Originally posted by TheAlaniDragonRising
Regarding Snowden, he was in a position generally accepted as having restraints against disclosing sensitive material. However, it could be argued that some of the material which was only embarrassing when disclosed should not be considered in the same light as material putting current field operatives in jeopardy. |
When I read "disclosing sensitive material", your all huge difference return to the dust, my friend.
Do you have any idea about why Can DUNDAR is accusing? I mean which news and how sensitve is the issue?
It seems that Dundar sees same huge difference as you. In his last defence, he mentioned about Snowden is a spy(he is not directly saying) but he is a reporter.
Let me discripe how shitty and cheap this perspective with a example
*Snowden can give the sources to an orginary reporter.
*Reporter can keep his source as secret.
*Reporter write it, make a news about it and he is totally free because of freedom speech.
*Reporter gets Pulitzer. HAPPY END