Civilisations Over 350,000 Years Old

Well, that's a controversial statement, isn't it? Mainstream science is not waiting for controversial theories or any other paradigm shift that endangers their institutions.

I come from a family of archaeologists and geologists, and what I have to tell is very controversial. My family possesses a display cabinet full of rare Sumerian tablets and cuneiform tablets. No one can read them. But my late grandfather could read them all, including the Sumerian tablets, as one of the few people in the world. I believe he guides me in his spirit, because I have no idea where my knowledge could come from otherwise.

Did you ever ask yourself how archaeologists base their conclusions upon?

Stone structures cannot be dated in any way. When they would date the stone, they find the formation age of the rock itself, and not when it was piled on top of eachother. Archaeologists conclude everything on excavations and finding in and around stone structures. Their interpretations are always indirect.

This it how classification in general works: we have stone age, bronze age and iron age. All these eras are classified into certain time frames. The stone age is everything beyond 5,000 years old, bronze age between 5,000 and 3,000, and iron age everything younger than 3,000 years. That's a rough classification. Archaeologists work with a much more subtle detailing.

When an archaeologist finds iron in or around an ancient temple, which (vaguely) can be related to the builders of a temple, the conclusion is that the age of the temple is younger than 3,000 years. And of course they use the C14 method to date the organic materials.

So, our time framing of stone, bronze and iron dictates in fact everything else. This time framing however is completely irrational, and caused by the conditioning of the involved scientists.

Where is the statement based upon that Civilisations are over 350,000 years old? It's not that simple to explain. I've written two extensive articles on on this issue:
http://hubpages.com/education/Why-is-Greenland-Covered-in-Ice
http://hubpages.com/education/How-Old-Are-Pyramids-Around-the-World

I'm working on a book that will explain everything in detail. It's making deep connections between different events and disciplines, without making illogical jumps, which leads to inevitable conclusions that knocks you off your feet.

In short:
- We all know the sages about the great floods.
- We all know what science tells us about former ice ages. No one knows what caused it.
- Some of us know about the staggering alignment of ancient buildings. The alignment of about 200 locations reveal 4 former locations of the geo North pole.
- Ice ages show a temperature drop that is similar to the latitude shift of the crust. Showing that ice ages were no 'ice ages' but dislocations of the crust, causing huge floods, and wiping out ancient civilizations.
- C14 has become useless when the crust slips once in a while, since the biosphere changes completely.
- The oldest alignments are to find in Peru, Iran, Guatemala, Mexico, Russia and Ukraine, pointing out that they are 4 glacial cycles ago, which is more than 350,000 years.




Edited by Buildreps - 26-Dec-2015 at 06:42

It's an interesting video, but what has this video to do with the above issue? Please don't flush the thread with irrelevant spam


Edited by Buildreps - 27-Dec-2015 at 03:43

I agree with you that everything's written in the stars, medenaywe. I hope all is well in the US where you live. Wish you a great Sunday!

Originally posted by Buildreps It's an interesting video, but what has this video to do with the above issue? Please don't flush the thread with irrelevant spam

 

Properly interpret?

That's sotto voco asking for or going to result, most likely, in an subjective opinion.

For that matter..DEFINE properly interpret.


How much value do you, the student, place on traditional academic training and knowledge and experience vs. a person less so? Iow. credentialing.

There are thousands of sites on the net that deal in esoterics and counterparts in the familiar. To include the Sumerian...'Google' and all will be revealed.

As to the OP....there has always been a minute few who have challenged the norm...whether their analysis could stand the test of the scientific and historical methods in validation of a hypothesis...is another question.

Which is to say I've heard all this before...many times. And until the aforementioned hypothesis can meet the aforementioned tests and subsequently be accepted by the majority in mainstream; until significant evidences; physical and others, can be accepted by the mainstream...it all remains subjective.

Originally posted by A.V. In the Sumerian kingship list...is Dumuzi 'followed' by Gilgamesh the hero?  I understand that Dumuzi ends up being pursued by cruel creatures of the netherworld (Galla) that do not know food...so Dumuzi hides in the plants...which the Gilgamesh seven heroes go about chopping down the cedars of some monster called the Huwawa...yet Gilgamesh finds his cedar on the seventh mountain...which was fashioned for him and things from it had fallen into the netherworld...so I assume that Dumuzi had hid there as well?...why else would Ianna want Gilgamesh to marry her?  In the creation myth, Enki was warned to not eat the plants...but does anyway.  Can anyone please properly interpret these stories for me and the meanings...