Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Old finnish culture

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
rapala View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl


Joined: 07-Oct-2005
Location: Finland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
  Quote rapala Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Old finnish culture
    Posted: 14-Apr-2006 at 10:14

Can't u people post pictures of finland in iron age or what kind of culture they had.

 



Edited by rapala
Back to Top
rapala View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl


Joined: 07-Oct-2005
Location: Finland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
  Quote rapala Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Apr-2006 at 16:37
Serious can,t some one post pictures or something good to write about finnish culture/history becaus no one has done it in this topic...
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Jul-2007 at 20:26
What's wrong with you, rapala? You appear like some Mongoloidic Svecoman suffering identity problems. You are right, Finns don't look like nordic, they are nordic. Finns have _nothing_ to do with Siberians/Altaic/Mongolians genetically, and even linguisticly just as much as Swedes have with Indians (of India).

So-called "Uralic" languages' birthplace is precisely as Eastern than Indo-European languages' birthplace, just more Northern. So "Uralic" languages should be called Northern and Indo-European Southern languages. Genetics states that Finns origin from Central Europe. Though, according skull measurements, Finns are the most European (Cro Magnon-like) people existing, Swedish coming as a close second, so atleast they have same kind of heads.

Anyway, this rapala is like a backflash from the history: some Swedish like to see Finns as slanted-eyed Eastern people and invent fancy theories to support this. This was done especially in 1800s with the racial (racistic) "science". Then they see Swedish as some pure, das ber-Aryan race of Vikings, which is how I construe your extremely wierd desire to deny all "Viking-like" things from Finns, even if Finns provably wore "Viking-like" clothes and does have a "Germanic/Scandinavian" outlook.

Fortunately, there are very few of you nowadays. Sieg Heil, mein race theorist!
Back to Top
rapala View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl


Joined: 07-Oct-2005
Location: Finland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
  Quote rapala Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Aug-2007 at 21:00
Originally posted by Rotta

What's wrong with you, rapala? You appear like some Mongoloidic Svecoman suffering identity problems. You are right, Finns don't look like nordic, they are nordic. Finns have _nothing_ to do with Siberians/Altaic/Mongolians genetically, and even linguisticly just as much as Swedes have with Indians (of India).

So-called "Uralic" languages' birthplace is precisely as Eastern than Indo-European languages' birthplace, just more Northern. So "Uralic" languages should be called Northern and Indo-European Southern languages. Genetics states that Finns origin from Central Europe. Though, according skull measurements, Finns are the most European (Cro Magnon-like) people existing, Swedish coming as a close second, so atleast they have same kind of heads.

Anyway, this rapala is like a backflash from the history: some Swedish like to see Finns as slanted-eyed Eastern people and invent fancy theories to support this. This was done especially in 1800s with the racial (racistic) "science". Then they see Swedish as some pure, das ber-Aryan race of Vikings, which is how I construe your extremely wierd desire to deny all "Viking-like" things from Finns, even if Finns provably wore "Viking-like" clothes and does have a "Germanic/Scandinavian" outlook.

Fortunately, there are very few of you nowadays. Sieg Heil, mein race theorist!


well sorry for my bad english but when i mean finns have mongoloid features well i didn't mean finns were asians but how could i say, not to be rude but some finns do have the down syndrome kind of eyes.
it was a long time iv posted here but heres my opinion
finns arent asian race but caucasian like samis, swedes and germans.

this is fact finns have much whiter skincolor than most swedes and germans and might be more caucasoid.




Back to Top
The_Turks View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 12-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote The_Turks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Aug-2007 at 08:07
Whay are some guys so curious about genes?
 
Being mongoloid or caucasid means nothing today. The most important element is culture in onder to belong a nation
 
Estonian and Finnish cultures have nothing which is similar to Turks Mongols or other Turanid nations.  
PROUD TO BE TURKMEN...

Back to Top
Ariston View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote Ariston Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Aug-2007 at 05:34
The Origin of the Baltic-Finns from the Physical Anthropological Point of View

http://www.mankindquarterly.org/samples/niskanenbalticcorrected.pdf

The author provides a comprehensive analysis of the physical
anthropology of the Finns and Saami, comparing them with other
Scandinavian peoples and contrasting them genetically with the
Mongoloid peoples of Asia, notwithstanding the affinities which
link the Finnish language with the Uralic and to a lesser extent
the Altaic languages. He concludes that both the Finns and the
Saami are genetically Caucasoid or European, and that the Finns
especially are closely akin to the other North European peoples of
Scandinavia.

Figure 2 presents scores of the first (x-axis) and the second (yaxis)
canonical discriminant functions computed using the
SPSS-program from c-scores of 42 cranial measurements. The
cranial populations are clustered almost as one would expect in
light of their geographic relationships. This diagram also
demonstrates that the North Europeans (the Finns, Saami, and
Swedes) have diverged craniometrically the least from the Cro-
Magnons of Europe. This is expected because the transition
from hunting to farming occurred both late and without largescale
population movements in Northern Europe. In Southern
and Central Europe, this subsistence transition occurred earlier
and largely as a result of demic diffusion of farmers of ultimately
Near Eastern and/or Balkan extraction. As a result, their cranial
configuration has changed more.
These craniometric analyses demonstrate that the Finns
(and presumably other Baltic-Finns) and Saami (although they
form their own subset within the European set) possess North
European craniofacial configuration with more than average
amount of Paleo-European (Cro-Magnoid) features. This
finding indicates that the Baltic-Finns and Saami (as well as their
Scandinavian neighbors) are indigenous people of northern
Europe and not recent immigrants from elsewhere.
Back to Top
rapala View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl


Joined: 07-Oct-2005
Location: Finland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
  Quote rapala Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Sep-2007 at 09:33
Originally posted by The_Turks

Whay are some guys so curious about genes?
 
Being mongoloid or caucasid means nothing today. The most important element is culture in onder to belong a nation
 
Estonian and Finnish cultures have nothing which is similar to Turks Mongols or other Turanid nations.  


they aren't even the same language group.

this topic is about culture not genes damn but i can tell u the truth about old finnish culture, there isn't anything called old finnish culture, we still lived in the stone ages hunting animals while other had large kingdoms and fought with iron swords so u se finland was quite retarded in medieval times compared to other civilisations.
Back to Top
Aelfgifu View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 25-Jun-2006
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3387
  Quote Aelfgifu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Sep-2007 at 14:55
Originally posted by rapala

Can't u people post pictures of finland in iron age or what kind of culture they had.

 
Posting pictures of Iron Age Finland? Now that would be quite a feat. Wink
 
I think the lack of Finnish history is related to the fact it has been ruled by others for so long, mainly by the Swedes. Because of this, Finnish culture never had a chance to bloom, proliferate or evolve itself, but that does not at all mean that Finland was less cutured or civilised than the nations around it.

Women hold their councils of war in kitchens: the knives are there, and the cups of coffee, and the towels to dry the tears.
Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Sep-2007 at 03:46
Originally posted by Aelfgifu

 
Posting pictures of Iron Age Finland? Now that would be quite a feat. Wink
 
I think the lack of Finnish history is related to the fact it has been ruled by others for so long, mainly by the Swedes. Because of this, Finnish culture never had a chance to bloom, proliferate or evolve itself, but that does not at all mean that Finland was less cutured or civilised than the nations around it.


Mostly due to the lack of the written word prior to the 12-13th centuries. Swedish history prior to that is also pretty wordless, except the runestones it's limited to a few sources written thousands of kilometers and hundreds of years away. Scandinavia and Finland was quite backwards up till the 12th century in the sense that no chronicles, books or anything lasting was produced there (except the stones, of course).


Edited by Styrbiorn - 10-Sep-2007 at 03:51
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.