations, Serbia has the most refugees displaced of any nation.
 
"Simply throwing insults doesnt really help your case too much..."
 
What insults? I didn't insult you at all.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:47
"No, your source is the "emperors new clothes" which is essentially devoted towards attacking anything America on the Balkans. Just as I stated before."

Right right, well regardless of what their agenda is they quoted the Finnish team, the exact lady you quoted in 2003, to say in 2007 that there was no massacre.
 
In any case no I didn't get it from Emperor's New Clothes.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:50
Interesting fact. Out of all the Balkan nations, Serbia has the most refugees displaced of any nation.


Interesting... perhaps you should really think about why it happened.

to say in 2007 that there was no massacre.


From Russian and Serbian sources of course.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 05:59
"Interesting... perhaps you should really think about why it happened. "
 
Krajina, Bosnia, Kosovo. How's that?
 
"From Russian and Serbian sources of course."

Ah okay ;) And they're lying right? Instead of just admiting that your source was out dated now you want to say they lied?
 
One more time what insult did I use?


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:03
"And here is what its commander in chief Hashim Thaci had to say to the BBC regarding Racak: “We had a key unit in the region. It was a fierce battle. We regrettably had many victims. But so did the Serbs.”
 
Thaci himself said it was a battle. Doesn't mention a massacre.
 
Perhaps you want a French perspective?:
 

The images filmed during the attack on the village of Racak contradict the Albanians' and the OSCE's version Racak.

Did the American ambassador William Walker, chief of the OSCE cease-fire verification mission to Kosovo, show undue haste when, last Saturday, he publicly accused Serbian security forces of having on the previous day executed in cold blood some forty Albanian peasants in the little village of Racak?

The question deserves to be raised in the light of a series of disturbing facts. In order to understand, it is important to go through the events of the crucial day of Friday in chronological order. At dawn, intervention forces of the Serbian police encircled and then attacked the village of Racak, known as a bastion of UCK (Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA) separatist guerrillas.

The police didn't seem to have anything to hide, since, at 8:30 a.m., they invited a television team (two journalists of AP TV) to film the operation. A warning was also given to the OSCE, which sent two cars with American diplomatic licenses to the scene. The observers spent the whole day posted on a hill where they could watch the village. At 3 p.m., a police communique reached the international press center in Pristina announcing that 15 UCK "terrorists" had been killed in combat in Racak and that a large stock of weapons had been seized.

At 3:30 p.m., the police forces, followed by the AP TV team, left the village, carrying with them a heavy 12.7 mm machine gun, two automatic rifles, two rifles with telescopic sights and some thirty Chinese-made kalashnikovs. At 4:40 p.m., a French journalist drove through the village and met three orange OSCE vehicles. The international observers were chatting calmly with three middle-aged Albanians in civilian clothes. They were looking for eventual civilian casualties. Returning to the village at 6 p.m., the journalist saw the observers taking away two very slightly injured old men and two women. The observers, who did not seem particularly worried, did not mention anything in particular to the journalist. They simply said that they were "unable to evaluate the battle toll".

The scene of Albanian corpses in civilian clothes lined up in a ditch which would shock the whole world was not discovered until the next morning, around 9 a.m., by journalists, soon followed by OSCE observers. At that time, the village was once again taken over by armed UCK soldiers who led the foreign visitors, as soon as they arrived, toward the supposed massacre site. Around noon, William Walker in person arrived and expressed his indignation. All the Albanian witnesses gave the same version: at midday, the policemen forced their way into homes and separated the women from the men, whom they led to the hilltops to execute them without more ado. The most disturbing fact is that the pictures filmed by the AP TV journalists -- which Le Figaro was shown yesterday -- radically contradict that version. It was in fact an empty village that the police entered in the morning, sticking close to the walls. The shooting was intense, as they were fired on from UCK trenches dug into the hillside.

The fighting intensified sharply on the hilltops above the village. Watching from below, next to the mosque, the AP journalists understood that the UCK guerrillas, encircled, were trying desperately to break out. A score of them in fact succeeded, as the police themselves admitted. What really happened? During the night, could the UCK have gathered the bodies, in fact killed by Serb bullets, to set up a scene of cold-blooded massacre? A disturbing fact: Saturday morning the journalists found only very few cartridges around the ditch where the massacre supposedly took place. Intelligently, did the UCK seek to turn a military defeat into a political victory? Only a credible international inquiry would make it possible to resolve these doubts. The reluctance of the Belgrade government, which has consistently denied the massacre, thus seems incomprehensible.

-- Renaud Girard for Le Figaro



Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:07
Some more? Why of course! :)
 

Where the Racak Dead Really Coldly Massacred?

Le Monde, 21 January 1999
by Christophe Chatelot

======================================================

The version of the facts spread by the Kosovo Albanians leaves several questions unanswered. Belgrade says that the forty-five victims were UCK "terrorst, fallen during combat, but rejects any international investigation.

Isn't the Racak massacre just too perfect? New eye witness accounts gathered on Monday, January 18, by Le Monde, throw doubt on the reality of the horrible spectacle of dozens of piled up bodies of Albanians supposedly summarily executed by Serb security forces last Friday.

Were the victims executed in cold blood, as UCK says, or killed in combat, as the Serbs say? According to the version gathered and broadcast by the press and the Kosovo verification mission (KVM) observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the massacre took place on January 15 in the early after-noon. "Masked" Serbian police entered the village of Racak which had been shelled all morning by Yugoslav army tanks. The broke down the doors and entered people's homes, ordering the women to stay there while they pushed the men to the edge of the village to calmly execute them with a bullet through the head, not without first having tortured and mutilated several. Some witnesses even said that the Serbs sang as they did their dirty work, before leaving the village around 3:30p.m.

The account by two journalists of Associated Press TV television (AP TV) who filmed the police operation in Racak contradicts this tale. When at 10 a.m. they entered the village in the wake of a police armored vehicle, the village was nearly deserted. They advanced through the streets under the fire of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UCK) fighters lying in ambush in the woods above the village. The exchange of fire continued throughout the operation, with more or less intensity. The main fighting took place in the woods. The Albanians who had fled the village when the first Serb shells were fired at dawn tried to escape. There they ran into Serbian police who had surrounded the village. The UCK was trapped in between. The object of the violent police attack on Friday was a stronghold of UCK Albanian independence fighters.

Virtually all the inhabitants had fled Racak during the frightful Serb offensive of the summer of 1998. With few exceptions, they had not come back. "Smoke came from only two chimneys", noted one of the two AP TV reporters. The Serb operation was thus no surprise, nor was it a secret. On the morning of the attack, a police source tipped off AP TV: "Come to Racak, something is happening". At 10 a.m., the team was on the spot alongside the police; it filmed from a peak overlooking the village and then through the streets in the wake of an armored vehicle.

The OSCE was also warned of the action. At least two teams of international observers watched the fighting from a hill where they could see part of the village. They entered Racak shortly after the police left. They then questioned a few Albanians about the situation, trying to find out whether there were wounded civilians. Around 6 p.m., they took four persons -- two women and two old men -- who were very slightly wounded toward the dispensary of the neighboring town of Stimje. The verifiers said at that time that they were "incapable of establishing the number of casualties of that day of fighting".

The publicity given by the Serbian police to that operation was intense. At 10:30 a.m., it gave out its first press release. It announced that the police had "encircled the village of Racak with the aim of arresting the members of a terrorist group who killed a policeman" the previous Sunday. At 3 p.m., a first bulletin announced fifteen Albanians killed in fighting. The next day, Saturday, it welcomed the success of the operation which, it said, had resulted in the death of dozens of UCK "terrorists" and the capture of a large stock of weapons.

The attempt to arrest an Albanian presumed to have murdered a Serb policemen turned into a massacre. At 5:30 p.m., the police evacuated the site under the sporadic fire of a handful of UCK fighters who continued to hold out thanks to the steep and rough terrain. In no time, the first of the Albanians who had got away come back down into the village, those who had managed to hide came out in the open and three KVM vehicles drove into the village. One hour after the police left, night fell. The next morning, the press and the KVM came to see the damage caused by the fighting.

It was at this moment that, guided by the armed UCK fighters who had recaptured the village, they discovered the ditch where a score of bodies were piled up, almost exclusively men. At midday, the chief of the KVM in person, the American diplomat William Walker, arrived on the spot and declared his indignation at the atrocities committed by "the Serb police forces and the Yugoslav army". The condemnation was total, irrevocable.

And yet questions remain. How could the Serb police have gathered a group of men and led them calmly toward the execution site while they were constantly under fire from UCK fighters? How could the ditch located on the edge of Racak have escaped notice by local inhabitants familiar with the surroundings who were present before nightfall? Or by the observers who were present for over two hours in this tiny village? Why so few cartridges around the corpses, so little blood in the hollow road where twenty three people are supposed to have been shot at close range with several bullets in the head? Rather, weren't the bodies of the Albanians killed in combat by the Serb police gathered into the ditch to create a horror scene which was sure to have an appalling effect on public opinion? Don't the violence and rapidity of Belgrade's reaction, which gave the chief of the KVM forty-eight hours to leave Yugoslavia, show that the Yugoslavs are sure of what they are saying?

Only an international inquiry above all suspicion will make it possible to clarify these obscure points. Finnish and Belurussian legal doctors were expected to arrive in Pristina on Wednesday to attend the autopsies being carried out by Yugoslav doctors. The problem is that the Belgrade authorities have never been cooperative in this matter. Why? Whatever the conclusions of the investigators, the Racak massacre shows that the hope of soon reaching a settlement of the Kosovo crisis seems quite illusory.

-- Christophe Chatelot for Le Monde



Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:21
Ah okay ;) And they're lying right? Instead of just admiting that your source was out dated now you want to say they lied?

One more time what insult did I use?


They played down Ranta's findings from the very moment they came out. In fact, before they were even seen. So, Im not saying that they are lying, but I dont have the context of anything said.

You clearly just attacked the KLA with one claim after another.

"And here is what its commander in chief Hashim Thaci had to say to the BBC regarding Racak: “We had a key unit in the region. It was a fierce battle. We regrettably had many victims. But so did the Serbs.”

Thaci himself said it was a battle. Doesn't mention a massacre.


He mentioned that there was fighting in Racak, he didnt say that the massacre didnt happen. This is completely taken out of context. Again its well known that the area was held by the KLA and there was major support for the KLA in the region as well. All the more reason to despise the populous.

So what about Tim Judah's account:

[quote]On January 8, in a well planned ambush, the KLA killed 3 Serbian policemen at the village of the town of Stimlje. Two days later, in another nearby village, they killed another policeman. Early on January 15th fighting broke out around the village of Racak. A few hours later the KLA retreated and the police entered the village. Several people were shot over the next few hours. A group of 30 men and boys hid in the cellar of a house." pg. 193 Kosovo: War and Revenge

The boy was sparred, as Judah goes on to say, since the intention was to kill the men, who were perceived as KLA troops whether they were or not.

Like I said before, people will right articles for different sides to back whichever one. Its the actual studies that carry weight. You have a nasty tendency to follow one particular side, you seem to source primarily from those websites which have an interest in putting blame on the US. I have yet to read a book on Kosovo, whether its from Misha Glenny or Tim Judah, or any other major writer on the area, that has given true credence to NATO being the cause of the flight or things along those lines.

The attacks by Albanians that happened after the campaign were directed toward Serb institutions since they were seen as a fault, not NATO. In fact that population praised the NATO bombing more then anything and considering it an end to things. But ofcourse their view on the event matters little. Why dont you go ask the people in the region what made them flee?


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:33
"They played down Ranta's findings from the very moment they came out. In fact, before they were even seen. So, Im not saying that they are lying, but I dont have the context of anything said. "
 
With good reason. The Finnish team even said there was no massacre (as well as every other team there.)
 
"You clearly just attacked the KLA with one claim after another."

Well what do you call people that abduct innocent civilians and take their body apart for the black market, get their funding through heroin and sex slave trade, start international wars by attacking police etc? I tend to call those terrorists.
 
"He mentioned that there was fighting in Racak, he didnt say that the massacre didnt happen. This is completely taken out of context. Again its well known that the area was held by the KLA and there was major support for the KLA in the region as well. All the more reason to despise the populous."

I don't think at the time there was such a notion as a massacre then. It was fabricated later on on a wider scale. Again the two journalists there explained it quite clearly. If there had been a massacre he would have mentioned it.
 
You assuming tha the Serbs would dispise the populace is a fallacy, you just want that to be true, but it doesn't act as proof.
 
"So what about Tim Judah's account:"
 
The account shows the KLA to be terrorists and provides no proof of civilians being executed. Only those men there and the Serbs knew if they were KLA or not. I tend to think that they are since attacking the police and hide amongst the populations is a typical KLA cowardly tactic.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:35
With good reason. The Finnish team even said there was no massacre (as well as every other team there.)


The Finnish team's reports concluded that there were: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/298131.stm

Even the Contact Group came out and showed disdain for what happened, the UN came out to acknowledge it.

The account shows the KLA to be terrorists and provides no proof of civilians being executed. Only those men there and the Serbs knew if they were KLA or not. I tend to think that they are since attacking the police and hide amongst the populations is a typical KLA cowardly tactic.


The account says that the men who remained in the village were taken and killed. The killing could have very well been a retaliatory attack. The account mentions that the KLA retreated. The remaining men may have been they may have not been. What matters is that they were executed....

PS: Tim Judah acknowledged the massacre as well, if you read the book. Along with acknowledging that Serb forces pushed Albs out. But Im guessing that its all propaganda.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:40
"Like I said before, people will right articles for different sides to back whichever one. Its the actual studies that carry weight. You have a nasty tendency to follow one particular side, you seem to source primarily from those websites which have an interest in putting blame on the US. I have yet to read a book on Kosovo, whether its from Misha Glenny or Tim Judah, or any other major writer on the area, that has given true credence to NATO being the cause of the flight or things along those lines. "
 
And the actual studies like the forensic ones say there was no massacre. So i'm asking you now, why do you still believe it?
 
"The attacks by Albanians that happened after the campaign were directed toward Serb institutions since they were seen as a fault, not NATO. In fact that population praised the NATO bombing more then anything and considering it an end to things. But ofcourse their view on the event matters little. Why dont you go ask the people in the region what made them flee? "
 
Yea the Albanians did attack Serbs even after the war. Destroying hundreds of churches as hundreds of mosques go up, funded by Saudi Wahabis, gold leafed and all when the Albanian population is what? 60 percent unemployed? Maybe more?
 
I have no doubt that the KLA supporters in Kosovo won't admit that NATO was the cause of the refugees. Perhaps it was the Serbs and they feared vengeance for what they had done to the Serbs from WW1 until the present.
 
Ask someone in the region? Like the Albanian girl i mentioned whos Gorani boyfriend was beaten up while she was sold off to the Arab Emirates by the KLA? I will next time I get a chance.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 06:45
"The Finnish team's reports concluded that there were: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/298131.stm "

Dated 1999. Nice try. :)
 
Again the team said quite the opposite in 2007.
 
"The account says that the men who remained in the village were taken and killed. The killing could have very well been a retaliatory attack. The account mentions that the KLA retreated. The remaining men may have been they may have not been. What matters is that they were executed.... "

And how does he know?
 
Summery executions are nothing new nor illegal especially under the circumstances.
 
"PS: Tim Judah acknowledged the massacre as well, if you read the book. Along with acknowledging that Serb forces pushed Albs out. But Im guessing that its all propaganda. "

I'd have to see the exact wording. Serb forces pushed albs out. Pushed out? Out of a door way? Airplane? Car? And which Serb admited this? For example a "Serb" admited to executing civilians in Srebrenica. It was found out he was actually a Croatian soldier and was never in Srebrenica alone. He had lied.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:04
Summery executions are nothing new nor illegal especially under the circumstances.


Execution of unarmed civilians is a crime under any book. There is no evidence that they were or werent, they were simply men( and one woman) who were in the wrong place.

Dated 1999. Nice try. :)


Thats when the report came out. In 2003 she was still sticking to her story, but according to an unsourced article that quotes from another Serbian source, they said it was a lie... suddenly. I have no direct evidence where she came out and suddenly denied it. If this was so plausible, why hasnt it become such a scandal yet. Compare this to the recent Carla Del Ponte event.

I'd have to see the exact wording. S


Read the book and stop basing your views on biased commentaries and articles then.

Yea the Albanians did attack Serbs even after the war. Destroying hundreds of churches as hundreds of mosques go up, funded by Saudi Wahabis, gold leafed and all when the Albanian population is what? 60 percent unemployed? Maybe more?


What do Mosques have to do with what happened? Why are you jumping from one thing to another like this, stick to the issue at hand. The fact is that the Albs saw Serbs as the cause of what happened, not NATO.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:13
"Execution of unarmed civilians is a crime under any book. There is no evidence that they were or werent, they were simply men( and one woman) who were in the wrong place."
 
You don't know they were simply men and the fact that one was a woman doesn't pull at my heart at all. Women can be KLA just as much as men. In the documentary they had one of the old men being beat up by two KLA women.
 
"Thats when the report came out. In 2003 she was still sticking to her story, but according to an unsourced article that quotes from another Serbian source, they said it was a lie... suddenly. I have no direct evidence where she came out and suddenly denied it. If this was so plausible, why hasnt it become such a scandal yet. Compare this to the recent Carla Del Ponte event. "

Actually it says where the article was from. As far as we know in 2007 she has denied there was any massacre as well as the rest of the forensic teams.
 
Carla Del Ponte, what does that have to do it with it? Interesting that you bring her up.
 
"Read the book and stop basing your views on biased commentaries and articles then."

Pot. Kettle. Black.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:15
"What do Mosques have to do with what happened? Why are you jumping from one thing to another like this, stick to the issue at hand. The fact is that the Albs saw Serbs as the cause of what happened, not NATO."

Germans in WW2 saw the Jews as the source of their problem too due to the propaganda being used.
 
I'm bringing it up because I personally think it is disgusting to say that the Serbs tried to ethnicly cleans Kosovo of Albania when we take into consideration the history of the province for the last 500 years. Or even just the last 100 years. How Kosovo got turned from a Serb majority to a Serb minority. How you can claim ethnic cleansing when Serbs are driven out churches destroyed as wahabi funded mosques go up. If this doesn't raise any alarms to you, i'm sorry friend but you're walking the same pattern as the tricked Germans in WW2.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:16

Actually it says where the article was from. As far as we know in 2007 she has denied there was any massacre as well as the rest of the forensic teams.

Carla Del Ponte, what does that have to do it with it? Interesting that you bring her up.


Meaning that as of yet there has been no major pieces that have come out by any large credited news sources of this denial. Del Ponte's claims have made the media all over, by contrast. Why has this apparent denial not made headlines?

How you can claim ethnic cleansing when Serbs are driven out churches destroyed as wahabi funded mosques go up.


Its called Revenge. And its dealt with extensively in Tim Judah's book. The mosques been funded by Saudi's are mostly restorations. 200+ mosques were destroyed during the war.

Pot. Kettle. Black.


Its not. Im asking you to look at a major study instead of simply giving me sources that are so obviously pro-Serb biased,


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:23
"Meaning that as of yet there has been no major pieces that have come out by any large credited news sources of this denial. Del Ponte's claims have made the media all over, by contrast. Why has this apparent denial not made headlines?"
 
With the trend of disinformation concerning the situation at hand are you surprised? I havn't heard anything about Carla Del Ponte in America either. I had to watch outside news for it.
 
"Its called Revenge. And its dealt with extensively in Tim Judah's book. The mosques been funded by Saudi's are mostly restorations. 200+ mosques were destroyed during the war."

Revenge? I call it continuation of hundreds year old trend of Albanian expansion into Serbian territory. For there to be revenge, the Serbs would have had to start something.
 
200+ mosques destroyed? I havn't seen any of this. Can you show me? I can flood this thread with hundreds of pictures of churches destroyed.
 
And even if they are restorations, funny that the saudis are funding it, but I guess since they sent mujehadeen too there is no surprise. IT still doesn't excuse why churches and monestaries are attacked and destroyed, why the monks, nuns and priests have to live under the protection of KFOR.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:24
"Its not. Im asking you to look at a major study instead of simply giving me sources that are so obviously pro-Serb biased,"

The UN forensic teams are pro-Serb biased? Spain is pro Serbian for example?


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:25
How exactly is B92 unreliable or biased? It is about one of the few channels in Serbia that has remained unbiased throughout the years. Unless of course something like serbianna.com suites your fancy.




-------------


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:27
Spain is pro Serbian for example?


1. I have not seen the Spanish report. The Finnish were the only teach that came out with any report, it was made in 1999. It was the only EU team that dealt with Racak.
2. Actually, Spain and France were the two countries that throughout the course of war showed themselves to favor the Serbian side over the Albanian side. This is a well known fact from the war.


How exactly is B92 unreliable or biased? It is about one of the few channels in Serbia that has remained unbiased throughout the years.


Im guessing that Serbianna is among the "unbiased".


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:34
"1. I have not seen the Spanish report. The Finnish were the only teach that came out with any report, it was made in 1999. It was the only EU team that dealt with Racak. "

And as of 2007 it is concluded that there was no massacre.
 
"2. Actually, Spain and France were the two countries that throughout the course of war showed themselves to favor the Serbian side over the Albanian side. This is a well known fact from the war. "
 
Del Monde or however the French paper is called is actually very anti Serb. One of the writers even details this in one of her articles.
 
Short comment from Diana Johnstone
======================================================
Contrary to what Renaud Girard says in his conclusion, "The reluctance of the Belgrade government" is not, in fact, entirely incomprehensible, since Belgrade is convinced that the U.S.-led "international community" is determined to frame the Serb side in order to justify NATO bombing. The hasty and virulent William Walker condemnation of the Serbs for "the most horrendous" massacre he had ever seen (and that after four years in El Salvador!), not to mention the latest in a series of fatal "captures" of Bosnian Serbs accused of war crimes, has only confirmed the view of most Serbs that they can expect only unfair condemnation, not justice, from such "investigators".
Doubts are cast on the reality of the "Racak massacre" even by Le Monde, which for years has led the crusade against the Serbs. But Le Monde's own correspondent, Christophe Chatelot, sent the following report from Pristina.
-- Diana Johnstone
 
"Im guessing that Serbianna is among the "unbiased". "
 
I've actually never seen that before in my life. Thanks for the link. Going to look through it when I have time.
 
And yes B92 is well known to be general western ass kissers, pro tadic sell outs.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 07:42
And as of 2007 it is concluded that there was no massacre.


So where is the actual report? You can find the 1999 report online(http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/kosovo/Kosovo-Massacres2.htm), but I cant see the apparent new one?

Here is a website that records the history of reports around the Racak massacre: http://citycellar.com/BalkanWitness/racak.htm

It ends in 2005. What happened to the 2007 report?


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 08:03
"What happened to the 2007 report? "
 
This:
 

By PETER WORTHINGTON - Toronto Sun

Back in March, 1999, what tipped the scales for then U.S. president Bill Clinton to launch an air war against Serbia, were reports of a massacre of 45 Albanian civilians by Serb security forces at the village of Racak, some 30 km from Pristina in southern Kosovo.

Clinton told the world on March 19, 1999: "We should remember what happened in Racak ... innocent men, women and children were taken from their homes to a gully, forced to kneel in the dirt and sprayed with gunfire." Photos circled the world. NATO bombing began March 24, and lasted 78 days.

White House press secretary Joe Lockhart said of Racak: "A strong message will be brought to President (Slobodan) Milosevic about bringing those to justice who should be punished for this ... "

U.S. Foreign Secretary Madeleine Albright, eager to make war against then-Yugoslavia and speaking on CBS´ Face the Nation, cited Racak where, she said, there were "dozens of people with their throats slit." She called this the "galvanizing incident" that meant peace talks at Rambouillet were pointless, "humanitarian bombing" the only recourse.

Germany´s Foreign Minister, Joschka Fischer, told the newspaper Berliner Zeitung that the Racak massacre "became the turning point for me" and war was the only answer.

Canada´s then foreign minister, Lloyd Axworthy, called the massacre "a disgusting victimization of civilians."

Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported the dead had fingernails torn out - evidence of torture.

On Jan. 16, the day after the actual massacre, William Walker, the veteran American diplomat who headed peace verifiers for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), was taken by Kosovo Liberation Army members to Racak to see the bodies in the ditch. He declared that the dead "obviously were executed where they lay."

His OSCE report spoke of "arbitrary arrests, killings and mutilations of unarmed civilians" at Racak.

GROUND TROOPS

Canada´s Louise Arbour, then special prosecutor for the war crimes tribunal, (hand-picked for the job by Albright) was prevented by Serb authorities from visiting Racak. She vowed retribution for the massacre, urging that "international troops on the ground" were the only way to effect arrests.

When Milosevic was indicted as a war criminal, the massacre at Racak was cited as evidence. The London Times wrote that victims had their eyes gouged out, heads smashed in, faces blown away at close range, all "farmers, workers, villagers, aged 12-74, men, women, children."

Serbian and Belorussian forensic people investigated, but were suspect, so the European Union authorized a forensic team from Finland, headed by Helena Ranta, a dental pathologist, to investigate. The Finnish report was not made public.

Ranta gave a press conference at which she was vague, admitting there was no evidence of mutilation or torture, and that Yugoslav authorities had co-operated. But she also called the killings "a crime against humanity," widely interpreted to mean Racak was indeed a cold-blooded massacre.

It has since turned out, through subsequent investigations by German, French and American correspondents and by human rights and peace groups, including the anti-war International Action Centre and the Liberty Foundation, that the Racak massacre seems an enormous, albeit effective, hoax perpetrated by the Kosovo Liberation Army to persuade the U.S. and NATO to attack the Serbs. The goal was independence for Kosovo, possibly leading to the dream of a Greater Albania.

We now have a far better idea of what really happened at Racak - a pre-crisis town of 2,000 and a stronghold of KLA agitation. By January, 1999, most of its population had fled to a nearby town, Stimlje, leaving perhaps 400 people behind. When four Serbian policemen were ambushed and murdered in two separate incidents in a week, Serb security forces surrounded Racak and attacked. The Serbs tipped off foreign journalists who came to see. Fighting was savage and brief, not only in town but in the countryside.

Journalists found Racak had few people actually living there.

Some 20 bodies were counted. Serbs and journalists left at dusk. The next day, Jan. 16, the KLA was again in control.

During the night, it seems that all the KLA killed fighting in the area - 45 of them - were dumped in a gully at Racak and journalists and the OSCE investigators invited to see what was described as the "massacre" of unarmed civilians.

Military insignia and/or badges had been removed from clothing, military gear replaced by civilian clothing. No weapons were in sight. The hoax was on. William Walker was first on the scene and believed what he saw and was told. The international press relayed his outrage to the world.

Forensic evidence showed - as the Finnish team has since confirmed - that most of the 45 Racak dead had been shot at long range, not execution-style. Corpses tested positive with residue of gunpowder on their hands, indicating they had been firing weapons. No ammunition or shell casings were found near the bodies, where they had supposedly been massacred, nor were there pools of blood.

BODIES MOVED

Pathologists also found the 45 dead men had all been shot in different parts of the body, from different directions, indicating a battle somewhere else, the dead dumped together for effect.

Until recently, no one was interested in the truth. "Whether or not it´s a massacre, nobody wants to know any more," wrote Austria´s Die Welt newspaper. Autopsy findings were delayed while the thirst for war echoed in the halls of allied power.

The German newspaper Berliner Zeitung got access to the Finnish forensic findings, and sent a team of reporters to investigate and concluded: "In all probability, there was no Racak massacre at all ... "

French journalist Renaud Girard of Le Figaro was in Racak and was puzzled that reports failed to mention it was a "fortified village with a lot of trenches" - a KLA stronghold. Although he wrote an initial massacre story, he later had doubts: "I felt something was wrong."

Christophe Chatelet of Le Monde was in Racak the day of the Serb attack, and found one dead and four wounded when he left at dusk. The next day the KLA showed bodies from a massacre that hadn´t been there before. "I can´t solve that mystery," he said. (At the time, KLA commander-in-chief Hashim Thaci told the BBC: "We had a key unit in the region and had a fierce fight. Regrettably, we had many casualties, but so did the Serbs.")

Further investigation shows that two TV journalists for Associated Press and two teams of OSCE observers also saw the fight for Racak from a hill, entered when Serb security forces did and left when they left. The AP crew filmed a deserted village. It was overnight that the KLA returned and gathered their dead from the fighting. Next day, Walker told the world how adults and children had been "executed," some as they tried to flee. CNN reporter Christiane Amanpour, wife of U.S. State Department spokesman James Rubin, showed little skepticism in reporting on the "massacre of civilians."

CHECK THE NET

(For those who want to check further, enter "Racak massacre" on Google or Yahoo on the Internet and see what you get.)

It changes nothing, but Racak should make people wary of government propaganda about areas where they have little knowledge, but strong feelings. Remember the emotions generated about "ethnic cleansing" in Kosovo?

At the end of World War II, the population of Kosovo was 50-50 Serb and Albanian. By 1999 it was 90% Albanian. Today, it´s close to 96%. Over 50 years, who´s been "ethnically cleansed"? Today, Albanians in Macedonia are using arguments similar to those used against Serbs in Kosovo - prejudice, being frozen from jobs, discriminated against. Rarely mentioned are maps produced in Albania that show not only Kosovo, but parts of Macedonia and Montenegro as part of "Greater Albania."

It doesn´t take an Einstein to realize that the U.S., NATO and western media have been conned and manipulated into supporting an aggressive exercise in nation-building that is not likely to be resolved peaceably. NATO´s beleaguered soldiers are innocents caught in a Balkan quagmire, thanks to a blundering, myopic, vainglorious political leader.



Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 08:15
This article uses outdated arguments that were used by Milosevic during the trial. The gunpowder evidence was negated because, as Ranta stated," they were based on a paraffin test which had been used already in the 1930s, and which she did not consider reliable." As the 2003 trial showed. In fact, bullets were discovered under the bodies. Meaning that these people were shot while they were prostrate.

I have found no evidence in the initial report that the clothing was changed. This most likely comes from Serbian claims. If the bodies were actually changed, then why wouldnt the forensics be able to see some disparity between the hours they were dead and the actual hours?

At the end of World War II, the population of Kosovo was 50-50 Serb and Albanian.


This has been dealt with extensively in our past discussion. You fail to note that this 50-50 came as a result of extensive resettlement programs that brought in Montenegrins and Serbs into Kosovo while also expelling Albanians. This was shown in a series of articles you can find here: www.elsie.de/pdf/B2002GatheringClouds.pdf

The actual demographic when Serbia took over was about 69% Albanian. This was after a series of events inwhich Serbs fled Kosovo and Albanians were expelled out of areas north of Kosovo(the Muhaxhers)

Ranta gave a press conference at which she was vague, admitting there was no evidence of mutilation or torture, and that Yugoslav authorities had co-operated.


Actually, Serbs had taken a large number of evidence away, including the bullets inside the bodies of those killed.

PS: The article you posted is not the 2007 report. Its an article.

Denying the Racak killings has been the goal of pretty much anyone who wants to attack Clinton, America or NATO. Its been denied by Yugoslavia since the accusation first sprang up. But your statement about the world denying it is wrong. Almost all major international organizations have come out and condemned the massacres, acknowledging them. So as of yet it remains a recognized massacre, and a hoax to articles with an agenda.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 08:25
"This article uses outdated arguments that were used by Milosevic during the trial. The gunpowder evidence was negated because, as Ranta stated," they were based on a paraffin test which had been used already in the 1930s, and which she did not consider reliable." As the 2003 trial showed. In fact, bullets were discovered under the bodies. Meaning that these people were shot while they were prostrate."

How does bullets under the body mean they were shot while prostrate? It doesn't even matter since the UN forensic teams already explained there is no massacre but I want to see how your logic works.
 
"This has been dealt with extensively in our past discussion. You fail to note that this 50-50 came as a result of extensive resettlement programs that brought in Montenegrins and Serbs into Kosovo while also expelling Albanians"

Actually comrade Marshall Tito ;) didn't allow Serbs to return to Kosovo. So nice try again?
 
And pray tell how did the Albanians become a majority in Kosovo? How did they get there in the first place? Perks for serving the axis? Are you aware of the methods used?
 
"Actually, Serbs had taken a large number of evidence away, including the bullets inside the bodies of those killed. "

Right right, well maybe you take a large number of edivence in another way. In a way that doesn't agree with the forensic team so your opinion is really moot at best.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 08:26
"PS: The article you posted is not the 2007 report. Its an article."

When you get a chance to read it, you'll see that it explains why there isn't a report.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 08:37

How does bullets under the body mean they were shot while prostrate? It doesn't even matter since the UN forensic teams already explained there is no massacre but I want to see how your logic works.


As you have brought me no actual evidence of the report, just countless articles. But anyway, as Helena Ranta stated at the official trial, if bullets enter a standing body(which is fighting) they will fly away. If the body is prostate, then the bullets enter the body and go right under it. Its not a major science. Bullets were found right under the bodies of those killed, as, again, Ranta stated during an official trial.

And the team was also prevented from looking at evidence that was removed from the bodies: "In January 1999, during the medicolegal investigations in Pristina, the Team’s access to any foreign objects discovered and removed from the bodies, was surprisingly restricted." http://citycellar.com/BalkanWitness/Racak-FET-summary.htm#_ftn2

And pray tell how did the Albanians become a majority in Kosovo? How did they get there in the first place? Perks for serving the axis? Are you aware of the methods used?


Albanians had higher birthrates then Serbs. Im not going to get into the rest because this has been dealt with in another topic. Go read through it and then comment. I will not repeat myself.

As of now Im done repeating myself. You have yet to actually provide this 2007 report. That Toranto sun report that you posted is older then the Helena Ranta testimony, its a 2001 report, so I dont so how it has any significance.



Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 08:51
"As you have brought me no actual evidence of the report, just countless articles. But anyway, as Helena Ranta stated at the official trial, if bullets enter a standing body(which is fighting) they will fly away. If the body is prostate, then the bullets enter the body and go right under it. Its not a major science. Bullets were found right under the bodies of those killed, as, again, Ranta stated during an official trial."
 
All fine, it doesn't change the fact that all (or all but one at best) say there was no massacre. But I pose a question to you. If one were to frame the massacre, would it be too hard to come up with an idea such as simply putting bullets below the people killed, or heck, let's really rack our brains, maybe even shoot the already dead bodies?
 
"And the team was also prevented from looking at evidence that was removed from the bodies: "In January 1999, during the medicolegal investigations in Pristina, the Team’s access to any foreign objects discovered and removed from the bodies, was surprisingly restricted.""
 
And who prevented them? Again still outdated but go ahead and tell us.
 
"Albanians had higher birthrates then Serbs. Im not going to get into the rest because this has been dealt with in another topic. Go read through it and then comment. I will not repeat myself."

That is part of it, but the main reason is because the Nazi Albanians slaughtered Serb civilians during WW2 and during Tito's reign Serbs were not allowed to return to Kosovo. At the same time he opened the boarder with Albania in an attempt to absorb it into his communist regime. So please, don't give me "higher birth rates" as the sole reason. You don't go from 50 percent to 96 in less then half a century simply like that. I'm not going to read 30 or whatever plus pages of the other thread you post in. If you have a point make it, if not i'll just assume you have none to make.
 
"As of now Im done repeating myself. You have yet to actually provide this 2007 report. That Toranto sun report that you posted is older then the Helena Ranta testimony, its a 2001 report, so I dont so how it has any significance."
 
I explained why there is no report. Or better yet the article did. We have her quoted in various news papers saying the same thing.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 09:08
At the same time he opened the boarder with Albania in an attempt to absorb it into his communist regime


This is a claim that I have seen not one shred of evidence. Hell even Belgrade has never made the claim, only journalists.

hat is part of it, but the main reason is because the Nazi Albanians slaughtered Serb civilians during WW2 and during Tito's reign Serbs were not allowed to return to Kosovo.


Those targeted were almost entirely colonists that were planted there during the 20-30's period. During that time nearly 10,000 Albanians died and many thousands were expelled. But, as I will say one more time, we have dealt with this before so this convo is useless. You didnt even look at the article I posted yet, gathering clouds is a revealing look at what was going on in Kosova during the Serb takeover. Thousands of Albanians were relocated into Albania during this period.

Anyway, this is my final post about this. This is available for you to read in the other topic.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 09:24
"This is a claim that I have seen not one shred of evidence. Hell even Belgrade has never made the claim, only journalists. "
 
It's a pretty easy well known fact. And denying them is like denying Stalin's expantionistic goals and the likes. If you can't see it look harder.
 
"Those targeted were almost entirely colonists that were planted there during the 20-30's period. "

Yes i'm sure the Nazi Albanian Waffen SS Skanderbeg blessed by the Mufti of Jerusalem, really took the time to figure out who was a "colonist" and who was not. And how can you be a colonist in your own country?
 
"During that time nearly 10,000 Albanians died and many thousands were expelled."

During what time ww2? Sorry but no one in Serbia could have done this. They were busy fighting against the axis unlike others, and I doubt Draza much gave a damn about the Albanian minority in Kosovo. Serbia had the full weight of the axis falling down on it, its army as a stand up fighting force did not exist. So I doubt they expelled and killed thousands of Albanians. This is fantasy land and you're riding a unicorn through it when you say such things.
 
"But, as I will say one more time, we have dealt with this before so this convo is useless."

You havn't dealt with me discussing the convo but I can understand you not wanting to proceed any further, but I hope that you do.
 
"You didnt even look at the article I posted yet, gathering clouds is a revealing look at what was going on in Kosova during the Serb takeover. Thousands of Albanians were relocated into Albania during this period."

I did and I already told you, Serbs weren't allowed to go back into Kosovo. Again Tito wanted Albania to be part of Yugoslavia so what would be the point of doing that?


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 17:44
And yes B92 is well known to be general western ass kissers, pro tadic sell outs.


.....

So Tadic is a sell out for a person who has never even been in Serbia? Laughable. From what I seen he is seen as someone more rational and not a mad-man nor an ass kisser. He won't ruin his nation for no reason, but he has not been friendly towards reconciling an independent kosovo either.


-------------


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 18:59
It's a pretty easy well known fact. And denying them is like denying Stalin's expantionistic goals and the likes. If you can't see it look harder.


Its not a fact because its never been proven.

Yes i'm sure the Nazi Albanian Waffen SS Skanderbeg blessed by the Mufti of Jerusalem, really took the time to figure out who was a "colonist" and who was not. And how can you be a colonist in your own country?


Serbia didnt have the demographic advantage when it first entered Kosovo so, like it did earlier in other parts, it granted land to Serb colonists from Montenegro. This went on from 1912 to the beginning of the first WW and then from the first WW to the start of the second. It was during WWII that Albanians started revenge attacks against those colonists Serbia brought in. Tito didnt allow Serbs who had been planted in Kosovo to return.

During what time ww2? Sorry but no one in Serbia could have done this. They were busy fighting against the axis unlike others, and I doubt Draza much gave a damn about the Albanian minority in Kosovo. Serbia had the full weight of the axis falling down on it, its army as a stand up fighting force did not exist. So I doubt they expelled and killed thousands of Albanians. This is fantasy land and you're riding a unicorn through it when you say such things.


The massacres happened in 1912-1914. British Red Cross workers in Albania attested to the large number of refugees and even older Albanians themselves will attest to how their grandfathers had to take in Kosovar refugees.

You havn't dealt with me discussing the convo but I can understand you not wanting to proceed any further, but I hope that you do.


Dont patronize me, as I stated, I have discussed this before with someone before, repeating it here is simpy just exhausting and boring me.

Again Tito wanted Albania to be part of Yugoslavia so what would be the point of doing that?


1. This was only for a very very short period of time. The breakup happened quickly, well before any Albanian would have known that living under Tito was going to be much better. There was no large scale immigration. It would have even been difficult if you know what the path was like then from north Albania to Kosova. It wasnt flat terrain. I know of only one case where people from Albania were stuck and that is the people of the region of Luma, which is right next to Kosova, they had a market they went to in Kosova and so many were stuck when the borders closed. The zone next to the borders then became the site of a major labor camp in Albania... it was guarded highly to say the least.

The only fantasy I have seen so far is the claims of Albanians being recent immigrants. The vast number of Albanians there have been in Kosova for a number of generations already.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 21:12
"So Tadic is a sell out for a person who has never even been in Serbia? Laughable. From what I seen he is seen as someone more rational and not a mad-man nor an ass kisser. He won't ruin his nation for no reason, but he has not been friendly towards reconciling an independent kosovo either."
 
You don't need to be there to figure it out. When he goes to Croatia and said what he said it's quite obvious. When he can't get a majority coalition and he threatens to make a parralel government I really have to wonder if his interests are for who is paying his salary or for the country.
 
"Its not a fact because its never been proven."
 
Never been proven? Then why would Tito not allow Serb refugees to return to Kosovo while opening the boarder with Albania via Kosovo?
 
"Serbia didnt have the demographic advantage when it first entered Kosovo so, like it did earlier in other parts, it granted land to Serb colonists from Montenegro. This went on from 1912 to the beginning of the first WW and then from the first WW to the start of the second. It was during WWII that Albanians started revenge attacks against those colonists Serbia brought in. Tito didnt allow Serbs who had been planted in Kosovo to return."
 
When they first entered Kosovo? What date is that? You are very vague in your dating.
 
What colonists? Again you repeating it doesn't make it true.
 
In any case even if it was 50/50 high birthrate doesn't explain how they become a majority.
 
Encyclopedia Britannica, Edition 1973, Vol 13, Page 479
(quote):
Kosovo-Metohija (Kosmet), an autonomous region of Serbia, Yugoslavia. Population (1961) 963,988, of whom the majority are Albanian-speaking Shqipetars.
(End quote)
Collier's Encyclopedia, Edition 1993, Vol 23, p 726
(qoute):
Kosovo, also known as Kosovo-Metohija..., an area on the south of the Republic of Serbia, southern Yugoslavia. Densely populated, Kosovo had 1,954,747 inhabitants in 1991. The largest group are Albanians (77 percent), Serbs (13 percent), Bosnian Muslims (4 percent), Roma (2 percent), and Montenegrins (2 percent).
(end quote)
So you had an over 100% birthrate? No sorry I don't think so.
 
"The massacres happened in 1912-1914. British Red Cross workers in Albania attested to the large number of refugees and even older Albanians themselves will attest to how their grandfathers had to take in Kosovar refugees."

Source? Perhaps I can refer you to an author, Michael Lees.
 
"Dont patronize me, as I stated, I have discussed this before with someone before, repeating it here is simpy just exhausting and boring me."

I think that is very sad actually, that me, an outsider can take more interest in history that you are part of then you.
 
"1. This was only for a very very short period of time. The breakup happened quickly, well before any Albanian would have known that living under Tito was going to be much better. There was no large scale immigration. It would have even been difficult if you know what the path was like then from north Albania to Kosova. It wasnt flat terrain. I know of only one case where people from Albania were stuck and that is the people of the region of Luma, which is right next to Kosova, they had a market they went to in Kosova and so many were stuck when the borders closed. The zone next to the borders then became the site of a major labor camp in Albania... it was guarded highly to say the least."
 
What was for a very very short period of time? What break up?
 
There wasn't a large scale imigration? Could you explain how you have a 100% increase in your population in just 30 or so years? And how do you know Tito didn't allow these supposed "colonists" to go back?
 
Take for example in the 1500s the Albanian population of Kosovo was 1.8 percent. These numbers are usually criticized because it doesn't take into account some of the mountain village. But even if we move the decimal over one spot and make it 18 percent that is far from a majority. Every time the Serbs rebelled, their lands were taken away and given to the Muslim Albanians. So this story is nothing new.
 
"The only fantasy I have seen so far is the claims of Albanians being recent immigrants. The vast number of Albanians there have been in Kosova for a number of generations already. "

Oh no not recent. WW2 happened a while ago where many Serbs were slaughtered and displaced. At the end of WW2 i'd say Albanians had a majority because of that. And then with Tito's plan they filled in the rest.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 21:35
Source? Perhaps I can refer you to an author, Michael Lees.


I brought you articles contemporary to the events, they are up above. The refugee problem is a well known event that occurred in Albania as at that time King Zog was planning of settling these people in the south of the country, so as to make the south purely Albanian. Many of them settled in southern portions of the country, others in the more northern part.

What was for a very very short period of time? What break up?


The fall out between Tito and Hoxha. The two became bitter enemies very quickly as Hoxha hated Tito's version of Socialism. There was a short stint in the period immediately followed WWII when they were close, but this relationship was torn pretty quickly. Hoxha allied with Stalin, who also opposed Tito.

When they first entered Kosovo? What date is that? You are very vague in your dating.


1912 was when Serbia entered Kosovo.

Never been proven? Then why would Tito not allow Serb refugees to return to Kosovo while opening the boarder with Albania via Kosovo?


Like I said, it was because many were colonists. Although I havent read any edict yet that mentions this restriction. If an original document could be presented by one of the authors of historians, it would be nice.

The border opening was because he hoped to attract Albania by uniting it with Kosovo, but like I said, this was a short stint as Hoxha didnt want to relinquish power. Some people were stuck on both sides, but this was mostly in the very south of Kosovo which had a market linked to northern Albania. This region of northern Albania has always been underpopulated, so not many immigrants could have come from that spot.

What colonists? Again you repeating it doesn't make it true.


If you read the documents I presented instead of ignoring them you would nt be in such a flux right now: www.elsie.de/pdf/B2002GatheringClouds.pdf

The colonists were brought over mostly from Montenegro. This occurred during the Kingdom period. Thousands of Albanians during this period were also shipped off to Turkey, where they have remained ever since. These are part of what was called the Muhaxhers.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 22:13
"I brought you articles contemporary to the events, they are up above. The refugee problem is a well known event that occurred in Albania as at that time King Zog was planning of settling these people in the south of the country, so as to make the south purely Albanian. Many of them settled in southern portions of the country, others in the more northern part. "
 
Your article is crap and apologetic to the Waffen SS. Perhaps next you can give me an article by some Ante Pavelic lover discribing the WW2 Serb genocide against the Croatians too? Now who is patronizing who?
 
"The fall out between Tito and Hoxha. The two became bitter enemies very quickly as Hoxha hated Tito's version of Socialism. There was a short stint in the period immediately followed WWII when they were close, but this relationship was torn pretty quickly. Hoxha allied with Stalin, who also opposed Tito. "
 
You seem to be confused because no where did I say that Hoxha wanted to be part of Yugoslavia. Tito did this because Yugoslavia had better living conditions. He wanted to twist Albania's arm into it more or less.
 
"1912 was when Serbia entered Kosovo. "
 
They had been majority since the early 1900s and at least 500 years before that.
 

Miss Mary E. Durham, an Englishwomen, travelled across the Serb lands and gave the impressions in her book "Through the Lands of the Serb". She visited Montenegro, Serbia and Old Serbia. The chapters directly related to Montenegro are available for reading online. The map is also available. Miss Durham dedicated the book to her mother. The book was published in London, in 1904, by Edward Arnold and printed in Edinburgh by Morrison and Gibb Ltd.
 
http://www.kosovo.net/durham.html - http://www.kosovo.net/durham.html
 
Few decade later things became extremely bad..Torture under christian Serbs continued..

The Kosovo Vilayet
In 1877, Ottoman Turkey created the Vilayet or province of Kosovo, or “Kossovo”- which consisted of the sandzak or district of Skopje, or Uskub, in Macedonia, and the sandzaks of Prizren in Kosovo and Novi Pazar in the Sandzak or Rashka region of Serbia.

The Albanian leaders of the 1878 League of Prizren, when the Greater Albania ideology was formulated, demanded that Turkey attach or annex the vilayet of Kosovo to a Greater Albania. The Ottoman Turkish government rejected the creation of a Greater Albania, which resulted in an Albanian insurgency to expel the Turks and to create a Greater Albania on their own.

The British Consul in Albania, Sir William Kirby-Green, described the Prizren League in an 1880 report as follows:
“[T]he Albanian League is an organization of the most fanatical Muslims in the country. Those people are now taken up with extreme religious fanaticism and hatred of Christians. With the exception perhaps of Mecca, Prizren is the most dangerous spot for a Christian to be in all Mohammedan countries.”
The goal to create a Greater Albania failed when Turkish military forces put down the rebellion. The Greater Albania ideology, however, endured and evolved.

In 1905, the population of the Kosovo vilayet was approximately 1,100,000.

The total area of the vilayet was 12,700 sq. m.

The population consisted of Serbs, Bulgarians, Macedonians, Albanians, Greeks, Turks, Vlachs, and Roma. There were good roads that ran through Skopje and a railway from Salonika that ran north and divided at Skopje, the capital of the vilayet. One branch traversed to Kosovska Mitrovica and the other to Nis in Serbia.

The vilayet was rich in minerals and there were many mines.
In 1907, there were two chrome mines in the vilayet, at Orasje and Verbestica, near Strpce in southern Kosovo.
http://www.rastko.org.yu/kosovo/istorija/kosovo_migrations/index.html - http://www.rastko.org.yu/kosovo/istorija/kosovo_migrations/index.html
 
"The border opening was because he hoped to attract Albania by uniting it with Kosovo, but like I said, this was a short stint as Hoxha didnt want to relinquish power. Some people were stuck on both sides, but this was mostly in the very south of Kosovo which had a market linked to northern Albania. This region of northern Albania has always been underpopulated, so not many immigrants could have come from that spot."

This is what i've been saying. Tito wanted to absorb Albania. I didn't say Hoxha wanted togo along willingly. So you yourself admit Tito's goal to absorb Albania into Yugoslavia.
 
"If you read the documents I presented instead of ignoring them you would nt be in such a flux right now: http://www.elsie.de/pdf/B2002GatheringClouds.pdf - www.elsie.de/pdf/B2002GatheringClouds.pdf
 
The colonists were brought over mostly from Montenegro. This occurred during the Kingdom period. Thousands of Albanians during this period were also shipped off to Turkey, where they have remained ever since. These are part of what was called the Muhaxhers."

This is pure crap. "The Serbs believe it is their god given right to ethnicly cleanse all non serbs." This is pure rubbish. Stupidity on the level of the magyar-gardra. Racist indoctrinated non-sense. It throws all sense of objectivity out the door in the first couple of paragraphs.


Posted By: Theodore Felix
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 22:33
The Albanian leaders of the 1878 League of Prizren, when the Greater Albania ideology was formulated, demanded that Turkey attach or annex the vilayet of Kosovo to a Greater Albania. The Ottoman Turkish government rejected the creation of a Greater Albania, which resulted in an Albanian insurgency to expel the Turks and to create a Greater Albania on their own.


I dont know what source you got this from but its seriously diluted. In 1878 there was no Albania as a state; thus there could not have been a greater Albania. This concept only came about after numerous Albanian inhabited regions were excluded from what is today called Albania: Ulcin in Montenegro, Kosova, and parts of Macedonia. The League of Prizren was a league formulated by the landed elite Albanians of the Ottoman Empire for the securing of their land against a common foe. The league didnt quite work as regional politics continued to dominate. The hope was that Albs should unite in the face of a growing threat: the continual expansion of Greece and Serbia and the increasing western and Russian penetration into the Balkans. The Turks attacked it because they feared that it would lead to great Albanian national awareness.

This is pure crap. "The Serbs believe it is their god given right to ethnicly cleanse all non serbs." This is pure rubbish. Stupidity on the level of the magyar-gardra. Racist indoctrinated non-sense. It throws all sense of objectivity out the door in the first couple of paragraphs.


They are contemporary articles, not modern day ones. These are essentially primary documents. You can attack the language as you please, but the events described are real. Among them there are Danish, German and Romanian reports.

They had been majority since the early 1900s and at least 500 years before that.


What was once is no more. What does that mean if they were the majority 500 years ago? That was 500 years ago.

This is what i've been saying. Tito wanted to absorb Albania. I didn't say Hoxha wanted togo along willingly. So you yourself admit Tito's goal to absorb Albania into Yugoslavia.


This was a well known fact, what isnt a fact is the claim that there was this mass rush of Albanians into Kosova. Thats as fictional as the unicorn. The actual migrations could not have been on a large number, they were more probably local and mostly from those that descended from Kosovar families that fled to Albania during the 1930's.


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 16-Jun-2008 at 23:28

This is pure crap. "The Serbs believe it is their god given right to ethnicly cleanse all non serbs." This is pure rubbish. Stupidity on the level of the magyar-gardra. Racist indoctrinated non-sense. It throws all sense of objectivity out the door in the first couple of paragraphs.

Let see an article from a wellknown serbian scholar:
 
1944 Vaso Cubrilovic:The Minority Problem in the New Yugoslavia: Memorandum
 
"The Minority Problem in the New Yugoslavia," is a second memorandum on the Albanians (and other minorities) written by the noted Bosnian Serb scholar and political figure Vaso Cubrilovic (1897-1990).
 
Reasons Why the Minority Problem in Yugoslavia Must be Solved
 
The democratic federation of Yugoslavia will only achieve peace and ensure its development if it can be made ethnically pure and if, by solving its minority problems, it can remove the causes of friction with neighbouring states once and for all.
 
 I have given deliberate priority to the Vojvodina and to Old Serbia (Kosovo), considering that these two regions represent the crux of our minority problem
 
After examining why the cleansing of minorities is necessary, let us now see what options are available for carrying out the task. In actual fact, conditions for implementation are quite favourable. In 1918, Europe held the view that the minority problem could be solved by giving privileges to such groups. The experience of this war has proven to all of Europe that this approach was wrong.
 
How to Solve the Minority Problem in the New Yugoslavia

If we take the stand, as we do, that the only just solution to the minority problem is expulsion, we are faced with a number of issues which have to be dealt with. Should all minorities be expelled or only certain ethnic groups? From which regions should ethnic minorities be expelled first? And what is more important, how are we to resettle the deserted towns and villages? I have a few suggestions to make in this connection.

As to priorities for expulsion, I hold the opinion that we should consider the following order: the Germans, the Hungarians, the Albanians, the Italians and the Romanians
 
Nonetheless, if we wish to solve the minority problem, we will have to take over Backa, Kosovo and Metohija in ethnic terms and drive out hundreds of thousands of Hungarians and Albanians
 
We must be more straightforward and practical in dealing with the Albanians in Old Serbia (Kosovo) and Macedonia in order to conquer Kosovo and Metohija ethnically and, at the same time, avoid a conflict with the neighbouring people in Albania.
 
 
What colonists? Again you repeating it doesn't make it true.
 
This quote is also from Cubrilovics memorandum:
From 1918 to 1938, the Albanians increased their numbers in Kosovo and Metohija more by natural growth than we were able to do by bringing in settlers. Driving our colonists out of Backa, Kosovo and Metohija, the Hungarians and Albanians were thus able to cancel out the few results we obtained.
 
 
http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts/AH1944_1.html - http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts/AH1944_1.html
 

 




-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 17-Jun-2008 at 02:41
"I dont know what source you got this from but its seriously diluted. In 1878 there was no Albania as a state; thus there could not have been a greater Albania. This concept only came about after numerous Albanian inhabited regions were excluded from what is today called Albania: Ulcin in Montenegro, Kosova, and parts of Macedonia. The League of Prizren was a league formulated by the landed elite Albanians of the Ottoman Empire for the securing of their land against a common foe. The league didnt quite work as regional politics continued to dominate. The hope was that Albs should unite in the face of a growing threat: the continual expansion of Greece and Serbia and the increasing western and Russian penetration into the Balkans. The Turks attacked it because they feared that it would lead to great Albanian national awareness. "
 
You're playing samantics now. We established that Albania came into existance as a nation in 1912. The League of Prizren was a group of fanatics that wanted to throw the Turks off and gain a bunch of land in the process. I think William who was actually there at the time knew what he was talking about.
 
"They are contemporary articles, not modern day ones. These are essentially primary documents. You can attack the language as you please, but the events described are real. Among them there are Danish, German and Romanian reports."
 
You are misusing contemporary I think.
 
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/contemporary - http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/contemporary
 
of the present time; modern: a lecture on the contemporary novel.
 
And during that time in 99, even I was against the Serbs. I believed they were ethnicly cleansing maniacs. But when I did the research with all the facts laid on the table i saw who really did what. I didn't care that civilians were hit with cluster bombs in belgrade, so what I said as I watched it on the news. So i've been where you are and perhaps further, have you been where I have been?
 
"What was once is no more. What does that mean if they were the majority 500 years ago? That was 500 years ago."

I said it reached back 500 years ago. But at the start of the 1900s the Albanians were not a majority. And I think you should echo your words to a few of your countrymen because based on the shakey Illyrian theory many Albanians who I speak to feel entitled to get the lands back that their supposed ancestors. If we use that logic, then i'm entitled to everything from Britania to Persia.
 
And what if Albanians are majority in Kosovo? So what? What gives them the right to pick a plot of land and say they are majority there and that it belongs to them. If I bring 3 romanians and go into your kitchen, then we become the majority in your kitchen. Are we then allowed to break away and form our own house?
 
Or here is another question, why are the Serbs in the Serb majority sections of Kosovo not allowed to break away? Double standards? Or what about the Serbs in Bosnia?
 
What about 1244? Here is the interesting thing. In September or so the entire UN will vote on if Kosovo is to be another Albanian country or not. This time the Serbs will be allowed to present their case. So far out of 192 UN member nations, only 28 or so have recognized Kosovo. Whatever the UN votes, will be law and those who do not follow it will simply be kicked out of the UN. I gotta be honest with you comrade, it isn't looking good for Thaci and the KLA government.
 
"This was a well known fact, what isnt a fact is the claim that there was this mass rush of Albanians into Kosova. Thats as fictional as the unicorn. The actual migrations could not have been on a large number, they were more probably local and mostly from those that descended from Kosovar families that fled to Albania during the 1930's."

I already showed you the Britannica quote. In 20 or 30 years the Albanian population jumped 100%+ percent. That isn't due to birth rate. That is migration.
 
"Let see an article from a wellknown serbian scholar"
 
Written 1944. Well let's see. The Croats, Bosniaks, Albanians and Romanians were all axis (Though Romania's goal wasn't the same as the previous 3 nations.) and what did those nations do? Well Croats and Bosniaks and Albanians all formed Waffen SS units and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Serbs. The Romanians offered no help. I think i'd be pissed enough in that situation that I wouldn't much disagree with Vaso.
 
Little tip for you, read something other then "albanianhistory.net"
 
"This quote is also from Cubrilovics memorandum"

It is their country. Serbs can move wherever they wanted to. And thank you for the quote. It explains my point exactly. The Albanians forced the Serbs to leave. Just because they are "colonists" didn't give the Albanians the right to force them out, to kill and to harrass.


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 17-Jun-2008 at 06:14

Written 1944. Well let's see. The Croats, Bosniaks, Albanians and Romanians were all axis (Though Romania's goal wasn't the same as the previous 3 nations.) and what did those nations do? Well Croats and Bosniaks and Albanians all formed Waffen SS units and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Serbs. The Romanians offered no help. I think i'd be pissed enough in that situation that I wouldn't much disagree with Vaso.

 

Like always you don’t read carefully,others ,posts. Here it is a phrase from Cubrilovics 1944 memorandum ,that was quoted in my previous post:

 

As to priorities for expulsion, I hold the opinion that we should consider the following order: the Germans, the Hungarians, the Albanians, the Italians and the Romanians

 

Of course you don’t know Cubrilovic,because in that case you would understand that his goal was the creation of an ethnically pure Greater Serbia,and that of the collaboration  with Germany was just an excuse.

 

To help you understand things better ill show you another memorandum, again from Cubrilovic,but this time in 1937,there were no Nazis in Yugoslavia when he wrote this one.

The title is self-explanatory :

 

1937 Vaso Cubrilovic:The Expulsion of the Albanians – Memorandum

 

Some quotes:

In the first part he complains with the bad job his government is doing in the colonization process:

 

The fundamental mistake made by the authorities in charge at that time was that, forgetting where they were, they wanted to solve all the major ethnic problems of the troubled and bloody Balkans by Western methods

 

The result has been negative, as evident from the statistics of the eighteen districts which make up the Albanian triangle. These figures show that the natural growth of the Albanian population in these regions is still greater than the total increase in our population from both natural growth and new settlers (from 1921 to 1931, the Albanian population increased by 68,060, while the Serbs showed an increase of 58,745, i.e. a difference of 9,315 in favour of the Albanians).

 

Even the strategy of gradual colonization was not properly applied. Worse still in a matter of such importance, there was no specific state plan for every government and regime to adhere to and implement. Work was intermittent, in fits and starts, with each new minister undoing what his predecessor had done and himself creating nothing solid.

 

Than he explains how to get rid of Albanians:

 

Even those few thousand families who were settled after the war did not remain where they were originally located. There was more success in Kosovo, especially in the Lab / Llap valley, where the Toplicans penetrated of their own accord from north to south. Our oldest and most stable settlements there were established with elements from various Serbian regions. In Drenica and Metohija we had no success at all. Colonization should never be carried out with Montenegrins alone.

 

Without doubt, the main cause for the lack of success in our colonization of these regions was that the best land remained in the hands of the Albanians. The only possible means for our mass colonization of these regions to succeed is for us to take the land away from them.

 

Here he explains past successful experiences,the ethnic cleansing of Novi Pazar and Niss (today south Serbia) from the Albanian element

 

The problem of the Sandjak of Novi Pazar is solving itself and no longer plays the role it did in the life of our country before 1912. Let it suffice to mention that with the elimination of the Albanians, the last link between our Moslems in Bosnia and Novi Pazar and the rest of the Moslem world will have been cut. They are becoming a religious minority, the only Moslem minority in the Balkans, and this fact will accelerate their assimilation.

 

Other quotes:

 

  The Albanians cannot be dispelled by means of gradual colonization alone. They are the only people who, over the last millennium, managed not only to resist the nucleus of our state, Rashka and Zeta, but also to harm us by pushing our ethnic borders northwards and eastwards.

 

With its sparse population, its many undrained swamps and uncultivated valleys, Albania would have no difficulty admitting some hundred thousand Albanians from our country. With its vast and uninhabited frontiers in Asia Minor and Kurdistan, modern Turkey, for its part, offers seemingly unlimited opportunities for internal colonization. Despite efforts on the part of Kemal Atatürk, the Turks have not yet been able to fill the vacuum created by the evacuation of the Greeks from Asia Minor to Greece and of some of the Kurds to Persia. Hence, the greatest possibilities lie in sending the bulk of our displaced Albanians there.

 

We have heard that Turkey has agreed, initially, to accept about 200,000 of our displaced persons on condition that they are Albanians, something which is most advantageous to us.

 

Agitators, especially from Turkey, must be found as quickly as possible to promote the evacuation, if Turkey will provide them for us. They must laud the beauties of the new territories in Turkey and the easy and pleasant life to be had there, and must kindle religious fanaticism among the masses and awaken pride in the Turkish state.

 

Another means would be coercion by the state apparatus. The law must be enforced to the letter so as to make staying intolerable for the Albanians: fines, imprisonment, the ruthless application of all police regulations, such as the prohibition of smuggling, cutting forests, damaging agriculture, leaving dogs unchained, compulsory labour and any other measure that an experienced police force can contrive. From the economic aspect, this should include the refusal to recognize old land deeds.

 

There remains one more method Serbia employed with great practical effect after 1878, that is, secretly razing Albanian villages and urban settlements to the ground.

 

This is the link for those interested in knowing more

 

http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts/AH1937_1.html - http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts/AH1937_1.html

 

This is the link for Carpathian W,same thing but from another site,because he have a sort of phobia ,for Robert Elsie’s website.

 

http://www.aacl.com/expulsion2.html - http://www.aacl.com/expulsion2.html

 

Little tip for you, read something other then "albanianhistory.net"

 

 

As i said  before that is not an Albanian website,and is simply fantastic, made of plain historical documents,translated in English and not only,where the reader is free to read learn an why not judge,with his own head.

 

Ps.Read something,i mean in general.

 

It is their country. Serbs can move wherever they wanted to. And thank you for the quote. It explains my point exactly. The Albanians forced the Serbs to leave. Just because they are "colonists" didn't give the Albanians the right to force them out, to kill and to harrass.

 

Sure dear Serbian…sorry Carpathian wolf.At least you are indirectly admitting that there was a colonization .But if you still don’t i just brought some fresh(almost a century old indeed) and hard evidences.

 

Just kidding,I know its impossible to convince you,and this quote from  the Serbian writer Vladimir Arsenijevic explains why:

 

 

A few years ago the Serbian media reported for months on end on mass graves whose dead had been identified by forensic experts as Kosovo Albanians. One of the most horrific images was that of a refrigerated lorry out of which murdered Kosovo Albanian women, children and old people were disposed in Lake Perucac, near the mouth of the river Derventa. On our screens we saw half-decayed, clothed corpses being pulled out of the water, we heard the shocking confession of the driver, who had been told to transport the dead out of Kosovo in order to cover up the crime. At the time a Belgrade television station broadcast an interview with a man bathing untroubled in this beautiful lake from whose green waters the corpses had just been pulled. When the reporter asked whether this bothered him the simpleton stood there shaking his head as the water dripped off him. Blinking innocently and smiling laconically, he looked at the camera and said without turning a hair: "To be honest, I don't believe all that," and dived defiantly back into the water.

The guy is mad, you might think. But actually the opposite is the case. His reaction is absolutely understandable. Serbian citizens have a decade of brainwashing by politicians and the media behind them, a decade of lessons in how continuous lying can eventually make people believe their own lies. The bathing man was simply using that acquired skill.

 

http://www.signandsight.com/features/1582.html



-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 17-Jun-2008 at 09:17
"Like always you don’t read carefully,others ,posts. Here it is a phrase from Cubrilovics 1944 memorandum ,that was quoted in my previous post:"
 
Ah finally you over commit yourself. Man and you almost looked like you were going to win this one too. When you over commit in war, when it feels it is too easy, be assured you are throwing yourself on someone's sword.
Your quotes are nice and all but the problem is this. You're quoting Cubrilovic, member of the Black Hand, an assassin. And what is that proving? Maybe I can quote some members of the League of Prizren or Waffen SS Skanderbeg members. The point is there are crazy people on both sides. The difference is they seemed to be leaders more often on one side rather then the other. Vaso proposed some ideas, but if you want to prove something you have to prove they were implimented.
 
As for who had the majority i'll admit it seems to be nominally 50/50. Sources i've read vary from Turks to English to French sides. The point is however that that changed dramatically. And for you to say it is due to birthrate it is non sense. You still do not reply to my question as to how you say a 100% increase within 20 to 30 years is possible.
 
"Sure dear Serbian…sorry Carpathian wolf.At least you are indirectly admitting that there was a colonization .But if you still don’t i just brought some fresh(almost a century old indeed) and hard evidences."
 
I simply asked for proof of it. And even more important proof that the Serbs that the Albanians drove out and slaughtered were colonists and not just Serbs living there. And even if they were colonists what gave them the right?
 
And you never answered my questions either. What gives Albanians the right to draw a line around a plot of land, and call for independence? Can I get in a group of 200 Romanians, bring them to my property and declare independence? Why can't the Serb majority sections of Kosovo be their own country? Why is there this double standard? It's okay you don't have to answer. Out of 192 UN nations most don't believe the myths the KLA criminals spout.

The next funny thing is that you actually think i'm Serbian. You're frustration and disbelief that someone outside of the situation doesn't believe your non sense really shows how bogged down you are in your own biggotry. "Oh he disagrees with me, he must be a Serb!" But i guess that sort of mentallity is a norm for you.
 
"Just kidding,I know its impossible to convince you,and this quote from  the Serbian writer Vladimir Arsenijevic explains why:"

I read the quote as well as the link and the writer is an idiot that doesn't explain anything other then the general propaganda thrown about against the Serbs. I don't doubt there were Serbs that did bad things. Crimes happen in war, by its very nature. I also don't doubt that Croats/Bosniaks/Albanians did bad things. We'll focus with the last group for this topic however. It is just funny to me how one can claim ethnic cleansing against Albanians in Kosovo when their population is rising as the Serb one is falling. We have video tapes of Albanians climbing up on Churches and taring them down. We have terrorist heroin and sex slave dealers such as the KLA being hailed as heroes and allowed to run a new country. It really makes me wonder who the brain washed simplton really is.
 
I'll be waiting for your "hard evidences".
 
So far i've shown you that the UN forensic teams (even the Finnish one) have stated there was no massacre at Racak and that the bodies were moved. Not surprising the KLA would do this.
 
Then you quoted Vaso of the Blackhand and his ideas which prove I don't know what.
 
But what can I expect from someone who calls me a liar, and tells me to "read something in general." I guess when you're capacity to express an idea is limited all you can fall back to is insults such as that.
 
Perhaps now you can answer my questions? Maybe you forgot to reply to them when you got yourself all frustrated and looking for something incriminating to paint the Serbs evil. In the long run I don't see people with attitudes such as yours winning much of anything.
 
I have another question however. How is it that Albania has problems with Montenegro, FYROM, Serbia, and Greece. Four countries that the Albanians want land from, yet no one wants your land. We have a saying in Romania. When one person says you are drunk you can ignore them. When two or more say so, go to sleep. Pretty much meaning that if you are starting to say "everyone but me is crazy" you're probably the one that is going to scream about the sky falling.
 
But to bring the topic back on track, let's go back to Racak. Are you still denying the UN forensic team's findings? Let's just say that the Finnish team still held the opinion it had pre 2007 when they said there was no massacre. Do you not see any bias in yourself in choosing them over the groups of other teams there? If the situation was reversed and all the teams except for the Finnish team said that there was a massacre, wouldn't you be making the arguement to me that "only one team said there was no massacre?"
 
You know what the main differences between me and you is when approaching this topic? You came into it with your mind already made up for one side. You drew your conclusions to fit your pre-existant opinion. I actually did the research from both sides. I can bring actual arguements that are relevant. I can show the ideals of both leagues of prizren, people that lead your nation. While you can only quote Vaso, a rather unstable fellow. Only people like you, who use those same methods actually agree with you concerning this topic. I've been PMed by a few people in the short time these discussions have been up and i've been posting in them and being thanked that I have made the points that I have made, and glad. They also let me know that generally your line of arguements from that direction are typically not taken seriously. I'm seeing why more and more.
 
But yes back to Racak. And please this time, don't call me a liar, or stupid. I'm a latin, I can read between the lines. We put the lines there to begin with.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 17-Jun-2008 at 09:19
http://www.rastko.org.yu/kosovo/istorija/kosovo_migrations/index.html - http://www.rastko.org.yu/kosovo/istorija/kosovo_migrations/index.html
 
Go ahead and read through that. I know you won't but when it is relevant you'll have no one but yourself to blame for not reading it.


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 01:09

 

Ah finally you over commit yourself. Man and you almost looked like you were going to win this one too. When you over commit in war, when it feels it is too easy, be assured you are throwing yourself on someone's sword.

Your quotes are nice and all but the problem is this. You're quoting Cubrilovic, member of the Black Hand, an assassin. And what is that proving? Maybe I can quote some members of the League of Prizren or Waffen SS Skanderbeg members. The point is there are crazy people on both sides. The difference is they seemed to be leaders more often on one side rather then the other. Vaso proposed some ideas, but if you want to prove something you have to prove they were implimented.

 

If your sword is wikipedia or some racist forum from where you borrow your quotes,then i have nothing to fear.My quotes are neither nice or cute,these a are wrong adjectives to judge a source.

You are trying to discredit Vaso,but you can’t impeach him as a witness.Clearly he is not only proposing ideas but also ascertaining facts.The first part of each of his memorandums is just a description of the past attempts some successful and some not, to colonize Albanian inhabited lands.

 

But I agree Vaso was an assassin.but also:

 

..A leading member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Art, Cubrilovic also held several ministerial portfolios after World War II. Among his writings is the monograph "Istorija politicke misle u Srbiji XIX veka," Belgrade 1958 (History of political thought in Serbia in the 19th century

 

So he was not an ordinary man.But if for you he is not enough I can bring you here other quotes from even more famous and important Serbians

 

As for who had the majority i'll admit it seems to be nominally 50/50. Sources i've read vary from Turks to English to French sides. The point is however that that changed dramatically. And for you to say it is due to birthrate it is non sense. You still do not reply to my question as to how you say a 100% increase within 20 to 30 years is possible.

 

How did you came out with this 50-50,even you own source,that is a biased interpretation of Kosovas history states the following.

The ethnic composition of present-day Kosovo Province can be assessed only indirectly for the period between the two wars, through data concerning the inhabitants' mother tongue. The 1921 Census lists 439,000 people as having Albanian for their mother tongue; in 1931 this figure was already 505,000 for the whole country, which means 280,000 to 332,000 for the Province of Kosovo, or 64% and 59% respectively. The drop in their share, despite the tangible growth in their number, is due to the arrival of the Serbian and Montenegrin population - both the return of refugees from World War I and the spontaneous and organized settlement of this sparsely populated area (in 1921 there were 41.3 people to 1 square kilometer of land).

Of course they forgot to put in their calculations the Albanian victims of the Serbian repression during  and after the Balkan wars,and also the Albanian emigration to Albanian and the organized mass deportation toward Turkey.But fortunately Vaso did not.

Also from your source:

Kosovo's Population by Number of inhabitants Nationality
Albanians
1921-439’000           
1931-552'000           
1948-728’000           
1953-808’000           
1961-964’000           
1971-1,245’000
 
Albanians in %
 
1921-(read the quote above)    
1931-(read the quote above)    
1948-68,5 
1953-64.9 
1961-67,2 
1971-73.7
1981-77.4
 
Albanians annual growth rate in %:
 
1948-53 - 1.02        
1953-61 - 2.60        
1961-71 – 3.44
1971-81 - 2.89
 
As you can see the annual Albanian growth rate, and the total growth were constant in all the Yugoslavian censuses so everything suggests the Albania birth rate as the only reason for the increase of the Albanian population.Of course there are many other collateral reasons like the Serbian low birth rate,the Kosovo Serbian abortion rate(Europe highest). 
 
 

Just google Yugoslav census and you will have the answer.This material is from the 1971 census.

 

TITLE: Yugoslavia's Population After Recent Census

DATE:1971-11-8
 
Summary: According to a census taken on 31
March 1971, Yugoslavia has more than 20 million
inhabitants. The first appraisals of the results
indicate that the greatest increase in population
growth has been among the Albanians. Some
Yugoslav estimates indicate that in 1986 there
will be almost two million Albanians in
Yugoslavia, and in 2000 perhaps even three million.
The capital of Yugoslavia, Belgrade, registered
1,204,271 inhabitants.
 
 
Albanians: Greatest Increase
 
In comparison to the 1961 census, the autonomous
province of Kosovo (predominantly populated by Albanians) had
the greatest population increase - 29 percent, followed
by Macedonia (17 percent), Bosnia and Hercegovina (14 percent)
and Montenegro (12 percent). Falling under the average Yugoslav
increase, which amounts to 11 percent, are Serbia, with
a population increase of only 10 percent, Croatia, 8 percent
and Vojvodina, 5 percent. [4]
 
Albanians jumped from fifth to fourth place according
to ethnic numerical strength. As seen in Table II,
the population in the autonomous province of Kosovo increased
from 964,000 in 1961 to 1,245,000 in 1971. The difference
is 281,000. Of course, not all these people are Albanians,
but surely at least 80 percent of them are.
 
http://www.osa.ceu.hu/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/79-3-119.shtml
 
As you see none is surprised with the Albanian growth,and they explain it simply with the birth rate.
 
Again this is the the demographic story of Kosovo after ww2
 
1921-439’000 (estimation)        
1931-552'000 (estimation)        
1948-728’000           
1953-808’000           
1961-964’000           
1971-1,245’000
 
If you wan’t to explain the increase with an Albanian emigration then here you have an article describing the Albanian-Yugoslavian,nor exactly friendly,relations.
 
Some quotes:
 
Until Yugoslavia's expulsion from the  http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/albania/al_glos.html#Cominform - Cominform  (see Glossary) in 1948, Albania acted like a Yugoslav satellite and Tito aimed to use his choke hold on the Albanian party to incorporate the entire country into Yugoslavia.
 
The pro-Yugoslav faction wielded decisive political power in Albania well into 1948.
 At a party plenum in February and March, the communist leadership voted to merge the Albanian and Yugoslav economies and militaries. 
Hoxha, to the core an opportunist, even denounced Spiru for attempting to ruin Albanian-Yugoslav relations. 
During a party Political Bureau (Politburo) meeting a month later, Xoxe proposed appealing to Belgrade to admit Albania as a seventh Yugoslav republic. 
When the Cominform expelled Yugoslavia on June 28, however, Albania made a rapid about-face in its policy toward Yugoslavia. 
The move surely saved Hoxha from a firing squad and as surely doomed Xoxe to one. 
Three days later, Tiranë gave the Yugoslav advisers in Albania forty-eight hours to leave the country,
 rescinded all bilateral economic agreements with its neighbor, and launched a virulent anti-Yugoslav propaganda blitz that transformed Stalin into an Albanian national hero, 
Hoxha into a warrior against foreign aggression, and Tito into an imperialist monster
 
The subsequent anti-Titoist purges in Albania brought the liquidation of 
fourteen members of the party's thirty-one-person Central Committee and thirty-two of the 109 People's Assembly deputies. 
Overall, the party expelled about 25 percent of its membership. 
Yugoslavia responded with a propaganda counterattack, canceled its treaty of friendship with Albania, and in 1950 withdrew its diplomatic mission from Tiranë.
 
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+al0036)
 
So tell me when exactly did those Albanians cross the border, since there was 0 contact between Albanians in the two sides of the border at least from1948. 
 

I simply asked for proof of it. And even more important proof that the Serbs that the Albanians drove out and slaughtered were colonists and not just Serbs living there. And even if they were colonists what gave them the right?

I know they were poor villagers that came in Kosova hoping for a better life and new land.But this land wasn’t theirs it was taken from the Albanian rightful owners, after the agrarian reform.To me the fact that they were Colonists is more then enough to justify their expulsion.  

 

 

 

 

 And you never answered my questions either. What gives Albanians the right to draw a line around a plot of land, and call for independence? Can I get in a group of 200 Romanians, bring them to my property and declare independence? Why can't the Serb majority sections of Kosovo be their own country? Why is there this double standard? It's okay you don't have to answer. Out of 192 UN nations most don't believe the myths the KLA criminals spout.

 

A group of Romanians is not the same of group of 2’000’000 Albanians,that at least from the formation of the Serbian and Albanian national conscience were the majority in that region.

Albanians can’t live in the same state with the people that ethnic cleansed 900’000 of them in only a week,that killed 15’000 of them burned down 120’000 of their houses,with the people that arbitrarily annuled thei autonomy,that fired them from their jobs,that closed all their schools,their university ,their Tv and papers in Albanian language,

All these reasons for me are more than enough,

 .

The next funny thing is that you actually think i'm Serbian. You're frustration and disbelief that someone outside of the situation doesn't believe your non sense really shows how bogged down you are in your own biggotry. "Oh he disagrees with me, he must be a Serb!" But i guess that sort of mentallity is a norm for you. .

 

If you are not a Serb,for sure you have close links with them,but I really don’t care for me you can be also Chinese it doesn’t changes that you your post are filled with Serbian extremist views, Albanians are from Caucasus,Albananians were never a majority,they emigrated from Albania and other conspiratorial rubbish.

 



I read the quote as well as the link and the writer is an idiot that doesn't explain anything other then the general propaganda thrown about against the Serbs. I don't doubt there were Serbs that did bad things. Crimes happen in war, by its very nature. I also don't doubt that Croats/Bosniaks/Albanians did bad things. We'll focus with the last group for this topic however. It is just funny to me how one can claim ethnic cleansing against Albanians in Kosovo when their population is rising as the Serb one is falling. We have video tapes of Albanians climbing up on Churches and taring them down. We have terrorist heroin and sex slave dealers such as the KLA being hailed as heroes and allowed to run a new country. It really makes me wonder who the brain washed simplton really is.

 

Ok ok,the writer is just an idiot,B92 a western servant Vaso just an unstable….However to me a church a mosque and a private house are exactly the same,as you sow,so shall you reap.Do you know that even the building of The prizren league was destroyed from the Serbian army in 1999,well you have to be Albanian to understand its importance.

 

I have another question however. How is it that Albania has problems with Montenegro, FYROM, Serbia, and Greece. Four countries that the Albanians want land from, yet no one wants your land. We have a saying in Romania. When one person says you are drunk you can ignore them. When two or more say so, go to sleep. Pretty much meaning that if you are starting to say "everyone but me is crazy" you're probably the one that is going to scream about the sky falling.

 

How is that there are a lot of Albanians in all these countries,and just few of Montenegrinians,Serbs and Slavo Macedonians in Albania?

Ps. don’t put Greece in the mess that’s a totally different topic.

 

 

 

You know what the main differences between me and you is when approaching this topic? You came into it with your mind already made up for one side. You drew your conclusions to fit your pre-existant opinion. I actually did the research from both sides. I can bring actual arguements that are relevant. I can show the ideals of both leagues of prizren, people that lead your nation. While you can only quote Vaso, a rather unstable fellow. Only people like you, who use those same methods actually agree with you concerning this topic. .

 

So you are unbiased ,and have a neutral aproach?!Good one!

 

.[QUOTE I've been PMed by a few people in the short time these discussions have been up and i've been posting in them and being thanked that I have made the points that I have made, and glad. They also let me know that generally your line of arguements from that direction are typically not taken seriously. I'm seeing why more and more.[/QUOTE]

 

Good for you.

 

 

But yes back to Racak. And please this time, don't call me a liar, or stupid. I'm a latin, I can read between the lines. We put the lines there to begin with.

 

I never called you stupid.

 
This topic is not exclusively about Racak,and i answered to precise statements of yours,though when ill have time,ill reply also about Racak,but sure you wan't my opinion,you had such a long conversation with T.F. about that,i thought it was enough.


-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Bankotsu
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 05:13
Here is an interesting article:

Correspondence between German Politicians Reveals the Hidden Agenda behind Kosovo's "Independence"

Or: How NATO broke international law in drive to match Rome’s “greatest territorial expansion”

To all those still trying to get at the bottom of the recent US-led unilateral declaration of Kosovo’s “independence” completely outside of the UN framework and America’s willingness to destabilize not just relations with Russia but the entire international order, no document provides a clearer or more cogent explanation of the entire process than the following piece of correspondence.

In a strikingly frank letter to then German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, of May 2, 2000, in the form of a report from a State Department/American Enterprise Institute-sponsored conference in Bratislava, Slovakia (“Is Euro-Atlantic Integration Still on Track? Opportunities and Obstacles,” held on April 28-30, 2000), Willy Wimmer, then member of the German Bundestag and Vice President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), succinctly lays out the causes of NATO’s 78-day bombing of Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999, the purposes behind NATO’s further enlargement toward the borders of Russia, and, most importantly from the aspect of global security, the US aim of undermining the international legal order as part of its vision of succeeding the Roman Empire at the height of its territorial expansion.

The conference itself was held at a very high level, with several prime ministers, foreign ministers and defense ministers from Central European countries in attendance, along with high-level State Department, OSCE and NATO officials, and representatives of high profile international NGO’s and think tanks

(see http://www.aei.org/research/nai/events/pageID.440,projectID.11/default.asp - - http://www.aei.org/research/nai/events/pageID.439,projectID.11/default.asp for the conference agenda), including Richard Perle and Daniel Fried, current U.S. Assistant Secretary of State.

The fact that the correspondence between two of Germany’s and Europe’s highest officials pertains to a conference that took place almost 8 years ago does not make it any less relevant.

Quite the contrary.

Looking back at the events that have taken place since, and especially having in mind the “Kosovo parliament’s” “Declaration of Independence” of February 17, 2008, and the subsequent lightning-quick recognition of the new “state” on the part of the US and its closest, mostly Western allies, Willy Wimmer’s letter is not just a prophecy, but a roadmap, both of certain key events in Europe of the previous 8 years (expanding NATO to Rumania and Bulgaria “in order to secure a land connection with Turkey,” “permanently excluding Serbia out of European development,” establishing an unhindered US military presence in ex-Yugoslavia – Camp Bondsteel, Kosovo – etc.) and of events (soon?) to come (“undermining the international legal order,” “favoring peoples’ rights to self-determination over all other provisions or rules of international law,” etc.) on the international scene, including, most likely, a descent into disorder on a global scale.

In a subsequent interview given to a German foreign policy magazine (an excerpt of which was translated into English and posted on the site of New Serbian Political Thought, an influential Serbian political periodical - http://www.nspm.org.yu/Prikazi/nspm_on_english/2008_wimer1.htm), Wimmer further elaborated on the points made in his letter, revealing, among other things, that the US is using the Balkans to cushion the fallout with Muslim states over its Mid-East policies, but also, following in Bismarck’s footsteps, to keep the rest of Europe off balance by encouraging unrest in that region, which, as an added bonus, is a good way to spoil European-Russian relations.

If there were any doubts as to the aggressive nature of the US-led policy regarding Kosovo (and Europe as a whole), the following letter will almost certainly dispel them.

The same applies to all doubts as to whether the case of Kosovo’s secession and its US-led recognition as an independent state represents not just a grievous but a deliberate violation of international law and the wrecking of the post-World War II European and global order.



Mr. Gerhard Schröder

Federal Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany

Bundeskanzleramt  
Schloßplatz 1  
10178 Berlin

Berlin, May 2, 2000

Highly esteemed Mr. Chancellor,

At the end of last week I had the opportunity to attend a conference in the Slovakian capital of Bratislava, jointly organized by the American State Department and the American Enterprise Institute (the foreign policy institute of the Republican Party). The main topics of the gathering were the Balkans and NATO enlargement.

The conference was attended by very high level political officials, as witnessed by the presence of a large number of prime ministers, as well as foreign ministers and defense ministers from the region. Among the numerous important points of discussion, certain themes deserve special mention:

  1. The conference organizers demanded the speediest possible international recognition of an independent state of Kosovo within the circle of the allied states.
  2. The organizers declared that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia lies outside of any legal framework, before all outside the Helsinki Final Act [on the inviolability of state borders – trans. note].
  3. The European legal order presents an obstacle to carrying out the plans of NATO. In this sense, the American legal system is more suitable for application in Europe.
  4. The war against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was waged in order to rectify General Eisenhower’s erroneous decision during World War II. Therefore, for strategic reasons, American troops must be stationed there, in order to compensate for the missed opportunity from 1945.
  5. The European allies participated in the war against Yugoslavia in order to, de facto, overcome the obstacle and dilemma that appeared after the adoption of NATO’s “New Strategic Concept” in April 1999, that is, the Europeans’ efforts to previously secure a UN or OSCE mandate.
  6. Without denigrating the importance of the Europeans’ after-the-fact legalistic interpretation, namely that the expansion of NATO’s tasks beyond the treaty’s legal domain in the war against Yugoslavia was just an exception, it is nevertheless clear that this represented a precedent, to be invoked by anyone at any time, and that many others will follow the example in the future.
  7. It would be good, during NATO’s current enlargement, to restore the territorial situation in the area between the Baltic Sea and Anatolia such as existed during the Roman Empire, at the time of its greatest power and greatest territorial expansion.
  8. For this reason, Poland must be flanked to the north and to the south with democratic neighbor states, while Romania and Bulgaria are to secure a land connection with Turkey. Serbia (probably for the purposes of securing an unhindered US military presence) must be permanently excluded from European development.
  9. North of Poland, total control over St. Petersburg’s access to the Baltic Sea must be established.
  10. In all processes, peoples’ rights to self-determination should be favored over all other provisions or rules of international law.
  11. The claim that, during its attack on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, NATO violated all international rules, and especially all the relevant provisions of international law – was not disputed.

After this conference, at which discussion was quite candid and open, it will not be possible to avoid the importance and long-term ramifications of its conclusions, especially having in mind the competence of the participants and organizers.

It seems that the American side, for the sake of its own goals, is willing and ready to undermine, on a global scale, the international legal order, which came about as a result of the two world wars in the previous century. Force is to stand above law. Wherever international law stands in the way, it is to be removed.

When the League of Nations experienced a similar fate, World War II was not far off. The manner of thought that takes into regard solely its own interests can only be referred to as totalitarian.

With friendly regards,

Willy Wimmer

Member, German Bundestag and Vice President, Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE

(Note: a facsimile of the original letter, in German, can be found at http://www.medienanalyse-international.de/wimmer.html - The above translation is from a German-to-Serbian translation by Nikola Živković, which appeared in the Belgrade weekly “NIN,” of February 8, 2007. Another translation, by Andrej Grubacic, preceded by a commentary, can be found at http://www.zmag.org/Sustainers/Content/2007-02/18grubacic.cfm)

Introduction and translation: Aleksandar Pavić

Aleksandar Pavić is a political commentator living in Belgrade, Serbia.

Contact e-mail: apavic@verat.net

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8304 - http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8304




Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 05:29
"If your sword is wikipedia or some racist forum from where you borrow your quotes,then i have nothing to fear.My quotes are neither nice or cute,these a are wrong adjectives to judge a source.

You are trying to discredit Vaso,but you can’t impeach him as a witness.Clearly he is not only proposing ideas but also ascertaining facts.The first part of each of his memorandums is just a description of the past attempts some successful and some not, to colonize Albanian inhabited lands."

 
If you don't even know the sword that strikes you I feel all the more sorry for you.
 
What did Vaso witness? Colonists in Kosovo? Did I ever deny there were colonists in Kosovo?
 
"But I agree Vaso was an assassin.but also:"
 
And so what? Were his ideas implimented? No. On the other hand the Leagues of Prizren did try to impliment their ideas and it was fairly successful. So what is your call against Vaso? You didn't like what he said? And you justify the actions of the League and of the KLA based on what one man said?
 
"How did you came out with this 50-50,even you own source,that is a biased interpretation of Kosovas history states the following."

I stated that some sources said there was a marginal majority to the Serbs, another to the Albanians. in the 1500s the Albanian population was 1.8 so we know that there was one change in a certain direction.
 
"Of course they forgot to put in their calculations the Albanian victims of the Serbian repression during  and after the Balkan wars,and also the Albanian emigration to Albanian and the organized mass deportation toward Turkey.But fortunately Vaso did not."
 
Victims of what? What did the Serbs do to the Albanians (who got their land through displacing Serbs via their Turkish loyalty) in the Balkan wars? Perhaps this was when the Albanians were trying to form "Greater Albania" ? It looks to me like you are just sore that Albania lost the wars. Oh darn we wanted to take lands of Serbia, Montenegro, FYROM and Greece but darn they beat us. So mean of them!
 
"So tell me when exactly did those Albanians cross the border, since there was 0 contact between Albanians in the two sides of the border at least from1948. "

You yourself admited that Tito wanted to absorb Albania. He opened the boarders between Kosovo and Albania. The Serbs were kicked out of their homes by the Albanians. The Albanians did not want to live alongside the Serbs in Kosovo.
 
"I know they were poor villagers that came in Kosova hoping for a better life and new land.But this land wasn’t theirs it was taken from the Albanian rightful owners, after the agrarian reform.To me the fact that they were Colonists is more then enough to justify their expulsion."
 
Can you prove that? Prove to me that the Serbs took the Albanian land? And please not the rants of Vaso. I mean actual actions being taken. It is interesting to know how little it takes for you to justify violence, murder and slaugther of people. It makes me wonder if perhaps Vaso did have the right idea. After all how can one live with someone who is so quick and prone to violence? Obviously had this been the 1940s you'd have been one to join the Waffen SS Skanderbeg, and justify it as "well they're just colonists". It justifies it right?
 
"

A group of Romanians is not the same of group of 2’000’000 Albanians,that at least from the formation of the Serbian and Albanian national conscience were the majority in that region.

Albanians can’t live in the same state with the people that ethnic cleansed 900’000 of them in only a week,that killed 15’000 of them burned down 120’000 of their houses,with the people that arbitrarily annuled thei autonomy,that fired them from their jobs,that closed all their schools,their university ,their Tv and papers in Albanian language,

All these reasons for me are more than enough,"


I was giving an example. And you STILL DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION ABOUT SERBIAN MAJORITY SECTIONS OF KOSOVO. If they are the majority in those sections why can they not call for independence? What gives you the right over them.
 
Ethnicly cleansed 900,000 of them in a week? When?
 
Killed 15,000? When?
 
Burned down 120,000 houses? When?
 
And their autonomy was taken away because when they did have autonomy the people in charged treated the Serbs like crap. They sought to get rid of the rest of the Serbs and unify with Albania. That is when Milosevic took the autonomy away.
 
"If you are not a Serb,for sure you have close links with them,but I really don’t care for me you can be also Chinese it doesn’t changes that you your post are filled with Serbian extremist views, Albanians are from Caucasus,Albananians were never a majority,they emigrated from Albania and other conspiratorial rubbish."
 
I came studying this topic a few years ago because I always liked history but I never really knew much about the Balkans. The yugoslav region looked like a big puzzle to me. So I read into it. Who did what. I came into studying it with the notion that Serbs were the bad guys, and one day they flipped out and started killing everyone that was non Serb. So pretty much in the general ball park of what you believe. I thought that the Albanians were victims, and they were simply targeted due to their race. But once I studied it myself and looked at the information I saw that it wasn't the case at all.
 
Serbian extremist views to you means anything that comes from a Serb. So please spare me the crap.
 
About the thread of where Albanians came from, I was simply asking because I truley don't know the origin of the people and I was curious and still am. But instead of having an actual discussion your fellow countrymen insult me, they call me Serb, and refuse to participate in a mature level. Very defensive and for what? Some questions? Even you now, oh I disagree with you, so I must be a Serb, or strong ties to the Serbs. Well what about the 164 UN members that havn't recognized the KLA government? Hmm maybe they're Serb too. Talk about conspiratorial rubbish.
 
"Ok ok,the writer is just an idiot,B92 a western servant Vaso just an unstable….However to me a church a mosque and a private house are exactly the same,as you sow,so shall you reap.Do you know that even the building of The prizren league was destroyed from the Serbian army in 1999,well you have to be Albanian to understand its importance."

It is disgusting to hear your opinion and I wonder just how far your justification for such actions go. You sow what you reap? Show me how many mosques have been destroyed. I can show you hundreds of pictures of Churches.
 
The League of Prizren as the British noted was made up of islamic fanatics with one goal in mind, Greater Albania. The building was a symbol of facism. So Facism and Islamic fanaticism and Greater Albania are important to your countrymen?
 
"How is that there are a lot of Albanians in all these countries,and just few of Montenegrinians,Serbs and Slavo Macedonians in Albania?

Ps. don’t put Greece in the mess that’s a totally different topic."

 
How is that there are a lot of Albanians in those countries? Simple, those Albanians left Albania and went to someone else's country. And then claim it as their own. And even if they had been there since forever, what gives them the right to say "okay this is my country now." And use violence?
 
"So you are unbiased ,and have a neutral aproach?!Good one!"

And you think because I don't agree with you i'm not neutral. Well I'm from a completely different country, I grew up in America. You? You're Albanian and you obviously have your biases. Anyone with two eyes and a working cell in their brain can tell who comes from a more unbias perspective.
 
"Good for you."

It is isn't it.
 
"I never called you stupid."

"Go read, in general I mean." Is what you said. This suggest you are saying I havn't read at all. And you are saying you did not call me stupid? Please save what little respect you have and don't bs me and the people reading this thread.
 
"This topic is not exclusively about Racak,and i answered to precise statements of yours,though when ill have time,ill reply also about Racak,but sure you wan't my opinion,you had such a long conversation with T.F. about "
 
I'll wait for a full reply to my questions when you can muster one. I just have to re calibrate what line of speaking I need to use with someone who justifies the violence that has been commited the way you do.
 
Something you can read:
 
The New York Times
November 1, 1987, Sunday, Late City Final Edition
Section 1; Part 1, Page 14, Column 1;

"In Yugoslavia, Rising Ethnic Strife Brings Fears of Worse Civil Conflict"

By DAVID BINDER, Special to the New York Times

BELGRADE, Yugoslavia

Portions of southern Yugoslavia have reached such a state of ethnic friction that Yugoslavs have begun to talk of the horrifying possibility of ''civil war'' in a land that lost one-tenth of its population, or 1.7 million people, in World War II.

The current hostilities pit separatist-minded ethnic Albanians against the various Slavic populations of Yugoslavia and occur at all levels of society, from the highest officials to the humblest peasants.

A young Army conscript of ethnic Albanian origin shot up his barracks, killing four sleeping Slavic bunkmates and wounding six others.

The army says it has uncovered hundreds of subversive ethnic Albanian cells in its ranks. Some arsenals have been raided.

Vicious Insults

Ethnic Albanians in the Government have manipulated public funds and regulations to take over land belonging to Serbs. And politicians have exchanged vicious insults.

Slavic Orthodox churches have been attacked, and flags have been torn down. Wells have been poisoned and crops burned. Slavic boys have been knifed, and some young ethnic Albanians have been told by their elders to rape Serbian girls.

Ethnic Albanians comprise the fastest growing nationality in Yugoslavia and are expected soon to become its third largest, after the Serbs and Croats.

Radicals' Goals

The goal of the radical nationalists among them, one said in an interview, is an ''ethnic Albania that includes western Macedonia, southern Montenegro, part of southern Serbia, Kosovo and Albania itself.'' That includes large chunks of the republics that make up the southern half of Yugoslavia.

Other ethnic Albanian separatists admit to a vision of a greater Albania governed from Pristina in southern Yugoslavia rather than Tirana, the capital of neighboring Albania.

There is no evidence that the hard-line Communist Government in Tirana is giving them material assistance.

The principal battleground is the region called Kosovo, a high plateau ringed by mountains that is somewhat smaller than New Jersey. Ethnic Albanians there make up 85 percent of the population of 1.7 million. The rest are Serbians and Montenegrins.

Worst Strife in Years

As Slavs flee the protracted violence, Kosovo is becoming what ethnic Albanian nationalists have been demanding for years, and especially strongly since the bloody rioting by ethnic Albanians in Pristina in 1981 - an ''ethnically pure'' Albanian region, a ''Republic of Kosovo' ' in all but name.

The violence, a journalist in Kosovo said, is escalating to ''the worst in the last seven years.''

Many Yugoslavs blame the troubles on the ethnic Albanians, but the matter is more complex in a country with as many nationalities and religions as Yugoslavia's and involves economic development, law, politics, families and flags. As recently as 20 years ago, the Slavic majority treated ethnic Albanians as inferiors to be employed as hewers of wood and carriers of heating coal. The ethnic Albanians, who now number 2 million, were officially deemed a minority, not a constituent nationality, as they are today.

Were the ethnic tensions restricted to Kosovo, Yugoslavia's problems with its Albanian nationals might be more manageable. But some Yugoslavs and some ethnic Albanians believe the struggle has spread far beyond Kosovo. Macedonia, a republic to the south with a population of 1.8 million, has a restive ethnic Albanian minority of 350,000.

''We've already lost western Macedonia to the Albanians,'' said a member of the Yugoslav party presidium, explaining that the ethnic minority had driven the Slavic Macedonians out of the region.

Attacks on Slavs

Last summer, the authorities in Kosovo said they documented 40 ethnic Albanian attacks on Slavs in two months. In the last two years, 320 ethnic Albanians have been sentenced for political crimes, nearly half of them characterized as severe.

In one incident, Fadil Hoxha, once the leading politician of ethnic Albanian origin in Yugoslavia, joked at an official dinner in Prizren last year that Serbian women should be used to satisfy potential ethnic Albanian rapists. After his quip was reported this October, Serbian women in Kosovo protested, and Mr. Hoxha was dismissed from the Communist Party.

As a precaution, the central authorities dispatched 380 riot police officers to the Kosovo region for the first time in four years.

Officials in Belgrade view the ethnic Albanian challenge as imperiling the foundations of the multinational experiment called federal Yugoslavia, which consists of six republics and two provinces.

'Lebanonizing' of Yugoslavia

High-ranking officials have spoken of the ''Lebanonizing'' of their country and have compared its troubles to the strife in Northern Ireland.

Borislav Jovic, a member of the Serbian party's presidency, spoke in an interview of the prospect of ''two Albanias, one north and one south, like divided Germany or Korea,'' and of ''practically the breakup of Yugoslavia.'' He added: ''Time is working against us.''

The federal Secretary for National Defense, Fleet Adm. Branko Mamula, told the army's party organization in September of efforts by ethnic Albanians to subvert the armed forces. ''Between 1981 and 1987 a total of 216 illegal organizations with 1,435 members of Albanian nationality were discovered in the Yugoslav People's Army,'' he said. Admiral Mamula said ethnic Albanian subversives had been preparing for ''killing officers and soldiers, poisoning food and water, sabotage, breaking into weapons arsenals and stealing arms and ammunition, desertion and causing flagrant nationalist incidents in army units.''

Concerns Over Military

Coming three weeks after the ethnic Albanian draftee, Aziz Kelmendi, had slaughtered his Slavic comrades in the barracks at Paracin, the speech struck fear in thousands of families whose sons were about to start their mandatory year of military service.

Because the Albanians have had a relatively high birth rate, one-quarter of the army's 200,000 conscripts this year are ethnic Albanians. Admiral Mamula suggested that 3,792 were potential human timebombs.

He said the army had ''not been provided with details relevant for assessing their behavior.'' But a number of Belgrade politicians said they doubted the Yugoslav armed forces would be used to intervene in Kosovo as they were to quell violent rioting in 1981 in Pristina. They reason that the army leadership is extremely reluctant to become involved in what is, in the first place, a political issue.

Ethnic Albanians already control almost every phase of life in the autonomous province of Kosovo, including the police, judiciary, civil service, schools and factories. Non-Albanian visitors almost immediately feel the independence - and suspicion - of the ethnic Albanian authorities.

Region's Slavs Lack Strength

While 200,000 Serbs and Montenegrins still live in the province, they are scattered and lack cohesion. In the last seven years, 20,000 of them have fled the province, often leaving behind farmsteads and houses, for the safety of the Slavic north.

Until September, the majority of the Serbian Communist Party leadership pursued a policy of seeking compromise with the Kosovo party hierarchy under its ethnic Albanian leader, Azem Vlasi.

But during a 30-hour session of the Serbian central committee in late September, the Serbian party secretary, Slobodan Milosevic, deposed Dragisa Pavlovic, as head of Belgrade's party organization, the country's largest. Mr. Milosevic accused Mr. Pavlovic of being an appeaser who was soft on Albanian radicals. Mr. Milosevic had courted the Serbian backlash vote with speeches in Kosovo itself calling for ''the policy of the hard hand.''

''We will go up against anti-Socialist forces, even if they call us Stalinists,'' Mr. Milosevic declared recently. That a Yugoslav politician would invite someone to call him a Stalinist even four decades after Tito's epochal break with Stalin, is a measure of the state into which Serbian politics have fallen. For the moment, Mr. Milosevic and his supporters appear to be staking their careers on a strategy of confrontation with the Kosovo ethnic Albanians.

Other Yugoslav politicians have expressed alarm. ''There is no doubt Kosovo is a problem of the whole country, a powder keg on which we all sit,'' said Milan Kucan, head of the Slovenian Communist Party.

Remzi Koljgeci, of the Kosovo party leadership, said in an interview in Pristina that ''relations are cold'' between the ethnic Albanians and Serbs of the province, that there were too many ''people without hope.''

But many of those interviewed agreed it was also a rare opportunity for Yugoslavia to take radical political and economic steps, as Tito did when he broke with the Soviet bloc in 1948.

Efforts are under way to strengthen central authority through amendments to the constitution. The League of Communists is planning an extraordinary party congress before March to address the country's grave problems.

The hope is that something will be done then to exert the rule of law in Kosovo while drawing ethnic Albanians back into Yugoslavia's mainstream.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 05:55

KLA -- Resurgent Nazis Under NATO's Wing


By George Thompson

"No one, in any case, should entertain any notion that any future Kosovo, whether run by Albanians or by an international protectorate, is going to have any Serbs in it." Tim Judah, New York Review of Books.

The false historical analogy underlying NATO's war against Yugoslavia is the purported resemblance of the Serbs' anti-KLA (Kosovo Liberation Army) counterinsurgency to nazi atrocities in the second world war. Clinton has compared the Serbian campaign to the Holocaust and Mrs. Clinton has stated that the images on CNN remind her of the movie Schindler's List; both implicitly analogize the Kosovar Albanians to Jews in the 1930s and '40s, and the Serbs to nazis. Other NATO leaders, and most journalists in NATO countries, have mindlessly echoed the Clintons' statements.

Not only is the analogy completely misplaced as a historical matter, but it was the Albanians who sided with the nazis and fascists in the 1940s and the current KLA that continues the ethnic eliminationist policies of that era. The Serbs are engaged in suppressing a resurgent neo-nazi movement, just as they did during and immediately after the world war. While NATO's rhetoric has served to rally an uninformed public's support for attacking Yugoslavia, even a cursory understanding of the area's recent history belies that rhetoric and refutes the false version of events that NATO has misused to justify its attack.

Mussolini's Italy occupied Albania proper in April 1939, and established a collaborationist regime with the enthusiastic support of the native population. After Hitler invaded and occupied Yugoslavia in spring 1941, the bulk of current Kosovo-Metohija was placed under Italian-Albanian collaborationist control and annexed to Albania. Kosovar Albanian fascist militias called the "Balli Kombëtar" or "Ballistas" conducted a campaign of murder and deportation against the Serb population between 1941 and 1943, the years of Italian control. Carlo Umilta, a civilian aide to the commander of the Italian occupation forces, described some of the atrocities in his memoirs and observed that "the Albanians are out to exterminate the Slavs."

The anti-Serb pogroms intensified after Italy's collapse in 1943, when the Germans assumed control of Albania, including Kosovo. In April 1944 the Germans formed the 21st "Waffen-Gebirgs Division der SS Skanderbeg" (alban.Nr.1) with German leadership and Kosovar Albanian officers and rank and file. Although the Germans raised the unit as an anti-Partisan force, its Albanian members were interested solely in murdering or expelling the Serb population, as their Ballista predecessors had done so successfully. The division was dissolved in early 1945.

A major impetus for the Kosovar Albanians' attempt to drive the Serbs from Kosovo under both fascist and nazi tutelage was militant Islam. The Islamist group "Second League of Prizren" was created in September 1943 by Xhafer Deva, a Kosovar Albanian, and proclaimed a jihad against Slavs. This effort was supported by the grand mufti of Jerusalem, El Haj Emin Huseini, who similarly called for the elimination of Jews in then-British-occupied Palestine.

No one is certain how many Serbs were killed or displaced in this Albanian-sponsored Holocaust. Estimates range between 10,000 and 30,000 murdered, with at least an additional 100,000 driven from Kosovo to elsewhere in Yugoslavia and replaced with "immigrants" from Albania proper. The Kosovar Albanians' depredations were a major cause of the current demographic imbalance: the Albanians constitute a majority of the Kosovo population because of their great success as Hitler's willing executioners. But their murderous attention was not limited only to Serbs. Countless Roma (Gypsies) were liquidated, and Kosovar Albanians, both acting alone and under German direction, managed to eliminate approximately 40 percent of Kosovo's Jewish population. The definitive work concerning the nazi-orchestrated elimination of Yugoslav Jews, "The Crimes of Fascist Occupants and Their Collaborators Against the Jews of Yugoslavia" (1952, revised 1957) (published by The Federation of Jewish Communities of Yugoslavia) estimates that there were approximately 550 Jews in Kosovo at the time of Hitler's takeover of Yugoslavia, and that 210 of them, or 38 percent, were murdered, primarily by Kosovar Albanians. In fact, the Skanderbeg division's first operation was to act as an "einsatzgruppen" against the Jews. Although KLA supporters now claim that no Jews were killed in Kosovo and that Jews were sheltered by the Kosovar Albanians, such claims are false and should be treated with the disdain shown to other Holocaust deniers.

Although their German mentors surrendered in 1945, the remnants of the Albanian Kosovar nazi and fascist groups continued fighting the Yugoslav government for an additional six years, with a major rebellion occurring from 1945 to 1948 in the Drenica region, the hotbed for today's KLA recruiting, under the command of Shaban Paluzha. Sporadic resistance continued from 1948 to 1951.

Notwithstanding the eventual suppression of these last Axis holdouts, Tito instituted a Kosovo policy of rewarding Albanians and subordinating Serbs instead of "denazifying" the Albanians. The Serbs that had been driven from Kosovo were as a general matter prevented from returning, while immigration from Albanian was encouraged to further skew the province's demographic profile. Tito granted an enhanced autonomy that placed Kosovar Albanians in local political control, and this power was used to continue making life intolerable for the Serbs, with the result that many thousands more fled during the 1970s and 1980s. The persecution of the Serbs during this time has been well documented elsewhere, particularly by David Binder of the New York Times who in 1982 -- long before Milosevic attained political power -- reported that the Albanians' violent "incidents have prompted many of Kosovo's Slavic inhabitants to flee the province, thereby helping to fulfill a nationalist demand for an ethnically 'pure' Albanian Kosovo." New York Times, Nov. 9, 1982 at A6. Facts on File reported similar findings, quoting an ethnic Albanian Communist Party official as saying "[t]he nationalists have a two-point platform, first to establish what they call an ethnically clean Albanian republic and then the merger with Albania to form a greater Albania". Facts on File World News Digest (Sept. 10, 1982).

In short, the same desire to drive out Serbs that animated the Albanian nazi and fascist units in the 1940s remained active throughout the post-war period. It flared anew into spectacular violence with the KLA's advent. In both form and substance, the KLA is merely a continuation of the Ballistas and Skanderbegs.

In form, the KLA has named its units after "heroes" of the Albanian nazi and fascist units. It has adopted the exact same insignia that was used by the Skanderbeg division. Many of its leaders and earliest members are the sons and grandsons of members of the Skanderbeg and Ballista units. A KLA-affiliated website, sponsored by the Kosova Liberation Peace Movement ( http://www.klpm.org - www.klpm.org ), looks with approbation on the nazi occupation:

As Germany overtook Yugoslavia in 1941, the Kosovar people were liberated by the Germans. All Albanian territories of this state, such as Kosova (sic), western Macedonia and border regions under Montenegro, were re-united into Albania proper. Albanian schools, governmental administration, press and radio were re-established.

And, needless to say, the Serbs were eliminated. The areas referred to constitute the "greater Albania" that the more audacious KLA leaders now seek to recreate. The kplm website envisions a similar "liberation" in the future: "The KLA is committed to liberate Kosova and to bring their motherland to freedom." Having seen that the previous liberation had resulted in the wholesale murder of the Serb and Jewish population, it is no wonder that the Serbian authorities took the strongest steps to prevent its promised recurrence.

Even more telling than the KLA's pedigree and self-chosen symbolism are its actions, for these truly demonstrate the group's unreconstructed nazism. The focus of the organization's efforts was the murder of Serb civilians, as well as Albanians that did not wish to provide their support. The KLA's 1998 terror campaign was designed to force all Serbs from areas under its control, and it was quite successful in doing so. In the autumn of 1998 the Associated Press reported that the Serbian populations of nearly 100 villages had been driven out, either by death or intimidation. KLA commanders Remi and Haradjani were particularly ruthless, and their documented campaign of terror against Serbs, Albanians and Roma, documented at http://www.siri-us.com - www.siri-us.com , would earn them an indictment in the Hague if the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia had any interest in justice.

The methods used by the KLA reek of Hitler-era barbarity. In Klecka, 22 Serb civilians were tortured and executed and their remains disposed of in an improvised crematorium, and near Glogovac Serb farmers and their families were butchered and thrown in a muddy ditch. While these incidents were ignored in the American press, which had long since picked the KLA as its favorites in the Kosovo conflict, the Serb authorities and citizenry were quite familiar with them and knew they portended a similar fate for the entire non-Albanian population unless the KLA was defeated.

And make no mistake: KLA victory and Kosovo's forced removal from Serbia will complete the process begun in the 1940s of eliminating the remaining Serbs. As Tim Judah, a strong supporter of the KLA, approvingly predicted in the May 1999 New York Review of Books: "No one, in any case, should entertain any notion that any future Kosovo, whether run by Albanians or by an international protectorate, is going to have any Serbs in it." Judah's words echo those of Carlo Umilta, the Italian fascist who at least had the decency to be disgusted by that prospect. In short, the KLA, with NATO's armed support, will complete what Hitler and Mussolini started, as people like Judah cheer them on.

Nor can the leaders and citizens of NATO countries feign ignorance of the KLA's true nature. Former New York Times reporter Chris Hedges, no friend of the Serbs, wrote in the May-June 1999 edition of Foreign Affairs that the KLA shows "hints of fascism on one side and whiffs of communism on the other" and notes the genealogical link between its leaders and members of "the Skanderbeg volunteer SS division raised by the Nazis" and their "part in the shameful roundup and deportation of . . . [the] few hundred Jews during the Holocaust." This description has been widely circulated although, predictably, Hedges ignored the shameful roundup and mass murder of Serbs during the nazi period. While most Americans, like Mrs. Clinton, may get their (mis)understanding of historical events through fictional movies, they should have at least a minimal understanding of the real historical facts before launching a war and destroying a country based solely on supposed historical analogies.

Some commentators in the U.S. have acknowledged the nazi/fascist affiliation of Kosovar Albanians in the 1940s, but argue that this is "ancient history" (to quote one U.S. congressman) and has no bearing on the current war. Aside from the fact that the Serb Holocaust is no more "ancient" than the gas chambers at Auschwitz, today's KLA has adopted the same goals and tactics of the Ballistas and Skanderbegs and should be given the same shrift that violent neo-nazi groups would receive in any other country.

Any group that considers the nazis as liberators, looks with nostalgia on nazi control, wishes to replicate that era today, and resorts to mass murder to do so deserves to be ruthlessly uprooted. Instead, NATO has allied itself with the KLA and gone to war to prevent the Serbs from eliminating this resurgent nazi cancer. What we have in the KLA is the resurrection of a 1940s nazi/fascist group, dressed up for 1990s media success and this time supported by the former world war 2 Allies along with, of course, Germany. The Serbs are no more the reincarnation of nazis than were the world war 2 resistance groups that fought against Hitler while the KLA's predecessors fought for him. The Serbian fight against the KLA was a continuation of the earlier struggle against Hitler's Kosovar Albanian allies. That Clinton's false analogy gained any credence among the ignorant populations of the United States and western Europe is, perhaps, a bigger injury than all the bombs and missiles dropped by NATO to help fulfill Hitler's agenda six decades later.

The Washington Post reported on June 5, 1999 that half the remaining Serb population had recently fled Kosovo, and the Washington Times of June 5 reported that the Pentagon expects the rest to follow. NATO has accomplished what even Hitler could not: the elimination of Serbs in Kosovo. Congratulations, America; you have done the Nazis' work, and Hitler is smiling in his grave..



Posted By: King John
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 05:58
Carpathian Wolf that last post is a bit hard on the eyes. Do you mind changing the type face (font) somehow.


Posted By: Bankotsu
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 06:47

CIA aided Kosovo guerrilla army


AMERICAN intelligence agents have admitted they helped to train the Kosovo Liberation Army before Nato's bombing of Yugoslavia. The disclosure angered some European diplomats, who said this had undermined moves for a political solution to the conflict between Serbs and Albanians...


http://www.geocities.com/cpa_blacktown/20000314ciakltimuk.htm - http://www.geocities.com/cpa_blacktown/20000314ciakltimuk.htm

WHO'S THE KLA? GERMAN DOCUMENT REVEALS SECRET CIA ROLE
http://www.serendipity.li/nato/kla.htm - http://www.serendipity.li/nato/kla.htm

British documentary substantiates US-KLA collusion in provoking war with Serbia
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/mar2000/koso-m16.shtml - http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/mar2000/koso-m16.shtml

Interesting balkan intrigue.

I wonder what plans USA and NATO has for the region.

I think USA/NATO goals are probably aimed against Russia, which is why Russia opposes Kosovo independence.

Will Moscow stun the world over Kosovo?
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080616/110734591.html - http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20080616/110734591.html


Posted By: Bankotsu
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 07:31


Interview with Willy Wimmer: " Americans are Recommending Themselves as the Successors of Rome"

September, 2001

Excerpt of Interview with Willy Wimmer -- Former member of the German Bundestag, ex-German Deputy Defense Secretary and ex-Vice President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe

The Strategic Framework of the Balkan Conflict

“The interests of the United States are obviously different from those of Europe. We are increasingly coming to the conclusion that the events in the Balkans developed in such a way so that Washington could establish a dominant presence in the region, which was not the case after 1945.

We should not lose sight of the fact that it was precisely Germany that started this unfortunate game, championing ethnically-based national states in the region. We should remember that Germany was the first to recognize Slovenia and Croatia. What still remains to be solved is why the Americans subsequently took up the German ethnic strategy.

I might say that, in the case of Germany, there was a sort of an aggressive laziness to genuinely deal with the situation in Yugoslavia and the Balkans. The cause probably lies in the simple fact that, in this way, without truly delving into the genuine state of affairs, people were able to, quite easily, without much effort, establish who was friend and who was foe.

In addition, there is no doubt at all that the United States decided very early on to support the Albanian side. This is also born out by the fact that Washington established its Information Office in Pristina [the provincial capital of Kosovo – trans. note] in 1997, contrary to the will of Belgrade. Here we should also remember the long years of activity on the part of Republican senator Bob Dole….

At the end of April 2000, I personally attended a conference in Bratislava, where the highest American officials discussed their future strategy in the Balkans. The conference organizers were the American State Department and the Republican Party's elite American Enterprise Institute. Among the conference participants were prime ministers, foreign ministers and defense ministers of Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Rumania and Bulgaria, and the personal representative of the NATO commander. Among these was a future American Assistant Secretary of State [Daniel Fried – trans. note]. The following was clearly stated there:

First point. The reason why we are in the Balkans today lies in our missed opportunity after 1945, when General Eisenhower made a mistake and did not station American land troops in that part of Europe. Now we must correct that error at all cost. Why? The reason lies in the very nature of land troops. The complete control of a territory is possible only if our land troops are present. Full control cannot be established with aircraft or ships alone.

Second point. I am surprised that the American side is discussing issues of European security, as evidenced by the example of Bratislava, in the tone of: “God is with us.” The consequence of such a relationship is that any attempt at a European, autonomous thinking is criticized or even labeled as anti-American. As a European, I must ask myself the following question: am I supposed to accept the Bratislava conclusions as the Laws of Moses or do I still have a right to think about my own interests.

Third point. The Americans see themselves as the successors of the Roman Empire. Their motto is: The Romans saw the Mediterranean as Mare nostrum. We Americans see the Atlantic as our own Mediterranean, as our own sea. For this reason we must draw a line of our interests, which is to extend from the Baltic Sea by Leningrad [present-day St. Petersburg – trans. note] to Odessa on the Black Sea, and on to Istanbul and Anatolia. Everything lying east of that line – these are now my own words – does not interest us. We must possess and secure a land communication on our own [sic!] territory, extending from Anatolia, i.e. Turkey, to Poland.

There are many indications that, for the Americans, the situation in the Balkans is a sort of compensation for the Middle East. They use the Balkans to compensate for failures in the Arab-Israeli conflict. Washington 's motto goes: the Israeli and the Palestine side will not be able to achieve a peace agreement. And, so as not to ruin chances at accord with the Islamic world, the Americans are now trying to offer concessions to the Muslims in the Balkans, the ones in Bosnia and Kosovo. In a word, to Washington the Balkans are serving as a reserve territory or a testing ground where, they believe, they might still be able to reach agreement with the Islamic world.

Whatever “Big Brother” says must be carried out unconditionally. I took this gathering in Bratislava seriously enough to inform Chancellor Schröder about it in a letter. My main motive was to prevent any future breech of international law. May the case of Serbia be the last such case. For, if I believe that I can ignore international law whenever it stands as an obstacle to my interests, then I am leaving the door wide open to a new war in Europe.

After Serbia, i.e. Kosovo, we had clashes in Macedonia. Until then, we were constantly showering Skoplje [the capital of the FYR Macedonia – trans. note] with praises. They disciplinedly carried out all our demands. And then the West suddenly changed its policy and extended support to the Albanian armed rebellion. What message were we sending to the Macedonian government? That violence pays off.

Let us return to Kosovo. As both member and Vice President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, I can claim with full responsibility that, in the summer of 1998, 90% of us were against the use of any kind of military force against Belgrade outside the provisions of the UN. What remains for us after the bombing of Serbia? To choose: either to bring down the edifice that has secured the peace for us in Europe since 1945 – which is precisely what the Americans are doing, either alone or with the help of the British, or to say: my dear good people, we must seek to return to the rules of behavior provided by the UN.

In a word, it occasionally appears to me that the Americans are now acting in the same way that the German statesman Bismarck did. On one occasion he said that Balkan unrest and conflict were in the German interest, as this kept German adversaries in a constant state of tension. Is not Washington 's present aim identical, namely, to interfere with European efforts at creating an autonomous, independent European policy?

Finally, some mention should be made here of the relations between Western Europe and Russia. In the case they are normal and good, then that would raise the question of NATO's continued existence. The Americans invented the conflict in the Balkans in order to prevent the Europeans from thinking that NATO is no longer needed. There are people at important positions in the EU who think that there is a constant in American, and possibly British, policy, that, within the European Union – as well as Turkey – power must never come into the hands of people who might bring into question Washington's direct influence on Europe….”

http://serbblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/interview-with-willy-wimmer-americans.html - http://serbblog.blogspot.com/2008/03/interview-with-willy-wimmer-americans.html






Posted By: Al Jassas
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 17:46
So because some Albanians joined Nazi Germany, like the Finns did by the way, they are the scum of the earth and deserve to die?
 
Al-Jassas


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 18:28
Originally posted by Al Jassas

So because some Albanians joined Nazi Germany, like the Finns did by the way, they are the scum of the earth and deserve to die?
 
Al-Jassas


Not to mention that in the closing months of the second World War Serbian royalists aka Cetinks also began cooperating with the Nazis and the Ustasa movement due to the Partizan victories.




-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 18:59
"So because some Albanians joined Nazi Germany, like the Finns did by the way, they are the scum of the earth and deserve to die?
 
Al-Jassas"
 
Please don't bring strawmen arguements into it. No one said that.
 
"Not to mention that in the closing months of the second World War Serbian royalists aka Cetinks also began cooperating with the Nazis and the Ustasa movement due to the Partizan victories."
 
Chetniks fought with the Nazis against the Ustashe because the communists started winning the war and it was more evident. The Chetniks were Royalists. They fought for that ideaology and didn't like either side. Compared to say for example the Bosniaks who joined for Jihad which the Mufti of Jerusalem was more then happy to back.
 
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dbP2EyF8d34 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=dbP2EyF8d34
 
Adolph Hitler Meets with Grand Mufti Amin Al Husseini. Grand Mufti Amin Al Husseini of Jerusalem organises recruitment to Bosnia's and Kosovo's Muslim Nazi SS divisions. Another prominent Kosovar Albanian Muslim, Bedri Pejani, was appointed to committee the Nazi occupation authorities established to rule the Nazi-created Greater Albania. Pejani announced a plan to create a Greater Islamic State consisting of Albania, Bosnia-Hercegovina, and the Sandzak/Rashka region of Serbia. The plan was presented to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el Husseini, who approved of the Pejani plan because it was seen as being in the interests of Islam.

On April 17,1944, pursuant to instructions by Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler, an Albanian Waffen SS Division, the 21st Waffen Gebirgs Division der SS "Skanderbeg" or "Skenderbeg" (Albanische Nr.1), was formed, which occupied and ethnically cleansed Kosovo-Metohija of Orthodox Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, and other non-Albanians. Himmler envisioned the formation of two Albanian SS Divisions, but the war ended before the second could be formed. Approximately 300 Albanian troops in the Bosnian Muslim 13th Waffen Gebirgs Division der SS "Handzar" or "Handschar" were transferred to the newly forming SS division. The Skanderbeg Division was made up of 6,491 ethnic Albanian Muslims, two-thirds of whom were from Kosovo-Metohija, "Kosovars". To this Albanian Muslims core were added German troops,Reichdeutsche from Austria and Volkdeutsche officers,NCOs and enlisted men transferred from the 7th SS Mountain Division "Prinz Eugen" or "Princ Eugen", then stationed in Bosnia-Hercegovina.The Skanderbeg Division was made up of Albanian Muslims of the Bektashi and Sunni sects of Wahhabi Islam. The total strength of the Skanderbeg Division was 8,500-9,000 men. The Kosovar Albanian Muslim Skanderbeg Nazi SS Division was created to establish a Greater Albania. In fact, from 1941 to 1944, there was a Greater Albania which Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini created.

On July 28, 1944 in the village of Velika in the Lim region of Montenegro, Skanderbeg massacred 428 Serbs of which 120 were children and burned around 300 houses during Operation Draufgegner, in a joint attack with the 7th Prinz Eugen Division. The Kosovar Albanian Skanderbeg SS Division drove out or ethnically cleansed approximately 10,000 Kosovo Serbian families, most of whom fled as refugees to Serbia while Albanian colonists from Albania entered Kosovo and took over their lands, homes, and possessions.

The 21st SS Division Skanderbeg played a role in the Holocaust or Shoah, the Final Solution to the Jewish Problem,the extermination of European Jewry. The first operation of Skanderbeg in Kosovo-Metohija was the raid on Kosovo Jews in Pristina which occurred on May 14,1944. The Albanian Muslim SS troops raided apartments and homes where Kosovo Jews lived, looted their possessions, and rounded them up for deportation to the Nazi concentration camp at "Bergen-Belsen", where they were "Gassed". Kosovo Jews were subsequently placed in makeshift jails. The 21st SS Division Skanderbeg apprehended 281 Kosovo Jews, which included men, women, and children.From May to June, 1944, Skanderbeg apprehended a total of 519 Kosovo Serbs and Jews. In Kosovo (Today), the small Jewish population was ethnically cleansed out of Kosovo in 1999 along with Kosovo Serbs and other non-Albanians after NATO troops occupied the Serbian province. The Kosovo Jews fled to Belgrade. There are no more Jews living in Kosovo today, which is under NATO military occupation.

Kosovo-Metohija is the cradle of the Serbian Orthodox church and of Serbian culture. The towns, cities, and villages all have Serbian names from the medieval period when it was part of Serbia. The oldest Serbian Orthodox churches are located in Kosovo. Albanian settlement and colonization during the Ottoman Turkish period could not erase its Serbian heritage. Moreover, Kosovo-Metohija was never a part of Albania. In fact, there had never been an Albanian state until 1912.

History is in many ways a myth we create for ourselves. History is constantly falsified to justify wars and territorial claims. Albanian apologists have falsified the role Albania played in the Holocaust to justify an illegal US/NATO war against Serbia and to allow for the creation of a Greater Albania that would include the Serbian province of Kosovo-Metohija. The Albanian role in the Holocaust was falsified and manipulated to advance the creation of an "independent" Islamic Kosovo, an ethnically pure Albania statelet, a second Islamic Albanian state in eastern Europe.
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=EAxrg7nMcs4 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=EAxrg7nMcs4
 
Islam Under The Swastika

Grand Mufti Amin Al Husseini of Jerusalem organises recruitment to Bosnia's and Kosovo's Muslim Nazi SS divisions. Another prominent Kosovar Albanian Muslim, Bedri Pejani, was appointed to committee the Nazi occupation authorities established to rule the Nazi-created Greater Albania. Pejani announced a plan to create a Greater Islamic State consisting of Albania, Bosnia-Hercegovina, and the Sandzak/Rashka region of Serbia. The plan was presented to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin el Husseini, who approved of the Pejani plan because it was seen as being in the interests of Islam.

On April 17,1944, pursuant to instructions by Reichsfuehrer-SS Heinrich Himmler, an Albanian Waffen SS Division, the 21st Waffen Gebirgs Division der SS "Skanderbeg" or "Skenderbeg" (Albanische Nr.1), was formed, which occupied and ethnically cleansed Kosovo-Metohija of Orthodox Serbs, Jews, Gypsies, and other non-Albanians. Himmler envisioned the formation of two Albanian SS Divisions, but the war ended before the second could be formed. Approximately 300 Albanian troops in the Bosnian Muslim 13th Waffen Gebirgs Division der SS "Handzar" or "Handschar" were transferred to the newly forming SS division. The Skanderbeg Division was made up of 6,491 ethnic Albanian Muslims, two-thirds of whom were from Kosovo-Metohija, "Kosovars". To this Albanian Muslims core were added German troops,Reichdeutsche from Austria and Volkdeutsche officers,NCOs and enlisted men transferred from the 7th SS Mountain Division "Prinz Eugen" or "Princ Eugen", then stationed in Bosnia-Hercegovina.The Skanderbeg Division was made up of Albanian Muslims of the Bektashi and Sunni sects of Wahhabi Islam. The total strength of the Skanderbeg Division was 8,500-9,000 men. The Kosovar Albanian Muslim Skanderbeg Nazi SS Division was created to establish a Greater Albania. In fact, from 1941 to 1944, there was a Greater Albania which Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini created.

On July 28, 1944 in the village of Velika in the Lim region of Montenegro, Skanderbeg massacred 428 Serbs of which 120 were children and burned around 300 houses during Operation Draufgegner, in a joint attack with the 7th Prinz Eugen Division. The Kosovar Albanian Skanderbeg SS Division drove out or ethnically cleansed approximately 10,000 Kosovo Serbian families, most of whom fled as refugees to Serbia while Albanian colonists from Albania entered Kosovo and took over their lands, homes, and possessions.

The 21st SS Division Skanderbeg played a role in the Holocaust or Shoah, the Final Solution to the Jewish Problem,the extermination of European Jewry. The first operation of Skanderbeg in Kosovo-Metohija was the raid on Kosovo Jews in Pristina which occurred on May 14,1944. The Albanian Muslim SS troops raided apartments and homes where Kosovo Jews lived, looted their possessions, and rounded them up for deportation to the Nazi concentration camp at "Bergen-Belsen", where they were "Gassed". Kosovo Jews were subsequently placed in makeshift jails. The 21st SS Division Skanderbeg apprehended 281 Kosovo Jews, which included men, women, and children.From May to June, 1944, Skanderbeg apprehended a total of 519 Kosovo Serbs and Jews. In Kosovo (Today), the small Jewish population was ethnically cleansed out of Kosovo in 1999 along with Kosovo Serbs and other non-Albanians after NATO troops occupied the Serbian province. The Kosovo Jews fled to Belgrade. There are no more Jews living in Kosovo today, which is under NATO military occupation.

Kosovo-Metohija is the cradle of the Serbian Orthodox church and of Serbian culture. The towns, cities, and villages all have Serbian names from the medieval period when it was part of Serbia. The oldest Serbian Orthodox churches are located in Kosovo. Albanian settlement and colonization during the Ottoman Turkish period could not erase its Serbian heritage. Moreover, Kosovo-Metohija was never a part of Albania. In fact, there had never been an Albanian state until 1912.

History is in many ways a myth we create for ourselves. History is constantly falsified to justify wars and territorial claims. Albanian apologists have falsified the role Albania played in the Holocaust to justify an illegal US/NATO war against Serbia and to allow for the creation of a Greater Albania that would include the Serbian province of Kosovo-Metohija. The Albanian role in the Holocaust was falsified and manipulated to advance the creation of an "independent" Islamic Kosovo, an ethnically pure Albania statelet, a second Islamic Albanian state in eastern Europe.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bNzTL4zu5Xg&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=4 - http://youtube.com/watch?v=bNzTL4zu5Xg&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=4
 
The Bosnian Muslim Nazi 13th SS "Handzar" or "Handschar" division was a mountain infantry formation, known by the Germans as "Gebirgsjäger". It was used to conduct operations against Yugoslav Partisans, Jews and Serbs in the Balkan Mountains.

The Kama Division was the second Bosnian Muslim Nazi SS Division formed by Heinrich Himmler. The first Bosnian Muslim Nazi SS Division was the Handzar Division formed in 1943. The Kama and Handzar Divisions were formed by Himmler and Bosnian Muslim political leaders to advance the goals of Bosnian Muslim nationalism by achieving "autonomy" for a Bosnian Muslim state. Kama and Handzar were perceived as the armed forces of a newly-emerging Bosnian Muslim autonomous statelet. Kama and Handzar are essential to any understanding of the development of Bosnian Muslim nationalism.

Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler developed and originated this strategy or policy of using Islam to advance their geopolitical objectives. The precursors to this policy can be found in the Austro-Hungarian Empire's exploitation and manipulation of Bosnian Muslim, Albanian Muslim, and Sandzak Muslim troops to advance its agendas in the Balkans. Hitler and Himmler developed this concept most fully and completely in the 20th century. The historical antecedents and origins of Zbiniew Brzezinski's policies in arming and training the Afghan mujahedeen and Ossama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda can be traced to Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler. Bill Clinton was not the first to exploit the Islamic jihad to serve a national interest by allowing Al-Qaeda to infiltrate Bosnia from 1992 to 1995 and then Kosovo in 1998. The precursors and antecedents of this policy go back to Himmler and Hitler.
 
 


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 19:01
Another interesting one. This one deals specifically with Racak and the KLA.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-muEj_E0PY&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=17 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-muEj_E0PY&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=17
 
Remember why NATO spent 78-days bombing Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999?

There was the ethnic cleansing. The atrocities. The refugees chased out of Kosovo by the Serb army. The mass graves. The heaps of bodies tossed into vats of sulphuric acid at the Trepca mines.

NATO spokesman Jamie Shea said there were 100,000 Kosovo Albanian Muslims unaccounted for.

Problem is, none of it happened.

NATO's original estimate of 100,000 ethnic Albanians slaughtered, later revised downward to 10,000, turns out to be considerably exaggerated.

Dr. Peter Markesteyn, a Winnipeg forensic pathologist, was among the first war crimes investigators to arrive in Kosovo after NATO ended its bombing campaign.

"We were told there were 100,000 bodies everywhere," said Dr. Markesteyn. "We performed 1,800 autopsies -- that's it."

Fewer than 2,000 corpses. None found in the Trepca mines. No remains in the vats of sulphuric acid. Most found in isolated graves -- not in the mass graves NATO warned about. And no clue as to whether the bodies were those of KLA terrorists, civilians, even whether they were Serbs or ethnic Albanians.

No wonder then that of all the incidents on which Slobodan Milosevic has been indicted for war crimes, the total body count is not 100,000, not 10,000, not even 1,800 -- but 391!

It was Walker, at the time head of the Kosovo Verification Mission (KVM) who, on the morning of January 16, 1999, led the press to the Kosovo village of Racak, a KLA stronghold. There some 20 bodies were found in a shallow trench, and 20 more were found scattered throughout the village. The KLA terrorists, and Walker, alleged that masked Serb policemen had entered the village the previous day, and killed men, women and children at close range, after torturing and mutilating them. Chillingly, the Serb police were said to have whistled merrily as they went about their work of slaughtering the villagers.

Clinton's Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, as eager to scratch her ever itchy trigger finger as her boss was to scratch his illimitable sexual itches, demanded that Yugoslavia be bombed immediately. Albright, like a kid agonizingly counting down the hours to Christmas, would have to wait until after Milosevic's rejection of NATO's ultimata at Rambouillet to get her wish.

But not everyone was so sure that Walker's story was to be believed. The French newspaper La Monde had some trouble swallowing the story. It reported on Jan. 21, 1999, a few days after the incident, that an Associated Press TV crew had filmed a gun battle at Racak between Serb police and KLA terrorists. Indeed, the crew was present because the Serbs had tipped them off that they were going to enter the village to arrest a man accused of shooting a police officer. Also present were two teams of KVM monitors.

It seems unlikely that if you're about to carry out a massacre that you would invite the press -- and international observers -- to watch.

The film showed that as soon as the Serbs entered Racak they came under heavy fire from KLA terrorists positioned in the surrounding hills. The idea that the police could dig a trench and then kill villagers at close range while under attack troubled La Monde. So too did the fact that, entering the village after the fire fight to assess the damage and interview the villagers, the KVM observers saw no sign of a massacre. What's more, the villagers said nothing about a massacre either.

Yet, when Walker returned the next day with the press -- at the KLA's invitation -- there was the trench with the bodies.

Could the police have returned later on and carried out the massacre under cover of darkness?

That seems unlikely. Racak is a KLA stronghold. Serb police had already discovered that if they were going to enter the village they would have to deal with the guerillas. How could they torture, mutilate and cold-bloodedly kill villagers at close range while harassed by KLA gunfire?

And why, wondered La Monde, were there few signs of spent cartridges and blood at the trench?

And now there's a report that the Finnish forensic pathologists who investigated the incident on behalf of the European Union, say there was no evidence of a massacre. In an article to be published in Forensic Science International at the end of February, the Finnish team writes that none of the bodies were mutilated, there was no evidence of torture, and only one was shot at close range.

The pathologists say Walker was quick to come to the conclusion that there was a massacre, even though the evidence was weak.

And they point out that there is no evidence that the deceased were from Racak.

The KLA terrorists, the Serbs charge, faked the massacre by laying out their fallen comrades in the trench they, themselves, prepared, and the United States used the staged massacre as a pretext for the bombing.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 19:30
If the rest of this doesn't make you think nothing will.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FN33NTMpLU&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=18 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FN33NTMpLU&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=18
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf84gioy8hU&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=19&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf84gioy8hU&feature=PlayList&p=57C3CA9880916DD6&index=19&playnext=1&playnext_from=PL


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 20:31
The Ustase were NAZIS - the first Slavic Nazis in that region, the 2nd the Slavic Muslim contigents, the Royalists - Cetniks joined the Ustase to fight the communists and the Nazis. Not to fight against the Cetniks. You live in Bizarro world.


-------------


Posted By: Al Jassas
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 20:38
Hello Carpathian
 
Have you ever took the time to read why the muslim SS and Albania SS units formed in the beginning and why did they seek Nazi support?
 
Lots of groups asked for Nazi support and got it and nobody said anything about the blood on their hands especially the Chetniks who killed as much if not more from muslims, Croats and Roma as Albanians or Bosniacs did. Vladimir Žerjavić a Croat and by no means a muslim said that some 50k muslims perished on the hands of the Chetnik (in the beginning of the war), what did you think they would do, bow at the altar of Serbian fascism? Nazis were the only way they could survive and most didn't even join, the largest number of the 13 SS division was 21000 and evenly distributed between Catholics and muslims both of which were victims of the chetniks.
http://www.hic.hr/books/manipulations/ - http://www.hic.hr/books/manipulations/
 
As for Amin Al-Husaini, the guys own country was being stripped from under his feet and given to strangers and he was prepared to deal with the devil, which he did, to liberate his country. Carl Mannerheim was a Nazi collaborator and yet he is considered a hero.
 
AL-Jassas


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 22:50
"The Ustase were NAZIS - the first Slavic Nazis in that region, the 2nd the Slavic Muslim contigents, the Royalists - Cetniks joined the Ustase to fight the communists and the Nazis. Not to fight against the Cetniks. You live in Bizarro world."
 
Ah i mis typed. I meant that the Chetniks fought with the Nazis against the Partizans which were communists. Thank you for the tactful correction.
 
"Hello Carpathian
 
Have you ever took the time to read why the muslim SS and Albania SS units formed in the beginning and why did they seek Nazi support?"

Of course I did. Coming from a country that worked with the Nazis in order to fight off the communist USSR I find the topic interesting. Why did the Muslims in Bosnia do it? Because they were a minority in a region they more or less ruled a few decades ago under the Ottoman Empire. And they couldn't opress their Christian subjects as they did before.
 
(Encyclopedia Britannica, Edition 1910, Vol 4, page 282, Entry Bosnia and Herzegovina, Religion. Quote)
In 1895 43% of the population were Orthodox Christians [i.e. Serbs], 35% Moslems and 21% Roman Catholics [i.e. Croats].
( end quote ).
 
One of many episodes of Bosnian Muslim religious fervor is described by the
Encyclopedia (Britannica, Edition 1910, Volume 4, page 284).
(That's true: Edition *1910*, i.e. before WWI, when the memories were fresh!)
 
The reform of the Ottoman government contemplated by the sultan Mahmud II. (1808-1839) was BITTERLY RESENTED in Bosnia, where Turkish prestige had already been weakened by the establishment of Servian autonomy under Karageorge. Many of the janissaries had married and settled on the land, forming a strongly conservative and FANATICAL caste, friendly to the Moslem nobles, who now dreaded the curtailment of their own privileges. Their opportunity came in 1820, when the Porte was striving to repress the insurrection in Moldavia, Albania and Greece. A first Bosnian revolt was crushed in 1821, a second, due principally to the massacres of the jannissaries, was quelled with much bloodshed in 1827. After Russo-Turkish War of 1828-29, a further attempt at reform was initiated by the sultan and his grand vizier, Reshid Pasha. Two years later came a most formidable outbreak: THE SULTAN WAS DENOUNCED AS FALSE TO ISLAM, AND THE BOSNIAN NOBLES GATHERED IN BANJALUKA (Bosnia), DETERMINED TO MARCH TO CONSTANTINOPLE, AND RECONQUER THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE FOR THE TRUE [Islam] FAITH.
A HOLY WAR WAS PREACHED BY THEIR LEADER, HUSSEIN AGA BERBERI, A BRILLIANT SOLDIER AND ORATOR, WHO CALLED HIMSELF "ZMAJ BOSANSKI", AND WAS REGARDED BY HIS FOLLOWERS AS A SAINT. The Moslems of Herzegovina, under Ali Pasha Rizvanbegovic, remained loyal to the Porte, but in Bosnia Hussein Aga encountered little resistance. At Kossovo he was reinforced by 20,000 Albanians, led by Mustapha Pasha, and within a few weeks the united armies occupied the whole of Bulgaria, and large part of Macedonia. Their career was checked by Reshid Pasha, who persuaded the two victorious commanders to intrigue against one another, secured the division of their forces, and then fell upon each in turn.
The rout of the Albanians at Prilipe and the capture of Mustapha at Scutari were followed by an invasion of Bosnia. After a desperate defence, Hussein Aga fled to Esseg in Croatia-Slavonia, his appeal for pardon was rejected, and in 1832 he was banished for life in Tribizond.
The power of the Bosnian nobles, though shaken by their defeat, remained unbroken, and they resisted vigorously when their kapetanates were abolished in 1837, and again when A MEASURE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW was conceded to the Christians in 1839.
In Herzegovina, Ali Pasha Rizvanbegovic reaped the reward of his fidelity. HE WAS LEFT FREE TO TYRANNIZE OVER HIS CHRISTIAN SUBJECTS, a king in all but name.
 
"Lots of groups asked for Nazi support and got it and nobody said anything about the blood on their hands especially the Chetniks who killed as much if not more from muslims, Croats and Roma as Albanians or Bosniacs did. Vladimir Žerjavić a Croat and by no means a muslim said that some 50k muslims perished on the hands of the Chetnik (in the beginning of the war), what did you think they would do, bow at the altar of Serbian fascism? Nazis were the only way they could survive and most didn't even join, the largest number of the 13 SS division was 21000 and evenly distributed between Catholics and muslims both of which were victims of the chetniks."
 
Chetniks didn't have the man power to kill 50K people. You are pulling that number out of a magician's hat. Chetniks were simply left over members of the Yugoslavian Royalist military and some volunteers. Not religious fanatics like the Muslim SS units.
 
Vladimir Žerjavić being a Croat probably aligns himself with the Partizani or Usashe. What i've read from he seems to try to sugar coat the murderous regime the Ustashe were and how many Serbs were slaughtered in their camps. So yea, crap source to say the least. You trying to say that the Muslims did what they did in reveange for what the Chetniks supposedly did (according to the Croat (dis)information Centre) is a joke.
 
"As for Amin Al-Husaini, the guys own country was being stripped from under his feet and given to strangers and he was prepared to deal with the devil, which he did, to liberate his country. Carl Mannerheim was a Nazi collaborator and yet he is considered a hero."
 
His country was stripped from under his feet? This was in 1944, Israel has yet to be (re)made. In any case it doesn't justify the action of the SS Muslims in the Balkans, not by a long shot.


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 23:03

If you don't even know the sword that strikes you I feel all the more sorry for you.

 

What did Vaso witness? Colonists in Kosovo? Did I ever deny there were colonists in Kosovo?

 

Datas from Noel Malcoms;Kosovo a short history.(the translation is mine)

 

The serb official for Kosovo Djorde Kristic,described the colonization program,like an success:"we was only 24% of the region in 1919 but now we are up to 38%."It was the year 1928.

 


Also a quote from NM book:

 

The whole kosovar territory had 584'000 ha of arable lands,of which 200'000ha were expropriated and distribuited among the new serbian settlers.13'000 serbian familys (about 70'000,10% of the whole population)were settled in kosova.the state investment for the colonizaton was 10'000'000 dinars(180 million dollars).

 his source:

 

fonts:Krstic.Kolonizacja pg3/Obradovic.Agrarna reforma pg 201.Roux,Le Albanais,p195/Verli,reforma

 

 

I stated that some sources said there was a marginal majority to the Serbs, another to the Albanians. in the 1500s the Albanian population was 1.8 so we know that there was one change in a certain direction.

 

You stated smth and your Serbian source was saying smth else,so make up your mind.

 

 

Victims of what? What did the Serbs do to the Albanians (who got their land through displacing Serbs via their Turkish loyalty) in the Balkan wars? Perhaps this was when the Albanians were trying to form "Greater Albania" ? It looks to me like you are just sore that Albania lost the wars. Oh darn we wanted to take lands of Serbia, Montenegro, FYROM and Greece but darn they beat us. So mean of them!

Indeed we won the last war.

 

You don’t have a clue.For sure there was a slight change in the population balance in favour of the Albanians during ottomans times as it was a change favoring serbs during Stephan Dushans Serbian empire.And your claims that this was an organized process  are just erroneous Albanians repopulated those few lands that serbs gradually(in 500 years) abandoned, their political an cultural center was in Belgrade so was natural for them to move north. That of the Serbian suffering under the Albanian-Turkish rule is just Serbian invention to justify their later negative attitude against Albanians.

One of their myths, often called history ,is that of the Serbian emigration after the Austrian-Turkish war, from Kosovo, when indeed smth like that never happened in a large scale in Kosova. Funnily in Kosova during that war there was a pro Austrian uprising,under the lead the Albanian catholic Archbishop Pjeter Bogdani,and the fighting force was composed from both catholic and muslim Albanians.

 

Btw here you have the speech made by the Serbian King addressed to the serbuian people,when the Serbian attack in Kosova was ready to start.His motivation are totally different from yours or from those of the modern Serbian nationalist.

 

18 October 1912

 

 "The Turkish governments showed no interest in their duties towards their citizens and turned a deaf ear to all complaints and suggestions. Things got so far out of hand that no one was satisfied with the situation in Turkey in Europe. It became unbearable for the Serbs, the Greeks and for the Albanians, too.
    By the grace of God, I have therefore ordered my brave army to join in the Holy War to free our brethren and to ensure a better future.
    In Old Serbia, my army will meet not only upon Christian Serbs, but also upon Moslem Serbs, who are equally dear to us, and in addition to them, upon Christian and Moslem Albanians with whom our people have shared joy and sorrow for thirteen centuries now. To all of them we bring freedom, brotherhood and equality."

 

But he never practiced his own preaches.

 



You yourself admited that Tito wanted to absorb Albania. He opened the boarders between Kosovo and Albania. The Serbs were kicked out of their homes by the Albanians. The Albanians did not want to live alongside the Serbs in Kosovo.

 

Yes but  how do you intend to prove that this actually happened,and when?

 

 

Can you prove that? Prove to me that the Serbs took the Albanian land? And please not the rants of Vaso. I mean actual actions being taken. It is interesting to know how little it takes for you to justify violence, murder and slaugther of people. It makes me wonder if perhaps Vaso did have the right idea. After all how can one live with someone who is so quick and prone to violence? Obviously had this been the 1940s you'd have been one to join the Waffen SS Skanderbeg, and justify it as "well they're just colonists". It justifies it right?

 

Actual actions?Here you have some:

 

 

 

Leon Trotsky, writing this in January 1913 as an open letter in the (Menshevik) paper Luch ("The Ray") was addressing the "liberal" Russian chauvinist politician Pavel Miliukov:

 

Do not the facts, undeniable and irrefutable, force you to come to the conclusion that the Bulgars in Macedonia, the Serbs in old Serbia, in their national endeavor to correct data in the ethnological statistics that are not quite favorable to them, are engaged quite simply in systematic extermination of the Muslim population in the villages, towns and districts?

 

Quoting a Serbian soldier whose civil and political conscience had been revolted, Trotsky reported:

The horrors actually began as soon as we crossed the old frontier.... The darker the sky became, the more brightly the fearful illumination of the fires stood out against it. Burning was going on all around us. Entire Albanian villages had been turned into pillars of fire, dwellings, possessions accumulated by fathers and grandfathers were going up in flames, the picture was repeated the whole way to Skopje. There the Serbs broke into Turkish and Albanian houses and performed the same task in every case: plundering and killing. For two days before my arrival in Skopje the inhabitants had woken up to the sight of heaps of Albanian corpses with severed heads. Among the mass of soldiers you see Serb peasants who have come from every part of Serbia on the pretext of looking for their sons and brothers. They cross the plain of Kosovo and start plundering, from the area around Vranje the population has crossed over en masse into the Albanian villages to pick up whatever may catch the eye. Peasant women carry away even the doors and windows of Albanian houses.”

(See Leon Trotsky,The Balkan Wars—1912-1913, New York, 1980, p.267)

Fritz Magnussen, war correspondent for the Danish newspaper Riget

Serbian military activities in Macedonia have taken on the character of an extermination of the Arnaut population. The army is conducting an unspeakable war of atrocities. According to officers and soldiers, 3,000 Arnauts were slaughtered in the region between Kumanova / Kumanovo and Skopje and 5,000 near Prishtina. The Arnaut villages were surrounded and set on fire. The inhabitants were then chased from their homes and shot like rats. The Serbian soldiers delighted in telling me of the manhunts they had conducted.

Daily Telegraph

All the horrors of history have been outdone by the atrocious conduct of the troops of General Jankovic. On their march through Albania, the Serbs have treacherously slaughtered not only armed Albanians, but in their savagery even unarmed individuals - old people, women, children and babies at their mother's breasts.
    Drunk with victory, Serbian officers have proclaimed that the only way of pacifying Albania is to exterminate the Albanians. They slaughtered 3,000 people in the region between Kumanova / Kumanovo and Skopje alone. 5,000 Albanians were murdered by the Serbs in the Prishtina area. These people did not die with honour on the battlefield, but were slain in a series of gruesome raids. The Serbian soldiers have found new methods of butchery to satisfy their thirst for blood. Houses were set on fire in several villages and the inhabitants slaughtered like rats when they tried to flee the flames.

Anyone who denounces an Albanian to the Serbs can be sure that the Albanian will be executed. There were people who owed money to Moslem Albanians. They went and denounced them to the Serbs as traitors. The wretched Albanians were immediately hanged and the informers later found ways of acquiring the home and land of their victims for a ridiculously low price.

The following is from central Albania,not even in Kosova.

 The Albanische Korrespondenz reported from Trieste on 21 March 1913:

 The suffering in Albania has reached an unspeakable zenith. The Serbian troops who took Durrës (Durazzo) were immediately ordered to proceed into the countryside although no provision had been made for their food and drink. They were therefore forced to rely on food they confiscated from the population, which they did with exception cruelty. They took nine-tenths of all the stocks available, and refused to give written receipts for the goods they requisitioned.
    The Serbian troops not only confiscated goods for their own usage. They seized or destroyed all the food that fell into their hands. Ancient olive trees which had been planted in the Venetian period and had provided sustenance to generations were cut down by the Serbs. Farm animals were slain. No sheep, no chickens, no corn which the Serbs could get their hands on remained untouched. They conducted extensive raids and looted wherever they could. In Durrës (Durazzo), the Serbs loaded ships with carpets and other stolen goods for transportation to Salonika whence the cargo was transferred back to Belgrade. Even antique benches from the government offices in Durrës were confiscated and loaded onto the booty ships.

The following report was received from Durrës (Durazzo) on 6 March:

Serbian troops have burnt the following villages to the ground: Zeza, Larushk, Monikla, Sheh and Gromni. In Zeza, twenty women and girls were locked in their homes and burnt alive.
    The inhabitants of the village of Kruja-Kurbin have taken to the mountains, in order to save their lives, leaving behind all their possessions.

 

  On 20 March, the Neue Freie Presse reported:

On 7 March, the soldateska joined fanatic Orthodox priests in and around Gjakova / Djakovica to forcefully convert the Catholic population to the Orthodox faith. About 300 persons, men, women and children, among whom Pater Angelus Palic, were bound with ropes and forced under threat of death to convert. An Orthodox priest pointed to the soldiers standing by with their rifles in hand and said, "Either you sign the declaration that you have converted to the one true faith or these soldiers of God will send your souls to hell."
    All the prisoners then signed the forms prepared for them which contained a declaration of conversion to the Orthodox faith. Pater Angelus was the last. He was the only one of them who had the strength, in a calm and dignified manner, to refuse to give up his faith. Pater Angelus stood by his word, even when ordered three times to convert and even when entreated by the other forcefully converted Catholics. The result was one of the most appalling scenes imaginable in twentieth-century Europe.
    After a sign from the Orthodox priest, the soldiers fell upon the Franciscan, ripped off his tunic and began beating him with the butts of their rifles. Pater Angelus collapsed after several of his bones and ribs had been fractured. At this moment, the Orthodox priest stopped the soldiers and asked him if he was now willing to convert. Again he shook his head and said placidly, "No, I will not abandon my faith and break my oath." Pater Angelus was beaten with the rifle butts again until one of the soldiers plunged a bayonet through the priest's lungs and put an end to his suffering.

 

I was giving an example. And you STILL DIDN'T ANSWER MY QUESTION ABOUT SERBIAN MAJORITY SECTIONS OF KOSOVO. If they are the majority in those sections why can they not call for independence? What gives you the right over them.

 

Personally I have nothing against ,but in that case Albanians in South Serbia should have the right to secede  and join Kosova.

 

Ethnicly cleansed 900,000 of them in a week? When?

 

Killed 15,000? When?

 

Burned down 120,000 houses? When?

 

 

In June NATO and Yugoslavia signed a peace accord outlining troop withdrawal and the return of nearly one million ethnic Albanians as well as another 500,000 displaced within the province.

 

Source  Britannica

 

 

The others are official data’s that you can find by your own.

 

 

And their autonomy was taken away because when they did have autonomy the people in charged treated the Serbs like crap. They sought to get rid of the rest of the Serbs and unify with Albania. That is when Milosevic took the autonomy away.

 

That’s simply not true:

 

Serbian extremist views to you means anything that comes from a Serb. So please spare me the crap.

 

Be sure that the Serbian official history,doesn’t claim that we came from Caucasus,or  explain our presence with a post ww2 emigrantions,like you do.  


It is disgusting to hear your opinion and I wonder just how far your justification for such actions go. You sow what you reap? Show me how many mosques have been destroyed. I can show you hundreds of pictures of Churches.

 

Our reap is Independence ,and i can show you photos too but its not my intention.As i said for me a church and a mosque are exactly the same thing. But this is is disgusting:

  

It makes me wonder if perhaps Vaso did have the right idea

 

 

The League of Prizren as the British noted was made up of islamic fanatics with one goal in mind, Greater Albania. The building was a symbol of facism. So Facism and Islamic fanaticism and Greater Albania are important to your countrymen?

 

First of all you have to bring here names.I don’t doubt that actually a English said that but at least have the decency to bring his name.

 

 

Some info about the Prizren league:

 

The Treaty of San Stefano triggered profound anxiety among the Albanians meanwhile, and it spurred their leaders to organize a defense of the lands they inhabited. In the spring of 1878, influential Albanians in Constantinople--including Abdyl Frasheri, the Albanian national movement's leading figure during its early years--organized a secret committee to direct the Albanians' resistance. In May the group called for a general meeting of representatives from all the Albanian-populated lands. On June 10, 1878, about eighty delegates, mostly Muslim religious leaders, clan chiefs, and other influential people from the four Albanian-populated Ottoman vilayets, met in the Kosovo town of Prizren. The delegates set up a standing organization, the Prizren League, under the direction of a central committee that had the power to impose taxes and raise an army. The Prizren League worked to gain autonomy for the Albanians and to thwart implementation of the Treaty of San Stefano, but not to create an independent Albania.

In July 1878, the league sent a memorandum to the Great Powers at the Congress of Berlin, which was called to settle the unresolved problems of Turkish War, demanding that all Albanians be united in a single Ottoman province that would be governed from Bitola by a Turkish governor who would be advised by an Albanian committee elected by universal suffrage.

The Sublime Porte, in fact, armed the Albanians and allowed them to levy taxes, and when the Ottoman army withdrew from areas awarded to Montenegro under the Treaty of Berlin, Roman Catholic Albanian tribesmen simply took control. The Albanians' successful resistance to the treaty forced the Great Powers to alter the border, returning Gusinje and Plav to the Ottoman Empire and granting Montenegro the mostly Muslim Albanian-populated coastal town of Ulcinj. But the Albanians there refused to surrender as well. Finally, the Great Powers blockaded Ulcinj by sea and pressured the Ottoman authorities to bring the Albanians under control. The Great Powers decided in 1881 to cede Greece only Thessaly and the small Albanian-populated district of Arta.

Faced with growing international pressure "to pacify" the refractory Albanians, the sultan dispatched a large army under Dervish Turgut Pasha to suppress the Prizren League and deliver Ulcinj to Montenegro. Albanians loyal to the empire supported the Sublime Porte's military intervention. In April 1881, Dervish Pasha's 10,000 men captured Prizren and later crushed the resistance at Ulcinj. The Prizren League's leaders and their families were arrested and deported. Frasheri, who originally received a death sentence, was imprisoned until 1885 and exiled until his death seven years later. In the three years it survived, the Prizren League effectively made the Great Powers aware of the Albanian people and their national interests. Montenegro and Greece received much less Albanian-populated territory than they would have won without the league's resistance.

http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+al0021)

How is that there are a lot of Albanians in those countries? Simple, those Albanians left Albania and went to someone else's country. And then claim it as their own. And even if they had been there since forever, what gives them the right to say "okay this is my country now." And use violence?

 

You are speaking without thinking,and you don’t look very neutral.As I said I would like to see some proofs backing your statements:

 


"Go read, in general I mean." Is what you said. This suggest you are saying I havn't read at all. And you are saying you did not call me stupid? Please save what little respect you have and don't bs me and the people reading this thread.

 

Obviously you don’t know the difference between ignorance and stupidity,and as I said I never called you stupid.And spare me the rest please.

 

 

Here you have another NYT article:

 

 

 The World; Kosovo's Brutal Game of See-Saw

ANTAGONISMS between Serbs and Albanians have marked Kosovo's history since the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. Christian Serb forces seized the province in October 1912 during the first Balkan War. Massive recriminations against local Muslim Albanians followed, including the burning of villages and forced conversions, which were described by reporters, including the Vienna correspondent of the Ukrainian newspaper Kievskaia Mysl, Lev Bronshtein, later known as Leon Trotsky. At the time, Serbs made up about 25 percent of a population of about 300,000; most of the rest were Muslims who identified themselves as either Turks or Albanians. An estimated 20,000 Albanians were killed.

Under Serb rule, periodic revolts by Albanian guerrillas known as kacaks broke out. The Government confiscated land for Serb settlers, many of whom formed armed bands known as chetniks to fight the kacaks. Perhaps 70,000 Serbs settled between the wars; nearly 100,000 Albanians were driven out.

When Italy and Germany occupied Kosovo in 1941, the Albanians, armed by the fascists, forced out at least 40,000 Serbs and Montenegrins.

Then Tito's partisans took the province, after quelling a rebellion that left as many as 10,000 Albanians dead. Tito largely suppressed ethnic rivalries and in 1974 granted Kosovo autonomy; harassment of Serbs increased and perhaps as many as 50,000 left. Slobodan Milosevic, as Serbia's President, revoked Kosovo's autonomy in 1989. Some 200,000 Serbs were left -- 10 percent of the population. CHRIS HEDGES

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E6DA1030F93BA15750C0A96F958260



-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Al Jassas
Date Posted: 18-Jun-2008 at 23:40
Here are some examples of how nice Serbian chetnik were to the Bosnians who issued fatwas prohibiting any support for Nazis and urging them to go to Jihad against them:
 
1150 killed in Stolac in July 41
2050 kiled in Foca and Gorazde in Dec-Jan 41/42
9000+ again in Foca and Sandjak 44-45
and many others.
As for Amin Al-Husaini, read these two articles in Wikipedia:
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orde_Wingate - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orde_Wingate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Night_Squads - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Night_Squads
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks_during_the_1930s - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks_during_the_1930s
 
all these terror acts were protected by British official who continued to support zionist terror groups despite the fact that several British nationals were targets.
 
By Carpathian
"Of course I did. Coming from a country that worked with the Nazis in order to fight off the communist USSR I find the topic interesting. Why did the Muslims in Bosnia do it? Because they were a minority in a region they more or less ruled a few decades ago under the Ottoman Empire. And they couldn't opress their Christian subjects as they did before."
 
This really shows how sick you are, I really pity you.
 
Al-Jassas


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:13
So the Bosnians and other Muslims and other Muslims in the Balkans joined the Nazis because they had a perverse idea to oppress? Don't you think that the war and recent aggression to all things Muslim since the late 1800s had a factor in it? You fancy a rather sickening theory. I had family members in the original Yugoslav Kingdom Army prior to WWII, including my great geat grandfather. However, that was prewar. Following the outbreak of war all family members that participated in any war effort were Partizans. So this is not a wishful thinking rant either. I just fail to believe that a group of people that had witnessed some intense agression would only join to opress. Most of these people had families to think off. 

-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:27
"Datas from Noel Malcoms;Kosovo a short history.(the translation is mine)"
 
More bias sources? This from the man that endources the war crimes of NATO? Nice try.
 
"You stated smth and your Serbian source was saying smth else,so make up your mind."
 
And other sources state one way or another. My point being is that it was around half/half.
 
"Indeed we won the last war."

Sadly there's another one coming around.
 
"You don’t have a clue.For sure there was a slight change in the population balance in favour of the Albanians during ottomans times as it was a change favoring serbs during Stephan Dushans Serbian empire.And your claims that this was an organized process  are just erroneous Albanians repopulated those few lands that serbs gradually(in 500 years) abandoned, their political an cultural center was in Belgrade so was natural for them to move north."
 
Slight change? 1 POINT 8 PERCENT to what is it today? 96 percent? That is slight? And how do you, an Albanian, get the right to tell Serbs where their cultural center was? It was natural for them to move north when you had people trying to kill you and forced you to move north.
 
"That of the Serbian suffering under the Albanian-Turkish rule is just Serbian invention to justify their later negative attitude against Albanians.

One of their myths, often called history ,is that of the Serbian emigration after the Austrian-Turkish war, from Kosovo, when indeed smth like that never happened in a large scale in Kosova."

Well you just destroyed any sense of objectivity concerning Balkan history. To say the Turks didn't harm or opress their subjects in the Balkans is mindless. My country did not have a single turkish fort north of the Danube and we managed to be only nominal vassals and I know the horrors the Turks did. Let alone a nation fully ruled by the Turks such as Bulgaria, Greece or Serbia.

"Btw here you have the speech made by the Serbian King addressed to the serbuian people,when the Serbian attack in Kosova was ready to start.His motivation are totally different from yours or from those of the modern Serbian nationalist."
 
And what is my motivation? Or the Serbs? And what did he say so much different in his speech?
 
"But he never practiced his own preaches."

Meaningless statement unless you want to go somewhere with it.
 
"Yes but  how do you intend to prove that this actually happened,and when?"
 
I believe it was 1948 when he did it. I don't need to prove it you already agreed that it happened. The only thing debated by us is the scale of which it happened. Since that time until now the figures rosed from about 70-78 percent Albanian depending on the source, to 90-96 Albanian depending on the source. The question still remains who is ethnicly cleansing who.
 
"Leon Trotsky, writing this in January 1913 as an open letter in the (Menshevik) paper Luch ("The Ray") was addressing the "liberal" Russian chauvinist politician Pavel Miliukov:"
 
And how would Leon know one way or another? For example when the Czar came through Bulgaria he stated that the village he visited in had every man with their throat slit, and all the women were naked having been raped and blinded. He even specifies how a girl around 12 years old was sobbing eyeless and wandering through the village aimlessly. Horrible things happened on both sides the question is on which side was it a norm rather then an exception.
 
"Quoting a Serbian soldier whose civil and political conscience had been revolted, Trotsky reported: "
 
Again I don't deny people didn't do bad things. Read above. What this soldier discribes isn't justified to you? After all these Turks and Albanians had lived for centuries on the back of the quasi slavery against the Serbs. But this isn't justifiable to you is it? No because the Serbs aren't your people are they? So they don't matter to you.
 
"Fritz Magnussen, war correspondent for the Danish newspaper Riget"
 
Fritz had no way to calculate the numbers. Was he even there present?
 
"Daily Telegraph"

This account reads like a story book doesn't it. Even on a linguistic level it is not objective. I really find it hard to believe that the Serbs would go through Albania, one of the poorest places on earth, with the sole motive of just killing civilians. It says "Neighbores owing money gave away the Albanians" This suggests there were Serbs in Albania living there. You've got to be kidding me. Get more specific with the source or I can't take it seriously, and I doubt anyone here will either with the few exception of those who already have their minds made up for the same reasons you do.
 
"The Albanische Korrespondenz reported from Trieste on 21 March 1913:"
 
What is this an Austrian report? Oh very objective. Failed again.
 
"On 20 March, the Neue Freie Presse reported:"
 
Okay this is just insane and unprecedent if true. But I really doubt a reporter would be kept around for such an act. It is against the Orthodox religion to do such a thing. I've find this sort of action being taken much more likely from Ustashe Croats.
 
"Personally I have nothing against ,but in that case Albanians in South Serbia should have the right to secede  and join Kosova."
 
The Albanians in south serbia can be their own country which is even conviniently named Albania so no one would get confused. It seems further instructions are needed for some.
 
"

In June NATO and Yugoslavia signed a peace accord outlining troop withdrawal and the return of nearly one million ethnic Albanians as well as another 500,000 displaced within the province. "

 
And if perhaps you can muster the strength to watch the objective documentary (I know you have an aversion to anything remotely objective) you'll see that Albanian refugees starting leaving after the NATO bombs started falling.
 
"The others are official data’s that you can find by your own."

Boring. If we're going to have a debate at least pretend to pose a challenge. I'm not going to search the sources of your "arguements".
 
"That’s simply not true"

Oh but it is. Albanians had their own university, radio, schools, autonomous government and they used it to try to purify Kosovo into an Albanian state. That is why their autonomy was taken away.
 
"Our reap is Independence ,and i can show you photos too but its not my intention.As i said for me a church and a mosque are exactly the same thing."

Reap it until the UN votes. Then we'll see.
 
Oh but please I insist. And how many mosques were destroyed exactly?
 
"But this is is disgusting:"

When you yourself justifies killing people simply because they are from Montenegro or Voivodina and they settle in Kosovo, I wonder how you can claim enough of a stable mind to be treated in any other way.
 
"First of all you have to bring here names.I don’t doubt that actually a English said that but at least have the decency to bring his name."

I did. It seems you are too busy yelling loudly and plugging your ears that you can't even read all of my arguements.
 
"You are speaking without thinking,and you don’t look very neutral.As I said I would like to see some proofs backing your statements:"
 
Maybe i don't look neutral to you, but as long as I can do that I think i'm in the right ballpark.
 
I'd like it if you could read my statements long enough to see the proofs.
 
"Obviously you don’t know the difference between ignorance and stupidity,and as I said I never called you stupid.And spare me the rest please."

When you open your mouth with the former it becomes the latter. Take note of that.
 
NYT article shows history. Serbs and Albanians harmed each other back and forth. But if you really want to take it all the way back, and we can go quite far back, the issue here is Islam vs Christianity. So which one took land from the other? Who was there first? But such questions have no place in modern society. I only brought up history to show how one thing led to another. You bring it up as a pissing match with a backwards mentality of "but see he started it!"
 
This for example is more relevant to our time:
 
EXODUS OF SERBIANS STIRS PROVINCE IN YUGOSLAVIA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The New York Times, Monday, July 12, 1982
By MARVINE HOWE, Special to the New York Times
DATELINE: PRISTINA, Yugoslavia
Danilo Krstic and his family are hardworking wheat and tobacco farmers, Serbs who get along with their Albanian neighbors.
"You have to love the place where you live to stay on the land here," Marko Krstic, the oldest son, told visitors to the farm at Bec, a few miles from the Albanian border. There have been no serious troubles between Serbians and Albanians in Bec, but Serbs in some of the neighboring villages have reportedly been harassed by Albanians and have packed up and left the region.
The exodus of Serbs is admittedly one of the main problems that the authorities have to contend with in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Yugoslavia inhabited largely by Albanians.
Rioting Brought Awareness
Last year's riots, in which nine people were killed, shocked not only the troubled province of Kosovo but also the entire country into an awareness of the problems of this most backward part of Yugoslavia, which is made up of many ethnic groups.
In June a 43-year-old Serb, Miodrag Saric, was shot and killed by an Albanian neighbor, Ded Krasnici, in a village near Djakovica, 40 miles southwest of Pristina, according to the official Yugoslav press agency Tanyug. It was the second murder of a Serb by an Albanian in Kosovo this year. The dispute reportedly started with a quarrel over damage done to a field belonging to the Saric family.
The local political and security bodies condemned the murder as "a grave criminal act" that could have serious repercussions, according to the press agency. Five members of the Krasnici family have been arrested and investigations are continuing.
The authorities have responded at various levels to the violence in Kosovo, clearly trying to avoid antagonizing the Albanian majority. Besides firm security measures, action has been taken to speed political, educational and economic changes.
Past Errors Acknowledged
Privately, some officials acknowledge that the rise of Albanian nationalism in a society that is based on the principle of the equality of nationalities is the result of past errors - at first neglect and discrimination, and more recently failure to act against divisive forces or even recognize them.
"The [Albanian] nationalists have a two-point platform," according to Becir Hoti, an executive secretary of the Communist Party of Kosovo, "first to establish what they call an ethnically clean Albanian republic and then the merger with Albania to form a greater Albania. "
Mr. Hoti, an Albanian, expressed concern over political pressures that were forcing Serbs to leave Kosovo. "What is important now," he said, "is to establish a climate of security and create confidence."
The migration of Serbs is no ordinary problem becuase Kosovo is the heartland of Serbian history, culture and religion. Serbs have been in this region since the seventh century, long before they founded their own independent dynasty here in 1168.
57,000 Serbs Have Left Region
Some 57,000 Serbs have left Kosovo in the last decade, and the number increased considerably after the riots of March and April last year, according to Vukasin Jokanovic, another executive secretary of the Kosovo party.
Mr. Jokanovic, former president of the Commission on Migration set up after last year's disturbances, said the cause of Serbian migration was "essentially of a political nature."
The commission has given four basic reasons for the departures: social-economic, normal migration from this underdeveloped area, an increasingly adverse social-political climate and direct and indirect pressures.
Mr. Jokanovic, a Serb, called the pressures disturbing and said they included personal insults, damage to Serbian graves and the burning of hay, cutting down wood and other attacks on property to force Serbs to leave.
The 1981 census showed Kosovo with a population of 1,584,558, of whom 77.5 percent were ethnic Albanians, 13.2 percent Serbs and 1.7 percent Montenegrins.
The population in 1971 of 1,243,693 was 73.8 percent Albanian, 18.4 percent Serbian and 2.5 percent Montenegrin.
Ex-Defense Minister Concerned
In a recent visit to Kosovo, Nikola Ljubcic, head of the Serbian Presidency and a former Minister of Defense, expressed particular concern about the continuing exodus of Serbs.
"An ethnically clean Kosovo will always be cause for instability," Mr. Ljubicic said, adding that Yugoslavia "will never give up one foot of her land."
Conversations with Serbs and Albanians in different parts of the province showed that that they were generally troubled about the Serbian migration but did not know what to do about it. Some people described it as "psychological warfare" but were at a loss to explain who was at fault.
In Pristina, the provincial capital, with its skyscrapers and bustling streets, people said they felt relatively secure because the authorities maintained "a close watch." Although the army remains at a distance and has not had to intervene, there is a strong militia presence.
Things appear relaxed on the Corso, Pristina's main street. As in other Yugoslav cities, every night from about 6 to 10 the main thoroughfare is closed to traffic and practically everyone turns out for a stroll, encounters and discussions.
Different Sides of Street
What is special about Pristina is that it has always been Serbs on one side of the street and Albanians on the other. Residents say Albanians have been encroaching on Serbian "territory" since the disturbances.
After the crackdown on Albanian nationalists - about 300 have been sentenced - they are said to have changed tactics, moving to the villages, where there is less security control.
In some mixed communities, there were reports of [Serbian] farmers being pressured to sell their land cheap and of Albanian shopkeepers refusing to sell goods to Serbs.
"We don't want to go because we have a large farm," a Serbian farmer's wife said in a village near Pristina. "Our property hasn't been touched, but there are the insults and the intimidation, so we feel uncomfortable." Several neighbors have left, she said, and her own sons who were planning to build a new house have stopped "to see how things will turn out."
There have been many changes since the riots, but most people in Pristina agree with Mr. Ljubicic that more could be done. The main thrust of the changes is economic. "We're going to change the economic structures with more emphasis on agriculture, the processing industry, small business and handicrafts," Aziz Abrashi, the Economics Minister, said in an interview.
"Ninety-nine percent of the Albanians have no wish to live in Albania," Mr. Abrashi, an Albanian, said, "but they view the rest of Yugoslavia and are aware of the higher living standards. Our young people want the same good life, the nice houses and cars, and they can't get them if they can't get jobs."


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:37
Please spare me the wiki Jass. This topic is much too deep then to rely on a fickle website such as wikipedia. I couldn't care less about the squabling of Zionists and Jihadists in the middle east. I hope they both bury each other in piles of bullets.
 
"This really shows how sick you are, I really pity you."
 
Oh yes my apology for not having the education that the Saudi regime offers you. But out here in the real world the crimes of Islam in the Balkans are not forgotten. The towers of skulls built by civilians is not an act of love. Neither is the ritualistic beheading which the world is being reaquainted with again. But perhaps the most disgusting to me is how the Turks took children from the Balkans, brain washed them and send them 10 years later to fight in the towns and country sides of their fore-fathers.
 
"A turk made is much worse then a turk." and "They sold their faith for supper." Discribes the Bosniak/Albanian rulership of the Balkans very well.
 
Myths and Politics
Origin or the Myth of a Tolerant Pluralistic Islamic Society

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC STUDIES ASSOCIATION
SYMPOSIUM ON THE BALKAN WAR
(Ramada Congress Hotel - Chicago, Illinois)
YUGOSLAVIA: PAST AND PRESENT
Dinner Address delivered on 31 August 1995
BAT YE'OR*
Myths and Politics: Origin or the Myth of a Tolerant Pluralistic Islamic Society
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and gentlemen:
My subject this evening is: Myths and Politics: Origin of the Myth of a Tolerant Pluralistic Islamic Society. I stress the world "Tolerant", which was omitted from the program.
Ten years ago, when I came to America for the launching of my book: THE DHIMMI, JEWS AND CHRISTIANS UNDER ISLAM, I was struck by the inscription on the Archives Building in Washington: "Past is Prologue". I had thought -- at least at the beginning of my research -- that my subject related to a remote past, but I realized that contemporary events were rapidly modernizing this past. Muslim countries where Islamic law -- the SHARI'A -- had been replaced by modern juridic (imposed by the European colonizing powers,) were abandoning the secularizing trend, replacing it with Islamization in numerous sectors of life. This impression of the return of the past became even more acute when I was working on my next book, published in 1991, the English edition which will appear in a few months under the title: THE DECLINE OF EASTERN CHRISTIANITY UNDER ISLAM - 7th TO 20th CENTURY: FROM JIHAD TO DHIMMITUDE (Associated University Presses).
In this study, I tried to analyze the numerous processes that had transformed rich, powerful Christian civilizations into Islamic lands and their long-term effects, which had reduced native Christian majorities into scattered small religious minorities, now slowly disappearing. This complex Islamization process of Christian lands and civilizations on both shores of the Mediterannean - and in Irak and Armenia - I have called: the process of "dhimmitude" and the civilization of those peoples who underwent such transformation, I have named the civilization of "dhimmitude". The indigenous native peoples were Jews and Christians: Orthodox, Catholics, or from other Eastern Christian Churches. They are all referred to by Muslim jurists as the "Peoples of the Book" - the Book being the Bible - and are subjected to the same condition according to Islamic law. They are called dhimmis: protected peoples, because Islamic law protects their life and goods on condition that they submit to Islamic rule. I will not go into details here for this is a very long and complex subject, but in order to understand the Serbian situation one should know that the Serbs were treated during half a millennium just like the other Christian and Jewish DHIMMIS. They participated in this civilization of dhimmitude. It is important to understand that the civilization of dhimmitude grows from two religious institutions: JIHAD and SHARI'A, which establish a particular ideological system that makes it mandatory - during the jihad operation -- to use terror, mass killings, deportation and slavery. And the Serbs -- because I am speaking of them tonight -- did not escape from this fate, which was the same for all the populations around the Mediterannean basin, vanquished by JIHAD. For centuries, the Serbs fought to liberate their land from the laws of JIHAD and of SHARI'A, which had legalized their condition of oppression.
So while I was analyzing and writing about the processes of dhimmitude and the civilization of dhimmitude, while listening to the radio, watching television, reading the newspapers, I had the uncomfortable feeling that the clock was being turned back.
Modern politicians, sophisticated writers -- using phones, planes, computers and all the modern techniques -- seemed to be returning several centuries back, with WIGS or STIFF COLLARS, using exactly the same CORRUPTING ARGUMENTS, the same tortuous short-term politics that had previously contributed to the gradual Islamization of numerous non-Muslim peoples. I had to shake myself in an effort to distinguish the past from the present.
So, is the past always prologue? Are we doomed to remain always prisoners of the same errors? Certainly, if we do not know the past. And this past -- the long and agonizing process of Christian annihilation by the laws of JIHAD and dhimmitude -- is a taboo history, not only in Islamic lands, but above all in the West. It has been buried beneath a myth, fabricated by Western politicians and religious leaders, in order to promote their own national strategic and economic interests.
Curiously, this myth started in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the 19th century. It alleges that Turkish rule over Christians in its European provinces was just and lawful. That the Ottoman regime, being Islamic, was naturally "tolerant" and well disposed toward its Christian subjects; that its justice was fair, and that safety for life and goods was guaranteed to Christians by Islamic laws. Ottoman rule was brandished as the most suitable regime to rule Christians of the Balkans.
This theory was advanced by European politicians in order to safeguard the balance of power in Europe, and in order to block the Russian advance towards the Mediterannean. To justify the maintenance of the Turkish yoke on the Slavs it was portrayed as a model for a multi-ethnical and multi-religious empire. Of course, the reality was totally different! First the Ottoman Empire was created by centuries of JIHAD against Christian populations; consequently the rules of JIHAD, elaborated by Arab-Muslim theologians from the 8th to the 10th centuries, applied to the subjected Christian and Jewish populations of the Turkish Islamic dominions. Those regulations are integrated into the Islamic legislation concerning the non-Muslim vanquished peoples and consequently they present a certain homogeneity throughout the Arab and Turkish empires.
The civilization of dhimmitude in which the Serbs participated had many aspects that evolved with changing political situations. In the 1830s, forced by the European powers, the Ottomans adopted a series of reforms aiming at ending the oppression of the Christians.
In the Serbian regions, the most fanatical opponents of Christian emancipation were the Muslims Bosniacs. They fought against the Christian right to possess lands and, in legal matters, to have equal rights as themselves. They pretended that under the old system that gave them full domination over the Christians, Muslims and Christians had lived for centuries in a convivial fraternity. And this argument is still used today by President Izetbegovic and others. He repeatedly affirms that the 500 years of Christian dhimmitude was a period of peace and religious harmony.
Let us now confront the myth with reality. A systematic enquiry into the condition of the Christians was conducted by British consuls in the Ottoman Empire in the 1860s. Britain was then Turkey's strongest ally. It was in its own interest to see that the oppression of the Christians would be eliminated in order to prevent any Russian or Austrian interference. Consul James Zohrab sent from Bosna-Serai (Sarajevo) a lengthy report, dated July 22, 1860, to his ambassador in Constantinople, Sir Henry Bulwer, in which he analyzed the administration of the provinces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. He stated that from 1463 to 1850 the Bosniac Muslims enjoyed all the privileges of feudalism. During a period of nearly 300 years Christians were subjected to much oppression and cruelty. For them no other law but the caprice of their masters existed.
The DEVSHIRME system is well known. Begun by the Sultan Orkhan (1326-1359), it existed for about 300 years. It consisted of a regular levy of Christian children from the Christian population of the Balkans. These youngsters, aged from fourteen to twenty, were Islamized and enslaved for their army. The periodic levies, which took place in contingents of a thousand, subsequently became annual. To discourage runaways, children were transferred to remote provinces and entrusted to Muslim soldiers who treated them harshly as slaves. Another parallel recruitment system operated. It provided for the levy of Christian children aged six to ten (ICHOGHLANI), reserved for the sultans' palace. Entrusted to eunuchs, they underwent a tyrannical training for fourteen years. (A system of enslaving Black Christian and Animist children, similar to the DEVSHIRME existed in Sudan as is shown from documents to be published in my book. A sort of DEVSHIRME system still exists today in Sudan and has been described and denounced by the United Nations Special Report on Sudan and in a recent article last Friday's TIMES OF LONDON.) In 1850, the Bosniac Muslims opposed the authority of the Sultan and the reforms, but were defeated by the Sultan's army aided by the Christians who hoped that their position would thereby improve, "but they hardly benefited." Moreover, despite their assistance to the sultan's army, Christians were disarmed, while the Muslims who fought the sultan could retain weapons. Christians remained oppressed as before, Consul Zobrab writes about the reforms: "I can safely say, they practically remain a dead letter".
Discussing the impunity granted to the Muslims by the sultan, Zohrab wrote:
"This impunity, while it does not extend to permitting the Christians to be treated as they formerly were treated, is so far unbearable and unjust in that it permits the Muslims to despoil them with heavy exactions. Under false accusations imprisonments are of daily occurrence. A Christian has but a small chance of exculpating himself when his opponent is a Muslim."
"Christians are now permitted to possess real property, but the obstacles which they meet with when they attempt to acquire it are so many and vexatious that very few have as yet dared to brave them. Although a Christian can buy land and take possession it is when he has got his land into order [...] that the Christian feels the helplessness of his position and the insincerity of the Government. [Under any pretext] "the Christian is in nineteen cases out of twenty dispossessed, and he may then deem himself fortunate if he gets back the price he gave."
Commenting on this situation, the consul writes:
"Such being, generally speaking, the course pursued by the Government towards the Christians in the capital of the province Sarajevo where the Consular Agents of the different Powers reside and can exercise some degree of control, it may easily be guessed to what extend the Christians, in the remoter districts, suffer who are governed by Mudirs generally fanatical."
He continues:
"Christian evidence in the Medjlises (tribunal) as a rule is refused. Knowing this, the Christians generally come forward prepared with Mussulman witnesses (...), twenty years ago, it is true, they had no laws beyond the caprice of their landlords."
"Cases of oppression are frequently the result of Mussulman fanaticism, but for these the Government must be held responsible, for if offenders were punished, oppression would of necessity became rare."
In the spring of 1861 the sultan announced new reforms in Herzegovina, promising among other things freedom to build churches, the use of church bells and the opportunity for Christians to acquire land.
Commenting on this, Consul William Holmes in Bosna-Serai writes to Ambassador Sir Henry Bulwer that those promises rarely applied. He mentions that the Serbs, the biggest community were refused the right to build a church in Bosna-Serai. Concerning the right to buy land, he writes; "Every possible obstacle is still thrown in the way of the purchase of lands by Christians, and very often after they have succeeded in purchasing and improving land, it is no secret that on one unjust pretext or another, it has been taken from them."
Consul Longworth writes, from Belgrade on 1860 that by its Edicts the "Government may hasten such a reform but I question very much whether more evil than good will not arise from proclaiming a social equality which is, in the present stage of things and relations of society, morally impossible."
The biggest problem, in fact, was the refusal to accept either Christian or Jewish testimony in Islamic tribunals.
Consul Longworth comments on "the lax and vicious principle acted upon in the Mussulman Courts, where, as the only means of securing justice to Christians, Mussulman false witnesses are permitted to give evidence on their behalf."
The situation didn't change, and in 1875 the Grand Vizier Mahmud Pasha admitted to the British Ambassador in Constantinople, Sir Henry Elliot, the "impossibility of allowing Christian testimony at courts of justice in Bosnia." Thus, the Ambassador noted: "The professed equality of Christians and Mussulmans is, however, so illusory so long as this distinction is maintained."
This juridical situation had serious consequences due to the system of justice, as he explained: "This is a point [the refusal of testimony] of much importance to the Christians, for, as the religious courts neither admit documentary nor written evidence, nor receive Christian evidence, they could hope for little justice from them."
The difficulty of imposing reforms in such a vast empire provoked this disillusioned comment, from Sir Francis, consul-general, judge at the British Consular Court in 1875 Constantinopole: "Indeed, the modern perversion of the Oriental idea of justice is a concession to a suitor through grace and favor, and not the declaration of a right, on principles of law, and in pursuance of equity."
From Consul Blunt writing from Pristina on 14 July 1860 to Ambassador Bulwer, we learn about the situation in the province of Macedonia: "[...] For a long time the province of Uscup [Skopje, Macedonia] has been a prey to brigandage: [...] Christian churches and monasteries, towns and inhabitants, are now pillaged, massacred, and burnt by Albanian hordes as used to be done ten years ago."
"The Christians are not allowed to carry arms. This, considering the want of a good police, exposes them the more to attacks from brigands." "Christian evidence in law suits between a Mussulman and a non-Mussulman is not admitted in the Local Courts."
Ten years before he said: "Churches were not allowed to be built; and one can judge of the measure of toleration practiced at that time by having had to creep under doors scarcely four feet high. It was an offense to smoke and ride before a Turk; to cross his path, or not stand up before him, was equally wrong." [...]
Fifteen years later, in another report from Bosna-Serai, dated December 30, 1875, from consul Edward Freeman, we learn that the Bosnian Muslims had sent a petition to the sultan stating that before the reforms, "they lived as brother with the Christian population. In fact, wrote the Consul, "their aim appears to reduce the Christians to their former ancient state of serfdom." So once again we go back to the myth. When reading the literature of the time, we see that the obstruction to Serbian, Greek and other Christian liberation movement was rooted in two main arguments:
1) Christian DHIMMIS are congenitally unfitted for independence and self-government. They should therefore remain under the Islamic rule.
2) The Ottoman rule is a perfect model for a multi-religious and multi-ethnical society.
Indeed these are theological Islamic arguments that justify the JIHAD since all non-Muslim people should not retain political independence because their laws are evil and must be eventually replaced by the Islamic rule. We find the same reasoning in the Palestinian 1988 Covenant of the Hamas. Those arguments are very common in the theological and legal literature and are exposed by modern Islamists.
Collusion
The myth didn't die with the collapse of the Turkish Empire after World War I. Rather it took another form: that of the National Arab Movement, which promoted an Arab society where Christians and Muslims would live in perfect harmony. Once again, this was the fabrication of European politicians, writers and clergyman. And in the same way as the myth of the Ottoman political paradise was created to block the independence of the Balkan nations, so the Arab multi-religious fraternity was an argument to destroy the national liberation of non-Arab peoples of the Middle East (Kurds, Armenians, Assyrians, Maronites and Zionists.)
And although from the beginning of this century until the 1930s, a stream of Christian refugees were fleeing massacres and genocide on the roads of Turkey, Irak and Syria, the myth continued to flourish, sustained mostly by Arab writers and clergyman. After the Israelis had succeeded in liberating their land from the laws of JIHAD and DHIMMITUDE, the myth reappeared in the form of a multi-cultural and multi-religious fraternal Palestine which had to replace the State of Israel (Cf. Arafat's 1975 UN speech). Its pernicious effects led to the destruction of the Christians in Lebanon. One might have thought that the myth would end there.
But suddenly the recent crisis in Yugoslavia offered a new chance for its reincarnation in a multi-religious Muslim Bosnian state. What a chance! A Muslim state again in the heartland of Europe. And we know the rest, the sufferings, the miseries, the trials of the war that this myth once again brought in its wake.
To conclude, I would like to say a few last words. The civilization of dhimmitude does not develop all at once. It is a long process that involves many elements and a specific conditioning. It happens when peoples replace history by myths, when they fight to uphold these destructive myths, more then their own values because they are confused by having transformed lies into truth. They hold to those myths as if they were the only guarantee of their survival, when, in fact, they are the path to destruction. Terrorized by the evidence and teaching of history, those peoples preferred to destroy it rather than to face it. They replace history with childish tales, thus living in amnesia.
=== The end of the speech
* About the author:
Madam BAT YE'OR, author and scholar, born in Egypt. A British citizen living in Switzerland, she is a specialist on the DHIMMIS and "DHIMMITUDE" (a new word which she coined), and the subject of her pioneer research for the past twenty-five years. Author, since 1971, of numerous articles on non-Muslims under Islamic rule, she broke new ground with her book:
THE DHIMMI: JEWS & CHRISTIANS UNDER ISLAM, preface by Jacques Ellul (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press & Associated University Presses, Cranbury, N.J./London/Toronto, 1985), Enlarged English edition.
Her second major work...
LES CHRETIENTES D'ORIENT ENTRE JIHAD ET DHIMMITUDE: VIIe-XXe siecle, preface de Jacques Ellul (Paris, La Cerf, 1991) (English edition published by AUP in early 1996, English title: THE DECLINE OF EASTERN CHRISTIANITY UNDER ISLAM; 7TH TO 20TH CENTURY. FROM JIHAD TO DHIMMITUDE) - Associated University Press, 440 Forsgate Drive, Canbury, New Jersey 08512, tel: (609) 655-4770, 520 pages, cloth and paper cover option... ...established the author's reputation as an innovative thinker in a virgin field of research. The significance of her latest book in French JUIFS ET CHRETIENS SOUS L'ISLAM: LES DHIMMIS FACE AU DEFI INTEGRISTE (Paris, Berg international, 1994) is revealed by its subtitle: The Dhimmis faced with the challenge of Fundamentalism. Here, she covers the period of Turkish rule in the Balkans and analyses contemporary events. An English edition is scheduled for 1997.
======== End - about the author =========
Excerpt from author's interview for daily Politika....
Politika: What is your experience in relation to Dhimmitude having in mind the fact that your are a Jew born in Egypt?
Madam Bat Ye'Or: "I was witness of expulsion of the Jewish community from Egypt (85,000 persons). It was done in the ambient of hatred, terrorism, pillage and robbery. It started in 1945 and had its peak in 1948 and 1956. Anyhow, this is common experience of Jews in the entire Arab world. There used to be some 1,000,000 Jews there. Today only 10,000 remained. I wrote about it in one of my books. Contacts with Arab Christians helped me a lot in my strive to widen the understanding of the problem..."
========= End of the excerpt
NOTE:
To learn more on how the myth of the Muslim tolerance occurred, please open any encyclopedia and look for "EASTERN QUESTION".
To simplify it: The super power of the 19th century, Great Britain, waged a "space game" with the other potential super power: Russia. Where interests of the two crossed was - Balkans (then under Turkish occupation).
It would be most natural that Russia should have the influence in the the area. Most of the subdued Balkan nations (Serbs, Greeks, Rumanians, Bulgarians) are Eastern Orthodox - like Russians. That did not fit British interests. That is how Britain allied itself with Turkey and invented the myth of the Muslim tolerance.
When Turks cut throats, raped women and steal children of Balkan Christians - it was OK for the Brits - it was an expression of tolerance... As long as Russians do not get influence in the Balkans.
The history repeats itself. Super powers play again with the destiny of the Balkan peoples. They play with fire. 


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:39
I'm sure they didn't see it as preserving the idea to opress. More like having their rightful spot as Muslims among infidels in society. All of the sudden after hundreds of years of opressing their Christian subjects, they now had to live amongst them. I'd have a pretty heavy conscience too.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:47
It has been some 60 years at this point. Two generations passed. More like protecting their own families. And what makes you think that they have been oppressing Christians for several hundred years? So basically every single Muslim in the Balkans ever only thought of opressing non-Muslims? You are funny. 

-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:53
Friedrich Griesendorf, who died in 1958, was a very educated man. He was at one time a court clergyman for the German Kaiser, Wilhelm II. After World War II, he was a pastor in the Eversburg church parish where a camp of Serbian prisoners of war was located. Before retiring, he dedicated these lines to his German parishioners:

"Our country lost the war. The English, Americans and Russians won. Maybe they had much better equipment, larger armies, better leadership. In reality, it was an explicit material victory. They took the victory. However, here among us is one nation that won another more beautiful victory, a victory of the soul, a victory of the heart and honesty, a victory of peace and Christian love. THEY ARE THE SERBS. We knew them earlier, some a little and some not at all. But we all knew what we did in their homeland. We killed hundreds of the Serbs who defended their country for one of our soldiers who represented the occupier -- the oppressor. And not only that, we looked favorably when others shot at Serbs from all sides; The Croatians, the Italians, Albanians, Bulgarians and Hungarians. Yet we knew that among us in the prisoner of war camps were 5,000 Serbian officers, who earlier were the elite of the society and, who now resembled living skeletons, exhausted and spent from hunger. We knew that among the Serbs smoldered the belief 'He who does not revenge is not sanctified'."
"We are truly afraid of the revenge by these Serbian martyrs. We were afraid that after our capitulation they would do what we did to them. We imagined murder, plunder, rape, demolition and destruction of our homes. However, what happened? When the barbed wires were torn down and 5,000 Serbian skeletons found themselves free in our midst, those skeletons caressed our children. Only now can we understand why our greatest poet, Goethe, studied the Serbian language. Only now can we comprehend why the last word for Bismark, on his deathbed, was -- 'SERBIA.' That kind of victory is more sublime than a material victory. It seems to me that only the Serbs could win such a victory, being brought up in their St. Sava's spirit and epic poetry, which our Goethe loved so much. This victory will live for centuries in the souls of us Germans. I want to dedicate my last clergyman's sermon to that victory and the Serbs who won it."

Friedrick Griesendorf.


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 00:58
"It has been some 60 years at this point. Two generations passed."

If my family had been opressing (on the side of the oppressors even) for hundreds of years i'd worry about my saftey. You can look at America even in the white/black relations concerning slavery.
 
"And what makes you think that they have been oppressing Christians for several hundred years?"

No doesn't make me think. I know. Islam was an ugly thing in the Balkans, and most of the people who converted simply did it for the benefits they had under Turkish rule.
 
"So basically every single Muslim in the Balkans ever only thought of opressing non-Muslims?"

Did I say that?
 
"You are funny. "

Your strawmen arguements are funny as well as your inability to make an actual point concerning the discussion. So you are left to make a ludacris arguement and then go on defeating it yourself. Please this isn't worth anyone's time. Don't put words in my mouth.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 01:01
Islam was an ugly thing in the Balkans Dead, oppressing - ok... so perpetual opression for 500 years. That sounds amusing. 

-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 01:15
Perhaps because your ancestors lived hand in hand with the Ottomans you can afford to make such jokes. Since I grew up and studied the medieval history of my people where we managed to hold off this massive seemingly unbeatable Empire (among others) by the skin of our teeth I can not afford to make those jokes.


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 01:36
Maybe minding to explain who exactly your people are? Bosnians as an example actually shifted in demographics due to Ottoman Wars, and I am mostly talking about the Muslim Bosniaks. From an absolute majority by the 1600s to fifty per cent during the Austro-Ottoman wars, and back up to a majority up until the massive emigrations following Austrian rule post 1870s.

As far as my ancestors... well I have 3 major ones in my family. Direct Bosnian,(both) Turkish(mostly Mothers), and Serbian ancestry(Fathers) side. And Medieval studies is actually what I have been pursuing.




-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 02:18
Isn't the name obvious? Romania.
 
Anyone living in Bosnia is a Bosnian.
 
"SERBIAN SETLEMENT IN BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA BEGAN IN THE SEVENTH CENTURY A.D."

Encyclopedia Britannica, Edition 1971
Volume 3, page 983
---------------------------------------------------
 

"THE EMPEROR CONSTANTINE VII PORPHYROGENITUS (reigned 913-957) REFFERED TO BOSNIA AS PART OF *THE LAND OF THE SERBS*."

Encyclopedia Britannica, Edition 1990, Volume 29, Macropedia, page 1098
 
------------------------------------------------
 
"THE LARGEST SINGLE NATIONAL ELEMENT [IN BOSNIA] IS THE ORTHODOX SERBS"

Collier's Encyclopedia, Edition 1956, page 661
 
------------------------
 
So I don't know where you got the idea that the Muslims were ever an "absolute majority".
 
Perhaps this explains how they became a majority:
 
"In RECORD TIME, during the spring of 1943,... TWENTY THOUSAND BOSNIAN MUSLIM MEN VOLUNTEER... INTO WAFFEN-SS...
THEY PARTICIPATED IN THE MASSACRE OF CIVILIANS IN BOSNIA and VOLUNTEERED TO JOIN IN THE HUNT FOR JEWS IN CROATIA..."

Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Edition 1990, Volume 2, Pages 706 and 707,
entry "Husseini, Hajj Amin Al"
 
-----------------------------------------
 
"...IN BOSNIA...THE CROATIAN [AND MUSLIM] FASCISTS BEGAN A MASSACRE OF SERBS WHICH, IN THE WHOLE ANNALS OF WORLD WAR II, WAS SURPASSED FOR SAVAGERY ONLY BY THE MASS EXTERMINATION OF POLISH JEWS."

Encyclopedia Britannica from 1971 to 1986 (entry: Yugoslavia, World War II)
 
================
 
The notion of a "Bosniak" came into be when certain Serbs and perhaps even Croatians converted to Islam for the benefits the Ottoman Turks provided for fellow Muslims. That would be a nice way of putting it. There never was a seperate ethnic group known as Bosniaks. When the Serbs migrated into the Balkans there was no Bosniaks. Neither when the Croats followed close behind.
 
So what is a Bosniak?
 
Encyclopedia Britannica, eleventh edition (year: 1910 (!)), Volume IV, page 281,
entry "Bosnia and Herzegovina", subentry (#10)
Population and National Characteristics
(quote:)
In 1895 the population, which tends to increase slowly... numbered 1,568,092. The alien element is small, consisting chiefly of Austro-Hungarians, gipsies, Italians and Jews. Spanish is a common language of the Jews, whose ancestors fled hither, during the 16th century, to escape the Inquisition.
The natives are officialy described as Bosniaks, but classify themselves according to religion. Thus the Roman Catholics PREFER the name of CROATS, Hrvats or Latins; the Orthodox, of SERBS; THE MOSLEMS, OF TURKS.
All alike belong to the Serbo-Croatian branch of the Slavonic race; and all speak a language almost identical to Serbian, though written by the Roman Catholics in Latin instead of Cyrillic letters.
TO AVOID OFFENDING EITHER "SERBS" OR "CROATS," IT IS OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED "BOSNITCH." ... The Bosnians or Bosniaks resemble their Serbian kindfolk in both appearance and character. They have the same love for poetry, music and romance; the same *intense* pride in their race and history; many of the same superstitions and customs. The Christians retain the Serbian costume, modified in detail, as the occasional use of the turban or fez. The "Turkish" women have in some districts abandoned the veil; but in others they even cover the eyes when they leave home.
(end quote)


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 02:22
O yeah I forgot I don't exist. 

-------------


Posted By: vranakonti
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 03:12

More bias sources? This from the man that endources the war crimes of NATO? Nice try.

 

Your try wasn’t even nice. Malcom was quoting an important Serbian official and Yugoslav archives.

 

 

And other sources state one way or another. My point being is that it was around half/half.

 

Its more honorable if you just admit your mistake.

 

 

Slight change? 1 POINT 8 PERCENT to what is it today? 96 percent? That is slight? And how do you, an Albanian, get the right to tell Serbs where their cultural center was? It was natural for them to move north when you had people trying to kill you and forced you to move north.

 

Their cultural original center was in Raskia, that after the Serbian invasion,Kosova,and from the ottoman invasion till the present times Belgrade bacame their only main center.I don’t think any right is need to state some obvious facts.

1.8 %,are you serious?

 

 

 Well you just destroyed any sense of objectivity concerning Balkan history. To say the Turks didn't harm or opress their subjects in the Balkans is mindless. My country did not have a single turkish fort north of the Danube and we managed to be only nominal vassals and I know the horrors the Turks did. Let alone a nation fully ruled by the Turks such as Bulgaria, Greece or Serbia.

 

You forgot to put Albania in those nations,i assume you just forgot it,since you are not biased,right?

 

And what is my motivation? Or the Serbs? And what did he say so much different in his speech?

Meaningless statement unless you want to go somewhere with it.

 

He clearly says that he is going to liberate Albanians as well, because they were suffering together with Serbs. Instead you are saying that Serbs suffered under the Albanians.If they “suffered” a little bit  more it was just because of their different religion and it wasn’t Albanians fault.

However all this thing of orthodox suffering under the muslims is just an overestimation, and all those churches all around kosova are the best proof of it. Even the famous church of Decani was under the protection of the Albanian Moslem voivods.

 

Another interesting  note about his speech:

 

 By the grace of God, I have therefore ordered my brave army to join in the Holy War to free our brethren and to ensure a better future.
 In Old Serbia, my army will meet not only upon Christian Serbs, but also upon Moslem Serbs, who are equally dear to us, and in addition to them, upon Christian and Moslem Albanians with whom our people have shared joy and sorrow for
thirteen centuries now. To all of them we bring freedom, brotherhood and equality."

 

Thirteen centuries??So the Serbian King his saying that Serbs and Albanians were living together for 13 centuries, exactly the time when Serbs came in the Balkans.

 

 
I believe it was 1948 when he did it. I don't need to prove it you already agreed that it happened. The only thing debated by us is the scale of which it happened. Since that time until now the figures rosed from about 70-78 percent Albanian depending on the source, to 90-96 Albanian depending on the source. The question still remains who is ethnicly cleansing who.

 

I agreed that we had close relation for almost 4 years with yugoslavia,but I never said there was an Albanian emigration.We had close relation with USSR and China but we never emigrated there aswell.

 

 

And how would Leon know one way or another? For example when the Czar came through Bulgaria he stated that the village he visited in had every man with their throat slit, and all the women were naked having been raped and blinded. He even specifies how a girl around 12 years old was sobbing eyeless and wandering through the village aimlessly. Horrible things happened on both sides the question is on which side was it a norm rather then an exception.

 

He was a war correspondent in the Balkans so he was well informed.During the Balkans wars horrible crimes happened on all sides, except for the Albanian side,that wasn’t even a side ,but just civilians at the mercy of foreign armies.

 

Again I don't deny people didn't do bad things. Read above. What this soldier discribes isn't justified to you? After all these Turks and Albanians had lived for centuries on the back of the quasi slavery against the Serbs. But this isn't justifiable to you is it? No because the Serbs aren't your people are they? So they don't matter to you.

 

You really think that Turks only worry was to kill serbs all day long.They did it at the beginning when the Balkans nations weren’t under their full control, but not only with Serbs but with every people they fought,but certainly this was everything but a norm during their reign.

 

 

Fritz had no way to calculate the numbers. Was he even there present?

 

The daily telegraph account states the same

 

 

"Daily Telegraph"

This account reads like a story book doesn't it. Even on a linguistic level it is not objective. I really find it hard to believe that the Serbs would go through Albania, one of the poorest places on earth, with the sole motive of just killing civilians. It says "Neighbores owing money gave away the Albanians" This suggests there were Serbs in Albania living there. You've got to be kidding me. Get more specific with the source or I can't take it seriously, and I doubt anyone here will either with the few exception of those who already have their minds made up for the same reasons you do.

 

I never said that those lands were 100% Albanian,the same as today there was a Serbian minority.And another thing, go inform your self about the Kosovar Albanian’s, and Kosova in general,they were one of the welthiest regions of the ottoman empire.

Serbs tried to annex not only Kosova but all of northern Albania including the sea port of Durres.Indeed they invaded all these lands during the 1913 offensive but were forced to withdraw thanks to the international pressure.

 

 

 

Okay this is just insane and unprecedent if true. But I really doubt a reporter would be kept around for such an act. It is against the Orthodox religion to do such a thing. I've find this sort of action being taken much more likely from Ustashe Croats.

 

And why only this is insane?Because the victims were Christians? 

 

The Albanians in south serbia can be their own country which is even conviniently named Albania so no one would get confused. It seems further instructions are needed for some.

 

Yeah whatever.

 

And if perhaps you can muster the strength to watch the objective documentary (I know you have an aversion to anything remotely objective) you'll see that Albanian refugees starting leaving after the NATO bombs started falling.

 

 

A documentary considered biased, by its own sponsor and producer (The checz TV),can’t become objective just because you say so.

 

 

Oh but it is. Albanians had their own university, radio, schools, autonomous government and they used it to try to purify Kosovo into an Albanian state. That is why their autonomy was taken away.

 

How they did purify Kosova anyway? Ethnically motivated crimes were almost inexistent when Kosova had its autonomy .Serbs were losing the control of the province,that’s right and they were just pissed of having Albanian ,communist leader, mayors ,doctors , and policemen.But you can see it by your own now,their paranoia just made true their worst nightmare, the independence of Kosova.    

 

 

 

 

Oh but please I insist. And how many mosques were destroyed exactly?

 

 

Architectural Heritage in Kosovo: A Post-War Report
              By Andrew Herscher and Andras Riedlmayer
 
The authors:
 
    Andrew Herscher is an architect, PhD candidate in architectural
    history and theory at Harvard University, and co-director of the
    Kosovo Cultural Heritage Project.
 
    Andras J. Riedlmayer directs the Aga Khan Program's
    Documentation Center for Islamic Art and Architecture at
    Harvard's Fine Arts Library and is co-director of the Kosovo
    Cultural Heritage Project
 
Andras J. Riedlmayer
Fine Arts Library
Harvard University
 
 
>From the spring of 1998 until the summer of 1999, Kosovo was the
scene of armed conflict and savage "ethnic cleansing." Thousands of
the region's Kosovar Albanian inhabitants were killed and nearly a
million were driven from their homes. Less well known than the human
tragedy is the fate of Kosovo's rich cultural heritage
 
Serbs blamed the Nato bombing of course:
 
Among the monuments and sites reported to have been destroyed or seriously
damaged by the air strikes: the Gracanica monastery near Prishtina;
the Decani monastery; the Pec Patriarchate complex; the Church of
the Virgin Ljeviska and the Sinan Pasha Mosque in Prizren; the
Prizren League Museum; the Hadum Mosque complex in Gjakova (Serbian:
Djakovica); the historic bazaars in Gjakova and Pec (Albanian:
Peja); the Roman Catholic church of St. Anthony in Gjakova; and two
old Ottoman bridges, Ura e Terzive (Terzijski most) and Ura e
Tabakeve (Tabacki most), near Gjakova. These allegations were given
wide publicity on Internet web sites, in the news media, in
professional forums (including the US/ICOMOS Newsletter), and in two
white books issued by the Yugoslav government.[1] On June 1, 1999,
Yugoslavia's ambassador to UNESCO announced that the old parts of
the Kosovo city of Prizren and the provincial capital Prishtina had
been completely destroyed by NATO bombing.[2]
 
Meanwhile, eyewitness accounts by Kosovar refugees also spoke of
cultural destruction. In a survey of Kosovar refugee heads of
households in camps in Albania and Macedonia, carried out in
April-May 1999 by the NGO Physicians for Human Rights, nearly half
(47 percent) of the respondents reported seeing mosques destroyed by
Serb forces before they left Kosovo.[3]
 
Thus, we made it our goal to ascertain, insofar as possible, the
condition of all cultural and religious monuments and institutions,
whether listed or not, that were reported to have been damaged.
Covering both wartime and post-war destruction, the survey was
primarily a damage assessment. Limitations on our time and resources
and the difficulties of access to some sites prevented us from
making a more detailed study of each monument.
 
Our survey database has 268 entries for architectural monuments,
representing sites we visited during our fieldwork in October 1999
 
We found that out of the four well-preserved historic urban centres
in Kosovo three old towns--Pec, Gjakova, Vushtrri (Serbian:
Vucitrn)--had suffered severe devastation. Allegations by the
Yugoslav authorities notwithstanding, it was evident both from the
nature of the damage we saw and from the statements of eyewitnesses
we interviewed that this destruction was not the result of aerial
bombardment.
 
Albanian historical buildings
 
The historic city of Prizren survived the war without
significant damage to any of its monuments, except for the Museum of
the 1878 Albanian League of Prizren, which was burned down on March
28, 1999, by Serbian police using rifle-propelled grenades
 
War damage in the capital was largely
limited to a handful of modern government buildings, including the
Serbian police headquarters and the post and telecommunications
centre, which were hit by NATO air strikes; one 16th-c. neighborhood
mosque and a number of Albanian houses and shops were burned by
Serbian forces during the war.
 
Other allegations of NATO bombing damage to cultural monuments in
Kosovo also proved to be unfounded. In Gjakova, for example, we
found the two Ottoman-era bridges, both alleged to have suffered
direct hits, to be completely intact.
 
In the small towns and villages of the countryside, traditional
residential architecture was also a major target in the recent
conflict. Ottoman-era town houses (konak, shtepia) of prominent
Albanian families, and the stone tower-residences (kulla) that are
indigenous to this area of the Balkans and typical of Albanian
traditional architecture, had clearly been singled out for
destruction by Serb forces during the "ethnic cleansing" campaigns
of the summer of 1998 and the spring of 1999. Of some 500 kullas in
Kosovo, most built during the 18th-19th c. and inhabited by
generations of the same families, barely 10 per cent are estimated
to have survived the war intact.
 
Catholic churches
 
The Roman Catholic church of
St. Anthony had been taken over by soldiers from the nearby Yugoslav
army base, who evicted the Albanian priests and the nuns from the
church and convent "half an hour before the war (i.e. the NATO
bombing) began," according to the parish priest, Fr. Ambroz Ukaj.
The church and the convent were used as a military command centre
for the next two months, while the army base was flattened by NATO's
air strikes. The only damage to the church, other than windows
broken by air blast, was that caused by Yugoslav soldiers who
thoroughly looted and vandalized the premises before they left in
early June 1999.
 
Mosques
 
Another category of historical architecture in urgent need of
protection in Kosovo is Muslim houses of worship. This part of
Europe is home to an indigenous Islamic tradition going back more
than 600 years,
 
This heritage suffered
massive destruction during the recent conflict. In the majority of
cases, it was evident from the statements of eyewitnesses, from the
type of damage (mosques burned out from within, with no bullet or
shrapnel holes; minarets that had been blown up with explosives
placed inside, causing the stone spire to collapse onto the
building), and from visible signs of vandalism (Koran manuscripts
ripped from bindings and burned or defaced with human excrement,
crude anti-Muslim and anti-Albanian graffiti in Serbian on the walls
of destroyed and desecrated mosques) that this destruction was not
the result of military activities. These were not buildings that had
been caught in the crossfire as Serbian forces fought Albanian
rebels, or hit by NATO's bombs and missiles.
 
According to statistics published before the war, there were 607
mosques in Kosovo as of 1993. Of these, 528 were congregational
mosques (xhamia) of which 498 were in active use, and 79 smaller
mosques (mesxhid) of which 70 were in active use; the majority dated
from Ottoman times.[8] More than 200 of these mosques--a third of
all Islamic houses of worship in Kosovo--were destroyed or damaged
during the recent conflict, according to our survey and
documentation we examined in the offices of the Islamic Community.
 
Orthodox Churches
 
Although much concern was expressed during last spring's NATO
bombing campaign about the fate of Kosovo's medieval Orthodox
churches and monasteries, in fact we found no evidence that any
Orthodox sites had suffered serious damage during the war--either
from NATO bombs or at the hands of Albanian rebels.
 
After the end of the war, however, the situation with respect to Serbian Orthodox heritage changed for the worse.
 
 http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byform/mailing-lists/cdl/2000/1124.html - http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byform/mailing-lists/cdl/2000/1124.html 
 
enough?


-------------
Ti Shqipri m ep nder...


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 06:51
"Your try wasn’t even nice. Malcom was quoting an important Serbian official and Yugoslav archives."
 
So quote the archive directly. In any case he is a bias source that pretty much invested half his life in pleading the Albanian cause.
 
"Its more honorable if you just admit your mistake."

More then happy to when it is the case.
 
"Their cultural original center was in Raskia, that after the Serbian invasion,Kosova,and from the ottoman invasion till the present times Belgrade bacame their only main center.I don’t think any right is need to state some obvious facts."

Non sense even in Byzantine times Kosovo was known as the monestary province.
 
"1.8 %,are you serious?"

Yea and i've stated this several times.
 
The Dečani Charter from 1330 contained a detailed list of households and chartered villages in Metohija and northwestern Albania:
3 of 89 settlements were Albanian, the other being non-Albanian.
Out of the 2,166 farming homesteads and 2,666 houses in cattle-grazing land, 44 were registered as Albanian (1,8%). The rest were registered as Slavic, mostly Serbian Orthodox.
1455: Turkish cadastral tax census (defter) of the Brankovic dynasty lands (covering 80% of present-day Kosovo) recorded 480 villages, 13,693 adult males, 12,985 dwellings, 14,087 household heads (480 widows and 13,607 adult males). Totally there were around 75,000 inhabitants in 590 villages comprising modern-day Kosovo. By ethnicity:
13,000 Serb dwellings present in all 480 villages and towns
75 Vlach dwellings in 34 villages
46 Albanian dwellings in 23 villages
17 Bulgarian dwellings in 10 villages
5 Greek dwellings in Lauša, Vučitrn
1 Jewish dwelling in Vučitrn
1 Croat dwelling
 

1487: A census of the House of Branković

Vučitrn district:
16,729 Christian housing (412 in Priština and Vučitrn)
117 Moslem households (94 in Priština and 83 in rural areas)
Ipek (Peć) district:
City of Ipek - 68% Serbs
121 Christian household
33 Moslem households
Suho Grlo and Metohija:
131 Christian household of which 52% in Suho Grlo were Serbs
Kline e Poshtme/Donja Klina - 50% Serbs
Dečani - 64% Serbs
Rural areas:
6,124 Christian housings (99%)
55 Moslem houses (1%)

"You forgot to put Albania in those nations,i assume you just forgot it,since you are not biased,right?"
 
Oh yea suffered so badly. Except for the fact that most Albanians converted to Islam and were treated as Turks. Perhaps now you will mention the Greek Epirote known as George Kastrioti, Byzantine seal and all.
 
"He clearly says that he is going to liberate Albanians as well, because they were suffering together with Serbs. Instead you are saying that Serbs suffered under the Albanians.If they “suffered” a little bit  more it was just because of their different religion and it wasn’t Albanians fault."
 
Political statements. He's obviously just trying to unfiy the Albanians. And they did suffer because of the Turks, when they tried rebelling, but before the late 1800s the Albanians lived just fine with the Turks. For you to deny they suffered is a joke. Did they make any skull towers out of Albanian skulls? They did it to the Serbs.
 
"However all this thing of orthodox suffering under the muslims is just an overestimation, and all those churches all around kosova are the best proof of it. Even the famous church of Decani was under the protection of the Albanian Moslem voivods."
 
You can have churches and still suffer. The method in which they got jannisaries and their slaves from the Balkans is proof enough of their tyranical rule. The Ottoman Turks treated their non Muslim subjects like crap. And they put muslims from the Balkans in charge of doing it too.
 
"I agreed that we had close relation for almost 4 years with yugoslavia,but I never said there was an Albanian emigration.We had close relation with USSR and China but we never emigrated there aswell."
 
It wasn't friendly emigration. It was Tito opening the boarder because he knew the Albanians would move to Yugoslavia which was much richer, instead of staying in Albania. Doing this he hoped to twist Albania's arm into getting absorbed.
 
"He was a war correspondent in the Balkans so he was well informed.During the Balkans wars horrible crimes happened on all sides, except for the Albanian side,that wasn’t even a side ,but just civilians at the mercy of foreign armies."
 
LOL "Everyone did bad things but Albania." Man you made me giggle. Good job. Showing yet again how bias you are.
 
"You really think that Turks only worry was to kill serbs all day long.They did it at the beginning when the Balkans nations weren’t under their full control, but not only with Serbs but with every people they fought,but certainly this was everything but a norm during their reign."
 
You really think Serbs only worry was to kill Albanians all day long?
 
And No i don't think the Turks wanted to do that all day. They would much prefer they convert to Islam, or be their slaves. When they didn't they killed them and made towers out of their skulls.
 
"The daily telegraph account states the same"

You have a bad eye for detail.
 
"I never said that those lands were 100% Albanian,the same as today there was a Serbian minority.And another thing, go inform your self about the Kosovar Albanian’s, and Kosova in general,they were one of the welthiest regions of the ottoman empire."
 
IIRC the account spoke of Serbs in Albania, not in Kosovo. So there were supposedly Serbs in Albania that borrowed money, and instead of paying back they told the military to kill them. Hmm right. And I know Kosovo was a wealthy region. But Kosovo wasn't Albania, and it isn't today, and it won't be in the future either.
 
"Serbs tried to annex not only Kosova but all of northern Albania including the sea port of Durres.Indeed they invaded all these lands during the 1913 offensive but were forced to withdraw thanks to the international pressure."

Serbs tried to take back Kosovo from the Turks and Albania was just another piece of Turkish territory to take. When was the last time Albania was an independent country? It was just another piece of Ottoman territory and before that a piece of Serbian territory and before that a piece of Roman territory. I personally think Albania should exist. But i believe Albanians should be there, not claiming Vardraska, Epirus, Montenegro or more land from the Serbs. You see until the modern era most people agreed generally on history. Nobody believed such non sense that Alexander, Justinian, and Constantine were Albanian for example. These were politically motivated revisionisms. Those are just a few examples. The two world wars have shown people how they can lie, and lie big. The communist regimes furthered these examples.
 
"And why only this is insane?Because the victims were Christians?"

Because Orthodox priests and the Orthodox faith in general is non aggressive. We haven no jihads, no crusades. And forcing someone to convert is impossible in our Church. It simply doesn't make sense. Communion for example is something to be earned. If you are not Orthodox you can not take it, and if you do it serves as damnation not salvation. If a priest willingly does this he takes the sin of that person to himself. So perhaps the story is true but it would be the first and only time. But again I doubt it.
 
"A documentary considered biased, by its own sponsor and producer (The checz TV),can’t become objective just because you say so."

Obviously you aren't reading my posts. I posted a documentary of my own. Please if we can hope for any form of discussion you at least have to read my posts.
 
"How they did purify Kosova anyway? Ethnically motivated crimes were almost inexistent when Kosova had its autonomy .Serbs were losing the control of the province,that’s right and they were just pissed of having Albanian ,communist leader, mayors ,doctors , and policemen.But you can see it by your own now,their paranoia just made true their worst nightmare, the independence of Kosova. "

Are you insane? I posted several articles and accounts detailing how the Serbs were forced to flee Kosovo under Albanian autonomy and after it was taken away.
 
"enough?"
 
No this is crap. It said no Orthodox Churches were destroyed because of NATO bombs yet I can show you pictures of Churches with cluster bomb fragments.
 
Just a few pictures:
 
http://www.kosovo.net/destruction.html - http://www.kosovo.net/destruction.html
 
I have a question. Why do you keep using Kosovo in a grammatical incorrect term? IIRC Kosova is used in an accusitive term.
 
In twisting every aspect of truth Kosovo separatists are changing even the name of the region calling it Kosova (with "A" at the end of the term). The name Kosovo - which is used as such in all world literature - is of Serbian origin. It would not be politically correct that future "Albanian" region carries a Serbian name. Thus it was Albanized into Kosova.
We looked through world Encyclopediae trying to find Kosova...
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is Kosova (with "A")?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A few old Encyclopedia Britannica have entry KOSOVA. Next to it is a refference - See Gusii. Here is what we have found there (quote):
GUSII also called KISSI, or KOSOVA, a Bantu-speaking people who inhabit the Kissii District of Nyanza Province, Western Kenya, an area between Lake Victoria ant the Tanzanian border...
(End quote)
Let us check one more informed view:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Kosova" or "Kosovo"?
The name "Kosovo"
By: J. P. Maher Ph. D.
Professor Emeritus of Linguistics
Northeastern Illinois University Chicago

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Kosovo" is a Serbian place name, more fully "kosovo polje", meaning the 'field (or plain) of blackbirds'. "Kosovo Polje" lies just outside the city of Prishtina.
Ornithology lesson: Among North Americans, Australians, and South Africans, only ornithologists can identify the species in question. Kosovo's "black bird" is no crow, nor raven, no starling nor grackle, but "turdus merula", European cousin of the North American rusty-bellied thrush ("turdus migratorius"), which Yanks call the "robin".
In Britain and Ireland "robin" is the name of another species, "erithacus rubecula".
(The "four and twenty 'blackbirds' baked in a pie", of the English rhyme, were of the species "merula", in Serbian called "kos". From this term "kosovo" is the derived possessive adjective.
Like America's harbinger of spring, the black bird called "kos" in Serbian language sings sweetly in the springtime and early summer.
For North Americans the feel of the Serbo-Croatian place name "Kosovo" can only be had from a free translation, "Field of Robins".
Albanians have borrowed the word from the Serbs, whose once overwhelming majority was driven down, especially since the Congress of Berlin, by savage aggression from Albanians incited then and in WW I by Austria-Hungary and Germany, in World War II by Mussolini's puppet Albanians, and after WW II by the discriminatory ethnic cleansing of the Stalinist dictator Josip Broz.
Native Indian place names in America have no meaning in English: e.g. "Michigan" means nothing in English. In Ojibwa "mishshikamaa" means "it is a big lake".
Just so the place names of Ireland have transparent meaning in Gaelic but are meaningless tags in the colonialist English, e.g. "Dublin" is Gaelic "dubh lin" 'black pool', and "Kildare" is "cil dara" 'church of the oak',
Just so the names of the Serbian province of Kosovo are clear Serbian formations, but have no meaning in the Albanian language.
Proof of the Serbian origin of the name and the loanword status of the immigrant Albanian term is that the word "kosovo" has a clear etymology to anyone who knows a Slavic language, while Albanian "Kosova" is an opaque, meaningless place name in the Albanian language.
Kosovo is Serbian.
(End of quoted text by Professor Maher)


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 06:53
"O yeah I forgot I don't exist."

Oh you do exist, just not in the way you think you do. Racially you are a Serb, albiet a Turk mixed one as you yourself admited. The difference between you and a Serb (except for the Turkish side of course) is the same as the different between me and a Romanian Muslim or Catholic or any other religion. It is a religious divide.


Posted By: Al Jassas
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 09:26
Hello Carpathian
 
I will dignify this forum from turning it religious bickering and i won't even reply on the BS Bat Ya'or wrote because it was throroughly discussed in other threads by me and other and there are books about the subject by real historian not politicoes.
 
If the muslims wanted to opress or at least be reigning over the infidels, why the hell did they issue fatwas against the Germans in the first place? Why did they join the other "infidels" the Croats instead of making their own country with German help?
 
And what are the problem with my sources, these are published works in english posted on the internet and If I could get a copy and sent them to you I will be more than happy. If this indicates something it shows you actually never bothered to read them or read them and they weren't to your liking.
 
Vladimir Zerjavic is a well known author, his Croat affiliation didn't stop him from condemning the murder of 320k Serbs by the Ustase not it hindered him from doing the other thing. Please tell me, Who the hell is Thompson or Dvorak? Here are more links:
 
http://www.hic.hr/books/seeurope/013e-dizdar.htm - http://www.hic.hr/books/seeurope/013e-dizdar.htm
http://www.croatianhistory.net/etf/bul.html - http://www.croatianhistory.net/etf/bul.html
http://www.hic.hr/books/manipulations/ - http://www.hic.hr/books/manipulations/
 
AL-Jassas


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 16:02
Thompson is a popular singer in Croatia who participated in the last war and had pro Croatia songs.




-------------


Posted By: Al Jassas
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 16:52
So a singer is an authority on the subject and an Academic who spent 70 years in the land of academia is total crap?
 
Al-Jassas
 


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 17:26
Originally posted by es_bih

Thompson is a popular singer in Croatia who participated in the last war and had pro Croatia songs.




Edit.

George Thompson - have no clue who he is.




-------------


Posted By: Carpathian Wolf
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 20:45
"I will dignify this forum from turning it religious bickering and i won't even reply on the BS Bat Ya'or wrote because it was throroughly discussed in other threads by me and other and there are books about the subject by real historian not politicoes."
 
We are not in that thread. We are in this thread, and I am not those people either. If you have something to say, then please say it. If you do not I will just remain with my points unchallenged and we can move on. Either way is fine for me.
 
"If the muslims wanted to opress or at least be reigning over the infidels, why the hell did they issue fatwas against the Germans in the first place? Why did they join the other "infidels" the Croats instead of making their own country with German help?"

But they did try to make their own country with the Germans. And the Croat Ustashe were the helpers of the Nazis. They did exactly that.
 
"And what are the problem with my sources, these are published works in english posted on the internet and If I could get a copy and sent them to you I will be more than happy. If this indicates something it shows you actually never bothered to read them or read them and they weren't to your liking.
 
Vladimir Zerjavic is a well known author, his Croat affiliation didn't stop him from condemning the murder of 320k Serbs by the Ustase not it hindered him from doing the other thing. Please tell me, Who the hell is Thompson or Dvorak?"
 
The problem is this is out dated. For example it wasn't known until fairly recently that the Partizani would send false messages to the British in WW2 to make it seem as if the Chetniks were siding with the communists when it was the Partizans themselves siding with the communists. The Croat you mentioned from the "Croat Centre of (dis)information" is also partial and anti chetnik because chetniks were seen as the enemies of Communist Yugoslavia. So just like today when they fought and won against the Chetniks they were evil men and very tough and when they lost against the Chetniks, it was actually only civilians they killed. Sounds very familiar to today. Srebrenica comes to mind. Another topic for another time.
 
"Thompson is a popular singer in Croatia who participated in the last war and had pro Croatia songs."

Thompson is a NAZI USTASHE that sings songs of the glory of the Ustashe state and slaughtering Serbs in war camps.
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5Ob58lEwEGk - http://youtube.com/watch?v=5Ob58lEwEGk
 
And the thing is, Croatian politicians go to these concerts. Not just "neo nazi kids" but actual members of the state. No not unelected unruling members, actual people with power.
 
 


Posted By: Al Jassas
Date Posted: 19-Jun-2008 at 23:05
Hello Carpathian
 
Mr Zerjavic is a respected scholar, The Wiesenthal center which persecutes anyone who challanges the official story of the holocaust and concentration camps and not only ruin their reputation but their families and friends etc find it extremely hard to challange Zerjavic in his analysis about war casualties and even accepted his numbers and figures, this my friend is enough to verify that the guy is saying the true. Again, who the hell is Thompson?
 
As for Bat Yeor, well, again, if you want a discussion, be my guest, you started this topic you finish it, open a new thread and I will be more than happy to discuss the issue with you. The woman is paranoid cook with no credentials whatsoever, except from cooks like her. She judges the 7th century attitudes with 20th century ideals and that is in my opinion enough. She ignores historical facts and cherrypicks historical events to support her arguments. She hates Islam, muslims and anything it stands for. If you want more I will go on and on I have all summer and since it is in the 40s C I have all the time in the world, start the topic and I will continue.
 
AL-Jassas



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com